In this research, we examined (a) the primary effects of intergroup friendships: whether having a friend of a different gender/racial status benefits children’s gender/racial status-based prosocial behavior and (b) the secondary transfer of intergroup friendships: whether friendships from one domain (e.g., gender) would extend to improved prosocial behavior toward outgroup members of another domain (e.g., race). Participants were 603 third- to fifth-grade students (Mage = 9.06, SD = .90; 47.9% girls; 52.4% racially minoritized). Peer nominations of prosocial behavior and friendships were collected twice in 1 year. Longitudinal path analyses focused on intergender friendships showed support for both the primary and secondary transfer effects on enhanced intergroup prosocial behavior. Analyses focused on racial status showed the primary effects of these friendships on enhanced interracial prosocial behavior, whereas the secondary transfer effects were less consistent. These findings provide a basis for interventions to promote equity in prosociality toward diverse others.
AboudF. E.BrownC. S. (2013). Positive and negative intergroup contact among children and its effect on attitudes. In HodsonG.HewstoneM. (Eds.), Advances in intergroup contact (pp. 176–199). Psychology Press.
2.
AikenL. S. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage Google Schola, 2, 103–135.
3.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
BennerA. D.WangY.ShenY.BoyleA. E.PolkR.ChengY. P. (2018). Racial/ethnic discrimination and well-being during adolescence: A meta-analytic review. American Psychologist, 73(7), 855–883. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000204
6.
BennetA.KuchirkoY.HalimM. D.CostanzoP.MartinC. L.StanalandA.RubleD. N. (2024). A six-year longitudinal exploration of diversity in ethnic/racially minoritized children’s early peer circles. Social Development, 33, Article e12744. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12744
7.
BiglerR. S.LibenL. S. (2007). Developmental intergroup theory: Explaining and reducing children’s social stereotyping and prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 162–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00496.x
8.
BrownC. S.TamM. J. (2022). Gender-based discrimination in childhood and adolescence. In VanderLaanD. P.WongW. I. (Eds.), Gender and sexuality development (pp. 277–356). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84273-410
9.
BrownT. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Press.
10.
CampigottoN.RapalliniC.RustichiniA. (2022). School friendship networks, homophily and multiculturalism: Evidence from European countries. Journal of Population Economics, 35(4), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-020-00819-w
11.
CillessenA. H. N. (2009). Sociometric methods. In RubinK. H.BukowskiW. M.LaursenB. (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 82–99). The Guilford Press.
12.
CillessenA. H. N.BukowskiW. M. (2018). Sociometric perspectives. In BukowskiW. M.LaursenB.RubinK. H. (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 64–83). Guilford Press.
13.
CrystalD. S.KillenM.RuckM. (2008). It is who you know that counts: Intergroup contact and judgments about race-based exclusion. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 26, 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151007X198910
14.
DaviesK.TroppL. R.AronA.PettigrewT. F.WrightS. C. (2011). Cross-group friendships and intergroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 332–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311411103
15.
DegnerJ.DalegeJ. (2013). The apple does not fall far from the tree, or does it? A meta-analysis of parent–child similarity in intergroup attitudes. Psychological Bulletin, 139(6), 1270. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031436
16.
DevineR. T.Grumley TraynorI.RonchiL.LecceS. (2024). Children in ethnically diverse classrooms and those with cross-ethnic friendships excel at understanding others’ minds. Child Development, 95, 1447–1461. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.14085
17.
DunhamY.ChenE. E.BanajiM. R. (2013). Two signatures of implicit intergroup attitudes: Developmental invariance and early enculturation. Psychological Science, 24, 860–868. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612463081
18.
EisenbergN.FabesR. A. (1998). Prosocial development. In DamonW.EisenbergN. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 701–778). John Wiley.
19.
FeddesA. R.NoackP.RutlandA. (2009). Direct and extended friendship effects on minority and majority children’s interethnic attitudes: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 80, 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01266.x
20.
FieldR. D.MartinC. L. (2016). The development of other-gender interactions: Behavioral, biological, cognitive, and contextual influences. In RobertsT.CurtinN.DuncanL. E.CortinaL. M. (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on building a better psychological science of gender (pp. 121–139). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32141-7_8
21.
FisherC. B.WallaceS. A.FentonR. E. (2000). Discrimination distress during adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29(6), 679–695. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026455906512
22.
Garcia-CollC.LambertyG.JenkinsR.McAdooH. P.CrnicK.WasikB. H.Vazquez GarciaH. (1996). An integrative model for the study of developmental competencies in minority children. Child Development, 67, 1891–1914. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131600
23.
GaspariniC.SetteS.BaumgartnerE.MartinC. L.FabesR. A. (2015). Gender-biased attitudes and attributions among young Italian children: Relation to peer dyadic interaction. Sex Roles, 73, 427–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0526-5
24.
GelmanS. A.TaylorM. G.NguyenS. P. (2004). The developmental course of gender differentiation. Monographs of the Society for Research in Children Development, 69(1), vii–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0037-976X.2004.00276.x
25.
GrahamS.EcholsL. (2018). Race and ethnicity in peer relations research. In BukowskiW. M.LaursenB.RubinK. H. (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (2nd ed., pp. 590–614). The Guilford Press.
26.
GriffinM. M.SteinbrecherT. D. (2013). Large-scale datasets in special education research. In HodappR. M.FidlerD. J. (Eds.), International review of research in developmental disabilities (Vol. 45, pp. 155–183). Academic Press.
27.
HalimM. L. D.GlazierJ.MartinezM. A.StanalandA.GaitherS. E.DunhamY.PaukerK.OlsonK. R. (2023). Gender attitudes and gender discrimination among ethnically and geographically diverse young children. Infant and Child Development, 33, e2482. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.2482
28.
HalimM. L. D.MartinC. L.AndrewsN. C.ZosulsK. M.RubleD. N. (2021). Enjoying each other’s company: Gaining other-gender friendships promotes positive gender attitudes among ethnically diverse children. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(12), 1635–1653. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220984407
29.
HalimM. L. D.RubleD. (2010). Gender identity and stereotyping in early and middle childhood. In ChrislerJ. C. (Ed.), Handbook of gender research in psychology: Vol. 1. Gender research in general and experimental psychology (pp. 495–525). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1465-1_24
30.
HanishL. D.MartinC. L.CookR.DeLayD.LecheileB.FabesR. A.GobleP.BryceC. I. (2021). Building integrated peer relationships in preschool classrooms: The potential of buddies. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 73, 101257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2021.101257
31.
HanishL. D.XiaoS. X.MaloufL. M.MartinC. L.GobleP.FabesR. A.DeLayD.BryceC. I. (2022). The benefits of buddies: Strategically pairing preschoolers with other-gender classmates promotes positive interactions. Early Education and Development, 34(5), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2022.2090773
32.
HilliardL. J.LibenL. S. (2010). Differing levels of gender salience in preschool classrooms: Effects on children’s gender attitudes and intergroup bias. Child Development, 81, 1787–1798. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01510.x
JenkinsD.XiaoS. X.MartinC. L. (2022). Does the gender of your friends matter for sexist attitudes about women?Emerging Adulthood, 11(2), 380–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/21676968221121165
35.
KalmijnM. (2003). Country differences in sex-role attitudes: Cultural and economic explanations. In Antonius ArtsW.HagenaarsJ. A.HalmanL. (Eds.), The cultural diversity of European unity (pp. 311–337). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047400035_019
36.
KlineR. B. (2006). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Guilford Publications.
37.
KovacsD. M.ParkerJ. G.HoffmanL. W. (1996). Behavioral, affective, and social correlates of involvement in cross-sex friendship in elementary school. Child Development, 67(5), 2269–2286. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131622
38.
LaddG. W.Troop-GordonW. (2003). The role of chronic peer difficulties in the development of children’s psychological adjustment problems. Child Development, 74(5), 1344–1367. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00611
39.
MaccobyE. E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Belknap Press.
40.
MartinC. L. (1989). Children’s use of gender-related information in making social judgments. Developmental Psychology, 25(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.25.1.80
41.
MartinC. L.FabesR. A. (2001). The stability and consequences of young children’s same-sex peer interactions. Developmental Psychology, 37, 431–446. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.37.3.431
42.
MartinC. L.HalversonC. F.Jr. (1981). A schematic processing model of sex typing and stereotyping in children. Child Development, 52, 1119–1134. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129498
43.
MartinC. L.XiaoS. X.FabesR. A.HanishL. D.DeLayD.OswaltK. (2024). Are coeducational classes truly coeducational?The Elementary School Journal, 124, 413–433. https://doi.org/10.1086/728674
44.
McGlothlinH.KillenM. (2006). Intergroup attitudes of European American children attending ethnically homogeneous schools. Child Development, 77, 1375–1386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2005.08.008
45.
MehtaC. M.StroughJ. (2009). Sex segregation in friendships and normative contexts across the life span. Developmental Review, 29, 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2009.06.001
46.
MilesE.CrispR. J. (2014). A meta-analytic test of the imagined contact hypothesis. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430213510573
47.
MulveyK. L.MiedemaS. T.StribingA.GilbertE.BrianA. (2020). SKIPing together: A motor competence intervention promotes gender-integrated friendships for young children. Sex Roles, 82, 550–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01079-z
48.
NesdaleD. (2004). Social identity processes and children’s ethnic prejudice. In BennettM.SaniF. (Eds.), The development of the social self (pp. 219–245). Psychology Press.
49.
PascoeE. A.Smart RichmanL. (2009). Perceived discrimination and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 531–554. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016059
50.
PaukerK.XuY.WilliamsA.BiddleA. M. (2016). Race essentialism and social contextual differences in children’s racial stereotyping. Child Development, 87(5), 1409–1422. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12592
51.
PeplakJ.SongJ.-H.ColasanteT.MaltiT. (2017). “Only you can play with me!” Children’s inclusive decision-making, reasoning, and emotions based on peers’ gender and behavior problems. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 162, 134–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.04.019
52.
PettigrewT. F. (1997). Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297232006
PettigrewT. F. (2009). Contact’s secondary transfer effect: Do intergroup contact effects spread to non-participating outgroups?Social Psychology, 40, 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335.40.2.55
55.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
QuintanaS. M.Segura-HerreraT. A. (2003). Developmental transformations of self and identity in the context of oppression. Self and Identity, 2(4), 269–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/714050248
58.
RaabeT.BeelmannA. (2011). Development of ethnic, racial, and national prejudice in childhood and adolescence: A multinational meta-analysis of age differences. Child Development, 82(6), 1715–1737. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01668.x
59.
RogersL. O.MeltzoffA. N. (2017). Is gender more important and meaningful than race? An analysis of racial and gender identity among Black, White, and mixed-race children. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 23(3), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000125
60.
RoseA. J.RudolphK. D. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 98–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.98
61.
RubleD. N.MartinC. L. (1998). Gender development. In Damon (Series Ed.)W.EisenbergN. (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 933–1016). Wiley.
62.
RutlandA.CameronL.BennettL.FerrellJ. (2005). Interracial contact and racial constancy: A multi-site study of racial intergroup bias in 3–5 year old Anglo-British children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 26, 699–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2005.08.005
63.
RutlandA.KillenM. (2015). A developmental science approach to reducing prejudice and social exclusion: Intergroup processes, social-cognitive development, and moral reasoning. Social Issues and Policy Review, 9, 121–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12012
64.
SeiderS.ClarkS.GravesD.KellyL. L.SoutterM.El-AminA.JennettP. (2019). Black and Latinx adolescents’ developing beliefs about poverty and associations with their awareness of racism. Developmental Psychology, 55(3), 509–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000585
65.
ShiaoJ. L. (2024). Beyond homophily: The boundary-specific effects of interracial contact. Race and Social Problems, 16, 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-024-09411-3
66.
ShuttsK.PembertonC. K.SpelkeE. S. (2013). Children’s use of social categories in thinking about people and social relationships. Journal of Cognition and Development, 14(1), 35–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2011.638686
67.
SpivakA. L.WhiteS. S.JuvonenJ.GrahamS. (2015). Correlates of prosocial behaviors of students in ethnically and racially diverse middle schools. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 61, 236–263. https://doi.org/10.13110/merrpalmquar1982.61.2.0236
68.
StrohmeierD. (2012). Friendship homophily among children and youth in multicultural classes. In MesserM.SchroederR.WodakR. (Eds.), Migrations: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 99–109). Springer.
69.
TroppL. R.PettigrewT. F. (2005). Relationships between intergroup contact and prejudice among minority and majority status groups. Psychological Science, 16, 651–653. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01643.x
70.
TurnerR. N.CameronL. (2016). Confidence in contact: A new perspective on promoting cross-group friendship among children and adolescents. Social Issues and Policy Review, 10, 212–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12023
71.
VezzaliL.Di BernardoG. A.BirtelM. D.StathiS.BrambillaM. (2020). Outgroup morality perceptions mediate secondary transfer effects from direct and extended contact: Evidence from majority and minority group members. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 23(7), 1066–1084. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219879223
72.
VezzaliL.Di BernardoG. A.CoccoV. M.StathiS.CapozzaD. (2021). Reducing prejudice in the society at large: A review of the secondary transfer effect and directions for future research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(3), Article e12583. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12583
73.
VezzaliL.Di BernardoG. A.StathiS.CadamuroA.LášticováB.AndraščikováS. (2018). Secondary transfer effect among children: The role of social dominance orientation and outgroup attitudes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57, 547–566. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12248
74.
WhitingB.EdwardsC. P. (1988). A cross-cultural analysis of sex differences in the behavior of children aged 3 through 11. In HandelG. (Ed.), Childhood socialization (pp. 281–297). Aldine de Gruyter.
75.
XiaoS. X.HanishL. D.MaloufL.MartinC. L.LecheileB.GobleP.FabesR. A.DeLayD.BryceC. I. (2022). Interactions with diverse peers promote preschoolers’ prosociality and reduce aggression: An examination of Buddy-Up intervention. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 60, 403–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2022.04.004
76.
XiaoS. X.HashiE.KorousK. M.EisenbergN. (2019). Gender differences across multiple types of prosocial behavior in adolescence: A meta-analysis of the Prosocial Tendency Measure-Revised (PTM-R). Journal of Adolescence, 77(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.09.003
77.
XiaoS. X.MartinC. L.DeLayD.CookR. E. (2021). A double-edged sword: Children’s intergroup gender attitudes have social consequences for the beholder. Developmental Psychology, 57(9), 1510–1524. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001065
78.
XiaoS. X.MartinC. L.SpinradT. L.EisenbergN.DeLayD.HanishL. D.FabesR. A.OswaltK. (2022). Being helpful to other-gender peers: School-age children’s gender-based intergroup prosocial behavior. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 40, 520–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12426
79.
XiaoS. X.RenH.HanishL. D.MillerC. F.MartinC. L.FabesR. A. (2023). Meet Up Buddy Up: effective strategies to promote 4th grade students’ intergroup prosocial behavior. Frontiers in Developmental Psychology, 1, Article 1177566. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdpys.2023.1177566
80.
ZhouS.Page-GouldE.AronA.MoyerA.HewstoneM. (2019). The extended contact hypothesis: A meta- analysis on 20 years of research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23(2), 132–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868318762647
81.
ZosulsK. M.MartinC. L.RubleD. N.MillerC. F.GaertnerB. M.EnglandD. E.HillA. P. (2011). “It’s not that we hate you”: Understanding children’s gender attitudes and expectancies about peer relationships. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29, 288–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.2010.02023.x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
