Although religiosity fosters some antisocial behaviors (e.g., support for suicide attacks), it is well-known that it also enhances in-group cooperation and prosociality (e.g., donating to charity). Supernatural punishment hypothesis suggests that the fear of punishment from an invisible, potent, and powerful supernatural agent can keep everyone in line, and encourage prosociality. We first investigated this relationship in a predominantly Muslim country and then tested a model suggesting that attachment to God can lead people to think God as authoritarian, which in turn leads them to report more prosocial intentions. The results demonstrate that (1) there are some findings suggesting that Attachment to God Inventory is a reliable measure in Turkey, (2) seeing God as authoritarian is positively correlated with prosociality, and (3) our above-mentioned model was supported by the data. Results generally support the supernatural punishment hypothesis and additionally show the utility of attachment theory in explaining the religiosity-prosociality link.
AinsworthM. D. (1969). Object relations, dependency, and attachment: A theoretical review of the infant-mother relationship. Child Development, 40, 969. doi:10.2307/1127008
2.
AinsworthM., & BellS. (1970). Attachment, exploration, and separation: Illustrated by the behavior of one-year-olds in a strange situation. Child Development, 41, 49–67. https://doi.org/10.2307/1127388
3.
AinsworthM. D., BleharM. C., WatersE., & WallS. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
4.
AtkinsonQ. D., & BourratP. (2011). Beliefs about God, the afterlife and morality support the role of supernatural policing in human cooperation. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32, 41–49. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.07.008
5.
BaumertA., HalmburgerA., & SchmittM. (2013). Interventions against norm violations: Dispositional determinants of self-reported and real moral courage. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1053–1068.
6.
BeckR., & McDonaldA. (2004). Attachment to God: The Attachment to God Inventory, tests of working model correspondence, and an exploration of faith group differences. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 32, 92–103.
7.
BeringJ., & JohnsonD. (2005). “O Lord … You Perceive my Thoughts from Afar”: Recursiveness and the evolution of supernatural agency. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 5, 118–142. doi:10.1163/1568537054068679
8.
BowlbyJ. (1958). The nature of the child's tie to his mother. International Journal of Psycho-Analysts, 39, 350–373.
9.
BowlbyJ. (1969a). Affectional bonds: Their nature and origin. In FreemanH. (Ed.), Progress in Mental Health. London: J. & A. Churchill.
10.
BowlbyJ. (1969b). Attachment and loss (vol. 1), Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
11.
BowlbyJ. (1973). Attachment and loss (vol. 2), Separation: Anxiety and anger. New York: Basic Books.
12.
BowlbyJ. (1980). Attachment and loss (vol. 3), Loss: Sadness and Depression. New York: Basic Books.
13.
BowlbyJ. (1982). Attachment and loss: Retrospect and prospect. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52, 664–678.
14.
BrennanK. A., ClarkC. L., & ShaverP. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In SimpsonJ. A. & RholesW. S. (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). New York: Guilford Press.
15.
CassibbaR., GranqvistP., & CostantiniA. (2013). Mothers’ attachment security predicts their childrens sense of God's closeness. Attachment & Human Development, 15, 51–64. doi:10.1080/14616734.2013.743253
16.
ClarkE. T. (1929). The psychology of religious awakening. NY: Macmillan.
17.
ClobertM., & SaroglouV. (2013). Intercultural non-conscious influences: Prosocial effects of Buddhist priming on Westerners of Christian tradition. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 37, 459–466. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2012.10.001
18.
FeeneyJ. A. (2008). Adult romantic attachment: Developments in the study of couple relationships. In CassidyJ. & ShaverP. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 456–481). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.
19.
FraleyR. C., & ShaverP. R. (2000). Adult romantic attachment: Theoretical developments, emerging controversies, and unanswered questions. Review of General Psychology, 4, 132–154. doi:10.1037//1089-2680.4.2.132
20.
FraleyR. C., WallerN. G., & BrennanK. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 350–365. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.350
21.
GranqvistP. (1998). Religiousness and perceived childhood attachment: On the question of compensation or correspondence. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37, 350. doi:10.2307/1387533
22.
GranqvistP. (2002.) Attachment and religion: An integrative developmental framework. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Social Sciences, 116, 94. ISBN 91-554-5255-5258.
23.
GranqvistP. (2003). Attachment theory and religious conversions: A review and a resolution of the classic and contemporary paradigm chasm. Review of Religious Research, 45, 172. doi:10.2307/3512581
24.
GranqvistP., & HagekullB. (1999). Religiousness and perceived childhood attachment: Profiling socialized correspondence and emotional compensation. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 38, 254. doi:10.2307/1387793
25.
GranqvistP., & HagekullB. (2000). Religiosity, adult attachment, and why “singles” are more religious. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 10, 111–123.
26.
GranqvistP., & HagekullB. (2003). Longitudinal predictions of religious change in adolescence: Contributions from the interaction of attachment and relationship status. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 793–817. doi:10.1177/ 0265407503206005
27.
GranqvistP., MikulincerM., GewirtzV., & ShaverP. R. (2012). Experimental findings on God as an attachment figure: Normative processes and moderating effects of internal working models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 804–818. doi:10.1037/a0029344
28.
HarrellA. (2012). Do religious cognitions promote prosociality?Rationality and Society, 24, 463–482. doi:10.1177/1043463112463930
29.
HazanC., & ShaverP. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511
30.
HazanC. & ZeifmanD. (1999). Pair bonds as attachments: Evaluating the evidence. In CassidyJ. & ShaverP. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 336–354). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.
31.
HoodR. W.Jr., SpilkaB., HunsbergerB., & GorsuchR. L. (1996). The psychology of religion: An empirical approach (2nd ed.). NY: Guilford.
32.
HoyleR. H. (1995). Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
33.
HuL., & BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
34.
JamesW. (1902). Varieties of religious experience. NY: Longmans, Green.
35.
JohnsonD. (2009). God would be a costly accident: Supernatural beliefs as adaptive. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 523–538. doi:10.1017/s0140525x09991245
36.
JohnsonD. (2011). Why God is the best punisher. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 1, 77–84. doi:10.1080/2153599x.2011.558714
37.
JohnsonD., & BeringJ. (2006). Hand of god, mind of man: Punishment and cognition in the evolution of cooperation. Evolutionary Psychology, 4, 219–233. doi:10.1177/147470490600400119
38.
JohnsonD., & KrügerO. (2004). The good of wrath: Supernatural punishment and the evolution of cooperation. Political Theology, 5, 159–176. doi:10.1558/poth.2004.5.2.159
39.
JohnsonK. A., LiY. J., CohenA. B., & OkunM. A. (2013). Friends in high places: The influence of authoritarian and benevolent god-concepts on social attitudes and behaviors. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 5, 15–22. doi:10.1037/a0030138
40.
JohnsonK. A., OkunM. A., & CohenA. B. (2015). The mind of the Lord: Measuring authoritarian and benevolent God representations. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 7, 227–238. doi:10.1037/rel0000011
41.
JohnsonP., & SpilkaB. (1991). Religion and the breast cancer patient: The roles of clergy and faith. Journal of Religion & Health, 31, 21–33.
42.
KirkpatrickL. (1992). An attachment-theory approach psychology of religion. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 3–28. doi:10.1207/s15327582ijpr0201_2
43.
KirkpatrickL. A. (1997). A longitudinal study of changes in religious belief and behavior as a function of individual differences in adult attachment style. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 36, 207. doi:10.2307/1387553
44.
KirkpatrickL. A. (1998). God as a substitute attachment figure: A longitudinal study of adult attachment style and religious change in college students. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 961–973. doi:10.1177/0146167298249004
45.
KirkpatrickL. A. (1999). Toward an evolutionary psychology of religion and personality. Journal of Personality, 67, 921–952. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00078
46.
KirkpatrickL. A. (2012). Attachment theory and the evolutionary psychology of religion. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 22, 231–241. doi:10.1080/10508619.2012.679556
47.
KirkpatrickL. A., & ShaverP. R. (1992). An attachment-theoretical approach to romantic love and religious belief. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 266–275. doi:10.1177/0146167292183002
48.
KirkpatrickL. A., & ShaverP. R. (2008). Attachment, evolution, and the psychology of religion. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
49.
KoenigH. G., & BüssingA. (2010). The Duke University Religion Index (DUREL): A five-item measure for use in epidemological studies. Religions, 1(1), 78–85. doi:10.3390/rel1010078
50.
LovelandG. G. (1968). The effects of bereavement on certain religious attitudes. Sociological Symposium, 1, 17–27.
51.
McCartneyK., BurchinalM. R., & BubK. L. (2006). Best practices in quantitative methods for developmentalists. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 71, 1–145. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-5834.2006.07103001.x
52.
MikulincerM., & ShaverP. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. New York: Guilford Press.
53.
MikulincerM., & ShaverP. R. (2012). Adult attachment orientations and relationship processes. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 4, 259–274. doi:10.1111/j.1756-2589.2012.00142.x
54.
MikulincerM., FlorianV., CowanP. A., & CowanC. P. (2002). Attachment security in couple relationships: A systemic model and its implications for family dynamics. Family Process, 41(3), 405–434. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2002.41309.x
55.
MuthénL. K., & MuthénB. O. (1998-2011). Mplus user's guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
56.
NorenzayanA. (2013). Big gods: How religion transformed cooperation and conflict. Princeton University Press.
57.
O'BrienM. E. (1982). Religious faith and adjustment to long-term hemodyalisis. Journal of Religion and Health, 21, 68–80.
58.
ParkesC. M. (1972). Bereavement: Studies of grief in later life. NY: International Universities Press.
59.
PichonI., BoccatoG., & SaroglouV. (2007). Nonconscious influences of religion on prosociality: A priming study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1032–1045. doi:10.1002/ejsp.416
60.
PurzyckiB. G., ApicellaC., AtkinsonQ. D., CohenE., McnamaraR. A., WillardA. K., HenrichJ. (2016). Moralistic gods, supernatural punishment and the expansion of human sociality. Nature, 530, 327–330. doi:10.1038/nature16980
61.
SchlossJ. P., & MurrayM. J. (2011). Evolutionary accounts of belief in supernatural punishment: A critical review. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 1, 46–99. doi:10.1080/2153599x.2011.558707
62.
SelçukE., GünaydınG., SümerN., & UysalA. (2005). A new measure for adult attachment styles: The psychometric evaluation of experiences in close relationships- revised (ECR-R) on a Turkish sample. Turkish Psychological Articles, 8, 1–11.
63.
SelcukE., ZayasV., & HazanC. (2010). Beyond satisfaction: The role of attachment in marital functioning. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 2, 258–279. doi:10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00061.x
64.
ShariffA. F., & NorenzayanA. (2011). Mean gods make good people: Different views of god predict cheating behavior. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 21, 85–96. doi:10.1080/10508619.2011.556990
65.
ShariffA. F., & RhemtullaM. (2012). Divergent effects of beliefs in heaven and hell on national crime rates. PLoS ONE, 7. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0039048
66.
ShariffA. F., WillardA. K., AndersenT., & NorenzayanA. (2016). Religious priming: A meta-analysis with a focus on prosociality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20, 27–48.
67.
ShaverP. R., & MikulincerM. (2002). Attachment-related psychodynamics. Attachment & Human Development, 4, 133–161. doi:10.1080/14616730210154171
68.
StarbuckE. D. (1899). The psychology of religion. NY: Charles Scribner's sons.
69.
SteigerJ. H. (2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 893–898.
70.
TracyR. L., & AinsworthM. D. S. (1981). Maternal affectionate behavior and infant-mother attachment patterns. Child Development, 52, 1341–1343.
71.
UllmanC. (1982). Cognitive and emotional antecedents of religious conversion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 183–192.
72.
Van CappellenP., SaroglouV. & Toth-GauthierM. (2014). Religiosity and prosocial behavior among churchgoers: Exploring underlying mechanisms. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion. 26, 1–27. 10.1080/10508619.2014.958004.
73.
WattW. M. (1948). Free will and predestination in early Islam. London, UK: Luzac & Co.
74.
YilmazO. (2015). The effect of political orientation and religiosity on prejudice toward atheists: The role of divine command, subjective morality and moral foundations (Unpublished master's thesis). Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
75.
YilmazO., & BahçekapiliH. G. (2016). Supernatural and secular monitors promote human cooperation only if they remind of punishment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37, 79–84. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.09.005
