Four studies investigated the link between cross-race friendships and attraction. In Study 1, White Australian participants (N = 240) who reported friendships with racial outgroup members were more likely to report attraction to the members of the racial group their friends belonged to. Studies 2a (N = 300 White American participants) and 2b (N = 303 White British participants) showed that experiences of cross-race non-verbal intimacy, perceived cross-race reciprocity in attraction, positive perceived ingroup norms about dating cross-racially, and warmth toward the racial outgroup were particularly important in explaining the friendship–attraction link in majority samples. Study 3 (N = 292 Black British participants) showed that in addition to the mediators above, self-disclosure was key to explaining the friendship–attraction link for racial minority group members. These findings extend the contact literature by exploring the specificity and mediators of the link between contact and attraction in the context of race relations.
AkramiN.EkehammarB.BerghR. (2011). Generalized prejudice: Common and specific components. Psychological Science, 22(1), 57–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610390384
2.
AllenC. K.UskulA. K. (2019). Preference for dating out-group members: Not the same for all out-groups and cultural backgrounds. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 68, 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.11.002
3.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
4.
AronA.MelinatE.AronE. N.ValloneR. D.BatorR. J. (1997). The experimental generation of interpersonal closeness: A procedure and some preliminary findings. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(4), 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297234003
5.
BabbittL. G. (2013). An intersectional approach to Black/White interracial interactions: The roles of gender and sexual orientation. Sex Roles, 68(11–12), 791–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0104-4
6.
BarlowF. K.HornseyM. J.HaywardL. E.HoukamauC. A.KangJ.MilojevP.SibleyC. G. (2019). Why do we hold mixed emotions about racial out-groups? A case for affect matching. Psychological Science, 30(6), 917–929. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619844269
7.
BarlowF. K.HornseyM. J.ThaiM.SenguptaN. K.SibleyC. G. (2013). The wallpaper effect: The contact hypothesis fails for minority group members who live in areas with a high proportion of majority group members. PLOS ONE, 8(12), Article e82228. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082228
8.
BarlowF. K.LouisW. R.HewstoneM. (2009). Rejected! Cognitions of rejection and intergroup anxiety as mediators of the impact of cross-group friendships on prejudice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(3), 389–405. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608X387089
9.
BastianB.LusherD.AtaA. (2012). Contact, evaluation and social distance: Differentiating majority and minority effects. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36, 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.02.005
10.
BrooksJ. E.NevilleH. A. (2017). Interracial attraction among college men: The influence of ideologies, familiarity, and similarity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34(2), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407515627508
DaviesK.TroppL. R.AronA.PettigrewT. F.WrightS. C. (2011). Cross-group friendships and intergroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 332–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311411103
14.
DaviesK.WrightS. C.AronA.ComeauJ. (2013). Intergroup contact through friendship: Intimacy and norms. In HodsonG.HewstoneM. (Eds.), Advances in intergroup contact (pp. 200–229). Psychology Press.
15.
DixonJ.TredouxC.DaviesG.HuckJ.HockingB.SturgeonB.WhyattD.JarmanN.BryanD. (2020). Parallel lives: Intergroup contact, threat, and the segregation of everyday activity spaces. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(3), 457–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000191
16.
EastwickP. W.FinkelE. J.MochonD.ArielyD. (2007). Selective versus unselective romantic desire: Not all reciprocity is created equal. Psychological Science, 18(4), 317–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01897.x
17.
EmersonM. O.KimbroR. T.YanceyG. (2002). Contact theory extended: The effects of prior racial contact on current social ties. Social Science Quarterly, 83, 745–761. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.00112
18.
FinkelE. J.NortonM. I.ReisH. T.ArielyD.CaprarielloP. A.EastwickP. W.. . . ManiaciM. R. (2015). When does familiarity promote versus undermine interpersonal attraction? A proposed integrative model from erstwhile adversaries. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614561682
19.
FoemanA.NanceT. (2002). Building new cultures, reframing old images: Success strategies of interracial couples. Howard Journal of Communication, 13(3), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646170290109716
20.
FujinoD. C. (1997). The rates, patterns and reasons for forming heterosexual interracial dating relationships among Asian Americans. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14(6), 809–828. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407597146006
21.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F.SamuelG. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Psychology Press.
HanC. S. (2007). They don’t want to cruise your type: Gay men of color and the racial politics of exclusion. Social Identities, 13, 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630601163379
24.
HarwoodJ. (2010). The contact space: A novel framework for intergroup contact research. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(2), 147–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09359520
25.
HayesA. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903310360
26.
HaywardL. E.TroppL. R.HornseyM. J.BarlowF. K. (2017). Toward a comprehensive understanding of intergroup contact: Descriptions and mediators of positive and negative contact among majority and minority groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216685291
27.
Henderson-KingE.Henderson-KingD.ZhermerN.PosokhovaS.ChikerV. (1997). In-group favoritism and perceived similarity: A look at Russians’ perceptions in the post-Soviet era. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(10), 1013–1021. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672972310002
HindeR. A. (Ed.). (1972). Non-verbal communication. Cambridge University Press.
30.
HoA. K.SidaniusJ.KteilyN.Sheehy-SkeffingtonJ.PrattoF.HenkelK. E.. . . StewartA. L. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO-scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6), 1003–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000033
31.
IoannouM.PanagiotouE. (2020). Opening the black box of contact: Unravelling the ways through which positive contact is imagined in a post-conflict context. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 30, 660–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2465
32.
JohnsonB. R.JacobsonC. K. (2005). Contact in context: An examination of social settings on whites’ attitudes toward interracial marriage. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68, 387–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800406
33.
KeilT. F.KoschateM. (2020). Variations in subjective definitions of everyday situations as intergroup contact. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(4), 965–991. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12372
34.
LalondeR. N.GiguèreB.FontaineM.SmithA. (2007). Social dominance orientation and ideological asymmetry in relation to interracial dating and transracial adoption in Canada. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 559–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022107305238
35.
LaurenceauJ.-P.BarrettL. F.PietromonacoP. R. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1238–1251. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1238
36.
LevinS.TaylorP. L.CaudleE. (2007). Interethnic and interracial dating in college: A longitudinal study. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24, 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407507077225
37.
LevinS.van LaarC.SidaniusJ. (2003). The effects of ingroup and outgroup friendships on ethnic attitudes in college: A longitudinal study. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430203006001013
38.
LewisK. (2013). The limits of racial prejudice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(47), 18814–18819. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1308501110
39.
LindellM. K.WhitneyD. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114
40.
LiuJ. H.CampbellS. M.CondieH. (1995). Ethnocentrism in dating preferences for an American sample: The ingroup bias in social context. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25(1), 95–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420250108
MarinucciM.MaunderR.SanchezK.ThaiM.McKeownS.TurnerR. N.StevensonC. (2021). Intimate intergroup contact across the lifespan. Journal of Social Issues, 77(1), 64–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12399
43.
MonsourM. (1992). Meanings of intimacy in cross-and same-sex friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9(2), 277–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407592092007
44.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.).
45.
OlsonM. A.JohnsonC. S.ZabelK. L.PhillipsJ. E. (2018). Different sides of the same conversation: Black and White partners differ in perceptions of interaction content. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(8), 424–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12522
46.
PatersonJ. L.TurnerR. N.ConnerM. T. (2015). Extended contact through cross-group romantic relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45(9), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12314
47.
PatersonJ. L.TurnerR. N.HodsonG. (2019). Receptivity to dating and marriage across the religious divide in Northern Ireland: The role of intergroup contact. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 49(9), 575–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12617
48.
PeerE.BrandimarteL.SamatS.AcquistiA. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006
49.
PettigrewT. F. (2008). Future directions for intergroup contact theory and research. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32, 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2007.12.002
50.
PettigrewT. F. (2009). Secondary transfer effect of contact: Do intergroup contact effects spread to non-contacted outgroups?Social Psychology, 40, 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335.40.2.55
51.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
52.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(6), 922–934. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.504
53.
ReisH. T.ShaverP. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In DuckS. W. (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 367–389). John Wiley.
54.
SheltonJ. N.TrailT. E.WestT. V.BergsiekerH. B. (2010). From strangers to friends: The interpersonal process model of intimacy in developing interracial friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(1), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509346422
TamT.HewstoneM.HarwoodJ.VociA.KenworthyJ. (2006). Intergroup contact and grandparent–grandchild communication: The effects of self-disclosure on implicit and explicit biases against older people. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9(3), 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430206064642
59.
TamT.HewstoneM.KenworthyJ.CairnsE. (2009). Intergroup trust in Northern Ireland. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208325004
60.
TechakesariP.BarlowF. K.HornseyM. J.SungB.ThaiM.ChakJ. L. (2015). An investigation of positive and negative contact as predictors of intergroup attitudes in the United States, Hong Kong, and Thailand. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46(3), 454–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022115570313
61.
ThaiM. (2020). Sexual racism is associated with lower self-esteem and life satisfaction in men who have sex with men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(1), 347–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-1456-z
62.
ThaiM.StainerM. J.BarlowF. K. (2019). The “preference” paradox: Disclosing racial preferences in attraction is considered racist even by people who overtly claim it is not. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 83, 70–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.03.004
63.
TidwellN. D.EastwickP. W.FinkelE. J. (2013). Perceived, not actual, similarity predicts initial attraction in a live romantic context: Evidence from the speed-dating paradigm. Personal Relationships, 20(2), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2012.01405.x
64.
TroppL. R.PettigrewT. F. (2005). Relationships between intergroup contact and prejudice among minority and majority status groups. Psychological Science, 16(12), 951–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01643.x
65.
TurnerR. N.FeddesA. R. (2011). How intergroup friendship works: A longitudinal study of friendship effects on outgroup attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(7), 914–923. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.843
66.
TurnerR. N.HewstoneM.VociA. (2007). Reducing explicit and implicit outgroup prejudice via direct and extended contact: The mediating role of self-disclosure and intergroup anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.369
67.
TurnerR. N.HewstoneM.VociA.VonofakouC. (2008). A test of the extended intergroup contact hypothesis: The mediating role of intergroup anxiety, perceived ingroup and outgroup norms, and inclusion of the outgroup in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(4), 843–860. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0011434
68.
WilkinsC. L.ChanJ. F.KaiserC. R. (2011). Racial stereotypes and interracial attraction: Phenotypic prototypicality and perceived attractiveness of Asians. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 17, 427–431. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024733
69.
WrightS. C.TroppL. R. (2005). Language and intergroup contact: Investigating the impact of bilingual instruction on children’s intergroup attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430205053945
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
