Teaching researchers commonly employ group-based collaborative learning approaches in Teaching of Psychology teaching activities. However, the authors know relatively little about the effectiveness of group-based activities in relation to known psychological processes associated with group dynamics. Therefore, the authors conducted a meta-analytic examination of whether learning outcomes are moderated by aspects of group process and collaborative learning. Results indicated that (a) group duration of a brief period (one to three classes) was more effective than group duration lasting more than one-half semester, (b) high levels of participant interdependence were associated with greater learning outcomes, and (c) group activities incorporating a formal group project presentation evidenced significantly less robust learning outcomes than activities that did not include a formal group presentation. Based on the findings, the authors provide teaching suggestions that reflect how group processes may impact learning effectiveness.
AggarwalP.O’BrienC. L. (2008). Social loafing on group projects: Structural antecedents and effect on student satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Education, 30, 255–264.
2.
*AllegrettiC. L.FrederickJ. N. (1995). A model for thinking critically about ethical issues. Teaching of Psychology, 22, 46–48.
3.
American Psychological Association. (2007). APA guidelines for the undergraduate psychology major. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved March 27, 2007, fromwww.apa.org/ed/resources.html
4.
AusubelD. P.NovakJ. D.HanesianH. (1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Holt, Rienhart, and Wintson.
5.
BaconD. R. (2005). The effect of group projects on content-related learning. Journal of Management Education, 29, 248–267. doi:10.1177/1052562904263729
6.
BarkelyE. F.CrossK. P.MajorC. H. (2005). Collaborative learning techniques: A handbook for college faculty. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7.
*BizerG. Y. (2005). A business-game demonstration for the undergraduate industrial/organizational course. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 187–189.
8.
*BlessingS. B.BlessingJ. S. (2010). PsychBusters: A means of fostering critical thinking in the introductory course. Teaching of Psychology, 37, 178–182.
*BudesheimT. L.LundquistA. R. (1999). Consider the opposite: Opening minds through in-class debates on course-related controversies. Teaching of Psychology, 26, 106–110.
11.
CampbellD. J. (1988). Task complexity: A review and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 13, 40–52.
12.
*CarrollD. W. (2006). Thinking about historical issues: Debates in the history and systems course. Teaching of Psychology, 33, 137–140.
13.
*CatheyC. (2007). Power of peer review: An online collaborative learning assignment in social psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 34, 97–99.
14.
*CharlesworthJ. R., Jr.SlateJ. R. (1986). Teaching about puberty: Learning to talk about sensitive topics. Teaching of Psychology, 13, 215–217.
15.
CohenJ. (1990). Things I have learned (so far). American Psychologist, 45, 1304–1312.
16.
CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
17.
CohenS. G.BaileyD. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239–290.
18.
ColbeckC. L.CampbellS. E.BjorklundS. A. (2000). Grouping in the dark: What college students learn from group projects. Journal of Higher Education, 71, 60–83.
19.
Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning: BransfordJ. D.BrownA. L.CockingR. R. (Eds.) & Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice: M. S.DonovanJ. D.Bransford,J. WPellegrino,. (Eds.). (2001). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
20.
DiMatteoM. R. (2004). Variations in patients’ adherence to medical recommendations: A quantitative review of 50 years of research. Medical Care, 42, 200–209.
21.
DiMatteoM. R.GiordaniP. J.LepperH. S.CroghanT. W. (2002). Patient adherence and medical treatment outcomes: A meta-analysis. Medical Care, 40, 794–811.
22.
DocyF.SegersM.SluijsmansD. (1999). The use of self-, peer, and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24, 331–350.
23.
DriscollM. P. (2005). Psychology of learning for instruction (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
24.
*DrouinM. A. (2010). Group-based formative summative assessment relates to improved student performance and satisfaction. Teaching of Psychology, 37, 114–118.
25.
DunnD. S. (2000). Letter exchanges on statistics and research methods: Writing, responding, and learning. Teaching of Psychology, 27, 128–130.
26.
DuvallS. J.TweedieR. L. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463.
27.
*EndersC. K.LaurenceauJ.StuetzleR. (2006). Teaching random assignment: A classroom demonstration using a deck of playing cards. Teaching of Psychology, 33, 239–242.
28.
FalchikovN.GoldfinchJ. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education. A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70, 287–322.
29.
*FinkenL. L. (2003). The complexity of student responses to in-class debates in a human sexuality course. Teaching of Psychology, 30, 263–265.
30.
ForrestK. D.MillerR. L. (2003). Not another group project: Why good teachers should care about bad group experiences. Teaching of Psychology, 30, 244–246.
31.
FreemanS. A.DyrenfurthM. J. (2003/2004). Using peer assessments in team activities. Journal of Industrial Technology, 20, 2–8.
32.
*FriesenM. D.EllisB. J. (2008). Convergent validation of an interview-based personality assessment: A laboratory project. Teaching of Psychology, 35, 109–112.
33.
GagnéR. M.DriscollM. P. (1988). Essentials of learning for instruction (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
34.
GagnéR. M.MedskerK. L. (1996). The conditions of learning: Training applications. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
35.
*GierV. S.KreinerD. S. (2009). Incorporating active learning with PowerPoint-based lectures using content-based questions. Teaching of Psychology, 36, 134–139.
36.
GueldenzophL. E.MayG. L. (2002). Collaborative peer evaluation: Best practices for group member assessments. Business Communication Quarterly, 65, 9–20.
37.
HagerL. D. (2011). Tools for teaching cognitive psychology: Using public service announcements for education on environmental sustainability. Teaching of Psychology, 38, 162–165.
38.
HakeR. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement vs. traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64–74.
39.
*HallS. S.SeeryB. L. (2006). Behind the facts: Helping students evaluate media reports of psychological research. Teaching of Psychology, 33, 101–104.
40.
HallahanM.RosenthalR. (1996). Statistical power: Concepts, procedures, and applications. Behavioral Research & Therapy, 5/6, 489–499.
41.
HalonenJ. S.BosackT.ClayS.McCarthyM.DunnD. S.HillG. W.WhitlockK. (2003). A rubric for learning, teaching, and assessing scientific inquiry in psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 30, 196–208.
42.
Hart Research Associates. (2008). How should colleges assess and improve student learning? Employers’ views on the accountability challenge: A survey of employers conducted on behalf of the Association of American Colleges and Universities. Retrieved December 3, 2009, fromhttp://www.aacu.org
43.
HedgesL. V.PigottT. D. (2001). The power of statistical tests in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 6, 203–217.
44.
*HillmanJ.MartinR. A. (2002). Lessons about gay and lesbian lives: A spaceship exercise. Teaching of Psychology, 29, 308–311.
45.
HoganD. M.TudgeJ. R. H. (1999). Implications of Vygotsky’s theory for peer learning. In O’DonnellA. M.KingA. (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 39–65).Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46.
*HolmesJ. D. (2008). Teaching traits and constructs through scale construction: A need and a strategy. Teaching of Psychology, 35, 86–90.
47.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
48.
JosephA.PayneM. (2003, February). Group dynamics and collaborative group performance (pp. 368–371). Proceedings of the 34th Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Reno, NV.
49.
KarauS. J.WilliamsK. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681–706.
50.
KatayamaA. D.ShambaughR. N.DoctorT. (2005). Promoting knowledge transfer with electronic note taking. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 129–131.
51.
KellyJ.McGrathJ. E. (1985). Effects of time limits and task types on task performance and interaction of four person groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 395–407.
52.
*KoschmannN.WespR. (2001). Using a dining facility as an introductory psychology research laboratory. Teaching of Psychology, 28, 105–108.
53.
*LafosseJ. M.ZinserM. C. (2002). A case-conference exercise to facilitate understanding of paradigms in abnormal psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 29, 220–222.
54.
LandrumR. E.HettichP. I.WilmerA. (2010). Alumni perceptions of workforce readiness. Teaching of Psychology, 37, 97–106.
55.
LataneB.WilliamsK.HarkinsS. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 37, 822–832.
56.
*LawsonT. J.McDonoughT. A.BodleJ. H. (2010). Confronting prejudiced comments: Effectiveness of a role-playing exercise. Teaching of Psychology, 37, 257–261.
57.
LevineJ. M.MorelandR. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 585–634.
58.
*LineweaverT. T. (2010). Online discussion assignments improve students’ class preparation. Teaching of Psychology, 37, 204–209.
59.
*MadsenS. D.Van AbbemaD. L.AllenC. C.SchmidtR. E. (2006). Questioning claims of baby genius: Students evaluate advertisements of infant stimulation products. Teaching of Psychology, 33, 134–137.
60.
MarchantG. J. (2002). Student reading of assigned articles: Will this be on the test?Teaching of Psychology, 29, 49–51.
61.
MarrM. B. (1997). Cooperative learning: A brief review. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 13, 7–20.
62.
*MaynardA. M.MaynardD. C.RoweK. A. (2004). Exposure to the fields of psychology: Evaluation of an introductory psychology project. Teaching of Psychology, 31, 37–40.
63.
MeyersS. A. (1997). Increasing student participation and productivity in small-group activities for psychology classes. Teaching of Psychology, 24, 105–115.
64.
MichaelsenL. K. (1992) Team learning: a comprehensive approach for harnessing the power of small groups in higher education. To Improve the Academy, 11, 107–122.
65.
MichaelsenL. K.SweetM. (2008). The essential elements of team-based learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 116, 7–27.
66.
*MillisK. K. (2001). Comparing two collaborative projects in a cognitive psychology course. Teaching of Psychology, 28, 263–265.
67.
*MiserandinoM. (2007). Heeeere’s Johnny: A case study in the five factor model of personality. Teaching of Psychology, 34, 37–40.
68.
NevidJ. S.LampmannJ. L. (2003). Effects on content acquisition of signaling key concepts in text material. Teaching of Psychology, 30, 227–230.
69.
*PawlowL. A. (2010). Standardized tests and other criteria in admissions decisions: A classroom activity. Teaching of Psychology, 37, 190–192.
70.
PenningrothS. L.DespainL. H.GrayM. J. (2007). A course designed to improve psychological critical thinking. Teaching of Psychology, 34, 153–157.
71.
*PerkinsD. V.SarisR. N. (2001). A “jigsaw classroom” technique for undergraduate statistics courses. Teaching of Psychology, 28, 111–113.
72.
*PettijohnT. F.PerelliE. G. (2005). Using group web page and video clip creation exercises in introductory psychology courses. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 54–56.
73.
PettyR.HarkinsS.WilliamsK.LataneB. (1977). The effects of group size on cognitive effort and evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 579–582.
74.
PopeN. (2005). The impact of stress in self- and peer assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 51–63.
75.
RosellM. C.BeckD. M.LutherK. E.GoedertK. M.ShoreW. J.AndersonD. D. (2005). The pedagogical value of experimental participation paired with course content. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 95–99.
76.
RosenthalR. (1979). The “file drawer problem” and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638–641.
RosnowR. L.RosenthalR. (1989). Statistical procedures and the justification of knowledge in psychological science. American Psychologist, 44, 1276–1284.
79.
RuscioJ. (2003). Comparing Baye’s theorem to frequency-based approaches to teaching Bayesian reasoning. Teaching of Psychology, 30, 325–328.
80.
*SagarinB. J.Lawler-SagarinK. A. (2005). Critically evaluating competing theories: An exercise based on the Kitty Genovese murder. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 167–169.
81.
SavilleB. K.ZinnT. E.ElliottM. P. (2005). Interteaching versus traditional methods of instruction: A preliminary analysis. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 161–163.
82.
SchlenkerB. R.WeigoldM. F. (1989). Self-identification and accountability. In GiacaloneR. A.RosenfeldP. (Eds.), Impression management in the organization(pp. 21–43).Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
83.
*SchwarzmuellerA. (2006). Critiquing media depictions of forensic professionals: A project for students. Teaching of Psychology, 33, 205–207.
84.
SchwarzmuellerA. (2011). A multi-modal active learning experience for teaching social categorization. Teaching of Psychology, 38, 158–161.
85.
SharanS.SharanY. (1976). Small group teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
86.
*SimpsonK. E. (2008). Classic and modern propaganda in documentary film: Teaching the psychology of persuasion. Teaching of Psychology, 35, 103–108.
87.
SkiltonP. F.ForsythD.WhiteO. J. (2008). Interdependence and integration learning in student project teams: Do team project assignments achieve what we want them to?Journal of Marketing Education, 30, 57–65.
88.
SlavinR. E. (1988). Cooperative learning and student achievement. Educational Leadership, 46, 31–33.
89.
SlavinR. E. (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
90.
SlavinR. E. (1991). Synthesis of research of cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 48, 71–82.
91.
SlavinR. E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 43–69.
92.
SmithK. A.SheppardS. D.JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T. (2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 1–15.
SpringerL.StanneM. E.DonovanS. S. (1997). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Research Monograph 11, National Institute for Science Education, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
95.
*SungY. T.LinC. S.LeeC. L.ChangK. E. (2003). Evaluating proposals for experiments: An application of web-based self-assessment and peer-assessment. Teaching of Psychology, 30, 331–334.
96.
TetlockP. E. (1985). Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice. In ShawB. M.CummingsL. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 279–232). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
97.
*ThompsonW. B. (2004).Ten cooperative learning activities for the cognitive psychology course. Teaching of Psychology, 31, 134–136.
98.
ThorntonA.LeeP. (2000). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Its causes and consequences. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53, 207–216.
99.
*TimmermanT. A. (2000). Survey design and multiple regression: Frequently encountered, but infrequently covered. Teaching of Psychology, 27, 201–203.
100.
TomchoT. J.FoelsR. (2008). Assessing effective teaching of psychology: A meta-analytic integration of learning outcomes. Teaching of Psychology, 35, 286–296.
101.
TomchoT. J.FoelsR. (2009). The power of teaching activities: Statistical and methodological recommendations. Teaching of Psychology, 36, 96–101.
102.
TomchoT. J.FoelsR.RiceD.JohnsonJ.MosesT. P.WarnerD.WetherbeeR.AmalfiT. (2008). A review of ToP teaching strategies: Links to students’ scientific inquiry skills development. Teaching of Psychology, 35,147–159.
103.
*TomchoT. J.WolfeW. L.FoelsR. (2006). Teaching about psychological disorders: Using a group interviewing approach. Teaching of Psychology, 33, 184–188.
104.
ToppingK. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68, 249–276.
105.
WalkerA. (2001). British psychology students’ perceptions of group-work and peer assessment. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 1, 28–36.
106.
WalkerA. (2006). Group work in higher education: Are introverted students disadvantaged?Psychology Learning and Teaching, 6, 20–25.
107.
WebbN. M. (1992). Testing a theoretical model of student interaction and learning in small groups. In Hertz-LazarowitzR.MillerN. (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning (pp. 102–119). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
108.
WebsterD. G.MuirJ. J. (1995). Presenting physiological measures: Effectiveness of demonstration versus lecture. Teaching of Psychology, 22, 192–195.
109.
*WespR.Eshun, S. (2005). Teaching the principles of test validation in introductory psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 234–236.
110.
*WespR.MontgomeryK. (1998). Developing critical thinking through the study of paranormal phenomena. Teaching of Psychology, 25, 275–278.
111.
WestC. K.FarmerJ. A.WolffP. M. (1991). Instructional design: Implications from cognitive science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
112.
WheelanS. A. (2009). Group size, group development, and group productivity. Small Group Research, 40, 247–262.
113.
WheelanS. A.DavidsonB.TilanF. (2003). Group development across time: Reality or illusion. Small Group Research, 34, 223–245.
114.
WheelerE.McDonaldR. L. (1998, November). Using writing to enhance collaborative learning in engineering courses. 28th annual Frontiers in Education Conference, Tempe, AZ.
115.
YalomI. D.LeszczM. (2005). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (5th ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.
