This work examined the power of live music events to enhance wellbeing through collective effervescence (CE)—the sense of sacredness and connection felt when in large groups. Four studies (N = 789) using both university and community samples examined the relationship between live music events and CE and how this relationship contributes to positive, lasting outcomes. Results suggest that CE is highly related to positive outcomes associated with attending live music events. CE uniquely predicted meaning in life and enjoyment during the event above and beyond related constructs. Feeling CE was also related to greater meaning in life during the event and continued happiness a week after live music events. Further, CE mediated effects between various elements of live music events (e.g., parasocial bonds with the artist) and positive lasting outcomes. In summary, CE plays a key role in the lasting wellbeing that follows live music events.
ArbuckleJ. L. (2019). Amos (Version 26.0) [Computer Program]. Chicago: IBM SPSS.
2.
AronA.AronE. N. (1986). Love and the expansion of self: Understanding attraction and satisfaction. Hemisphere Publishing Corp/Harper & Row Publishers.
3.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
4.
BerkersP. P.MichaelJ. J. (2017). Just what makes today’s music festivals so appealing? In KoudstaalP. (Ed.), Music brings us together: Music & Art Festivals (pp. 98–115).
5.
BlackG. C.FoxM. A.KochanowskiP. (2007). Concert tour success in North America: An examination of the Top 100 tours from 1997 to 2005. Popular Music and Society, 30(2), 149-172.https://doi.org/10.1080/03007760701267698
6.
BoothbyE. J.ClarkM. S.BarghJ. A. (2014). Shared experiences are amplified. Psychological Science, 25(12), 2209–2216.
7.
BrownS. C.KnoxD. (2017). Why go to pop concerts? The motivations behind live music attendance. Musicae Scientiae, 21(3), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864916650719
8.
CsíkszentmihályiM. (1990). Flow. The psychology of optimal experience, 1–22.
9.
DaykinN.MansfieldL.MeadsC.JulierG.TomlinsonA.PayneA.Grigsby DuffyL.LaneJ.D’InnocenzoG.BurnettA.KayT.DolanP.TestoniS.VictorC. (2018). What works for wellbeing? A systematic review of wellbeing outcomes for music and singing in adults. Perspectives in Public Health, 138(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757913917740391
10.
DienerE.SuhE. M.LucasR. E.SmithH. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276
DurkheimE. (1965). The elementary forms of the religious life. The Free Press: New York.
13.
FancourtD.WilliamonA. (2016). Attending a concert reduces glucocorticoids, progesterone and the cortisol/DHEA ratio. Public Health, 132, 101–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2015.12.005
14.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior research methods, 39(2), 175–191.
15.
FritzM. S.MacKinnonD. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science, 18(3), 233–239.
16.
GabrielS.ParavatiE. (2021). If music be the food of love, play on: Four ways that music may lead to social connection. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 44.
17.
GabrielS.NaiduE.ParavatiE.MorrisonC. D.GaineyK. (2020). Creating the sacred from the profane: Collective effervescence and everyday activities. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 15(1), 129–154.
18.
GabrielS.ReadJ. P.YoungA. F.BachrachR. L.TroisiJ. D. (2017). Social surrogate use in those exposed to trauma: I get by with a little help from my (fictional) friends. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 36(1), 41–63. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2017.36.1.41
19.
GilesD. C. (2002). Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology, 4(3), 279–305.
20.
GreenM. C.BrockT. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701
21.
GroarkeJ. M.HoganM. J. (2016). Enhancing wellbeing: An emerging model of the adaptive functions of music listening. Psychology of Music, 44(4), 769–791. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735615591844
22.
HamiltonD. L.ShermanS. J.LickelB. (1998). Perceiving social groups: The importance of the entitativity continuum. In SedikidesC.SchoplerJ.InskoC. A. (Eds.), Intergroup cognition and intergroup behavior (pp. 47–74). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
23.
IsotalusP. (1995). Friendship through screen: Review of parasocial relationship. Nordicom Review, 1(1995), 59–64.
24.
KeltnerD.HaidtJ. (2003). Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 17(2), 297–314.
25.
KimJ. H. (2019). Multicollinearity and misleading statistical results. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 72(6), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.19087
26.
KingL. A.HicksJ. A.KrullJ. L.Del GaisoA. K. (2006). Positive affect and the experience of meaning in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(1), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.179
27.
KruegerP. J. (2014). Doing ethnography in music education. The Oxford.
28.
LakensD. (2010). Movement synchrony and perceived entitativity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(5), 701–708.
29.
LamontA. (2011). University students’ strong experiences of music: Pleasure, engagement, and meaning. Musicae Scientiae, 15(2), 229–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864911403368
30.
LoerschC.ArbuckleN. L. (2013). Unraveling the mystery of music: music as an evolved group process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(5), 777.
31.
MauryS.RickardN. (2016). Wellbeing in the classroom: How an evolutionary perspective on human musicality can inform music education. Australian Journal of Music Education, 50(1), 3–15.
32.
MonroyM.KeltnerD. (2023). Awe as a pathway to mental and physical health. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18(2), 309–320.
33.
MuthénB.MuthénL. (2017). Mplus. In Handbook of item response theory (pp. 507–518). Chapman and Hall/CRC.
34.
NaiduE.GabrielS.WildschutT.SedikidesC. (2023). Reliving the good old days: Nostalgia increases psychological wellbeing through collective effervescence. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 15(1), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506221149813
35.
PáezD.RiméB.BasabeN.WlodarczykA.ZumetaL. (2015). Psychosocial effects of perceived emotional synchrony in collective gatherings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(5),711–729. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000014
36.
ParavatiE.NaiduE. S.GabrielS. (revise and resubmit). Thank you for the music: Music as a social surrogate that protects against social threats.
37.
PerseE. M.RubinR. B. (1989). Attribution in social and parasocial relationships. Communication Research, 16(1), 59–77.
38.
PinelE. C.LongA. E.LandauM. J.AlexanderK.PyszczynskiT. (2006). Seeing I to I: A pathway to interpersonal connectedness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(2), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.2.243
39.
PizarroJ. J.ZumetaL. N.BouchatP.WłodarczykA.RiméB.BasabeN.. . . PáezD. (2022). Emotional processes, collective behavior, and social movements: A meta-analytic review of collective effervescence outcomes during collective gatherings and demonstrations. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 974683.
40.
RheinbergF.VollmeyerR.EngeserS. (2003). Die Erfassung des Flow-Erlebens [The assessment of flow experience]. In Stiensmeier-PelsterJ.RheinbergF. (Eds.), Diagnostik von Motivation und Selbstkonzept (pp. 261–279). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
41.
RiméB.PáezD. (2023). Why we gather: A new look, empirically documented, at Émile Durkheim’s theory of collective assemblies and collective effervescence. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18(6), 1306–1330. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221146388
RoutledgeC.ArndtJ.WildschutT.SedikidesC.HartC. M.JuhlJ.VingerhoetsA. J.SchlotzW. (2011). The past makes the present meaningful: Nostalgia as an existential resource. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(3), 638–652. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024292
44.
RubinR. B.McHughM. P. (1987). Development of parasocial interaction relationships. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 31(3), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838158709386664
45.
SchlegelR.J.HicksJ.A. (2011). The true self and psychological health: Emerging evidence and future directions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5: 989–1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00401.x
46.
SchrammH.HartmannT. (2008). The PSI-Process Scales. A new measure to assess the intensity and breadth of parasocial processes. Communications, 33(4), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2008.025
SilviaP. J.FaynK.NusbaumE. C.BeatyR. E. (2015). Openness to experience and awe in response to nature and music: Personality and profound aesthetic experiences. Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts, 9(4), 376.
StegerM. F.FrazierP.OishiS.KalerM. (2006). The meaning in life questionnaire: assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of counseling psychology, 53(1), 80. Doi:10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.80
51.
StegerM. F.FrazierP.OishiS.KalerM. (2009). Meaning. The Encyclopaedia of Positive Psychology, 627–632.
52.
SwannW. B.Jr.JettenJ.GómezÁ.WhitehouseH.BastianB. (2012). When group membership gets personal: A theory of identity fusion. Psychological Review, 119(3), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028589
53.
TibshiraniR. J.EfronB. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. Monographs on statistics and applied probability, 57(1).
54.
WlodarczykA.ZumetaL.BasabeN.RiméB.PáezD. (2023). Religious and secular collective gatherings, perceived emotional synchrony and self-transcendent emotions: two longitudinal studies. Current Psychology, 42(6), 4754–4771.
55.
WlodarczykA.ZumetaL.PizarroJ. J.BouchatP.HatibovicF.BasabeN.RiméB. (2020). Perceived emotional synchrony in collective gatherings: Validation of a short scale and proposition of an integrative measure. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1721. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01721
56.
WolfE. J.HarringtonK. M.ClarkS. L.MillerM. W. (2013). Sample size requirements for structural equation models: An evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76(6), 913–934. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413495237
57.
WoodE. H.KinnunenM. (2020). Emotion, memory and re-collective value: Shared festival experiences. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(3), 1275–1298.
58.
XygalatasD.KonvalinkaI.BulbuliaJ.RoepstorffA. (2011). Quantifying collective effervescence: Heart-rate dynamics at a fire-walking ritual. Communicative & Integrative Biology, 4(6), 735–738.
59.
YadenD. B.KaufmanS. B.HydeE.ChiricoA.GaggioliA.ZhangJ. W.KeltnerD. (2019). The development of the Awe Experience Scale (AWE-S): A multifactorial measure for a complex emotion. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 14(4), 474–488.
60.
ZumetaL.BasabeN.WlodarczykA.BobowikM.PaezD. (2016). Shared flow and positive collective gatherings. Anales de Psicología / Annals of Psychology, 32(3), 717–727. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.32.3.261651
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
