To provide deeper insights into the relationships between psychopathic traits and utilitarian moral judgment, we studied N = 702 adults using three psychopathy scales: (a) the Levenson’s Self-report Psychopathy Scale; (b) the Psychopathic Personality Inventory; and (c) the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure; and three measures of utilitarian moral judgment: (a) trolley dilemmas; (b) the Consequences, Norms, and Inaction (CNI) model of moral decision-making; and (c) the Oxford Utilitarianism Scale. When using the traditional approach to moral judgment (i.e., trolley dilemmas, instrumental harm, traditional score from the CNI model), we found that higher levels of psychopathic traits were associated with a higher utilitarian tendency. When using the modeling approach, we found that a higher level of psychopathic traits was related to weaker sensitivity to moral norms and less action averse in morally problematic situations. In addition, we found negative associations between impartial beneficence and all psychopathy scores.
BartelsD. M.PizarroD. A. (2011). The mismeasure of morals: Antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas. Cognition, 121, 154–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.05.010
BlaisJ.SolodukhinE.ForthA. E. (2014). A meta-analysis exploring the relationship between psychopathy and instrumental versus reactive violence. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41, 797–821. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854813519629
4.
CaleE. M.LilienfeldS. O. (2002). Sex differences in psychopathy and antisocial personality disorder. A review and integration. Clinical Psychology Review, 22, 1179–1207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(01)00125-8
5.
CleckleyH. (1941). The mask of sanity. Mosby.
6.
ConwayP.GawronskiB. (2013). Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: A process dissociation approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 216–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031021
7.
ConwayP.Goldstein-GreenwoodJ.PolacekD.GreeneJ. D. (2018). Sacrificial utilitarian judgments do reflect concern for the greater good: Clarification via process dissociation and the judgments of philosophers. Cognition, 179, 241–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.018
8.
CooperB. S.HervéH.YuilleJ. C. (2007). Psychopathy and memory for violence. The International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 6, 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2007.10471257
9.
CroneD. L.LahamS. M. (2017). Utilitarian preferences or action preferences? De-confounding action and moral code in sacrificial dilemmas. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 476–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.09.022
10.
CroweM. L.WeissB. M.SleepC. E.HarrisA. M.CarterN. T.LynamD. R.MillerJ. D. (2021). Fearless Dominance/Boldness is not strongly related to externalizing behaviors: An item response-based analysis. Assessment, 28, 413–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191120907959
11.
De BritoS. A.ForthA. E.Baskin-SommersA. R.BrazilI. A.KimonisE. R.PardiniD.FrickP. J.BlairR. J. R.VidingE. (2021). Psychopathy. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 7, Article 49. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-021-00282-1
DecetyJ.CowellJ. M. (2014b). Friends or foes: Is empathy necessary for moral behavior?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 525–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614545130
14.
EdensJ. F.MarcusD. K.LilienfeldS. O.PoythressN. G.Jr. (2006). Psychopathic, not psychopath: Taxometric evidence for the dimensional structure of psychopathy. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.115.1.131
15.
EverettJ. A. C.KahaneG. (2020). Switching tracks? Towards a multidimensional model of utilitarian psychology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24, 124–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.11.012
16.
FootP. (1967). The problem of abortion and the doctrine of the double effect. Oxford Review, 5, 5–15.
17.
FriesdorfR.ConwayP.GawronskiB. (2015). Gender differences in responses to moral dilemmas: A process dissociation analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 696–713. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215575731
18.
GatnerD. T.DouglasK. S.AlmondM. F. E.HartS. D.KroppP. R. (2022). How much does that cost? Examining the economic costs of crime in North America attributable to people with psychopathic personality disorder. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000575
19.
GawronskiB.ArmstrongJ.ConwayP.FriesdorfR.HütterM. (2017). Consequences, norms, and generalized inaction in moral dilemmas: The CNI model of moral decision-making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 343–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000086
20.
GawronskiB.ConwayP.ArmstrongJ.FriesdorfR.HütterM. (2018). Effects of incidental emotions on moral dilemma judgments: An analysis using the CNI model. Emotion, 18, 989–1008. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000399
21.
GlennA. L.KolevaS.IyerR.GrahamJ.DittoP. H. (2010). Moral identity in psychopathy. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 497–505.
22.
GlennA. L.RaineA.SchugR. A.YoungL.HauserM. (2009). Increased DLPFC activity during moral decision-making in psychopathy. Molecular Psychiatry, 14, 909–911. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2009.76
23.
GreeneJ. D.NystromL. E.EngellA. D.DarleyJ. M.CohenJ. D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44, 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027
24.
GreeneJ. D.SommervilleR. B.NystromL. E.DarleyJ. M.CohenJ. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105–2108. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1062872
25.
GrothJ.CierpiałkowskaL. (2012). Pięcioczynnikowy model osobowości a profile psychopatii w grupie nieprzestępczej [The five-factor model of personality and psychopathy profiles in the non-criminal group]. Czasopismo Psychologiczne, 18, 107–118.
HervéH. (2017). Psychopathy across the ages: A history of the Hare psychopath. In HerveH.YuilleJ. C. (Eds.), The psychopath: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 31–55). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315085470
KahaneG.EverettJ. A. C.EarpB. D.CaviolaL.FaberN. S.CrockettM. J.SavulescuJ. (2018). Beyond sacrificial harm: A two-dimensional model of utilitarian psychology. Psychological Review, 125, 131–164. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000093
31.
KahaneG.EverettJ. A. C.EarpB. D.FariasM.SavulescuJ. (2015). “Utilitarian” judgments in sacrificial moral dilemmas do not reflect impartial concern for the greater good. Cognition, 134, 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.005
32.
KantI. (1916). Fundamental principles of the metaphysics of ethics. Longmans, Green.
KörnerA.DeutschR.GawronskiB. (2020). Using the CNI model to investigate individual differences in moral dilemma judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46, 1392–1407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220907203
35.
KroneisenM.HeckD. W. (2020). Interindividual differences in the sensitivity for consequences, moral norms, and preferences for inaction: Relating basic personality traits to the CNI model. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 46, 1013–1026. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219893994
36.
LeisticoA. M.SalekinR. T.DeCosterJ.RogersR. (2008). A large-scale meta-analysis relating the Hare measures of psychopathy to antisocial conduct. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-007-9096-6
37.
LevensonM. R.KiehlK. A.FitzpatrickC. M. (1995). Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.68.1.151
38.
LilienfeldS. O.WattsA. L.SmithS. F.LatzmanR. D. (2018). Boldness: Conceptual and methodological issues. In PatrickC. J. (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 165–186). The Guilford Press.
39.
LilienfeldS. O.WidowsM. R. (2005). Psychopathic Personality Inventory-revised. Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
40.
LukeD. M.GawronskiB. (2021). Psychopathy and moral dilemma judgments: A CNI model analysis of personal and perceived societal standards. Social Cognition, 39, 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2021.39.1.41
41.
LukeD. M.NeumannC. S.GawronskiB. (2022). Psychopathy and moral dilemma judgment: An analysis using the four-factor model of psychopathy and the CNI model of moral decision-making. Clinical Psychological Science, 10, 553–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026211043862
42.
LykkenD. T. (1957). A study of anxiety in the sociopathic personality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55, 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047232
43.
LykkenD. T. (2018). Psychopathy, sociopathy, and antisocial personality disorder. In PatrickC. J. (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 22–38). The Guilford Press.
44.
LynamD. R.MillerJ. D. (2012). Fearless dominance and psychopathy: A response to Lilienfeld et al. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3, 341–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028296
45.
MarshallJ.WattsA. L.LilienfeldS. O. (2018). Do psychopathic individuals possess a misaligned moral compass? A meta-analytic examination of psychopathy’s relations with moral judgment. Personality Disorders, 9, 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000226
46.
McCordW.McCordJ. (1964). The psychopath: An essay on the criminal mind. Van Nostrand.
47.
MillJ. S. (1863). Utilitarianism. Parker, Son, and Bourn.
48.
MokrosA.HareR. D.NeumannC. S.SanttilaP.HabermeyerE.NitschkeJ. (2015). Variants of psychopathy in adult male offenders: A latent profile analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124, 372–386. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000042
49.
MoshagenM. (2010). MultiTree: A computer program for the analysis of multinomial processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 42–54. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.1.42
50.
NeumannC. S.UziebloK.CrombezG.HareR. D. (2013). Understanding the Psychopathic Personality Inventory (PPI) in terms of the unidimensionality, orthogonality, and construct validity of PPI-I and -II. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4, 77–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027196
PatilI. (2015). Trait psychopathy and utilitarian moral judgment: The mediating role of action aversion. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27, 349–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2015.1004334
53.
PatrickC. J. (2010a). Conceptualizing psychopathic personality: Disinhibited, bold, or just plain mean? In SalekinR. J.LynamD. R. (Eds.), Handbook of child and adolescent psychopathy (pp. 15–48). Guilford Press.
PatrickC. J. (2013). Conceptualizing psychopathy: Criminal and noncriminal variants. In HelfgottJ. B. (Ed.), Criminal psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 277–310). Praeger.
56.
PatrickC. J.DrislaneL. E. (2015). Triarchic model of psychopathy: Origins, operationalizations, and observed linkages with personality and general psychopathology. Journal of Personality, 83, 627–643. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12119
57.
PatrickC. J.FowlesD. C.KruegerR. F. (2009). Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: Developmental origins of disinhibition, boldness, and meanness. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 913–938. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579409000492
58.
PaulhusD. L.NeumannC. S.HareR. D. (2009). Manual for the Self-Report Psychopathy Scale. Multi-Health Systems.
59.
PaulhusD. L.NeumannC. S.HareR. D. (2017). Manual of the Hare Self-Report Psychopathy Scale. Multi-Health Systems.
60.
PilchI.SaneckaE.HylaM. (2015). Polska adaptacja skali TriPM do badania psychopatii w ujęciu triarchicznym [Polish adaptation of the TriPM scale to study psychopathy in triarchic approach]. Psychologia Społeczna, 4, 435–454. https://doi.org/10.7366/1896180020153506
61.
PlettiC.LottoL.BuodoG.SarloM. (2017). It’s immoral, but I’d do it! Psychopathy traits affect decision-making in sacrificial dilemmas and in everyday moral situations. British Journal of Psychology, 108, 351–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12205
62.
PorterS.WoodworthM. T.BlackP. J. (2018). Psychopathy and aggression. In PatrickC. J. (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 611–634). The Guilford Press.
63.
RogozaR.CieciuchJ. (2020). Dark Triad traits and their structure: An empirical approach. Current Psychology, 39, 1287–1302. doi:10.1007/s12144-018-9834-6
64.
RoyS.VizeC.UziebloK.van DongenJ. D. M.MillerJ. D.LynamD. R.BrazilI.YoonD.MokrosA.GrayN. S.SnowdenR.NeumannC. S. (2021a). The perils of untested assumptions in theory testing: A reply to Patrick et al. (2020). Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 12, 24–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000461
65.
RoyS.VizeC.UziebloK.van DongenJ. D. M.MillerJ.LynamD.BrazilI.YoonD.MokrosA.GrayN. S.SnowdenR.NeumannC. S. (2021b). Triarchic or septarchic? Uncovering the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure’s (TriPM) structure. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 12, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000392
SkeemJ. L.PolaschekD. L.PatrickC. J.LilienfeldS. O. (2011). Psychopathic personality: Bridging the gap between scientific evidence and public policy. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12, 95–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611426706
68.
SorokowskiP.MarczakM.MisiakM.BiałekM. (2020). Trolley Dilemma in Papua. Yali horticulturalists refuse to pull the lever. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27, 398–403. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01700-y
69.
TassyS.DeruelleC.ManciniJ.LeistedtS.WickerB. (2013). High levels of psychopathic traits alters moral choice but not moral judgment. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, Article 229. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00229
TurpinM. H.WalkerA. C.FugelsangJ. A.SorokowskiP.GrossmannI.BiałekM. J. (2020). The search for predictable moral partners: Predictability and moral (character) preferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 97, 104196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104196
72.
WygantD. B.PardiniD. A.MarshA. A.PatrickC. J. (2018). Understanding psychopathy: Where we are, where we can go. In PatrickC. J. (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 755–778). The Guilford Press.
