Across five studies (total N = 8,414), we examined whether religious individuals experienced more mixed emotions. Studies 1 and 2 examined associations between dispositional religiosity and mixed emotions, while Study 3 provided a pre-registered replication. Study 4 provided a pre-registered exploratory examination of three potential mediators of the relationship between dispositional religiosity and mixed emotions: trait dialecticism, cognitive reappraisal, and fear of God. Finally, Study 5 provided pre-registered prospective analyses testing associations between dispositional religiosity and mixed emotions 1 month later. Across all studies, positive and negative emotions were also examined, and latent variable structural equation modeling was performed, controlling for age, gender, education, and income. A multilevel multivariate meta-analysis was then performed to aggregate key findings. Results indicated that dispositional religiosity was associated with increased mixed emotions and positive emotions but not negative emotions. Additionally, fear of God was supported as a potential mediator between dispositional religiosity and mixed emotions.
AbramowitzJ. S.HuppertJ. D.CohenA. B.TolinD. F.CahillS. P. (2002). Religious obsessions and compulsions in a non-clinical sample: The Penn Inventory of Scrupulosity (PIOS). Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40, 825–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00070-5
2.
AdachiP.WilloughbyT. (2015). Interpreting effect sizes when controlling for stability effects in longitudinal autoregressive models: Implications for psychological science. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12(1), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2014.963549
3.
AdlerJ. M.HershfieldH. E. (2012). Mixed emotional experience is associated with and precedes improvements in psychological well-being. PLoS ONE, 7(4), Article e35633. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035633
4.
AlbertsenE. J.O’ConnorL. E.BerryJ. W. (2006). Religion and interpersonal guilt: Variations across ethnicity and spirituality. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 9, 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/13694670500040484
5.
BarfordK. A.KovalP.KuppensP.SmillieL. D. (2020). When good feelings turn mixed: Affective dynamics and big five trait predictors of mixed emotions in daily life. European Journal of Personality, 34, 393–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2264
6.
BarfordK. A.SmillieL. D. (2016). Openness and other big five traits in relation to dispositional mixed emotions. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 118–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.07.002
7.
BerriosR.TotterdellP.KellettS. (2015). Eliciting mixed emotions: A meta-analysis comparing models, types, and measures. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 428. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00428
8.
BerriosR.TotterdellP.KellettS. (2018). When feeling mixed can be meaningful: The relation between mixed emotions and eudaimonic well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19, 841–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9849-y
9.
BushmanB. J.RidgeR. D.DasE.KeyC. W.BusathG. L. (2007). When God sanctions killing: Effect of scriptural violence on aggression. Psychological Science, 18(3), 204–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01873.x
10.
ChaudhuryS. H.GargN.JiangZ. (2022). The curious case of threat-awe: A theoretical and empirical reconceptualization. Emotion, 22(7), 1653–1669. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000984
11.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling:A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
12.
DickinsonD. L. (2024). Deliberation, mood response, and the confirmation bias in the religious belief domain. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 109, 102161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2024.102161
13.
EisenhauerJ. G. (2021). Meta-analysis and mega-analysis: A simple introduction. Teaching Statistics, 43(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/test.12242
14.
EllisonC. G.LeeJ. (2010). Spiritual struggles and psychological distress: Is there a dark side of religion?Social Indicators Research, 98(3), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9553-3
15.
EndersC.BandalosD. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8(3), 430–457. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0803_5
16.
ExlineJ. J.YaliA. M.LobelM. (1999). When God disappoints: Difficulty forgiving God and its role in negative emotion. Journal of Health Psychology, 4(3), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910539900400306
17.
FabrigarL. R.WegenerD. T.PettyR. E. (2020). A validity-based framework for understanding replication in psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 24(4), 316–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868320931366
FordB. Q.KarnilowiczH. R.MaussI. B. (2017). Understanding reappraisal as a multicomponent process: The psychological health benefits of attempting to use reappraisal depend on reappraisal success. Emotion, 17(6), 905–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000310
FunderD. C.OzerD. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847202
22.
GebauerJ. E.SedikidesC.NeberichW. (2012). Religiosity, social self-esteem, and psychological adjustment: On the cross-cultural specificity of the psychological benefits of religiosity. Psychological Science, 23, 158–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611427045
23.
Giner-SorollaR.MontoyaA. K.ReifmanA.CarpenterT.LewisN. A.AbersonC. L.BostynD. H.ConriqueB. G.NgB. W.SchoemannA. M.SoderbergC. (2024). Power to detect what? Considerations for planning and evaluating sample size. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 28(3), 276–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683241228328
24.
GohJ. X.HallJ. A.RosenthalR. (2016). Mini meta-analysis of your own studies: Some arguments on why and a primer on how. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(10), 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12267
25.
GoodM.WilloughbyT.BusseriM. A. (2011). Stability and change in adolescent spirituality/religiosity: A person-centered approach. Developmental Psychology, 47(2), 538–550. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021270
26.
GrossJ. J.JohnO. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348
27.
HoggM. A.AdelmanJ. R.BlaggR. D. (2010). Religion in the face of uncertainty: An uncertainty-identity theory account of religiousness. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309349692
28.
HoogeveenS.SarafoglouA.AczelB.AdityaY.AlayanA. J.AllenP. J.AltayS.AlzahawiS.AmirY.AnthonyF.-V.Kwame AppiahO.AtkinsonQ. D.BaimelA.Balkaya-InceM.BalsamoM.BankerS.BartošF.BecerraM.BeffaraB. . . . WagenmakersE.-J. (2023). A many-analysts approach to the relation between religiosity and well-being. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 13(3), 237–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070255
29.
HouckS. C.ConwayL. G.ParrowK.LuceA.SalvatiJ. M. (2018). An integrative complexity analysis of religious and irreligious thinking. SAGE Open, 8, 215824401879630. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018796302
30.
ImburgioM. J.MacNamaraA. (2019). Cognitive reappraisal in an unpredictable world: Prior context matters. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 146, 173–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.09.003
31.
JohnsonK. A.LiY. J.CohenA. B.OkunM. A. (2013). Friends in high places: The influence of authoritarian and benevolent god-concepts on social attitudes and behaviors. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 5(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030138
32.
JohnsonM. K.RowattW. C.LaBouffJ. (2010). Priming Christian religious concepts increases racial prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(2), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550609357246
33.
KearnsP. O.TylerJ. M. (2022). Examining the relationship between awe, spirituality, and religiosity. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 14(4), 436–444. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000365
34.
Kim-PrietoC.DienerE. (2009). Religion as a source of variation in the experience of positive and negative emotions. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 447–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760903271025
KlineR. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
37.
LandisR. S.BealD. J.TeslukP. E. (2000). A comparison of approaches to forming composite measures in structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 186–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810032003
38.
LarsenJ. T.HershfieldH. E.StastnyB. J.HesterN. (2017). On the relationship between positive and negative affect: Their correlation and their co-occurrence. Emotion, 17, 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000231
39.
LarsenJ. T.McGrawA. P. (2011). Further evidence for mixed emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(6), 1095–1110. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021846
40.
LechugaJ.JonesD. N. (2024). Bible overclaiming and intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 39(13–14), 3040–3061. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605231225518
41.
LedgerwoodA.ShroutP. E. (2011). The trade-off between accuracy and precision in latent variable models of mediation processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1174–1188. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0024776
42.
LeeS. A.RobertsL. B.GibbonsJ. A. (2013). When religion makes grief worse: Negative religious coping as associated with maladaptive emotional responding patterns. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 16(3), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2012.659242
43.
MiyamotoY.UchidaY.EllsworthP. C. (2010). Culture and mixed emotions: Co-occurrence of positive and negative emotions in Japan and the United States. Emotion, 10(3), 404–415. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018430
44.
MoellerJ.IvcevicZ.BrackettM. A.WhiteA. E. (2018). Mixed emotions: Network analyses of intra-individual co-occurrences within and across situations. Emotion, 18(8), 1106–1121. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000419
45.
MuthénB.KaplanD.HollisM. (1987). On structural equation modeling with data that are not missing completely at random. Psychometrika, 52(3), 431–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294365
NorrisC. J.WuE. (2021). Accentuate the positive, eliminate the negative: Reducing ambivalence through instructed emotion regulation. Emotion, 21(3), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000716
48.
OhV. Y. S. (2023). Direct versus indirect measures of mixed emotions in predictive models: Comparing predictive validities, multicollinearity, and confounding factors. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1231845. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1231845
49.
OhV. Y. S.TongE. M. W. (2022) Specificity in the study of mixed emotions: A theoretical framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 26(4), 283–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683221083398
50.
OhV. Y. S.TongE. M. W. (2023). Mixed emotional variants of gratitude: Antecedent situations, cognitive appraisals, action tendencies, and psychosocial outcomes. Cognition and Emotion, 37(3), 572–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2023.2205104
51.
PaloutzianR. F.ParkC. L. (2021). The psychology of religion and spirituality: How big the tent?Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 13(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000218
ParkC. L.WiltJ. A. (2024). Do religious practices improve one’s mood? Daily religious behaviors are associated with daily wellbeing and buffer against hassles and uplifts. Journal of Research in Personality, 111, 104499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104499
54.
PermutS.FisherM.OppenheimerD. M. (2019). Taskmaster: A tool for determining when subjects are on task. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2, 188–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919838479
55.
PrestonJ. L.ShinF. (2017). Spiritual experiences evoke awe through the small self in both religious and non-religious individuals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 212–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.11.006
56.
RamsayJ. E.TongE. M. W.ChowdhuryA.HoM. R. (2019). Teleological explanation and positive emotion serially mediate the effect of religion on well-being. Journal of Personality, 87, 676–689. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12425
57.
ReesL.RothmanN. B.LehavyR.Sanchez-BurksJ. (2013). The ambivalent mind can be a wise mind: Emotional ambivalence increases judgment accuracy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 360–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.12.017
58.
RobinsonM. D.CloreG. L. (2002). Belief and feeling: Evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report. Psychological Bulletin, 128(6), 934–960. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.6.934
59.
RosseelY. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
60.
RutkowskiL.SvetinaD. (2014). Assessing the hypothesis of measurement invariance in the context of large-scale international surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74(1), 31–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413498257
61.
SchbleyA. H. (2006). Toward a common profile of religious terrorism: Some psychosocial determinants of Christian and Islamic terrorists. Police Practice and Research, 7(4), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614260600919621
62.
SchneiderI. K.GillebaartM.MattesA. (2019). Meta-analytic evidence for ambivalence resolution as a key process in effortless self-control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 85, 103846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103846
63.
SchneiderS.StoneA. A. (2015). Mixed emotions across the adult life span in the United States. Psychology and Aging, 30, 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000018
64.
SchönbrodtF. D.PeruginiM. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize?Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 609–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.009
65.
SchumannK.McGregorI.NashK. A.RossM (2014). Religious magnanimity: Reminding people of their religious belief system reduces hostility after threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 432–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036739
66.
SeraF.ArmstrongB.BlangiardoM.GasparriniA. (2019). An extended mixed-effects framework for meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 38(29), 5429–5444. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8362
67.
ShariffA. F.WillardA. K.AndersenT.NorenzayanA. (2016). Religious priming: A meta-analysis with a focus on prosociality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20, 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314568811
Spencer-RodgersJ.PengK.WangL. (2010). Dialecticism and the co-occurrence of positive and negative emotions across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41, 109–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022109349508
70.
Spencer-RodgersJ.SrivastavaS.BoucherH. C.EnglishT.PaletzS. B.PengK. (2015). The dialectical self scale. Unpublished manuscript, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo.
71.
StellarJ. E.BaiY.AndersonC. L.GordonA.McNeilG. D.PengK.KeltnerD. (2024). Culture and awe: Understanding awe as a mixed emotion. Affective Science, 5(2), 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-024-00243-3
72.
SverdlikN.RechterE. (2020). Religious and secular roads to justify wrongdoing: How values interact with culture in explaining moral disengagement attitudes. Journal of Research in Personality, 87, 103981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103981
TongE. M. W.TeoA. Q. H. (2018). The influence of religious concepts on the effects of blame appraisals on negative emotions. Cognition, 177, 150–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.012
75.
TroyA. S.ShallcrossA. J.BrunnerA.FriedmanR.JonesM. C. (2018). Cognitive reappraisal and acceptance: Effects on emotion, physiology, and perceived cognitive costs. Emotion, 18(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000371
76.
TugadeM. M.FredricksonB. L. (2004). Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 320–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.320
77.
VaccaroA. G.KaplanJ. T.DamasioA. (2020). Bittersweet: The neuroscience of ambivalent affect. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(5), 1187–1199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620927708
78.
Van CappellenP.Toth-GauthierM.SaroglouV.FredricksonB. L. (2016). Religion and well-being: The mediating role of positive emotions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 485–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9605-5
79.
Van HarreveldF.van der PligtJ.de LiverY. N. (2009). The agony of ambivalence and ways to resolve it: Introducing the MAID model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308324518
80.
VillaniD.SorgenteA.IannelloP.AntoniettiA. (2019). The role of spirituality and religiosity in subjective well-being of individuals with different religious status. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1525. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01525
81.
VishkinA.BigmanY. E.PoratR.SolakN.HalperinE.TamirM. (2016). God rest our hearts: Religiosity and cognitive reappraisal. Emotion, 16, 252–262. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000108
82.
WardS. J.KingL. A. (2018). Moral self-regulation, moral identity, and religiosity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115, 495–525. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000207
83.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
84.
WaughC. E.SchieberM.ZhaoY. (2025). Feeling good about the bad: Making positive appraisals of predominantly negative stressors. Emotion. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001517
85.
WeeksM.GeislerS. (2019). Revisiting cognitive complexity of religious topics: Multiple complexity, religious fundamentalism, and a quest orientation. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 11, 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000160
86.
XiaM.ChenJ.LiH. (2016). Tragedy or tragicomedy: Mixed feelings induced by positive and negative emotional events. Cognition and Emotion, 30, 857–867. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2015.1031090
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
