People higher (vs. lower) in religiosity differ in the emotions they typically experience, but do they also differ in how they deal with their emotions? In this investigation, we systematically tested links between religiosity and elements of emotion regulation, including beliefs regarding the controllability of emotion, the motivation to feel better, and the tendency to use specific emotion regulation strategies (e.g., cognitive reappraisal, rumination, distraction). Participants were American Catholics, Israeli Jews, and Muslim Turks (N = 616) who were stratified sampled based on level of religiosity. All eight preregistered hypotheses were confirmed, even after controlling for demographic variables. We found that people higher (vs. lower) in religiosity were more likely to use emotion regulation strategies that are typically linked to adaptive emotional outcomes (e.g., cognitive reappraisal, acceptance) and less likely to use emotion regulation strategies that are typically linked to less adaptive outcomes (e.g., rumination). These findings suggest that people higher (vs. lower) in religiosity may deal with their emotions in more adaptive ways.
AiA. L.ParkC. L.HuangB.RodgersW.TiceT. N. (2007). Psychosocial mediation of religious coping styles: A study of short-term psychological distress following cardiac surgery. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 867-882.
2.
AldaoA.Nolen-HoeksemaS.SchweizerS. (2010). Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 217-237.
3.
AllportG. W.RossJ. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 432-443.
4.
BaumeisterR. F. (1991). Meanings of life. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
5.
Ben-Nun BloomP.ArikanG.CourtemancheM. (2015). Religious social identity, religious belief, and anti-immigration sentiment. American Political Science Review, 109, 203-221.
6.
BerkingM.WuppermanP. (2012). Emotion regulation and mental health: Recent findings, current challenges, and future directions. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 25, 128-134.
7.
BigmanY.MaussI. B.GrossJ. J.TamirM. (2016). Yes I can: Self-efficacy beliefs promote successful emotion regulation. Cognition and Emotion, 30, 1380-1387.
8.
BohlmeijerE.KloosterP. M.FledderusM.VeehofM.BaerR. (2011). Psychometric properties of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in depressed adults and development of a short form. Assessment, 18, 308-320.
9.
BondF. W.HayesS. C.BaerR. B.CarpenterK. M.GuenoleN.OrcuttH. K.ZettleR. D. (2011). Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: A revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behavior Therapy, 42, 676-688.
10.
BuberM. (1991). Tales of the Hasidim. New York, NY: Schocken Books.
11.
BurrisC. T.PetricanR. (2011). Hearts strangely warmed (and cooled): Emotional experience in religious and atheistic individuals. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 21, 183-197.
12.
ByrneB. M.ShavelsonR. J.MuthenB. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456-466.
13.
CameronC. D.PayneB. K. (2011). Escaping affect: How motivated emotion regulation creates insensitivity to mass suffering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 1-15.
14.
CarverC. S.ScheierM. F.WeintraubJ. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267-283.
15.
CervoneD.PeakeP. K. (1986). Anchoring, efficacy, and action: The influence of judgmental heuristics on self-efficacy judgments and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 492-501.
16.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464-504.
17.
CohenA. B. (2009). Many forms of culture. American Psychologist, 64, 194-204.
18.
CohenJ.CohenP. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19.
CohenA. B.HillP. C. (2007). Religion as culture: Religious individualism and collectivism among American Catholics, Jews, and Protestants. Journal of Personality, 75, 709-742.
20.
CohenA. B.MazzaG.JohnsonK. A.EndersC. K.WarnerC.PasekM.CookJ. E. (2017). Theorizing and measuring religiosity across cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 1724-1736.
21.
CohenA. B.RozinP. (2001). Religion and the morality of mentality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 697-710.
22.
CohenA. B.WuM. S.MillerJ. (2016). Religion and culture: Individualism and collectivism in the east and west. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47, 1236-1249.
23.
DaviesD. J. (2011). Emotion, identity and religion: Hope, reciprocity, and otherness. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
24.
De CastellaK.GoldinP.JazaieriH.ZivM.DweckC. S.GrossJ. J. (2013). Beliefs about emotion: Links to emotion regulation, well-being, and psychological distress. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 35, 497-505.
25.
De CastellaK.PlatowM. J.TamirM.GrossJ. J. (2018). Beliefs about emotion: Implications for avoidance-based emotion regulation and psychological health. Cognition & Emotion, 32, 773-795.
26.
DienerE.TayL.MyersD. G. (2011). The religion paradox: If religion makes people happy, why are so many dropping out?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1278-1290.
27.
El-AzayemG. A.Hedayat-DibaZ. (1994). The psychological aspects of Islam: Basic principles of Islam and their psychological corollary. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 4, 41-50.
28.
FischerR.FontaineJ. R. (2011). Methods for investigating structural equivalence. In MatsumotoD.van de VijverE. (Eds.), Cross-cultural research methods in psychology (pp. 179-215). Cambridge, UKCambridge University Press.
29.
GalenL. W. (2012). Does religious belief promote prosociality? A critical examination. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 876-906.
30.
GamezW.ChmielewskiM.KotovR.RuggeroC.WatsonD. (2011). Development of a measure of experiential avoidance: The Multidimensional Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 23, 692-713.
31.
GebauerJ. E.SedikidesC.SchönbrodtF. D.BleidornW.RentfrowP. J.PotterJ.GoslingS. D. (2017). The religiosity as social value hypothesis: A multi-method replication and extension across 65 countries and three levels of spatial aggregation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, e18-e39.
32.
GingesJ.HansenI.NorenzayanA. (2009). Religion and support for suicide attacks. Psychological Science, 20, 224-230.
33.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ. (2010). Beyond beliefs: Religions bind individuals into moral communities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 140-150.
34.
GrossJ. J. (1998). Antecedent and response focused emotion regulation: Divergent consequences for experience, expression and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 224-237.
35.
GrossJ. J.JohnO. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348-362.
36.
HackneyC. H.SandersG. S. (2003). Religiosity and mental health: A meta-analysis of recent studies. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42, 43-55.
37.
HalperinE.Bar-TalD.Nets-ZehngutR.DroriE. (2008). Emotions in conflict: Correlates of fear and hope in the Israeli-Jewish society. Peace and Conflict, 14, 233-258.
38.
HayesS. C. (2004). Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies. Behavior Therapy, 35, 639-665.
39.
HillP. C.EdwardsE. (2013). Measurement in the psychology of religiousness and spirituality: Existing measures and new frontiers. APA Handbook of Psychology, Religion, and Spirituality: Context, Theory, and Research, 1, 151-177.
40.
HolmN. G. (1982). Religious ecstasy. Stockholm, Sweden: Almqvist & Wiksell.
41.
HongY.ChiuC.DweckC. S.LinM.-S.WanW. (1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 588-599.
42.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
43.
JamesW. (1902). The varieties of religious experience. New York, NY: Longmans.
44.
Kim-PrietoC.DienerE. (2009). Religion as a source of variation in the experience of positive and negative emotions. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 447-460.
45.
KoenigH. G. (2012). Religion, spirituality, and health: The research and clinical implications. ISRN Psychiatry, 2012, Article 278730.
46.
KooleS. L. (2009). Does emotion regulation help or hurt self-regulation?. In ForgasJ. P.BaumeisterR. F.TiceD. M. (Eds.), Psychology of self-regulation: Cognitive, affective and motivational processes (pp. 217-232). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
47.
KrauseN. (2005). God-mediated control and psychological well-being in late life. Research on Aging, 27, 136-164.
48.
LakeyB.OrehekE. (2011). Relational regulation theory: A new approach to explain the link between perceived social support and mental health. Psychological Review, 118, 482-495.
49.
LazarusR. S.FolkmanS. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York, NY: Springer.
50.
LitmanJ. A.LunsfordG. D. (2009). Frequency of use and impact of coping strategies assessed by the COPE Inventory and their relationships to post-event health and well-being. Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 982-991.
51.
McCulloughM. E.WilloughbyB. L. B. (2009). Religion, self-regulation, and self-control: Associations, explanations, and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 69-93.
52.
MillgramY.SheppesG.KuppensP.KalokerinosE. K.TamirM. (2019). Do the ends dictate the means in emotion regulation?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148, 80-96
53.
Naragon-GaineyK.McMahonT. P.ChackoT. P. (2017). The structure of common emotion regulation strategies: A meta-analytic examination. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 384-427.
OppenheimerD. M.MeyvisT.DavidenkoN. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867-872.
56.
OttenbreitN. D.DobsonK. S. (2004). Avoidance and depression: The construction of the Cognitive-Behavioral Avoidance Scale. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 293-313.
57.
PargamentK. I. (1997). The psychology of religion and coping: Theory, research, practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
58.
ParkinsonB.TotterdellP. (1999). Classifying affect-regulation strategies. Cognition and Emotion, 13, 277-303.
RayR. D.OchsnerK. N.CooperJ. C.RobertsonE. R.GabrieliJ. D. E.GrossJ. J. (2005). Individual differences in trait rumination and the neural systems supporting cognitive reappraisal. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 156-168.
61.
RichardsP. S.BerrettM. E.HardmanR. K.EggettD. L. (2006). Comparative efficacy of spirituality, cognitive, and emotional support groups for treating eating disorder inpatients. Eating Disorders, 14, 401-415.
62.
RiedigerM.SchmiedekF.WagnerG. G.LindenbergerU. (2009). Seeking pleasure and seeking pain: Differences in prohedonic and contra-hedonic motivation from adolescence to old age. Psychological Science, 20, 1529-1535.
63.
RobertsB. W.RobinsR. W. (2000). Broad dispositions, broad aspirations: The intersection of personality traits and major life goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1284-1296.
64.
RosseelY. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling and more. Version 0.6–3 (BETA). Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1-36.
65.
RothbaumF.WeiszJ. R.SnyderS. S. (1982). Changing the world and changing the self: A two-process model of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 5-37.
66.
SaloveyP.MayerJ. D.GoldmanS. L.TurveyC.PalfaiT. P. (1995). Emotional attention, clarity, and repair: Exploring emotional intelligence using the Trait Meta-Mood Scale. In PennebakerJ. W. (Ed.), Emotion, Disclosure, and Health (pp. 125-154). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
67.
SaroglouV.DelpierreV.DernelleR. (2004). Values and religiosity: A meta-analysis of studies using Schwartz’s model. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 721-734.
68.
SasakiJ. Y.KimH. S. (2011). At the intersection of culture and religion: A cultural analysis of religion’s implications for secondary control and social affiliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 401-414.
69.
SchwartzS. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65.
70.
SheppesG.ScheibeS.SuriG.RaduP.BlechertJ.GrossJ. J. (2014). Emotion regulation choice: A conceptual framework and supporting evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 143, 163-181.
71.
SmidtC. E.KellstedtL. A.GuthJ. L. (2009). The role of religion in American politics: Explanatory theories and associated analytical and measurement issues. In SmidtC. E.KellstedtL. A.GuthJ. L. (Eds.), Oxford Handbook on Religion and American Politics (pp. 3-42). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
72.
StegerM. F.FrazierP. (2005). Meaning in life: One link in the chain from religion to well-being. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 574-582.
73.
TamirM. (2016). Why do people regulate their emotions? A taxonomy of motives in emotion regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20, 199-222.
74.
TamirM.HalperinE.PoratR.BigmanY.HassonY. (2019). When there’s a will, there’s a way: Disentangling the effects of goals and means in emotion regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116, 795-816.
75.
TamirM.JohnO. P.SrivastavaS.GrossJ. J. (2007). Implicit theories of emotion: Affective and social outcomes across a major life transition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 731-744.
76.
TamirM.MillgramY. (2017). Motivated emotion regulation: Principles, lessons, and implications of a motivational analysis of emotion regulation. In ElliotA. J. (Ed.), Advances in motivation science (pp. 207-247). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
77.
TamirM.MitchellC.GrossJ. J. (2008). Hedonic and instrumental motives in anger regulation: Research report. Psychological Science, 19, 324-328.
78.
ThompsonB. L.WaltzJ.CroyleK.PepperA. C. (2007). Trait meta-mood and affect as predictors of somatic symptoms and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1786-1795.
79.
ThompsonR. A. (1994). Emotion regulation: A theme in search of definition. The development of emotion regulation: Biological and behavioral considerations. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59, 25-52.
80.
TiceD. M.BratslavskyE.BaumeisterR. F. (2001). Emotional distress regulation takes precedence over impulse control: If you feel bad, do it!. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 53-67.
81.
TrapnellP. D.CampbellJ. D. (1999). Private self-consciousness and the five-factor model of personality: Distinguishing rumination from reflection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 284-304.
82.
TroyA. S.FordB. Q.McRaeK.ZaroliaP.MaussI. B. (2017). Change the things you can: Emotion regulation is more beneficial for people from lower than from higher socioeconomic status. Emotion, 17, 141-154.
83.
TroyA. S.ShallcrossA. J.MaussI. B. (2013). A person-by-situation approach to emotion regulation: Cognitive reappraisal can either help or hurt, depending on the context. Psychological Science, 24, 2505-2514.
84.
VailK. E.RothschildZ. K.WeiseD. R.SolomonS.PyszczynskiT.GreenbergJ. (2010). A terror management analysis of the psychological functions of religion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 84-94.
85.
Van CappellenP.Toth-GauthierM.SaroglouV.FredricksonB. L. (2016). Religion and well-being: The mediating role of positive emotions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 485-505.
86.
van de VijverF. J. R.LeungK. (2011). Equivalence and bias: A review of concepts, models, and data analytic procedures. In MatsumotoD.van de VijverF. J. R. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural research methods (pp. 17-45). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
87.
VishkinA.Ben-Nun BloomP.TamirM. (2018). Always look on the bright side of life: Emotion regulation, religiosity, and well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20, 427-447.
88.
VishkinA.BigmanY.PoratR.SolakN.HalperinE.TamirM. (2016). God rest our hearts: Religiosity and cognitive reappraisal. Emotion, 16, 252-262.
89.
VishkinA.BigmanY.TamirM. (2014). Religion, emotion regulation, and well-being. In Kim-PrietoC. (Ed.), Positive psychology of religion and spirituality across cultures (pp. 247-269). New York, NY: Springer.
90.
VishkinA.SchwartzS. H.Ben-Nun BloomP.SolakN.TamirM. (2019). Religiosity and desired emotions: Belief maintenance or prosocial facilitation? Manuscript under review.
91.
WattsF. N. (1996). Psychological and religious perspectives on emotion. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 6, 71-87.
92.
WattsF. N. (2007). Emotion regulation and religion. In GrossJ. J. (Ed.), Handbook of Emotion Regulation (pp. 504-520). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
93.
WebbT. L.MilesE.SheeranP. (2012). Dealing with feeling: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 775-808.
94.
WellsA.DaviesM. I. (1994). The Thought Control Questionnaire: A measure of individual differences in the control of unwanted thoughts. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32, 871-878.
95.
WhittingtonB. L.ScherS. J. (2010). Prayer and subjective well-being: An examination of six different types of prayer. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 20, 59-68.
96.
WorthingtonE. L. J.WadeN. G.HightT. L.RipleyJ. S.McCulloughM. E.SchmittM. M.O’ConnorL. (2003). The Religious Commitment Inventory—10: Development, refinement, and validation of a brief scale for research and counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50, 84-96.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
