Mentally contrasting a desired future with present reality fosters selective goal pursuit: People pursue feasible desired futures and let go from unfeasible ones. We investigated whether people are more inclined to spontaneously use mental contrasting when they feel responsibility. Studies 1 and 2 provided correlational evidence: Employees who felt responsible for completing an important team project (Study 1) and MTurk users who felt and actively took social responsibility (Study 2) were more inclined to use mental contrasting. Studies 3 and 4 added experimental evidence: Students who were instructed to imagine responsibility for giving an excellent class presentation in a group or alone (Study 3) and participants who elaborated on an idiosyncratic wish that involved responsibility for others or themselves tended to use mental contrasting (Study 4). Apparently, people who feel or take responsibility for others, the society, or themselves are more likely to use mental contrasting as a self-regulation tool.
BanduraA.UnderwoodB.FromsonM. E. (1975). Disinhibition of aggression through diffusion of responsibility and dehumanization of victims. Journal of Research in Personality, 9, 253–269.
2.
BerkowitzL.DanielsL. R. (1964). Affecting the salience of the social responsibility norm: Effects of past help on the response to dependency relationships. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 275–281.
BierhoffH. W. (2000). Skala der sozialen Verantwortung nach Berkowitz und Daniels: Entwicklung und Validierung [The social responsibility scale by Berkowitz and Daniels: Development and validation]. Diagnostica, 46, 18–28.
5.
BryanC. J.HershfieldH. E. (2013). You owe it to yourself: Boosting retirement saving with a responsibility-based appeal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 429–432.
6.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
DalbertC.MontadaL.SchmittM. (1987). Glaube an eine gerechte Welt als Motiv: Validierungskorrelate zweier Skalen [Belief in a just world: Validation correlates of two scales]. Psychologische Beitrage, 29, 596–615.
8.
DarleyJ. M.LatanéB. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 377–383.
9.
DavisM. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113–126.
10.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
11.
FischerP.KruegerJ. I.GreitemeyerT.VogrincicC.KastenmüllerA.FreyD.. . . KainbacherM. (2011). The bystander-effect: A meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 517–537.
12.
FreemanS.WalkerM. R.BordenR.LataneB. (1975). Diffusion of responsibility and restaurant tipping: Cheaper by the bunch. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1, 584–587.
13.
GollwitzerA.OettingenG.KirbyT.DuckworthA.MayerD. (2011). Mental contrasting facilitates academic performance in school children. Motivation and Emotion, 35, 403–412.
14.
HackmanJ. R.OldhamG. R. (1975). Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 159–170.
15.
HeiderF. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. Wiley.
16.
HowellD. C. (2009). Statistical methods for psychology. Cengage Learning.
17.
KaiserF. G.RanneyM.HartigT.BowlerP. A. (1999). Ecological behavior, environmental attitude, and feelings of responsibility for the environment. European Psychologist, 4, 59–74.
18.
KappesA.OettingenG. (2014). The emergence of goal pursuit: Mental contrasting connects future and reality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 25–39.
19.
KappesA.SingmannH.OettingenG. (2012). Mental contrasting instigates goal pursuit by linking obstacles of reality with instrumental behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 811–818.
20.
KappesA.WendtM.ReineltT.OettingenG. (2013). Mental contrasting changes the meaning of reality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 797–810.
21.
KarauS. J.WilliamsK. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681–706.
22.
KemperC. J.BeierleinC.BenschD.KovalevaA.RammstedtB. (2012). Eine Kurzskala zur Erfassung des Gamma-Faktors sozial erwünschten Antwortverhaltens: Die Kurzskala Soziale Erwünschtheit-Gamma (KSE-G). [A short scale to assess socially desirable responding: The short scale social desirability gamma (KSG-G)]. https://www.gesis.org/fileadmin/_migrated/content_uploads/KSE_G_Workingpaper_01.pdf
23.
KizilcecR. F.CohenG. L. (2017). Eight-minute self-regulation intervention raises educational attainment at scale in individualist but not collectivist cultures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114, 4348–4353.
24.
KovalevaA.BeierleinC.KemperC. J.RammstedtB. (2012). Eine Kurzskala zur Messung von Kontrollüberzeugung: Die Skala Internale-Externale-Kontrollüberzeugung-4 (IE-4). [A short scale to measure control beliefs: The scale internal-external control beliefs-4 (IE-4)]. https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/31209
25.
KravitzD. A.MartinB. (1986). Ringelmann rediscovered: The original article. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 936–941.
26.
KrohneH. W.EgloffB.KohlmannC. W.TauschA. (1996). Untersuchungen mit einer deutschen Version der “Positive and Negative Affect Schedule” (PANAS) [Examinations with a German version of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)]. Diagnostica, 42, 139–156.
LiereK. D.DunlapR. E. (1978). Moral norms and environmental behavior: An application of Schwartz’s norm-activation model to yard burning. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 174–188.
29.
McWilliamsA.SiegelD. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 26, 117–127.
30.
MilgramS. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. Harper & Row.
31.
MuravenM.BaumeisterR. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle?Psychological Bulletin, 126, 247–259.
32.
OettingenG. (2000). Expectancy effects on behavior depend on self-regulatory thought. Social Cognition, 18, 101–129.
33.
OettingenG.MayerD.SevincerA. T.StephensE. J.PakH.HagenahM. (2009). Mental contrasting and goal commitment: The mediating role of energization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 608–622.
34.
OettingenG.PakH.SchnetterK. (2001). Self-regulation of goal setting: Turning free fantasies about the future into binding goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 736–753.
35.
OettingenG.SevincerA. T. (2018). Fantasy about the future as friend and foe. In OettingenG.SevincerA. T.GollwitzerP. M. (Eds.), The psychology of thinking about the future (pp. 127–149). Guilford.
36.
OettingenG.SevincerA. T.GollwitzerP. M. (2008). Goal pursuit in the context of culture. In SorrentinoR.YamaguchiS. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition across cultures (pp. 191–211). Elsevier.
37.
RushtonJ. P.ChrisjohnR. D.FekkenG. C. (1981). The altruistic personality and the self-report altruism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 2, 293–302.
SchwartzS. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism1. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 221–279). Academic Press.
40.
SevincerA. T.BusattaP. D.OettingenG. (2014). Mental contrasting and transfer of energization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 139–152.
41.
SevincerA. T.MehlP. J.OettingenG. (2017). Well self-regulated people use mental contrasting. Social Psychology, 48, 348–364.
42.
SevincerA. T.OettingenG. (2013). Spontaneous mental contrasting and selective goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1240–1254.
43.
SevincerA. T.OettingenG. (2015). Future thought and the self-regulation of energization. In GendollaG. H. E.TopsM.KooleS. (Eds.), Biobehavioral approaches to self-regulation (pp. 315–329). Springer.
44.
SevincerA. T.SchlierB.OettingenG. (2015). Mental contrasting and ego-depletion. Motivation and Emotion, 39, 876–891.
45.
SevincerA. T.TessmannP.OettingenG. (2018). Demand to act and use of mental contrasting. Social Psychology, 49, 344–359.
46.
SheeranP.HarrisP.VaughanJ.OettingenG.GollwitzerP. M. (2013). Gone exercising: Mental contrasting promotes physical activity among overweight, middle-aged, low-SES fishermen. Health Psychology, 32, 802–809.
47.
SpinathB.SchöneC. (2003). Subjektive Überzeugungen zu Bedingungen von Erfolg in Lern- und Leistungskontexten und deren Erfassung [Subjective beliefs about success in learning and teaching and their assessment]. In Stiensmeier-PelsterJ.RheinbergF. (Eds.), Diagnostik von Motivation und Selbstkonzept (pp. 15–27). Hogrefe.
48.
WackerA.JaunzemeJ.JaksztatS. (2008). Eine Kurzform des Prüfungsängstlichkeitsinventars TAI-G [A short form of the Test Anxiety Inventory TAI-G]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 22, 73–81.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
