According to the extended contact hypothesis, knowing that in-group members have cross-group friends improves attitudes toward this out-group. This meta-analysis covers the 20 years of research that currently exists on the extended contact hypothesis, and consists of 248 effect sizes from 115 studies. The aggregate relationship between extended contact and intergroup attitudes was r = .25, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [.22, .27], which reduced to r = .17, 95% CI = [.14, .19] after removing direct friendship’s contribution; these results suggest that extended contact’s hypothesized relationship to intergroup attitudes is small-to-medium and exists independently of direct friendship. This relationship was larger when extended contact was perceived versus actual, highlighting the importance of perception in extended contact. Current results on extended contact mostly resembled their direct friendship counterparts, suggesting similarity between these contact types. These unique insights about extended contact and its relationship with direct friendship should enrich and spur growth within this literature.
*AboudF. E.FriedmannJ.SmithS. (2015). Direct and indirect friends in cross-ethnolinguistic peer relations. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 47, 68-79. doi:10.1037/a0037590
2.
*AbramsD.EllerA.BryantJ. (2006). An age apart: The effects of intergenerational contact and stereotype threat on performance and intergroup bias. Psychology and Aging, 21, 691-702. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.21.4.691
3.
*AdesokanA. A. (2014). Intergroup contact in nigeria: Nature and consequences of close interethnic relationships (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
4.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
5.
*AndrighettoL.MariS.VolpatoC.BehluliB. (2012). Reducing competitive victimhood in Kosovo: The role of extended contact and common ingroup identity. Political Psychology, 33, 513-529. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00887.x
6.
AronA.McLaughlin-VolpeT.MashekD.LewandowskiG.WrightS. C.AronE. N. (2004). Including others in the self. European Review of Social Psychology, 15, 101-132. doi:10.1080/10463280440000008
7.
*BeckerJ. C.WrightS. C.LubenskyM. E.ZhouS. (2013). Friend or ally: Whether cross-group contact undermines collective action depends on what advantaged group members say (or don’t say). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 442-455.
8.
BeelmannA.HeinemannK. S. (2014). Preventing prejudice and improving intergroup attitudes: A meta-analysis of child and adolescent training programs. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35, 10-24. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2013.11.002
9.
*BoykinC. M.AronA.WrightS. C.ZhouS.SpectorS. (2014, June). Extended contact among religious Christians, Jews, and Muslims in the U.S. Paper presented at the Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues, Portland, OR.
10.
CameronL.RutlandA. (2006). Extended contact through story reading in school: Reducing children’s prejudice toward the disabled. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 469-488. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00469.x
11.
*CameronL.RutlandA.BrownR. (2007). Promoting children’s positive intergroup attitudes towards stigmatized groups: Extended contact and multiple classification skills training. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 454-466. doi:10.1177/0165025407081474
12.
CameronL.RutlandA.BrownR.DouchR. (2006). Changing children’s intergroup attitudes toward refugees: Testing different models of extended contact. Child Development, 77, 1208-1219. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00929.x
13.
CameronL.RutlandA.HossainR.PetleyR. (2011). When and why does extended contact work? The role of high quality direct contact and group norms in the development of positive ethnic intergroup attitudes amongst children. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 193-206. doi:10.1177/1368430210390535
14.
*CapozzaD.FalvoR.FavaraI.TrifilettiE. (2013). The relationship between direct and indirect cross-group friendships and outgroup humanization: Emotional and cognitive mediators. TPM-Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 20, 383-398.
15.
*CapozzaD.FalvoR.TrifilettiE.PaganiA. (2013). Cross-group friendships, extended contact, and humanity attributions to homosexuals. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 114, 276-282.
16.
*CernatV. (2011). Extended contact effects: Is exposure to positive outgroup exemplars sufficient or is interaction with ingroup members necessary?The Journal of Social Psychology, 151, 737-753. doi:10.1080/00224545.2010.522622
17.
*ChristO.HewstoneM.TauschN.WagnerU.VociA.HughesJ.CairnsE. (2010). Direct contact as a moderator of extended contact effects: Cross-sectional and longitudinal impact on outgroup attitudes, behavioral intentions, and attitude certainty. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1662-1674.
18.
*ComeauJ. E. (2004). Perceptions of intergroup norms, levels of ingroup identity, and the extended contact effect (Unpublished master’s thesis). Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
19.
CrispR. J.TurnerR. N. (2009). Can imagined interactions produce positive perceptions? Reducing prejudice through simulated social contact. American Psychologist, 64, 231-240. doi:10.1037/a0014718
20.
*CummingsH. M. (2013). Improving intergroup relations through para-social contact: An examination of how pro-social television can heal race relations between Black and White Americans (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
21.
*DaviesK. M. (2006). Perceived cross-group distinctiveness, outgroup contact, inclusion of other in self variables, and outgroup attitude: An exploratory investigation (Unpublished master’s thesis). Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY.
22.
*DaviesK. M.AronA.WrightS.EberhardtJ. L.BergsiekerH. (2006, June). Extended contact and direct contact in “real-world” cross-group settings. Paper presented at the Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues, Long Beach, CA.
23.
DaviesK. M.TroppL. R.AronA.PettigrewT. F.WrightS. C. (2011). Cross-group friendships and intergroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 332-351. doi:10.1177/1088868311411103
*De Tezanos-PintoP. (2010). A normative approach to intergroup contact: The role of ingroup norms regarding interactions with members of the outgroup (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Sussex, Sussex, UK.
26.
*De Tezanos-PintoP.BrattC.BrownR. (2010). What will the others think? In-group norms as a mediator of the effects of intergroup contact. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 507-523. doi:10.1348/014466609X471020
27.
*DhontK.RoetsA.Van HielA. (2011). Opening closed minds: The combined effects of intergroup contact and need for closure on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 514-528. doi:10.1177/0146167211399101
28.
*DhontK.Van HielA. (2011). Direct contact and authoritarianism as moderators between extended contact and reduced prejudice: Lower threat and greater trust as mediators. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 223-237. doi:10.1177/1368430210391121
29.
*DruryL.HutchisonP.AbramsD. (2016). Direct and extended intergenerational contact and young people’s attitudes towards older adults. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55, 522-543. doi:10.1111/bjso.12146
30.
du ToitM.QuayleM. (2011). Multiracial families and contact theory in South Africa: Does direct and extended contact facilitated by multiracial families predict reduced prejudice?South African Journal of Psychology, 41, 540-551. doi:10.1177/008124631104100412
31.
*EllerA.AbramsD.GomezA. (2012). When the direct route is blocked: The extended contact pathway to improving intergroup relations. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36, 637-646. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2012.03.005
32.
*EllerA.AbramsD.VikiG. T.ImaraD. A. (2007). When my friend’s friend is a police officer: Extended contact, crossed-categorization, and public-police relations of Black and White people. South African Journal of Psychology, 37, 783-802.
33.
*EllerA.AbramsD.ZimmermannA. (2011). Two degrees of separation: A longitudinal study of actual and perceived extended international contact. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 175-191. doi:10.1177/1368430210391120
34.
*FeddesA. R.NoackP.RutlandA. (2009). Direct and extended friendship effects on minority and majority children’s interethnic attitudes: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 80, 377-390. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01266.x
35.
*GómezÁ.HuiciC. (2008). Vicarious intergroup contact and role of authorities in prejudice reduction. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11, 103-114.
36.
*GómezÁ.TroppL. R.FernándezS. (2011). When extended contact opens the door to future contact: Testing the effects of extended contact on attitudes and intergroup expectancies in majority and minority groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 161-173. doi:10.1177/1368430210391119
37.
*HaywardL. E.BarlowF. K.TroppL. R. (2013). A comprehensive examination of positive and negative intergroup contact across majority and minority samples. Manuscript in preparation.
38.
*HewstoneM.JuddC. M.SharpM. (2011). Do observer ratings validate self-reports of intergroup contact? A round-robin analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 599-609. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.014
39.
*HodsonG.HarryH.MitchellA. (2009). Independent benefits of contact and friendship on attitudes toward homosexuals among authoritarians and highly identified heterosexuals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 509-525. doi:10.1002/ejsp.558
40.
HunterJ. E.SchmidtF. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
41.
*HusnuS.MertanB.ÇiçekÖ. (2016). Reducing Turkish Cypriot children’s prejudice toward Greek Cypriots: Vicarious and extended intergroup contact through storytelling. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. doi:10.1177/1368430216656469
42.
*HutchisonP.RosenthalH. E. S. (2011). Prejudice against Muslims: Anxiety as a mediator between intergroup contact and attitudes, perceived group variability and behavioural intentions. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34, 40-61. doi:10.1080/01419871003763312
43.
*IoannouM. (2009). Comparing direct and extended contact in Cyprus. Journal of European Psychology Students, 1, 1-10.
44.
*JoyceN.HarwoodJ. (2014). Improving intergroup attitudes through televised vicarious intergroup contact: Social cognitive processing of ingroup and outgroup information. Communication Research, 41, 627-643. doi:10.1177/0093650212447944
45.
*KamataK. (2008). A comparison of intergroup relationships between an eastern country and a western country: An exploration of the mechanisms of direct and extended contact (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
46.
*KoballA. M.CarelsR. A. (2015). Intergroup contact and weight bias reduction. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 1, 298-306. doi:10.1037/tps0000032
47.
LemmerG.WagnerU. (2015). Can we really reduce ethnic prejudice outside the lab? A meta-analysis of direct and indirect contact interventions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 152-168. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2079
48.
*LiebkindK.MähönenT. A.SolaresE.SolheimE.Jasinskaja-LahtiI. (2014). Prejudice-reduction in culturally mixed classrooms: The development and assessment of a theory-driven intervention among majority and minority youth in Finland. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 24, 325-339. doi:10.1002/casp.2168
49.
*LiebkindK.McAlisterA. L. (1999). Extended contact through peer modelling to promote tolerance in Finland. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 765-780. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199908/09)29:5/6<765:: AID-EJSP958>3.0.CO;2-J
50.
*LienemannB. A.StoppH. T. (2013). The association between media exposure of interracial relationships and attitudes toward interracial relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, E398-E415. doi:10.1111/jasp.12037
51.
*LyonsP. A. (2011). An experimental test of the extended contact hypothesis: Its boundary conditions and psychological processes (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX.
52.
*LytleA. (2016). A comparison of two theoretical approaches to addressing ageism: Education and extended contact (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY.
53.
MallettR. K.WilsonT. D. (2010). Increasing positive intergroup contact. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 382-387. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.11.006
54.
*MazziottaA.MummendeyA.WrightS. C. (2011). Vicarious intergroup contact effects: Applying social-cognitive theory to intergroup contact research. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 255-274. doi:10.1177/1368430210390533
55.
*MazziottaA.RohmannA.WrightS. C. (2014). Cross-group contact and collective action. Manuscript in preparation.
56.
*MazziottaA.RohmannA.WrightS. C.De Tezanos-PintoP. (2014). The effects of positive and negative day-to-day contact experiences on different dimensions of intergroup attitudes. Manuscript in preparation.
57.
*MazziottaA.RohmannA.WrightS. C.De Tezanos-PintoP.LutterbachS. (2015). (How) does positive and negative extended cross-group contact predict direct cross-group contact and intergroup attitudes?European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 653-667. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2110
58.
*MeeusenC. (2014). The parent–child similarity in cross-group friendship and anti-immigrant prejudice: A study among 15-year old adolescents and both their parents in Belgium. Journal of Research in Personality, 50, 46-55. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2014.03.001
59.
*MereishE.PoteatV. P. (2015). Effects of heterosexuals’ direct and extended friendships with sexual minorities on their attitudes and behaviors: Intergroup anxiety and attitude strength as mediators and moderators. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45, 147-157. doi:10.1111/jasp.12284
60.
MilesE.CrispR. J. (2014). A meta-analytic test of the imagined contact hypothesis. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17, 3-26. doi:10.1177/1368430213510573
61.
MunniksmaA.StarkT. H.VerkuytenM.FlacheA.VeenstraR. (2013). Extended intergroup friendships within social settings: The moderating role of initial outgroup attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16, 752-770. doi:10.1177/1368430213486207
62.
*OpenshawL. (2015). The secondary transfer effect of intergroup contact: An experimental study of direct and extended contact (Unpublished master’s thesis). Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
63.
*PaoliniS.HewstoneM.CairnsE. (2007). Direct and indirect intergroup friendship effects: Testing the moderating role of the affective-cognitive bases of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1406-1420.
64.
*PaoliniS.HewstoneM.CairnsE.VociA. (2004). Effects of direct and indirect cross-group friendships on judgments of Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland: The mediating role of an anxiety-reduction mechanism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 770-786. doi:10.1177/0146167203262848
65.
*PatersonJ. L. (2012). Extended contact with cross-group romantic relationships (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
66.
*PatersonJ. L.TurnerR. N.ConnerM. T. (2015). Extended contact through cross-group romantic relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45, 489-497. doi:10.1111/jasp.12314
67.
PettigrewT. F. (1997). Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 173-185. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167297232006
68.
*PettigrewT. F.ChristO.WagnerU.StellmacherJ. (2007). Direct and indirect intergroup contact effects on prejudice: A normative interpretation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31, 411-425. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2006.11.003
69.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751-783. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
70.
SchiappaE.GreggP. B.HewesD. E. ( 2005). The parasocial contact hypothesis. Communication Monographs, 72, 92-115. doi:10.1080/ 0363775052000342544
71.
*SchmidK.HewstoneM.KüpperB.ZickA.WagnerU. (2012). Secondary transfer effects of intergroup contact: A cross-national comparison in Europe. Social Psychology Quarterly, 75, 28-51. doi:10.1177/0190272511430235
72.
*SchmidK.RamiahA. A.HewstoneM. (2014). Neighborhood ethnic diversity and trust: The role of intergroup contact and perceived threat. Psychological Science, 25, 665-674. doi:10.1177/0956797613508956
73.
SchofieldJ. W.HausmannL. R. M.YeF.WoodsR. L. (2010). Intergroup friendships on campus: Predicting close and casual friendships between White and African American first-year college students. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 585-602. doi:10.1177/1368430210362437
74.
*SharpM.VociA.HewstoneM. (2011). Individual difference variables as moderators of the effect of extended cross-group friendship on prejudice: Testing the effects of public self-consciousness and social comparison. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 207-221. doi:10.1177/1368430210391122
75.
*SloneM.TarraschR.HallisD. (2000). Ethnic stereotypic attitudes among Israeli children: Two intervention programs. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 46, 370-389.
76.
StasiukK.BilewiczM. (2013). Extending contact across generations: Comparison of direct and ancestral intergroup contact effects on current attitudes toward outgroup members. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23, 481-491. doi:10.1002/casp.2147
77.
SteigerJ. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245-251. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.87.2.245
78.
*TamT.HewstoneM.KenworthyJ.CairnsE. (2009). Intergroup trust in Northern Ireland. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 45-59. doi:10.1177/0146167208325004
79.
*TauschN.HewstoneM.SchmidK.HughesJ.CairnsE. (2011). Extended contact effects as a function of closeness of relationship with ingroup contacts. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 239-254. doi:10.1177/1368430210390534
80.
ThomasW. I.ThomasD. S. T. (1928). The child in America: Behavior problems and programs. New York, NY: A. A. Knopf.
81.
TroppL. R.PettigrewT. F. (2005). Relationships between intergroup contact and prejudice among minority and majority status groups. Psychological Science, 16, 951-957. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01643.x
82.
*TurnerR. N.HewstoneM.VociA. (2007). Reducing explicit and implicit outgroup prejudice via direct and extended contact: The mediating role of self-disclosure and intergroup anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 369-388. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.369
83.
TurnerR. N.HewstoneM.VociA.PaoliniS.ChristO. (2007). Reducing prejudice via direct and extended cross-group friendship. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 212-255. doi:10.1080/10463280701680297
84.
*TurnerR. N.HewstoneM.VociA.VonofakouC. (2008). A test of the extended intergroup contact hypothesis: The mediating role of intergroup anxiety, perceived ingroup and outgroup norms, and inclusion of the outgroup in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 843-860. doi:10.1037/a0011434
85.
*TurnerR. N.TamT.HewstoneM.KenworthyJ.CairnsE. (2013). Contact between Catholic and Protestant schoolchildren in Northern Ireland. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, E216-E228. doi:10.1111/jasp.12018
86.
*VezzaliL.BrambillaM.GiovanniniD.ColucciF. P. (2017). Strengthening purity: Moral purity as a mediator of direct and extended cross-group friendships on sexual prejudice. Journal of Homosexuality, 64, 716-730. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2016.1196998
87.
*VezzaliL.GiovanniniD. (2010). Effects of direct and extended contact among Italian elementary school teachers. Unpublished manuscript.
88.
*VezzaliL.GiovanniniD.CapozzaD. (2012). Social antecedents of children’s implicit prejudice: Direct contact, extended contact, explicit and implicit teachers’ prejudice. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 569-581. doi:10.1080/17405629.2011.631298
89.
VezzaliL.HewstoneM.CapozzaD.GiovanniniD.WölferR. (2014). Improving intergroup relations with extended and vicarious forms of indirect contact. European Review of Social Psychology, 25, 314-389. doi:10.1080/10463283.2014.982948
90.
*VezzaliL.HewstoneM.CapozzaD.TrifilettiE.Di BernardoG. A. (2017). Improving intergroup relations with extended contact among young children: Mediation by intergroup empathy and moderation by direct intergroup contact. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 27, 35-49. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/casp.2292
91.
*VezzaliL.SaguyT.AndrighettoL.GiovanniniD. (2013). When direct contact is not enough: Extended contact and desire for equality. Manuscript in preparation.
92.
VezzaliL.StathiS.GiovanniniD. (2012). Indirect contact through book reading: Improving adolescents’ attitudes and behavioral intentions toward immigrants. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 148-162. doi:10.1002/pits.20621
93.
*VezzaliL.StathiS.GiovanniniD.CapozzaD.VisintinE. P. (2015). “And the best essay is . . .”: Extended contact and cross-group friendships at school. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54, 601-615. doi:10.1111/bjso.12110
94.
ViechtbauerW. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36, 1-48. doi:10.18637/jss.v036.i03
95.
*VisintinE. P.BrylkaA.GreenE. G. T.MähönenT. A.Jasinskaja-LahtiI. (2016). The dynamics of interminority extended contact: The role of affective and cognitive mediators. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology. doi:10.1037/cdp0000089
96.
*VisintinE. P.VociA.PagottoL.HewstoneM. (2017). Direct, extended, and mass-mediated contact with immigrants in Italy: Their associations with emotions, prejudice, and humanity perceptions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47, 175-194. doi:10.1111/jasp.12423
97.
*VittrupB.HoldenG. W. (2011). Exploring the impact of educational television and parent-child discussions on children’s racial attitudes. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 11, 82-104. doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2010.01223.x
98.
*WalkerJ.SciorK. (2013). Tackling stigma associated with intellectual disability among the general public: A study of two indirect contact interventions. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 2200-2210. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.03.024
99.
*WestK.TurnerR. (2014). Using extended contact to improve physiological responses and behavior toward people with schizophrenia. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 57-64. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.06.009
100.
*WölferR.SchmidK.HewstoneM.van ZalkM. (2016). Developmental dynamics of intergroup contact and intergroup attitudes: Long-term effects in adolescence and early adulthood. Child Development, 87, 1466-1478. doi:10.1111/cdev.12598
101.
*WrightS. C.AronA.McLaughlin-VolpeT.RoppS. A. (1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 73-90. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.73
102.
*WrightS. C.DaviesK. M.SaundersL. (2007). Direct and extended contact effects on attitudes towards lesbians and gay men: Testing mechanisms. Unpublished manuscript.
103.
ZhouS.SharplesA.Page-GouldE. (2017, January). A meta-analysis of media contact. Paper presented at the Media Psychology Pre-Conference of the 17th annual meeting of the Society of Personality and Social Psychology, San Antonio, TX.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
