The current meta-analysis addressed whether theistic religious beliefs are causally related to greater prejudice by analyzing 44 studies (Ntotal = 11,330) that used experimental designs—priming religion and then measuring negativity toward outgroups (e.g., LGBT and Muslim). The overall priming effect was significant but small (r = .06), indicating that priming religion increases prejudice. The implications of these results for the relation between religion and prejudice and for future work on religious priming are discussed.
*Al-KireR. L. (2018). Primed and prejudiced: Examining the effects of priming religious exemplars on prejudice toward Muslims [Unpublished master’s thesis, Northern Arizona University].
2.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Perseus.
3.
BarghJ. A.ChenM.BurrowsL. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.230
4.
*BassettJ. F.Van TongerenD. R. (2020). Examining the effects of scriptural primes on attitudes towards Christian and Muslim refugees [Unpublished manuscript].
5.
BlogowskaJ.SaroglouV.LambertC. (2013). Religious prosociality and aggression: It’s real. Scientific Study of Religion, 52(3), 524–536.
6.
*BloomB.-N.ArikanG.CourtemancheM. (2015). Religious social identity, religious belief, and anti-immigration sentiment. American Political Science Review, 109(2), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055415000143
7.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P. T.RothsteinH. R. (2010). A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 1, 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.12
8.
*ClobertM.SaroglouV.HwangK. K. (2015). Buddhist concepts as implicitly reducing prejudice and increasing prosociality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(4), 513–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215571094
9.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2003). Applied multiple correlation/regression analysis for the behavioral sciences. Taylor & Francis.
10.
*DeelD. (2014). The effects of positive and negative God-images on Christian undergraduates’ attitudes toward homosexuals [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northcentral University].
11.
DeslandesC.AndersonJ. R. (2019). Religion and prejudice toward immigrants and refugees: A meta-analytic review. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 29, 128–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2019.1570814
12.
*DolinskaB.JarząbekJ.DolinskiD. (2020). I like you even less at Christmas dinner! Prejudice level as a function of an approaching national or religious holiday. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 42(2), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2019.1695615
13.
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (2010). Intergroup bias. In FiskeS. T.GilbertD. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 1084–1121). John Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002029
14.
DoyenS.KleinO.PichonC. L.CleeremansA. (2012). Behavioral priming: It’s all in the mind, but whose mind?PLOS ONE, 7(1), Article e29081.
15.
*ErumW.TsangJ. (2011). Religious priming, transgressor religious group membership, and forgiveness [Unpublished data].
16.
FazioR. H.OlsonM. A. (2014). The MODE model: Attitude-behavioral processes as a function of motivation and opportunity. In ShermanJ. W.GawronskiB.TropeY. (Eds.), Dual process theories of the social mind (pp. 155–171). Guildford.
17.
FunderD. C.OzerD. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156–168.
18.
GervaisW. M.XygalatasD.McKayR. T.van ElkM.BuchtelE. E.AveyardS. R.Dar-NimrodS. I.Svedholm-HäkkinenA. M.RiekkiT.KlocováE. K.RamsayJ. E.BulbuliaJ. (2017). Global evidence of extreme intuitive moral prejudice against atheists. Nature Human Behavior, 1, Article 0151.
19.
*GiladC.StepanovaE. V. (2015). The effect of religious priming on attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 20(4), 188–196. https://doi.org/10.24839/2164-8204.jn20.4.188
20.
*GingesJ.PasekM. H.KellyJ. M.ShacklefordC.WhiteC. J. M.VishkinA.SmithJ.NorenzayanA.ShariffA. (2020). Thinking of God leads to more generosity to members of other religious groups [Unpublished data].
*HaggardM. C.KaelenR.SaroglouV.KleinO.RowattW. C. (2019). Religion’s role in the illusion of gender equality: Supraliminal and subliminal religious priming increases benevolent sexism. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 11(4), 392–398.
23.
HaidtJ. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Pantheon Books.
24.
HallD. L.MatzD. C.WoodW. (2010). Why don’t we practice what we preach? A meta-analytic review of religious racism. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 126–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309352179
25.
HoneL. S. E.MccauleyT. G.PedersenE. J.CarterE. C.McculloughM. E.HoneL. S. E.MccauleyT. G.PedersenE. J.CarterE. C.McculloughM. E. (2020). The sex premium in religiously motivated moral judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(6), 1621–1633. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000296
26.
*HowardS. (2016). The effects of Christian religious imagery on anti-Black attitudes [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tufts University].
27.
HowardS.SommersS. R. (2019). White religious iconography increases anti-Black attitudes. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 11(4), 382–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000144
28.
HunsbergerB.JacksonL. M. (2005). Religion, meaning, and prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 61(4), 807–826.
29.
HunterJ. E.SchmidtF. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). SAGE.
30.
*JenningsJ. (2013, August23). Religious motivation and racial prejudice [Paper presentation]. American Political Science Association Conference (APSA). SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2300612
31.
*JohnsonM. K. (2012). Better understanding the paradoxical relationship between religiosity and prejudice through priming religious concepts: An intergroup bias perspective [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Baylor University].
32.
*JohnsonM. K.RowattW. C.LaBouffJ. (2010). Priming Christian religious concepts increases racial prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(2), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550609357246
33.
*JohnsonM. K.RowattW. C.LaBouffJ. P. (2012). Religiosity and prejudice revisited: In-group favoritism, out-group derogation, or both?Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 4(2), 154–168. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025107
34.
*LaBouffJ. P. (2011). The ecological validity of priming religiousness: Context and culture [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Baylor University].
35.
*LaBouffJ. P.RowattW. C.JohnsonM. K.FinkleC. (2012). Differences in attitudes toward outgroups in religious and nonreligious contexts in a multinational sample: A situational context priming study. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 22(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2012.634778
36.
LaurinK.KayA. C.FitzsimonsG. M. (2012). Divergent effects of activating thoughts of God on self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(1), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025971
37.
NorenzayanA. (2013). Big Gods: How religion transformed cooperation and conflict. Princeton University Press.
38.
NorrisP.InglehartR. (2011). Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge University Press.
39.
*PopeA. R. D. (2017). Morality as an explanation for the co-occurrence of prosocial and antisocial attitudes and actions in the religious [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Saint Louis University].
40.
RamsayJ. E.PangJ. S.ShenM. J.RowattW. C. (2014). Rethinking value violation: Priming religion increases prejudice in Singaporean Christians and Buddhists. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 24(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2012.761525
41.
*RamsayJ. E.TongE. M. W.PangJ. S.ChowdhuryA. (2016). A puzzle unsolved: Failure to observe different effects of God and religion primes on intergroup attitudes. PLOS ONE, 11(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147178
42.
*RatchfordJ. L.Al-KireR. L. (2019). Profiles of thrift and generous giving toward in-group or out-group members: Examining the role of Christian nationalism [Unpublished manuscript, Baylor University].
43.
*Razpurker-ApfeldI.Shamoa-NirL. (2015). The influence of exposure to religious symbols on out-group stereotypes. Psychology, 6, 650–663. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2015.65063
44.
RosenthalR.RosnowR. L. (2008). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. McGraw-Hill.
45.
RowattW. C.CarpenterT.HaggardM. C. (2013). Religion, prejudice, and intergroup relations. In SaroglouV. (Ed.), Religion, personality, and prosocial behavior (pp. 170–192). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473915350
*RutchickA. M. (2010). Deus ex machina: The influence of polling place on voting behavior. Political Psychology, 31(2), 209–225. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20721286
48.
*Shamoa-NirL.Razpurker-ApfeldI. (2019a). Investigating stereotypes towards the outgroup: The role of religious concepts and group membership. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 41(3), 188–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2019.1610657
49.
*Shamoa-NirL.Razpurker-ApfeldI. (2019b). Religious primes and threat-perceptions as predictors of attitudes toward Muslims in Israel. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 54(2), 392–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-019-09509-z
50.
ShariffA. F. (2015). Does religion increase moral behavior?Current Opinions in Psychology, 6, 108–113.
51.
ShariffA. F.WillardA. K.AndersenT.NorenzayanA. (2016). Religious priming: A meta-analysis with a focus on prosociality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314568811
SimonsohnU.NelsonL. D.SimmonsJ. P. (2014). P-curve and effect size: Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614553988
54.
SrullT. K.WyerR. S. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(10), 1660–1672.
55.
SterneJ. A. C.SuttonA. J.IoannidisJ. P. A.TerrinN.JonesD. R.LauJ.CarpenterJ.RückerG.HarbordR. M.SchmidC. H.TetzlaffJ.DeeksJ. J.PetersJ.MacaskillP.SchwarzerG.DuvalS.AltmanD. G.MoherD.HigginsJ. P. T. (2011). Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. British Medical Journal, 343(7818), Article d4002. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4002
56.
*Van TongerenD. R.RaadJ. M.McintoshD. N.PaeJ. (2013). The existential function of intrinsic religiousness: Moderation of effects of priming religion on intercultural tolerance and afterlife anxiety. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 52(3), 508–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12053
57.
ViechtbauerW. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48. https://www.jstatsoft.org/v36/i03/
58.
WatanabeS.LaurentS. M. (2020). Past its prime? A methodological overview and critique of religious priming research in social psychology. Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion, 6(1–2), 22–46.
59.
WhitleyB. E. (2009). Religiosity and attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: A meta-analysis. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 19(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508610802471104
60.
*WilkinsC. L.WellmanJ. D.ToosiN. R.MillerC. A.LisnekJ. A.MartinL. A. (2022). Is LGBT progress seen as an attack on Christians? Examining Christian/sexual orientation zero-sum beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(1), 73–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000363
61.
*YilmazO.KaradöllerD. Z.SofuogluG. (2016). Analytic thinking, religion, and prejudice: An experimental test of the dual-process model of mind. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 26(4), 306–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2016.1151117
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
