Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Trust plays a central role in social interactions. Recent research has highlighted the importance of others’ moral decisions in shaping trust inference: individuals who reject sacrificial harm in moral dilemmas (which aligns with deontological ethics) are generally perceived as more trustworthy than those who condone sacrificial harm (which aligns with utilitarian ethics). Across five studies (N = 1,234), we investigated trust inferences in the context of iterative moral dilemmas, which allow individuals to not only make deontological or utilitarian decisions, but also harm-balancing decisions. Our findings challenge the prevailing perspective: While we did observe effects of the type of moral decision that people make, the direction of these effects was inconsistent across studies. In contrast, moral similarity (i.e., whether a decision aligns with one’s own perspective) consistently predicted increased trust. Our findings suggest that trust is not just about adhering to specific moral frameworks but also about shared moral perspectives.

Keywords

trust cooperation moral psychology trolley dilemmas iterative decision-making

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bates

Kliegl

R. K.

Vasishth

Baayen

(2015). Parsimonious mixed models. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ arxiv.1506.04967

Bostyn

D. H.

Chandrashekar

S. P.

Roets

(2023). Deontologists are not always trusted over utilitarians: Revisiting inferences of trustworthiness from moral judgments. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 1665. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-27943-3

Bostyn

D. H.

Roets

(2017). Trust, trolleys and social dilemmas: A replication study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(5), e1–e7. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000295

Bostyn

D. H.

Roets

(2022). Sequential decision-making impacts moral judgment: How iterative dilemmas can expand our perspective on sacrificial harm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 98, 104244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104244

Brown

Sacco

D. F.

(2019). Is pulling the lever sexy? Deontology as a downstream cue to long-term mate quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(3), 957–976. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517749331

Cialdini

R. B.

Goldstein

N. J.

(2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015

Everett

J. A.

Faber

N. S.

Savulescu

Crockett

M. J.

(2018). The costs of being consequentialist: Social inference from instrumental harm and impartial beneficence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 200–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.07.004

Everett

J. A. C.

Pizarro

D. A.

Crockett

M. J.

(2016). Inference of trustworthiness from intuitive moral judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(6), 772–787. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000165

Goodwin

G. P.

Piazza

Rozin

(2014). Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(1), 148–168. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034726

10.

Graham

Nosek

B. A.

Haidt

Iyer

Koleva

Ditto

P. H.

(2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847

11.

Greene

J. D.

Nystrom

L. E.

Engell

A. D.

Darley

J. M.

Cohen

J. D.

(2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44(2), 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027

12.

Kant

(1959). Foundation of the metaphysics of morals ( Beck

L. W.

, Trans.). Bobbs- Merrill (Original work published 1785).

13.

Mill

J. S.

(1999). Utilitarianism. In Crisp

(Ed.), Utilitarianism (pp. 47–110). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1861)

14.

Plaks

J. E.

Robinson

J. S.

Forbes

(2022). Anger and sadness as moral signals. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(2), 362–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211025909

15.

R Core Team. (2023). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/

16.

Rom

S. C.

Conway

(2018). The strategic moral self: Self-presentation shapes moral dilemma judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.08.003

17.

Rom

S. C.

Weiss

Conway

(2017). Judging those who judge: Perceivers infer the roles of affect and cognition underpinning others’ moral dilemma responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69, 44–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.09.007

18.

Sacco

D. F.

Brown

Lustgraaf

C. J.

Hugenberg

(2017). The adaptive utility of deontology: Deontological moral decision-making fosters perceptions of trust and likeability. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 3(2), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-016-0080-6

19.

Shweder

R. A.

Haidt

(1993). The future of moral psychology: Truth, intuition, and the pluralist way. Psychological Science, 4(6), 360–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00582.x

20.

Smillie

L. D.

Katic

Laham

S. M.

(2021). Personality and moral judgment: Curious consequentialists and polite deontologists. Journal of Personality, 89(3), 549–564. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12598

21.

Weiss

Burgmer

Rom

S. C.

Conway

(2024). Taking the moral high ground: Deontological and absolutist moral dilemma judgments convey self-righteousness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 110, 104505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104505

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.61 MB

In Similarity We Trust: Like-Mindedness,Rather Than Just the Type of Moral Judgment,Drives Inferences of Trustworthiness

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material