Research suggests that evaluations of an object can be jointly influenced by (a) the mere co-occurrence of the object with a pleasant or unpleasant stimulus (e.g., mere co-occurrence of object A and negative event B) and (b) the object’s specific relation to the co-occurring stimulus (e.g., object A starts vs. stops negative event B). Three experiments investigated the impact of cognitive load during learning on the effects of stimulus co-occurrence and stimulus relations. Counter to the shared prediction of competing theories suggesting that effects of stimulus relations should be reduced by cognitive load during learning, effects of stimulus relations were greater (rather than smaller) under high-load compared with low-load conditions. Effects of stimulus co-occurrence were not significantly affected by cognitive load. The results are discussed in terms of theories suggesting that cognitive load can influence behavioral outcomes via strategic shifts in resource allocation in response to task-specific affordances.
BaeyensF.EelenP.CrombezG.Van den BerghO. (1992). Human evaluative conditioning: Acquisition trials, presentation schedule, evaluative style and contingency awareness. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 30, 133–142.
2.
BarghJ. A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. In WyerR. S.SrullT. K. (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (pp. 1–40). Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
CorneilleO.StahlC. (2019). Associative attitude learning: A closer look at evidence and how it relates to attitude model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23, 161–189.
5.
CurranP. J.HussongA. M. (2009). Integrative data analysis: The simultaneous analysis of multiple data sets. Psychological Methods, 14, 81–100.
6.
DaviesS. R.El-DeredyW.ZandstraE. H.BlanchetteI. (2012). Evidence for the role of cognitive resources in flavor-flavor evaluative conditioning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 2297–2308.
7.
DedonderJ.CorneilleO.YzerbytV.KuppensT. (2010). Evaluative conditioning of high-novelty stimuli does not seem to be based on an automatic form of associative learning. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1118–1121.
8.
De HouwerJ. (2011). Why the cognitive approach in psychology would profit from a functional approach and vice versa. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 202–209.
9.
De HouwerJ. (2018). Propositional models of evaluative conditioning. Social Psychological Bulletin, 13(3), Article e28046.
10.
De HouwerJ.GawronskiB.Barnes-HolmesD. (2013). A functional-cognitive framework for attitude research. European Review of Social Psychology, 24, 252–287.
11.
De HouwerJ.MoorsA. (2012). How to define and examine implicit processes. In ProctorR.CapaldiJ. (Eds.), Implicit and explicit processes in the psychology of science (pp. 183–198). Oxford University Press.
12.
De HouwerJ.Van DesselP.MoranT. (2020). Attitudes beyond associations: On the role of propositional representations in stimulus evaluation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 61, 127–183.
13.
GastA.GawronskiB.De HouwerJ. (2012). Evaluative conditioning: Recent developments and future directions. Learning and Motivation, 43, 79–88.
14.
GawronskiB.ArmstrongJ.ConwayP.FriesdorfR.HütterM. (2017). Consequences, norms, and generalized inaction in moral dilemmas: The CNI model of moral decision-making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 343–376.
15.
GawronskiB.BodenhausenG. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692–731.
16.
GawronskiB.BodenhausenG. V. (2011). The associative-propositional evaluation model: Theory, evidence, and open questions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 59–127.
17.
GawronskiB.BodenhausenG. V. (2014). The associative-propositional evaluation model: Operating principles and operating conditions of evaluation. In ShermanJ. W.GawronskiB.TropeY. (Eds.), Dual-process theories of the social mind (pp. 188–203). Guilford Press.
18.
GawronskiB.BodenhausenG. V. (2015). Social-cognitive theories. In GawronskiB.BodenhausenG. V. (Eds.), Theory and explanation in social psychology (pp. 65–83). Guilford Press.
19.
GawronskiB.BodenhausenG. V. (2018). Evaluative conditioning from the perspective of the associative-propositional evaluation model. Social Psychological Bulletin, 13(3), Article e28024.
20.
GawronskiB.BrannonS. M. (in press). Attitudinal effects of stimulus co-occurrence and stimulus relations: Range and limits of intentional control. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
21.
GawronskiB.De HouwerJ. (2014). Implicit measures in social and personality psychology. In ReisH. T.JuddC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2nd ed., pp. 283–310). Cambridge University Press.
22.
GawronskiB.LukeD. M.NgN. L. (2021). Is less of an unhealthy ingredient healthy or unhealthy? Effects of mere co-occurrence and quantitative relations on attribute judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 97, 104193.
23.
GawronskiB.WaltherE.BlankH. (2005). Cognitive consistency and the formation of interpersonal attitudes: Cognitive balance affects the encoding of social information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 618–626.
24.
HeyckeT.GawronskiB. (2020). Co-occurrence and relational information in evaluative learning: A multinomial modeling approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149, 104–124.
25.
HofmannW.De HouwerJ.PeruginiM.BaeyensF.CrombezG. (2010). Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 390–421.
26.
HuX.GawronskiB.BalasR. (2017). Propositional versus dual-process accounts of evaluative conditioning: I. The effects of co-occurrence and relational information on implicit and explicit evaluations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 17–32.
27.
HughesS.YeY.Van DesselP.De HouwerJ. (2019). When people co-occur with good and bad events: Graded effects of relational qualifiers on evaluative conditioning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45, 196–208.
28.
HütterM.KlauerK. C. (2016). Applying processing trees in social psychology. European Review of Social Psychology, 27, 116–159.
29.
InzlichtM.SchmeichelB. J.MacraeC. N. (2014). Why self-control seems (but may not be) limited. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 127–133.
30.
IoannidisJ. P. A.MunafoM. R.Fusar-PoliP.NosekB. A.DavidS. P. (2014). Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: Detection, prevalence, and prevention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 235–241.
31.
KukkenN.HütterM.HollandR. (2020). Are there two independent evaluative conditioning effects in relational paradigms? Dissociating effects of CS-US pairings and their meaning. Cognition and Emotion, 34, 170–187.
32.
KurdiB.DunhamY. (2020). Propositional accounts of implicit evaluation: Taking stock and looking ahead. Social Cognition, 38, s42–s67.
33.
LakensD.ScheelA. M.IsagerP. D. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1, 259–269.
34.
MartinI.LeveyA. B. (1978). Evaluative conditioning. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1, 57–102.
35.
MieropA.HütterM.CorneilleO. (2017). Resource availability and explicit memory largely determine evaluative conditioning effects in a paradigm claimed to be conducive to implicit attitude acquisition. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 758–767.
36.
MoorsA.De HouwerJ. (2006). Automaticity: A conceptual and theoretical analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 297–326.
37.
MoranT.Bar-AnanY. (2013). The effect of object–valence relations on automatic evaluation. Cognition and Emotion, 27, 743–752.
38.
MoreyR. D.RouderJ. N. (2011). Bayes factor approaches for testing interval null hypotheses. Psychological Methods, 16, 406–419.
39.
MoshagenM. (2010). MultiTree: A computer program for the analysis of multinomial processing tree models. Behavioral Research Methods, 42, 42–54.
40.
PleyersG.CorneilleO.YzerbytV.LuminetO. (2009). Evaluative conditioning may incur attentional costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 35, 279–285.
41.
Van DesselP.GawronskiB.De HouwerJ. (2019). Does explaining social behavior require multiple memory systems?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23, 368–369.
42.
WilhelmO.HildebrandtA.OberauerK. (2013). What is working memory capacity, and how can we measure it?Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 433.
43.
YzerbytV. Y.CoullA.RocherS. J. (1999). Fencing off the deviant: The role of cognitive resources in the maintenance of stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 449–462.
44.
ZanonR.De HouwerJ.GastA. (2012). Context effects in evaluative conditioning of implicit evaluations. Learning and Motivation, 43, 155–165.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
