Intergroup conflict is a salient aspect of our social world, yet relatively little is known about the way intergroup conflicts affect subsequent intergroup interactions. The present research employed a daily diary methodology to examine how cross-group friendship affects intergroup approach and avoidance after intergroup conflict. After assessing the diversity and quality of participants’ social networks, the daily social interactions of 60 participants were tracked for 10 days. Among individuals with low-quality or no cross-group friends, intergroup conflict on a preceding day predicted reductions in self-initiated intergroup interactions on the following day. However, individuals with close cross-group friends did not avoid intergroup interactions after intergroup conflict. This effect was mediated by the degree to which people with close cross-group friends sought social support from out-group members in the social interactions that followed intergroup conflict. The implications of these findings for maintenance of positive intergroup relations are discussed.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: SAGE.
2.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA, US: Addison-Wesley.
3.
AndersenS. M.GlassmanN. S.ChenS.ColeS. W. (1995). Transference in social perception: The role of chronic accessibility in significant-other representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 41–57.
4.
BlascovichJ.MendesW. B.HunterS. B.LickelB.Kowai-BellN. (2001). Perceiver threat in social interactions with stigmatized others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 253–267.
5.
BlascovichJ.MendesW. B.TomakaJ.SalomonK.SeeryM. (2003). The robust nature of the biopsychosocial model challenge and threat: A reply to Wright and Kirby. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 234–243.
6.
BrissetteI.CohenS. (2002). The contribution of individual differences in hostility to the associations between daily interpersonal conflict, affect, and sleep. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1265–1274.
7.
BrownR.EllerA.LeedsS.StaceK. (2007). Intergroup contact and intergroup attitudes: A longitudinal study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 692–703.
8.
CrispR. J.TurnerR. N. (2009). Can imagined interactions produce positive perceptions?: Reducing prejudice through simulated social contact. American Psychologist, 64, 231–240.
9.
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L.KawakamiK.HodsonG. (2002). Why can’t we just get along? Interpersonal biases and interracial distrust. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 8, 88–102.
10.
EisenbergerN. I.TaylorS. E.GableS. L.HilmertC. J.LiebermanM. D. (2007). Neural pathways link social support to attenuated neuroendocrine stress responses. NeuroImage, 35, 1601–1612.
11.
EllerA.AbramsD. (2004). Come together: Longitudinal comparisons of Pettigrew’s reformulated intergroup contact model and the common ingroup identity model in Anglo-French and Mexican-American contexts. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 229–256.
12.
GottliebB. H. (1985). Social networks and social support: An overview of research, practice, and policy implications. Health Education & Behavior, 12, 5–22.
13.
HallinanM. T.WilliamsR. A. (1987). The stability of students’ interracial friendships. American Sociological Review, 52, 653–664.
14.
HunterL.EliasM. J. (1999). Interracial friendships, multicultural sensitivity, and social competence: How are they related?Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 20, 551–573.
15.
IslamM. R.HewstoneM. (1993). Dimensions of contact as predictors of intergroup anxiety, perceived out-group variability, and out-group attitude: An integrative model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 700–710.
16.
KrullJ. L.MackinnonD. P. (2001). Multilevel modeling of individual and group level mediated effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 249–277.
17.
LazarusR. S.FolkmanS. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY, US: Springer Publishing Company.
18.
LevinS.van LaarC.SidaniusJ. (2003). The effects of ingroup and outgroup friendship on ethnic attitudes in college: A longitudinal study. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 76–92.
19.
MendesW. B.BlascovichJ.LickelB.HunterS. (2002). Challenge and threat during social interactions with White and Black men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 939–952.
20.
Mendoza-DentonR.Page-GouldE.PietrzakJ. (2006). Mechanisms for coping with status-based rejection expectations. In LevinS.van LaarC. (Eds.), Stigma and group inequality: Social psychological perspectives, The Claremont symposium on Applied Social Psychology (pp. 151–169). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21.
MullerD.JuddC. M.YzerbytV. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852–863.
22.
Page-GouldE.MendesW. B.MajorB. (2010). Intergroup contact facilitates physiological recovery following stressful intergroup interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 854–858.
23.
Page-GouldE.Mendoza-DentonR.AlegreJ. M.SiyJ. O. (2010). Understanding the impact of cross-group friendship on interactions with novel outgroup members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 775–793.
24.
PaoliniS.HewstoneM.CairnsE.VociA. (2004). Effects of direct and indirect cross-group friendships on judgments of Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland: The mediating role of an anxiety-reduction mechanism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 770–786.
25.
PaoliniS.HewstoneM.VociA.HarwoodJ.CairnsE. (2006). Intergroup contact and the promotion of intergroup harmony: The influence of intergroup emotions. In BrownRupertCapozzaDora(2006). Social Identities: Motivational.
26.
PettigrewT. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85.
27.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.
28.
PlantE. A.ButzD. A. (2006). The causes and consequences of an avoidance-focus for interracial interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 833–846.
29.
PlantE. A.DevineP. G. (2003). The antecedents and implications of interracial anxiety. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 790–801.
30.
ReynoldsK. A.HelgesonV. S.SeltmanH.JanickiD.Page-GouldE.WardleM. (2006). Impact of interpersonal conflict on individuals high in unmitigated communion. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 1595–1616.
31.
SchluchterM. D.ElashoffJ. T. (1990). Small-sample adjustments to tests with unbalanced repeated measures assuming several covariance structures. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 37, 69–87.
32.
SchrieffL. E.TredouxC. G.FinchilescuG.DixonJ. A. (2010). Understanding the seating patterns in a residence-dining hall: A longitudinal study of intergroup contact. South African Journal of Psychology, 40, 5–17.
33.
SheltonJ. N. (2000). A reconceptualization of how we study issues of racial prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 374–390.
34.
SmithT. W. (2002). Measuring inter-racial friendships. Social Science Research, 31, 576–593.
35.
StephanW. G.StephanC. W. (1985). Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 157–175.
36.
TaylorS. E. (2007). Social support. In FriedmanH. S.SilverR. C. (Eds.), Foundations of health psychology (pp. 145–171). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.
37.
TrawalterS.RichesonJ. A.SheltonJ. N. (2009). Predicting behavior during interracial interactions: A stress and coping approach. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 243–268.
38.
TurnerR. N.CrispR. J. (2010). Imagining intergroup contact reduces implicit prejudice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 129–142.
39.
TurnerR. N.CrispR. J.LambertE. (2007). Imagining intergroup contact can improve intergroup attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 427–441.
40.
WrightS. C.AronA.McLaughlin-VolpeT.RoppS. A. (1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross–group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 73–90.
