Does Buddhism really promote tolerance? Based on cross-cultural and cross-religious evidence, we hypothesized that Buddhist concepts, possibly differing from Christian concepts, activate not only prosociality but also tolerance. Subliminally priming Buddhist concepts, compared with neutral or Christian concepts, decreased explicit prejudice against ethnic, ideological, and moral outgroups among Western Buddhists who valued universalism (Experiment 1, N = 116). It also increased spontaneous prosociality, and decreased, among low authoritarians or high universalists, implicit religious and ethnic prejudice among Westerners of Christian background (Experiment 2, N = 128) and Taiwanese of Buddhist/Taoist background (Experiment 3, N = 122). Increased compassion and tolerance of contradiction occasionally mediated some of the effects. The general idea that religion promotes (ingroup) prosociality and outgroup prejudice, based on research in monotheistic contexts, lacks cross-cultural sensitivity; Buddhist concepts activate extended prosociality and tolerance of outgroups, at least among those with socio-cognitive and moral openness.
AbelsonR. P.PrenticeD. A. (1997). Contrast tests of interaction hypotheses. Psychological Methods, 2, 315-328.
2.
AkramiN.EkehammarB.BerghR. (2011). Generalized prejudice: Common and specific components. Psychological Science, 22, 57-59.
3.
AronA.AronE. N.SmollanD. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal for Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596-612.
4.
AsbrockF.SibleyC. G.DuckittJ. (2010). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice: A longitudinal test. European Journal of Personality, 24, 324-340.
5.
BarghJ. A.ChartrandT. L. (2014). The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In ReisH. T.JuddC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2nd ed., pp. 311-344). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BatsonC. D.SchoenradeP.VentisW. L. (1993). Religion and the individual: A social-psychological perspective. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
7.
BlogowskaJ.SaroglouV. (2013). For better or worse: Fundamentalists’ attitudes toward outgroups as a function of exposure to authoritative religious texts. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 23, 103-125.
8.
BrandtM. J.RenyaC. (2010).The role of prejudice and the need for closure in religious fundamentalism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 715-725.
9.
ClobertM.SaroglouV. (2013). Intercultural non-conscious influences: Prosocial effects of Buddhist priming on Westerners of Christian tradition. International Journal for Intercultural Relations, 37, 459-466.
10.
ClobertM.SaroglouV.HwangK.-K.SoongW.-L. (2014). Eastern religious tolerance: A myth or a reality? Empirical investigations of religious prejudice in East Asian societies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45, 1515-1533.
11.
CohenA. B. (2009). Many forms of culture. American Psychologist, 64, 194-204.
12.
DavidsonR. J.HarringtonA. (Eds.). (2002). Visions of compassion: Western scientists and Tibetan Buddhists examine human nature. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
13.
DetenberB. H.CeniteM.KuM. K. Y.OngC. P. L.TongH. Y.YeowM. L. H. (2007). Singaporeans’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men and their tolerance of media portrayals of homosexuality. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19, 367-379.
14.
DijksterhuisA.AartsH.BarghJ. A.Van KnippenbergA. (2000). On the relation between associative strength and automatic behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 531-544.
15.
DuckittJ.SibleyC. G. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248-279.
16.
FlanaganO. (2013). The view from the East pole: Buddhist and Confucian tolerance. In ClarkeS.PowellR.SavulescuJ. (Eds.), Religion, intolerance, and conflict (pp. 201-220). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
17.
FunkeF. (2005). The dimensionality of right-wing authoritarianism: Lessons from the dilemma between theory and measurement. Political Psychology, 26, 195-218.
18.
GalenL. W. (2012). Does religious belief promote prosociality? A critical examination. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 876-906.
19.
GingesJ.HansenI.NorenzayanA. (2009). Religion and support for suicide attacks. Psychological Science, 20, 224-230.
20.
GoldbergE. (2006). Buddhism in the West: Transplantations and innovations. In BerkwitzS. C. (Ed.), Buddhism in world cultures: Comparative perspectives (pp. 285-310). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
21.
GreenwaldA. G.McGheeD. E.SchwartzJ. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
22.
GreenwaldA. G.NosekB. A.BanajiM. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197-216.
23.
GriesP.SuJ.SchakD. (2012). Toward the scientific study of polytheism: Beyond forced-choice measures of religious belief. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 51, 623-637.
24.
HarveyP. (1990). An introduction to Buddhism: Teachings, history, and practices. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25.
HayesA. F. (2013). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
26.
HillE. D.TerrellH. K.CohenA. B.NagoshiC. T. (2010). The role of social cognition in the religious fundamentalism–prejudice relationship. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49, 724-739.
27.
HunsbergerB.JacksonL. M. (2005). Religion, meaning, and prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 807-826.
28.
JiL. J.LeeA.GuoT. (2010). The thinking style of Chinese people. In BondM. H. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 155-167). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
29.
JohnsonM. K.RowattW. C.LaBouffJ. P. (2010). Priming Christian religious concepts increases racial prejudice. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 1, 119-126.
30.
JohnsonM. K.RowattW. C.LaBouffJ. P. (2012). Religiosity and prejudice revisited: In-group favoritism, out-group derogation, or both?Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 4, 154-168.
31.
KaelenR.KleinO.SaroglouV. (2013, July–August). Religious priming increases sexist attitudes, both benevolent and hostile ones. Paper presented at the 121st American Psychological Association Convention, Honolulu, HI.
32.
LaBouffJ. P.RowattW. C.JohnsonM. K.FinkleC. (2012). Differences in attitudes toward outgroups in religious and nonreligious contexts in a multinational sample: A situational context priming study. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 22, 1-9.
33.
Ma-KellamsC.Spencer-RodgersJ.PengK. (2011). I am against us? Unpacking cultural differences in ingroup favoritism via dialecticism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 15-27.
34.
NisbettR. E.PengK.ChoiI.NorenzayanA. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291-310.
35.
PengK.NisbettR. (1999). Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American Psychologist, 54, 741-754.
36.
PichonI.BoccatoG.SaroglouV. (2007). Nonconscious influences of religion on prosociality: A priming study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1032-1045.
37.
PichonI.SaroglouV. (2009). Religion and helping: Impact of target, thinking styles, and just-world beliefs. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 31, 215-236.
38.
PrestonJ. L.RitterR. S.HermandezJ. I. (2010). Principles of religious prosociality: A review and reformulation. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 574-590.
39.
RamboL. R.FarhadianC. (Eds.). (2014). The Oxford handbook of religious conversion. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
40.
RamsayJ. E.PangJ. S.Johnson ShenM.RowattW. C. (2014). Rethinking value violation: Priming religion increases prejudice in Singaporean Christians and Buddhists. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 24, 1-15.
41.
RowattW. C.CarpenterT.HaggardM. (2014). Religion, prejudice, and intergroup relations. In SaroglouV. (Ed.), Religion, personality, and social behavior (pp. 170-192). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
42.
SagivL.SchwartzS. H. (1995). Value priorities and readiness for out-group social contact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 437-448.
43.
SaroglouV. (2012). Is religion not prosocial at all? Comment on Galen (2012). Psychological Bulletin, 138, 907-912.
44.
SaroglouV. (2013). Religion, spirituality, and altruism. In PargamentK. I.ExlineJ. J.JonesJ. W. (Eds.), APA handbook of psychology, religion and spirituality (Vol. 1, pp. 439-457). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
45.
SaroglouV.CohenA. B. (2013). Cultural and cross-cultural psychology of religion. In PaloutzianR. F.ParkC. L. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (2nd ed., pp. 330-356). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
46.
SaroglouV.DelpierreV.DernelleR. (2004). Values and religiosity: A meta-analysis of studies using Schwartz’s model. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 721-734.
47.
SaroglouV.DupuisJ. (2006). Being Buddhist in Western Europe: Cognitive needs, prosocial character, and values. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 16, 163-179.
48.
SchwartzS. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-65). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
49.
ShariffA. F.NorenzayanA. (2007). God is watching you: Priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science, 18, 803-809.
50.
Spencer-RodgersJ.WilliamsM.PengK. (2012). Culturally based lay beliefs as a tool for understanding intergroup and intercultural relations. International Journal for Intercultural Relations, 36, 169-178.
51.
SprecherS.FehrB. (2005). Compassionate love for close others and humanity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 629-651.
52.
TsangJ.-A.SchulwitzA.CarlisleR. D. (2012). An experimental test of the relationship between religion and gratitude. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 4, 40-55.
53.
Van de VijverF. J. R.LeungK. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
54.
Van PachterbekeM.FreyerC.SaroglouV. (2011). When authoritarianism meets religion: Sacrificing others in the name of abstract deontology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 898-903.
55.
VilaythongO. T.LindnerN. M.NosekB. A. (2010). “Do unto others”: Effects of priming the Golden Rule on Buddhists’ and Christians’ attitudes toward gay people. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49, 494-506.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
