Recent findings have shown that both trait levels of personality and situational variability in its expression are of importance. So here, the Big Five personality traits of 77 professional and 125 amateur stand-up comedians were compared with two large matched samples (N > 100,000). The comedians were also observed while performing, which enabled a comparison of their stage personalities with situational requirements on 10 selected NEO-PIR facets. Both amateurs and professionals showed higher openness-to-experience, extraversion, and lower conscientiousness than their norm samples, while professionals also evidenced greater neuroticism. Irrespective of trait standing, with regard to most NEO-PIR facets, professionals expressed the appropriate on-stage persona and were better able to regulate their personality to conform to situational requirements than amateurs. This is consistent with research showing that individuals regulate their personality to conform to situational and goal requirements, and adds the finding that successful comedians demonstrate enhanced adaptability compared with amateurs.
AllikJ.ChurchA. T.OrtizF. A.RossierJ.HřebičkováM.de FruytF.. . .McCraeR. R. (2017). Mean profiles of the NEO personality inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48, 402-420.
2.
AndoV.ClaridgeG.ClarkK. (2014). Psychotic traits in comedians. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 204, 341-345. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.113.134569
3.
BackM. D.BaumertA.DenissenJ. J. A.HartungF.-M.PenkeL.SchmukleS. C.. . .WrzusC. (2011). PERSOC: A unified framework for understanding the dynamic interplay of personality and social relationships. European Journal of Personality, 25, 90-107. doi:10.1002/per.811
4.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.
5.
BarrickM. R.MountM. K.JudgeT. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next?International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9-30. doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00160
6.
BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. D.FunderD. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 396-403. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00051.x
7.
BleidornW. (2009). Linking personality states, current social roles and major life goals. European Journal of Personality, 23, 509-530. doi:10.1002/per.731
8.
BlockJ. (1995). A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187-215. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.187
Bradley-GeistJ. C.LandisR. S. (2012). Homogeneity of personality in occupations and organizations: A comparison of alternative statistical tests. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27, 149-159. doi:10.1007/s10869-011-9233-6
11.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464-504. doi:10.1080/10705510701301834
CliftonA.KuperL. E. (2011). Self-reported personality variability across the social network is associated with interpersonal dysfunction. Journal of Personality, 79, 359-389. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00686.x
14.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum. doi:10.4324/9780203771587
15.
CostaP. T.Jr.McCraeR. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory and NEO Five-Factor Inventory professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. doi:10.1037/t03907-000
16.
CôtéS.MoskowitzD. S.ZuroffD. C. (2012). Social relationships and intraindividual variability in interpersonal behavior: Correlates of interpersonal spin. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 646-659. doi:10.1037/a0025313
17.
Del GiudiceM.BoothT.IrwingP. (2012). The distance between Mars and Venus: Measuring global sex differences in personality. PLoS ONE, 7(1), e29265. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029265
18.
DenissenJ. J. A.UlfertsH.LudtkeO.MuckP. M.GerstorfD. (2014). Longitudinal transactions between personality and occupational roles: A large and heterogeneous study of job beginners, stayers, and changers. Developmental Psychology, 50, 1931-1942. doi:10.1037/a0036994
19.
DeYoungC. G. (2014). Cybernetic Big Five theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 33-58.
20.
DolanC. V.MolenaarP. C. M. (1994). Testing specific hypotheses concerning latent group differences in multi-group covariance structure analysis with structured means. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 203-222.
FeistG. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of the impact of personality on scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290-309. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5
23.
FinchJ. F.WestS. G. (1997). The investigation of personality structure: Statistical models. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 439-485. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1997.2194
24.
FisherS.FisherR. L. (1981). Pretend the world is funny and forever: A psychological analysis of comedians, clowns, and actors. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. doi:10.4324/9781315802947
25.
FleesonW. (2001). Toward a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distribution of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 1011-1027. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.1011
26.
FleesonW.GallagherP. (2009). The implications of big five standing for the distribution of trait manifestation in behavior: Fifteen experience-sampling studies and a meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1097-1114. doi:10.1037/a0016786
27.
FleesonW.JayawickremeE. (2015). Whole trait theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 82-92. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2014.10.009
28.
FleesonW.LawM. K. (2015). Trait enactments as density distributions: The role of actors, situations, and observers in explaining stability and variability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 1090-1104. doi:10.1037/a0039517
29.
FournierM. A.MoskowitzD. S.ZuroffD. C. (2009). The interpersonal signature. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 155-162. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.01.023
30.
FrenchB. F.FinchW. (2006). Confirmatory factor analytic procedures for the determination of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 378-402. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1303_3
31.
GreengrossG.MillerG. F. (2009). The Big Five personality traits of professional comedians compared to amateur comedians, comedy writers, and college students. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 79-83.
32.
HellerD.KomarJ.LeeW. B. (2007). The dynamics of personality states, goals, and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 898-910. doi:10.1177/0146167207301010
33.
HoD. E.ImaiK.KingG.StuartE. A. (2011). MatchIt: Nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. Journal of Statistical Software, 42(8), 1-28. doi:10.18637/jss.v042.i08
34.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
35.
HughesD. J.LeeA.TianA. W.NewmanA.LegoodA. (2018). Leadership, creativity, and innovation: A critical review and practical recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 29, 549-569. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.03.001
36.
JanusS. S. (1975). The great comedians: Personality and other factors. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 35, 169-174. doi:10.1007/bf01358189
37.
JanusS. S.BessB. E.JanusB. R. (1978). The great comediennes: Personality and other factors. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 38, 367-372. doi:10.1007/bf01253595
38.
JohnO. P.NaumannL. P.SotoC. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In PervinL. A.JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 114-158). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
39.
JohnO. P.SrivastavaS. (1999). The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In PervinL. A.JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102-138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
40.
JonesA. B.BrownN. A.SerfassD. G.ShermanR. A. (2017). Personality and density distributions of behavior, emotions, and situations. Journal of Research in Personality, 69, 225-236. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2016.10.006
41.
JordanM.HerriotP.ChalmersC. (1991). Testing Schneider’s ASA theory. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 40, 47-53. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.1991.tb01357.x
42.
JudgeT. A.RodellJ. B.KlingerR. L.SimonL. S.CrawfordE. R. (2013). Hierarchical representations of the Five-Factor Model of personality in predicting job performance: Integrating three organizing frameworks with two theoretical perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 875-925. doi:10.1037/a0033901
43.
KaufmanS. B.QuiltyL. C.GraziopleneR. G.HirschJ. B.GrayJ. R.PetersonJ. B.DeYoungC. G. (2014). Openness to experience and intellect differentially predict creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Personality, 84, 249-258. doi:10.1111/jopy.12156
44.
KingD. D.Ott-HollandC. J.RyanA. M.HuangJ. L.WadlingtonP. L.ElizondoF. (2017). Personality homogeneity in organizations and occupations: Considering similarity sources. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32, 641-653. doi:10.1007/s10869-016-9459-4
45.
LievensF.LangW. B.De FruytF.CorstjensJ.de VijverM.BledlowR. (2018). The predictive power of people’s intraindividual variability across situations: Implementing whole trait theory in assessment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103, 753-771. doi:10.1037/apl0000280
46.
LittleT. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guildford press.
47.
Lodi-SmithJ.RobertsB. W. (2007). Social investment and personality: A meta-analysis of the relationship of personality traits to investment in work, family, religion, and volunteerism. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 68-86. doi:10.1177/1088868306294590
48.
McCabeK. O.FleesonW. (2012). What is extraversion for? Integrating trait and motivational perspectives and identifying the purpose of extraversion. Psychological Science, 23, 1498-1505. doi:10.1177/0956797612444904
49.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T.Jr. (2008). Empirical and theoretical status of the five-factor model of personality traits. In BoyleG. J.MatthewsG.SaklofskeD. H. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment: Personality theories and models (Vol. 1, pp. 273-294). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
MillerJ. D.LynamD. R. (2015). Understanding psychopathy using the basic elements of personality. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9, 223-237. doi:10.1111/spc3.12170
52.
MillsapR. E.KimH. (2018). Factorial invariance across multiple populations in discrete and continuous data. In IrwingP.BoothT.HughesD. J. (Eds.), Wiley handbook of psychometric testing: A multidisciplinary reference on survey, scale and test development (pp. 849-884). London, England: John Wiley.
53.
MinbashianA.WoodR. E.BeckmannN. (2010). Task-contingent conscientiousness as a unit of personality at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 793-806. doi:10.1037/a0020016
54.
MischelW.ShodaY. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246-268. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.2.246
55.
NettleD. (2006). Psychological profiles of professional actors. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 375-383. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.07.008
56.
PaunonenS. V.JacksonD. N. (2000). What is beyond the Big Five? Plenty!Journal of Personality, 68, 821-835. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00117
57.
PerunovicW. Q. E.HellerD.RossM.KomarS. (2011). The within-person dynamics of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, affective states, and cultural identification: A diary study of bicultural individuals. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 635-641. doi:10.1177/1948550611405071
58.
PloyhartR. E.WeekleyJ. A.BaughmanK. (2006). The structure and function of human capital emergence: A multilevel examination of the attraction-selection-attrition model. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 661-677. doi:10.5465/amj.2006.22083023
59.
R Development Core Team. (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
60.
RobertsB. W. (2006). Personality development and organizational behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 27, 1-40. doi:10.1016/s0191-3085(06)27001-1
61.
RobertsB. W.WaltonK. E.ViechtbauerW. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 1-25.
62.
RobertsB. W.WoodD.CaspiA. (2008). Personality development. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 375-398). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
63.
RosenbaumP. R.RubinD. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41-55.
64.
RussellJ. J.MoskowitzD. S.ZuroffD. C.SookmanD.ParisJ. (2007). Stability and variability of affective experience and interpersonal behavior in borderline personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 578-588. doi:10.1037/0021-843x.116.3.578
65.
SatterwhiteR. C.FleenorJ. W.BraddyP. W.FeldmanJ.HoopesL. (2009). A case for homogeneity of personality at the occupational level. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17, 154-164. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2009.00459.x
66.
SchaubroeckJ.GansterD.JonesJ. (1998). Organization and occupation influences in the attraction-selection-attrition process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 869-891. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.869
67.
Schermelleh-EngelK.MoosbruggerH.MüllerH. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
68.
SchmidtF. L.HunterJ. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262-274. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262
69.
SchmidtF. L.OhI. S. (2010). Can synthetic validity methods achieve discriminant validity?Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 3, 344-350. doi:10.1017/S1754942600002510
70.
SchmidtF. L.ShafferJ. A.OhI. S. (2008). Increased accuracy for range restriction corrections: Implications for the role of personality and general mental ability in job and training performance. Personnel Psychology, 61, 827-868. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00132.x
71.
ShermanR. A.RauthmannJ. F.BrownN. A.SerfassD. G.JonesA. B. (2015). The independent effects of personality and situations on real-time expressions of behavior and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 872-888. doi:10.1037/pspp0000036
72.
SilviaP. J.KaufmanJ. C.Reiter-PalmonR.WigertB. (2011). Cantankerous creativity: Honesty-humility, agreeableness, and the HEXACO structure of creative achievement. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 687-689. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.011
73.
SouthwickS. M.VythilingamM.CharneyD. S. (2005). The psychobiology of depression and resilience to stress: Implications for prevention and treatment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 255-291. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.143948
74.
SutinA. R.CostaP. (2010). Reciprocal influences of personality and job characteristics across middle adulthood. Journal of Personality, 78, 257-288. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00615.x
75.
TettR. P.BurnettD. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 500-517. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.500
76.
ThorsonJ. A.PowellF. C. (1993). Sense of humor and dimensions of personality. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49, 799-809.
77.
WidamanK. F.ReiseS. P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In BryantK. J.WindleM.WestS. G. (Eds.), The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 281-324). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
78.
WoodsS. A.WilleB.WuC. H.LievensF.de FruytF. (2019). The influence of work on personality trait development: The demands-affordances TrAnsactional (DATA) model, an integrative review, and research agenda. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110, 258-271. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2018.11.010
79.
WrzesniewskiA.DuttonJ. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26, 179-201. doi:10.5465/amr.2001.4378011
80.
WrzusC.RobertsB. W. (2017). Processes of personality development in adulthood: The TESSERA framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21, 253-277. doi:10.1177/1088868316652279
81.
Zeigler-HillV.LiH.MasriJ.SmithA.VonkJ.MadsonM. B.ZhangQ. (2013). Self-esteem instability and academic outcomes in American and Chinese college students. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 455-463. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.03.010
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
