Research exploring the perspectives of stigmatized people has examined general processes related to experiencing prejudice. Past work, however, has invoked the assumption that prejudices against different group memberships are experienced in a similar manner. Across three studies we directly compare experiences of racism and sexism among female minorities and show, in contrast, that people respond to different forms of prejudice in distinct ways. In Study 1 we examined the attributions invoked by Asian women to explain prejudice and discovered that participants made stronger internal attributions to explain racism than sexism. In Study 2 we investigated emotional reactions to prejudice and found that Asian women report experiencing more depression following a race-based rejection than a gender-based rejection. In Study 3 we observed that Asian women reported perceiving more racism than sexism in their environments. Implications for advancing theories of prejudice experiences are discussed.
BranscombeN. R.SchmittM. T.HarveyR. D. (1999). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 135–149.
2.
CheryanS.BodenhausenG. V. (2000). When positive stereotypes threaten intellectual performance: The psychological hazards of “model minority” status. Psychological Science, 11, 399–402.
3.
CrockerJ.LuhtanenR.BroadnaxS.BlaineB. E. (1999). Belief in U.S. government conspiracies against Blacks among Black and White college students: Powerlessness or system blame?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 941–953.
4.
CrockerJ.MajorB. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608–630.
5.
CrockerJ.MajorB. (1994). Reactions to stigma: The moderating role of justifications. In ZannaM. P.OlsonJ. M. (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario symposium, Vol. 7 (pp. 289–314). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
CrockerJ.VoelklK.TestaM.MajorB. (1991). Social stigma: The affective consequences of attributional ambiguity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 218–228.
7.
CuddyA. J. C.FiskeS. T.GlickP. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 631–648.
8.
DaviesP. G.SpencerS. J.QuinnD. M.GerhardsteinR. (2002). Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1615–1628.
9.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902.
10.
GarstkaT. A.SchmittM. T.BranscombeN. R.HummertM. L. (2004). How young and older adults differ in their responses to perceived age discrimination. Psychology and Aging, 19, 326–335.
11.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.
12.
JonesE. E.DavisK. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 2 (pp. 219–266). New York, NY: Academic Press.
13.
KelleyH. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107–128.
14.
LevinS.SinclairS.VeniegasR.TaylorP. (2002). Perceived discrimination in the context of multiple social identities. Psychological Science, 13, 557–560.
15.
MacraeC. N.BodenhausenG. V.MilneA. B. (1995). The dissection of selection in person perception: Inhibitory processes in social stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 397–407.
16.
MajorB.KaiserC. R.McCoyS. K. (2003). It’s not my fault: When and why attributions to prejudice protect self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 772–781.
17.
MajorB.O’BrienL. T. (2005). The social psychology of stigma. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 393–421.
18.
MajorB.QuintonW.McCoyS. K. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of attributions to discrimination: Theoretical and empirical advances. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 34 (pp. 251–330). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
19.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.
20.
McClureJ. (1998). Discounting causes of behavior: Are two reasons better than one?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 7–20.
21.
RudmanL. A.BorgidaE. (1995). The afterglow of construct accessibility: The behavioral consequences of priming men to view women as sex objects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 493–517.
22.
SchmittM. T.BranscombeN. R. (2002). The internal and external causal loci of attributions to prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 620–628.
23.
SchmittM. T.BranscombeN. R.KobrynowiczD.OwenS. (2002). Perceiving discrimination against one’s gender group has different implications for well-being in women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 197–210.
24.
ShihM.PittinskyT. L.AmbadyN. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10, 80–83.
25.
SinclairS.HardinC. D.LoweryB. S. (2006). Self-stereotyping in the context of multiple social identities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 529–542.
26.
TanA. (1989). The joy luck club. London: Penguin Books.
