Research suggests that evaluations of an object can be simultaneously influenced by (a) the mere co-occurrence of the object with a pleasant or unpleasant stimulus (e.g., mere co-occurrence of object A and negative event B) and (b) the object’s particular relation to the co-occurring stimulus (e.g., object A starts vs. stops negative event B). Using a multinomial modeling approach to disentangle the two kinds of influences on choice decisions, three experiments investigated whether learners can intentionally control the relative impact of stimulus co-occurrence and stimulus relations. An integrative analysis of the data from the three experiments (N = 1,154) indicate that incentivized instructions to counteract effects of stimulus co-occurrence by focusing on stimulus relations increased the impact of stimulus relations without affecting the impact of stimulus co-occurrence. Implications for evaluative learning, intentional control, and public policy are discussed.
AustF.DiedenhofenB.UllrichS.MuschJ. (2013). Seriousness checks are useful to improve data validity in online research. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 527–535.
2.
BadingK.StahlC.RothermundK. (2020). Why a standard IAT effect cannot provide evidence for association formation: The role of similarity construction. Cognition and Emotion, 34, 128–143.
3.
BalasR.GawronskiB. (2012). On the intentional control of conditioned evaluative responses. Learning and Motivation, 43, 89–98.
4.
ChanM. S.JonesC. R.JamiesonK. H.AlbarracínD. (2017). Debunking: A meta-analysis of the psychological efficacy of message countering misinformation. Psychological Science, 28, 1531–1546.
5.
CorneilleO.HütterM. (2020). Implicit? What do you mean? A comprehensive review of the delusive implicitness construct in attitude research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 24, 212–232.
6.
CorneilleO.MertensG. (2020). Behavioral and physiological evidence challenges the automatic acquisition of evaluations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29, 569–574.
7.
CorneilleO.MieropA.StahlC.HütterM. (2019). Evidence suggestive of uncontrollable attitude acquisition replicates in an instructions-based evaluative conditioning paradigm: Implications for associative attitude acquisition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 85, Article 103841.
8.
CorneilleO.StahlC. (2019). Associative attitude learning: A closer look at evidence and how it relates to attitude model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23, 161–189.
9.
CurranP. J.HussongA. M. (2009). Integrative data analysis: The simultaneous analysis of multiple data sets. Psychological Methods, 14, 81–100.
10.
De HouwerJ. (2009). The propositional approach to associative learning as an alternative for association formation models. Learning & Behavior, 37, 1–20.
11.
De HouwerJ. (2011). Why the cognitive approach in psychology would profit from a functional approach and vice versa. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 202–209.
12.
De HouwerJ. (2018). Propositional models of evaluative conditioning. Social Psychological Bulletin, 13(3), Article e28046.
13.
De HouwerJ.Van DesselP.MoranT. (2020). Attitudes beyond associations: On the role of propositional representations in stimulus evaluation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 61, 127–183.
14.
GawronskiB.BalasR.CreightonL. A. (2014). Can the formation of conditioned attitudes be intentionally controlled?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 419–432.
15.
GawronskiB.BodenhausenG. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692–731.
16.
GawronskiB.BodenhausenG. V. (2011). The associative-propositional evaluation model: Theory, evidence, and open questions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 59–127.
17.
GawronskiB.BodenhausenG. V. (2015a). Social-cognitive theories. In GawronskiB.BodenhausenG. V. (Eds.), Theory and explanation in social psychology (pp. 65–83). Guilford Press.
18.
GawronskiB.BodenhausenG. V. (2015b). Theory evaluation. In GawronskiB.BodenhausenG. V. (Eds.), Theory and explanation in social psychology (pp. 3–23). Guilford Press.
19.
GawronskiB.BodenhausenG. V. (2018). Evaluative conditioning from the perspective of the associative-propositional evaluation model. Social Psychological Bulletin, 13(3), Article e28024.
20.
GawronskiB.De HouwerJ. (2014). Implicit measures in social and personality psychology. In ReisH. T.JuddC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2nd ed., pp. 283–310). Cambridge University Press.
21.
GawronskiB.MitchellD. G. V.BalasR. (2015). Is evaluative conditioning really uncontrollable? A comparative test of three emotion-focused strategies to prevent the acquisition of conditioned preferences. Emotion, 15, 556–568.
22.
GawronskiB.WaltherE.BlankH. (2005). Cognitive consistency and the formation of interpersonal attitudes: Cognitive balance affects the encoding of social information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 618–626.
23.
GreenL. J. S.LuckC. C.GawronskiB.LippO. (in press). Contrast effects in backward evaluative conditioning: Exploring effects of affective relief/disappointment versus instructional information. Emotion. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000701
24.
HeyckeT.GawronskiB. (2020). Co-occurrence and relational information in evaluative learning: A multinomial modeling approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149, 104–124.
25.
HuX.GawronskiB.BalasR. (2017). Propositional versus dual-process accounts of evaluative conditioning: I. The effects of co-occurrence and relational information on implicit and explicit evaluations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 17–32.
26.
HütterM.KlauerK. C. (2016). Applying processing trees in social psychology. European Review of Social Psychology, 27, 116–159.
27.
HütterM.SweldensS. (2018). Dissociating controllable and uncontrollable effects of affective stimuli on attitudes and consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 45, 320–349.
28.
KukkenN.HütterM.HollandR. (2020). Are there two independent evaluative conditioning effects in relational paradigms? Dissociating effects of CS-US pairings and their meaning. Cognition and Emotion, 34, 170–187.
29.
KurdiB.DunhamY. (2020). Propositional accounts of implicit evaluation: Taking stock and looking ahead. Social Cognition, 38, s42–s62.
30.
LewandowskyS.EckerU. K. H.SeifertC. M.SchwarzN.CookJ. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 106–131.
31.
MoorsA. (2016). Automaticity: Componential, causal, and mechanistic explanations. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 263–287.
32.
MoranT.Bar-AnanY. (2013). The effect of object–valence relations on automatic evaluation. Cognition and Emotion, 27, 743–752.
33.
MoshagenM. (2010). multiTree: A computer program for the analysis of multinomial processing tree models. Behavioral Research Methods, 42, 42–54.
34.
NebenzahlI. D.JaffeE. D. (1998). Ethical dimensions of advertising executions. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 805–817.
35.
NoarS. M.FrancisD. B.BridgesC.SontagJ. M.RibisilK. M.BrewerN. T. (2016). The impact of strengthening cigarette pack warnings: Systematic review of longitudinal observational studies. Social Science and Medicine, 164, 118–129.
36.
OppenheimerD. M.MeyvisT.DavidenkoN. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867–872.
37.
PetersK. R.GawronskiB. (2011). Are we puppets on a string? Comparing the impact of contingency and validity on implicit and explicit evaluations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 557–569.
Van DesselP.GawronskiB.De HouwerJ. (2019). Does explaining social behavior require multiple memory systems?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23, 368–369.
40.
ZanonR.De HouwerJ.GastA. (2012). Context effects in evaluative conditioning of implicit evaluations. Learning and Motivation, 43, 155–165.
41.
ZanonR.De HouwerJ.GastA.SmithC. T. (2014). When does relational information influence evaluative conditioning?The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 2105–2122.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
