Do Agency and Communion Explain the Relationship Between Perceiver and Target Effects in Interpersonal Perception? A Meta-Analysis on Generalized Reciprocity

Abstract

This meta-analysis examines generalized reciprocity, that is, the relationship between how people perceive others and how they are perceived by others. It tests the hypothesis that generalized reciprocity varies as a function of the content domain under investigation. Generalized reciprocity for attributes with primarily communal content (e.g., friendliness) was hypothesized to be more positive than generalized reciprocity for attributes with primarily agentic content (e.g., assertiveness). Sixty-four primary studies reporting correlations between perceiver and target effects with a total number of 17,561 participants were included in the analysis. Results of a multilevel meta-analytical random effects model showed that reciprocity correlations were slightly negative, but around zero, for primarily agentic attributes (r = −.05) and became more positive with increasing communal content (up to r = .18 for primarily communal attributes). Generalized reciprocity thus varied depending on the extent to which the regarded attribute is agentic versus communal.

Keywords

social relations model reciprocity agency and communion interpersonal perception interpersonal circumplex

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abele

A. E.

Hauke

Peters

Louvet

Szymkow

Duan

(2016). Facets of the fundamental content dimensions: Agency with competence and assertiveness-communion with warmth and morality. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1810. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01810

Abele

A. E.

Wojciszke

(2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 751–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751

Back

M. D.

Kenny

D. A.

(2010). The Social Relations Model: How to understand dyadic processes. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(10), 855–870. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00303.x

Bakan

(1966). The duality of human existence. An essay on psychology and religion. Rand Mcnally.

Bonito

J. A.

Kenny

D. A.

(2010). The measurement of reliability of social relations components from round-robin designs. Personal Relationships, 17(2), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01274.x

Campbell

D. T.

Miller

Lubetsky

O’Connell

E. J.

(1964). Varieties of projection in trait attribution. Psychological Monographs, 78(15), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093872

Dufner

Leising

Gebauer

J. E.

(2016). Which basic rules underlie social judgments? Agency follows a zero-sum principle and communion follows a non-Zero-sum principle. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(5), 677–687. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216640902

Eastwick

P. W.

Finkel

E. J.

Mochon

Ariely

(2007). Selective versus unselective romantic desire: Not all reciprocity is created equal. Psychological Science, 18(4), 317–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01897.x

Entringer

T. M.

Gebauer

J. E.

Paulhus

D. L.

(2021). Extracting agency and communion from the Big Five: A four-way competition. Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911211003978

10.

Ghaed

S. G.

Gallo

L. C.

(2006). Distinctions among agency, communion, and unmitigated agency and communion according to the interpersonal circumplex, Five-factor model, and social-emotional correlates. Journal of Personality Assessment, 86(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8601_09

11.

Grafeman

S. J.

Barry

C. T.

Marcus

D. K.

Leachman

L. L.

(2015). Interpersonal perceptions of narcissism in an at-risk adolescent sample: A social relations analysis. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 25(1), 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12088

12.

Gurtman

M. B.

(1992). Construct validity of interpersonal personality measures: The interpersonal circumplex as a nomological net. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(1), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.1.105

13.

Heynicke

Rau

Leising

Wessels

Wiedenroth

(2021). Perceiver effects in person perception reflect acquiescence, positivity, and trait-specific content: Evidence from a large-scale replication study. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(4), 839–848. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211039101

14.

Hogan

Jones

W. H.

Cheek

J. M.

(1985). Socioanalytic theory: An alternative to armadillo psychology. In Schlenker

B. R.

(Ed.), McGraw Hill series in social psychology and personality. The self and social life (pp. 175–198). McGraw Hill.

15.

Imhoff

Koch

(2017). How orthogonal are the Big Two of social perception? On the curvilinear relation between agency and communion. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(1), 122–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616657334

16.

IntHout

Ioannidis

J. P. A.

Borm

G. F.

(2014). The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14(1), Article 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-25

17.

John

O. P.

Robins

R. W.

(1993). Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits: The Big Five domains, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self. Journal of Personality, 61(4), 521–551.

18.

John

O. P.

Srivastava

(1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In Pervin

John

O. P.

(Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102–138). The Guilford Press.

19.

Kenny

D. A.

(1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. Distinguished contributions in psychology. The Guilford Press.

20.

Kenny

D. A.

(2004). Person: A general model of interpersonal perception. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(3), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_3

21.

Kenny

D. A.

(2019). Interpersonal perception, Second Edition: The foundation of social relationships. The Guilford Press.

22.

Kenny

D. A.

West

T. V.

(2010). Similarity and agreement in self-and other perception: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(2), 196–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309353414

23.

Knapp

Hartung

(2003). Improved tests for a random effects meta-regression with a single covariate. Statistics in Medicine, 22(17), 2693–2710. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1482

24.

Kurzius

Borkenau

Leising

(2022). Spontaneous interpersonal complementarity in the lab: A multilevel approach to modeling the antecedents and consequences of people’s interpersonal behaviors and their dynamic interplay. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(2), 244–264. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000347

25.

Leary

(1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. Ronald Press.

26.

Leising

Scherbaum

Locke

K. D.

Zimmermann

(2015). A model of “substance” and “evaluation” in person judgments. Journal of Research in Personality, 57, 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2015.04.002

27.

Locke

K. D.

Zheng

Smith

(2014). Establishing commonality versus affirming distinctiveness. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(4), 389–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613506718

28.

Mahaffey

K. J.

Marcus

D. K.

(2006). Interpersonal perception of psychopathy: A social relations Analysis. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2006.25.1.53

29.

Nestler

Lüdtke

Robitzsch

(2020). Maximum likelihood estimation of a social relations structural equation model. Psychometrika, 85(4), 870–889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-020-09728-z

30.

Nestler

Lüdtke

Robitzsch

(2022). Analyzing longitudinal social relations model data using the social relations structural equation model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 47(2), 231–260. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986211056541

31.

Page

M. J.

McKenzie

J. E.

Bossuyt

P. M.

Boutron

Hoffmann

T. C.

Mulrow

C. D.

Shamseer

Tetzlaff

J. M.

Akl

E. A.

Brennan

S. E.

Chou

Glanville

Grimshaw

J. M.

Hróbjartsson

Lalu

M. M.

Loder

E. W.

Mayo-Wilson

McDonald

. . .Moher

(2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

32.

Rau

Carlson

E. N.

Back

M. D.

Barranti

Gebauer

J. E.

Human

L. J.

Leising

Nestler

(2021). What is the structure of perceiver effects? On the importance of global positivity and trait-specificity across personality domains and judgment contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(3), 745–764. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000278

33.

Rau

Nestler

Geukes

Back

M. D.

Dufner

(2019). Can other-derogation be beneficial? Seeing others as low in agency can lead to an agentic reputation in newly formed face-to-face groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(1), 201–227. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000250

34.

R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical (Version R version 4.0.2) [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing https://www.R-project.org/

35.

Sadler

Woody

(2003). Is who you are who you’re talking to? Interpersonal style and complementarily in mixed-sex interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 80–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.80

36.

Schönbrodt

F. D.

Back

M. D.

Schmukle

S. C.

(2012). TripleR: An R package for social relations analyses based on round-robin designs. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 455–470. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0150-4

37.

Shrout

P. E.

Fleiss

J. L.

(1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420

38.

Sidik

Jonkman

J. N.

(2007). A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in combining results of studies. Statistics in Medicine, 26(9), 1964–1981. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2688

39.

Srivastava

Guglielmo

Beer

J. S.

(2010). Perceiving others’ personalities: Examining the dimensionality, assumed similarity to the self, and stability of perceiver effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 520–534. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017057

40.

Swann

W. B.

(1987). Identity negotiation: Where two roads meet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1038–1051. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1038

41.

Tiedens

L. Z.

Jimenez

M. C.

(2003). Assimilation for affiliation and contrast for control: Complementary self-construals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 1049–1061. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1049

42.

Tiedens

L. Z.

Unzueta

M. M.

Young

M. J.

(2007). An unconscious desire for hierarchy? The motivated perception of dominance complementarity in task partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(3), 402–414. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.402

43.

Triandis

H. C.

(2001). Individualism-collectivism and personality. Journal of Personality, 69(6), 907–924. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.696169

44.

Viechtbauer

(2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor Package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03

45.

Viechtbauer

(2015). Metafor package: Bias and sensitivity diagnostics. https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/155693/metafor-package-bias-and-sensitivity-diagnostics

46.

Viechtbauer

López-López

J. A.

Sánchez-Meca

Marín-Martínez

(2015). A comparison of procedures to test for moderators in mixed-effects meta-regression models. Psychological Methods, 20(3), 360–374. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000023

47.

Wiggins

J. S.

(1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(3), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.3.395

48.

Wiggins

J. S.

(1991). Agency and communion as conceptual coordinates for the understanding and measurement of interpersonal behavior. In Cicchetti

Grove

W. M.

(Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology: Essays in honor of Paul E. Meehl: Vol. 1. Matters of public interest; Vol. 2. Personality and psychopathology (pp. 89–113). University of Minnesota Press.

49.

Wojciszke

Abele

A. E.

(2008). The primacy of communion over agency and its reversals in evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(7), 1139–1147. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.549

50.

Ybarra

Chan

Park

(2001). Young and old adults’ concerns about morality and competence. Motivation and Emotion, 25(2), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010633908298

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB

0.04 MB

0.03 MB