This research takes a new perspective on the long-standing mystery of personality in negotiation, which has seen decades of null and inconsistent findings. Grounded in interactionist theories defining personality as consistency in behaviors when placed multiple times in the same situation, the investigation examines consistency in individuals’ behavioral profiles across negotiation partners. Such consistency supports efforts to identify enduring dispositions that can predict objective and subjective outcomes. A comprehensive set of behaviors related to negotiation was coded in a round-robin study using groups of four negotiators who each took turns working with each other person. Analysis using Kenny’s Social Relations Model revealed evidence for extensive actor effects (indicating consistency in negotiators’ behavior), as well as moderate partner effects (indicating consistency in counterparts’ behavior) and dyadic reciprocity (indicating similarity in the behavior of negotiators and counterparts). We conclude with optimism for investigating the effects of personality in negotiation.
AdairW. A.BrettJ. M. (2005). The negotiation dance: Time, culture, and behavioral sequences in negotiation. Organization Science, 16, 33–51.
2.
AmanatullahE. T.MorrisM. W.CurhanJ. R. (2008). Negotiators who give too much: Unmitigated communion, relational anxieties, and economic costs in distributive and integrative bargaining. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 723–738.
3.
AntonioniD. (2008). Relationship between the Big Five personality factors and conflict management styles. International Journal of Conflict Management, 9, 336–355.
4.
AschS. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258–290.
5.
AugustineA. A.LarsenR. J. (2012). Is a trait really the mean of states? Similarities and differences between traditional and aggregate assessments of personality. Journal of Individual Differences, 33, 131–137.
6.
AxelrodR. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books.
7.
BakanD. (1966). The duality of human existence. Rand McNally.
8.
BarleyS. R. (1991). Contextualizing conflict: Notes on the anthropology of disputes and negotiations. In LewickiR. J.SheppardB. H.BazermanM. H. (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (Vol. 3, pp. 238–257). JAI Press.
9.
BazermanM. H.CurhanJ. R.MooreD. A.ValleyK. L. (2000). Negotiation. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 279–314.
10.
BernieriF. J.DavisJ. M.RosenthalR.KneeC. R. (1994). Interactional synchrony and rapport: Measuring synchrony in displays devoid of sound and facial affect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 303–311.
11.
BernieriF. J.GillisJ. S.DavisJ. M.GraheJ. E. (1996). Dyad rapport and the accuracy of its judgment across situations: A lens model analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 110–129.
12.
BernieriF. J.ReznickJ. S.RosenthalR. (1988). Synchrony, pseudosynchrony, and dissynchrony: Measuring the entrainment process in mother-infant interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 243–253.
13.
BernieriF. J.RosenthalR. (1991). Coordinated movement in human interaction. In FeldmanR. S.RimeB. (Eds.), Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior (pp. 401–431). Cambridge University Press.
14.
BrettJ. M.ShapiroD.LytleA. (1998). Breaking the bonds of reciprocity in negotiation. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 410–424.
15.
BussD. M. (1987). Selection, evocation, and manipulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1214–1221.
16.
BussD. M.CraikK. H. (1983a). The act frequency approach to personality. Psychological Review, 90, 105–126.
17.
BussD. M.CraikK. H. (1983b). Why not measure that trait? Alternative criteria for identifying important dispositions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 934–946.
18.
CarverC. S.WhiteT. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333.
19.
CondonW. S.OgstonW. D. (1966). Sound film analysis of normal and pathological behavior patterns. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 143, 338–457.
20.
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 653–665.
21.
CôtéS.MoskowitzD. (1998). On the dynamic covariation between interpersonal behavior and affect: Prediction from neuroticism, extraversion, and agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1032–1046.
22.
CurhanJ. R.ElfenbeinH. A.XuH. (2006). What do people value when they negotiate? Mapping the domain of subjective value in negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 493–512.
23.
CurhanJ. R.PentlandA. (2007). Thin slices of negotiation: Predicting outcomes from conversational dynamics within the first 5 minutes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 802–811.
24.
DeRueD. S.ConlonD. E.MoonH.WillabyH. W. (2009). When is straightforwardness a liability in negotiations? The role of integrative potential and structural power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1032–1047.
25.
DeutschM. (1973). The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes. Yale University Press.
26.
DienerE.LarsenR. J. (1984). Temporal stability and cross-situational consistency of affective, cognitive, and behavioral responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 871–883.
27.
DimotakisN.ConlonD. E.IliesR. (2012). The mind and heart (literally) of the negotiator: Personality and contextual determinants of experiential reactions and economic outcomes in Negotiation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 183–193.
28.
DonohueW. A. (1981). Analyzing negotiation tactics: Development of a negotiation interact system. Human Communication Research, 7, 273–187.
29.
EisenkraftN.ElfenbeinH. A. (2010). The way you make me feel: Evidence for individual differences in affective presence. Psychological Science, 21, 505–510.
30.
ElfenbeinH. A. (2015). Individual differences in negotiation: A nearly abandoned pursuit revived. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 131–136.
31.
ElfenbeinH. A.CurhanJ. R.EisenkraftN.ShirakoA.BaccaroL. (2008). Are some negotiators better than others? Individual differences in bargaining outcomes. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1463–1475.
32.
ElfenbeinH. A.EisenkraftN.CurhanJ. R.DiLallaL. F. (2018). On the relative importance of individual-level characteristics and dyadic interaction effects in distributive negotiations: Variance partitioning evidence from a twins study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103, 88–96.
33.
EmersonR. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31–40.
34.
EpsteinS. (1979). The stability of behavior: On predicting most of the people much of the time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1097–1126.
35.
FisherR.UryW. (1981). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Houghton Mifflin.
36.
FisherR.UryW.PattonB. (1991). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in (2nd ed.). Penguin
37.
FleesonW. (2004). Moving personality beyond the person-situation debate: The challenge and the opportunity of within-person variability. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 83–87.
38.
FleesonW.GallagherP. (2009). The implications of big five standing for the distribution of trait manifestation in behavior: Fifteen experience-sampling studies and a meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1199–1210.
39.
FooM.Der ElfenbeinH. A.TanH. H.AikV. C. (2004). Emotional intelligence and negotiation: The tension between creating and claiming value. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15, 411–429.
40.
FromanL. A.CohenM. D. (1970). Compromise and logroll: Comparing the efficiency of two bargaining processes. Behavioral Science, 30, 180–183.
41.
FunderD. C. (2008). Persons, situations, and person-situation interactions. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 568–580). Guilford Press.
42.
FunderD. C. (2009). Persons, behaviors and situations: An agenda for personality psychology in the postwar era. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 120–126.
43.
HelgesonV. S.FritzH. L. (1999). Unmitigated agency and unmitigated communion: Distinctions from agency and communion. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 131–158.
44.
KendonA. (1970). Movement coordination in social interaction: Some examples described. Acta Psychologica, 32, 100–125.
45.
KennyD. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. Guilford Press.
KennyD. A.La VoieL. (1984). The Social Relations Model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 141–182.
48.
KennyD. A.MalloyT. E. (1988). Partner effects in social interaction. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12, 34–57.
49.
LawlerE. J.YoonJ. (1996). Commitment in exchange relations: Test of a theory of relational cohesion. American Sociological Review, 61, 89–108.
50.
LearyT. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. Ronald Press.
51.
LeikasS.LönnqvistJ.-E.VerkasaloM. (2012). Persons, situations, and behaviors: Consistency and variability of different behaviors in four interpersonal situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 1007–1022.
52.
LewickiR. J.LittererJ. A. (1985). Negotiation. Richard D. Irwin.
53.
LoewensteinJ.ThompsonL.GentnerD. (1999). Analogical encoding facilitates knowledge transfer in negotiation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 586–597.
54.
MagnussonD.EndlerN. S. (1977). Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology. Lawrence Erlbaum.
55.
MischelW. (1968). Personality and assessment. Wiley.
56.
MischelW. (2004). Toward an integrative science of the person. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 1–22.
57.
MischelW.ShodaY. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246–268.
58.
MobergP. J. (2001). Linking conflict strategy to the five-factor model: Theoretical and empirical foundations. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12, 47–68.
59.
MuellerJ. S.CurhanJ. R. (2006). Emotional intelligence and counterpart mood induction in a negotiation. International Journal of Conflict Management, 17, 110–128.
60.
MurphyN. A. (2005). Using thin slices for behavioral coding. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 29, 235–245.
61.
NadlerJ.ThompsonL.Van BovenL. (2003). Learning negotiation skills: Four models of knowledge creation and transfer. Management Science, 49, 529–540.
62.
NealeM. A. (1997). The new recruit. Dispute Resolution Research Center, Northwestern University.
63.
NealeM. A.NorthcraftG. B. (1991). Behavioral Negotiation Theory: A framework for conceptualizing dyadic bargaining. Research in Organizational Behavior, 13, 147–190.
64.
PennebakerJ. W.FrancisM. E. (1999). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC. Lawrence Erlbaum.
65.
PennebakerJ. W.GraybealA. (2001). Patterns of natural language use: Disclosure, personality, and social integration. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 90–93.
66.
PennebakerJ. W.KingL. A. (1999). Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1296–1312.
67.
PennebakerJ. W.MehlM. R.NiederhofferK. G. (2003). Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 547–577.
68.
PervinL. A. (1989). Persons, situations, interactions: The history of a controversy and a discussion of theoretical models. Academy of Management Review, 14, 350–360.
69.
PinkleyR. L.NealeM. A.BennettR. J. (1994). The impact of alternatives to settlement in dyadic negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 97–116.
70.
PruittD. G. (1983). Achieving integrative agreements. In BazermanM. H.LewickiR. J. (Eds.), Negotiating in organizations (pp. 35–49). SAGE.
71.
PruittD. G.CarnevaleP. J. (1993). Negotiation in social conflict. Brooks-Cole.
72.
PruittD. G.LewisS. A. (1975). Development of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 621–630.
73.
PutnamL. L.JonesT. S. (1982). Reciprocity in negotiations: An analysis of bargaining interaction. Communication Monographs, 49, 171–191.
74.
RaiffaH. (1982). The art and science of negotiation. Belknap.
75.
RosenthalR.RosnowR. L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
76.
RubinJ. Z.BrownB. R. (1975). The social psychology of bargaining and negotiation. Academic Press.
77.
SchönbrodtF. D.BackM. D.SchmukleS. C. (2012). TripleR: An R package for social relations analyses based on round-robin designs. Behavioral Research Methods, 44, 455–470.
78.
SharmaS.BottomW. P.ElfenbeinH. A. (2013). On the role of personality, cognitive ability, and emotional intelligence in predicting negotiation outcomes: A meta-analysis. Organizational Psychology Review, 3, 293–336.
79.
SullivanB. A.O’ConnorK. M.BurrisE. R. (2006). Negotiator confidence: The impact of self-efficacy on tactics and outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 567–581.
80.
TerhuneK. (1970). The effects of personality in cooperation and conflict. In SwingleP. (Ed.), The structure of conflict (pp. 193–234). SAGE.
81.
ThomasK. W.KilmannR. H. (1974). Thomas Kilmann conflict mode instrument. Xicom.
82.
ThompsonL. (1990). Negotiation behavior and outcomes: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 515–532.
83.
ThompsonL.HastieR. (1990). Social perception in negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 98–123.
ThompsonL.LoewensteinJ.GentnerD. (2000). Avoiding missed opportunities in managerial life: Analogical training more powerful than individual case training. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 60–75.
86.
Tickle-DegnenL.RosenthalR. (1990). The nature of rapport and its nonverbal correlates. Psychological Inquiry, 1, 285–293.
87.
WaltonR. E.McKersieR. B. (1965). A behavioral theory of labor negotiation: An analysis of a social interaction system. McGraw-Hill.
88.
WeingartL. R.BennettR. J.BrettJ. M. (1993). The impact of consideration of issues and motivational orientation on group negotiation process and outcome. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 504–517.
89.
WeingartL. R.ThompsonL. L.BazermanM. H.CarrollJ. S. (1990). Tactical behavior and negotiation outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 1, 7–31.
90.
WigginsJ. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 395–412.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
