The co-occurrence of a neutral stimulus with affective stimuli typically causes the neutral stimulus’s evaluation to shift toward the affective stimuli’s valence. Does that assimilative effect occur even when one knows the co-occurrence is due to an opposition relation between the stimuli (e.g., Batman stops crime)? Previous evidence tentatively supported that possibility, based on results compatible with an assimilative effect obscured by a larger contrast effect of the opposition relation (e.g., people like Batman less than expected, perhaps due to his co-occurrence with crime). We report three experiments (N = 802) in which participants preferred stimuli that stopped positive events over stimuli that stopped negative events—an assimilative effect of co-occurrence, unobscured by a contrast effect, despite comprehending the opposition relation and its evaluative implications. Our findings suggest that the assimilative effect of co-occurrence is potentially ubiquitous, not limited only to co-occurrence due to relations that suggest valence similarity.
AjzenI.FishbeinM. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior. In AlbarracínD.JohnsonB. T.ZannaM. P. (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 173–221). Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
BadingK.BarthM.RothermundK.AustF.StahlC. (2022). Does mere co-occurrence affect evaluation? MPT modelling of relational evaluative conditioning cannot (yet) tell [Preprint]. PsychArchives. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.5381
3.
BadingK.StahlC.RothermundK. (2020). Why a standard IAT effect cannot provide evidence for association formation: The role of similarity construction. Cognition and Emotion, 34(1), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2019.1604322
4.
Bar-AnanY.MoranT. (2018). Simple first: A skeleton for an evaluative learning model. Social Psychological Bulletin, 13(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.5964/spb.v13i3.28761
5.
Bar-AnanY.NosekB. A.VianelloM. (2009). The sorting paired features task: A measure of association strengths. Experimental psychology, 56(5), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.56.5.329
6.
De HouwerJ. (2006). Using the Implicit Association Test does not rule out an impact of conscious propositional knowledge on evaluative conditioning. Learning and Motivation, 37(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2005.12.002
7.
De HouwerJ. (2007). A conceptual and theoretical analysis of evaluative conditioning. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10, 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600006491
8.
De HouwerJ. (2009). The propositional approach to associative learning as an alternative for association formation models. Learning & Behavior, 37(1), 1–20.
9.
De HouwerJ. (2018). Propositional models of evaluative conditioning. Social Psychological Bulletin, 13(3), Article e28046. https://doi.org/10.5964/spb.v13i3.28046
10.
De HouwerJ.BaeyensF.VansteenwegenD.EelenP. (2000). Evaluative conditioning in the picture–picture paradigm with random assignment of conditioned stimuli to unconditioned stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 26(2), 237–242.
11.
De HouwerJ.ThomasS.BaeyensF. (2001). Association learning of likes and dislikes: A review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. Psychological Bulletin, 127(6), 853–869.
12.
De HouwerJ.Van DesselP.MoranT. (2020). Attitudes beyond associations: On the role of propositional representations in stimulus evaluation. In GawronskiB. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 61, pp. 127–183). Academic Press.
13.
FazioR. H.SanbonmatsuD. M.PowellM. C.KardesF. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 229. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939408408957
14.
FördererS.UnkelbachC. (2012). Hating the cute kitten or loving the aggressive pit-bull: EC effects depend on CS–US relations. Cognition and Emotion, 26(3), 534–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2011.588687
15.
GawronskiB.BodenhausenG. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 692–731.
16.
GawronskiB.BodenhausenG. V. (2011). The associative–propositional evaluation model: Theory, evidence, and open questions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 59–127.
17.
GawronskiB.BodenhausenG. V. (2018). Evaluative conditioning from the perspective of the associative-propositional evaluation model. Social Psychological Bulletin, 13(3), Article e28024.
18.
GawronskiB.BrannonS. M. (2021). Attitudinal effects of stimulus co-occurrence and stimulus relations: Range and limits of intentional control. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(12), 1654–1667. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220982906
19.
GreenL. J.LuckC. C.LippO. V. (2020). How disappointing: Startle modulation reveals conditional stimuli presented after pleasant unconditional stimuli acquire negative valence. Psychophysiology, 57(8), Article e13563. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13563
20.
HeyckeT.GawronskiB. (2020). Co-occurrence and relational information in evaluative learning: A multinomial modeling approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(1), 104–124. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000620
21.
HofmannW.De HouwerJ.PeruginiM.BaeyensF.CrombezG. (2010). Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 390–421. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018916
22.
HolmbergS.OscarssonH. (2011). Party leader effects on the vote. In AartsK.BlaisA.SchmittH. (Eds.), Political leaders and democratic elections (pp. 35–51). Oxford University Press.
23.
HuX.GawronskiB.BalasR. (2017). Propositional versus dual-process accounts of evaluative conditioning: I. The effects of co-occurrence and relational information on implicit and explicit evaluations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216673351
24.
HughesS.YeY.De HouwerJ. (2019). Evaluative conditioning effects are modulated by the nature of contextual pairings. Cognition and Emotion, 33(5), 871–884.
25.
KlauerK. C. (2015). Mathematical modeling. In GawronskiB.BodenhausenG. V. (Eds.), Theory and explanation in social psychology (pp. 371–389). Guilford Press.
26.
KukkenN.HütterM.HollandR. W. (2020). Are there two independent evaluative conditioning effects in relational paradigms? Dissociating the effects of CS-US pairings and their meaning. Cognition and Emotion, 34(1), 170–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2019.1617112
27.
LangP. J.BradleyM. M.CuthbertB. N. (2008). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual (Technical Report A-8). University of Florida.
MoranT.Bar-AnanY. (2020). The effect of co-occurrence and relational information on speeded evaluation. Cognition and Emotion, 34(1), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2019.1604321
30.
MoranT.Bar-AnanY.NosekB. A. (2016). The assimilative effect of co-occurrence on evaluation above and beyond the effect of relational qualifiers. Social Cognition, 34(5), 435–461. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2016.34.5.435
NosekB. A. (2005). Moderators of the Relationship Between Implicit and Explicit Evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(4), 565–584. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.134.4.565
33.
RozinP.MillmanL. (1987). Family environment, not heredity, accounts for family resemblances in food preferences and attitudes: A twin study. Appetite, 8(2), 125–134.
34.
SchimmackU.DienerE. (2003). Predictive validity of explicit and implicit self-esteem for subjective well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(2), 100–106.
35.
ZanonR.De HouwerJ.GastA.SmithC. T. (2014). When does relational information influence evaluative conditioning?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(11), 2105–2122. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.907324
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
