The way in which individuals react to a partner’s disclosure of positive news (capitalization response) is associated with relational well-being. Two studies analyzed the role of couple identity in explaining the association between perceived capitalization responses and relationship quality. A daily diary study (n = 90 couples) revealed that on days people perceived their partners’ responses as active-constructive, they reported higher levels of couple identity. A longitudinal two-wave study (n = 169 couples) showed that couple identity mediated the link between active-constructive (for both women and men) and passive-destructive responses (only for men) and relationship quality. Overall, our findings suggest that the experience of the partner’s involvement and support in good times contribute to a sense of couple identity, which over the long turn, is associated with partners’ relational well-being.
AcitelliL. K. (1992). Gender differences in relationship awareness and marital satisfaction among young married couples. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 102-110. doi:10.1177/0146167292181015
2.
AgnewC. R.Van LangeP. A.RusbultC. E.LangstonC. A. (1998). Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 939-954. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.939
3.
AronA.AronE. N. (1986). Love and the expansion of self: Understanding attraction and satisfaction. New York, NY: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.
4.
AronA.AronE. N.SmollanD. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596-612. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
5.
AronE. N.AronA. (1996). Love and the expansion of the self: The state of the model. Personal Relationships, 3, 45-58. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1996.tb00103.x
6.
BadrH.AcitelliL. K.Carmack TaylorC. L. (2007). Does couple identity mediate the stress experienced by caregiving spouses?Psychology and Health, 22, 211-229. doi:10.1080/14768320600843077
7.
BergerP.KellnerH. (1964). Marriage and the construction of reality. Diogenes, 12, 1-26. doi:10.1177/039219216401204601
8.
BodenmannG. (1995). A systemic-transactional conceptualization of stress and coping in couples. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 54, 34-39.
9.
BodenmannG. (1997). Dyadic coping: A systemic-transactional view of stress and coping among couples: Theory and empirical findings. European Review of Applied Psychology, 47, 137-140.
10.
BodenmannG. (2005). Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In RevensonT.KayserK.BodenmannG. (Eds.), Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 33-50). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
11.
BodenmannG.RandallA. K.FalconierM. K. (2016). Systemic-transactional model of dyadic coping. In FalconierM. K.RandallA. K.BodenmannG. (Eds.), Couples coping with stress: A cross-cultural perspective (pp. 5-22). New York, NY: Routledge.
12.
BolgerN.LaurenceauJ. P. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
13.
BolgerN.StadlerG.LaurenceauJ.-P. (2012). Power analysis for intensive longitudinal studies. In MehlM. R.ConnerT. S. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 285-301). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
14.
CookW. L.KennyD. A. (2005). The actor-partner interdependence model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 101-109. doi:10.1080/01650250444000405
15.
CrossS. E.MadsonL. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5-37. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.122.1.5
16.
DonatoS.PaganiA. F.PariseM.BertoniA.IafrateR. (2014). The capitalization process in stable couple relationships: Intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits. Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 140, 207-211. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.411
17.
DonatoS.PaganiA. F.PariseM.BertoniA.IafrateR. (2018). Through thick and thin: Perceived partner responses to negative and positive events. In BertoniS. M. A.DonatoS. (Eds.), When “we” are stressed: A dyadic approach to coping with stressful events (pp. 41-64). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
18.
DonatoS.PariseM. (2012). The role of enacted and perceived dyadic coping for young couples’ satisfaction. In MolinelliB.GrimaldoV. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of coping: New research (pp. 261-278). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
19.
DonatoS.PariseM. (2015). Introduction to special section on the bright side of the couple relationship: Pro-relationship processes in response to positive and negative events. Family Science, 6, 94-98. doi:10.1080/19424620.2015.1081900
20.
DonatoS.PariseM.IafrateR.BertoniA.FinkenauerC.BodenmannG. (2015). Dyadic coping responses and partners’ perceptions for couple satisfaction: An actor-partner interdependence analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32, 580-600. doi:10.1177/0265407514541071
21.
FolkmanS.MoskowitzJ. T. (2004). Coping: Pitfalls and promise. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 745-774. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141456
22.
GableS. L.AlgoeS. B. (2010). Being there when things go right: Support processes for positive events. In SullivanK.DavilaJ. (Eds.), Support processes in intimate relationships (pp. 200-216). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
23.
GableS. L.AndersonJ. F. (2016). Capitalization: The good news about close relationships. In KneeC. R.ReisH. T. (Eds.), Positive approaches to optimal relationship development (pp. 103-123). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781316212653.006.
24.
GableS. L.GonzagaG.StrachmanA. (2006). Will you be there for me when things go right? Supportive responses to positive event disclosures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 904-917. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.904
25.
GableS. L.GosnellC. L.MaiselN. C.StrachmanA. (2012). Safely testing the alarm: Close others’ responses to personal positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 963-981. doi:10.1037/a0029488
26.
GableS. L.ReisH. T. (2010). Good news! Capitalizing on positive events in an interpersonal context. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 195-257. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(10)42004-3
27.
GableS. L.ReisH. T.ImpettE.AsherE. R. (2004). What do you do when things go right? The intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits of sharing positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 228-245. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.228
28.
GrecoO.RosnatiR.FerrariL. (2015). Adult adoptees as partners and parents: The joint task of revisiting the adoption history. Adoption Quarterly, 18, 25-44. doi: 10.1080/10926755.2014.895468
29.
HershenbergR.DavilaJ.LeongS. H. (2014). Depressive symptoms in women and the preference and emotional benefits of discussing positive life events. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 33, 767-788. doi:10.1521/jscp.2014.33.9.767
30.
HershenbergR.MavandadiS.BaddeleyJ.LibetJ. (2016). Capitalization in distressed couples: A pilot study and outline for future research. Personal Relationships, 23, 684-697. doi: 10.1111/pere.12154
31.
IafrateR.DonatoS. (2012). Coping in a relational context: The case of dyadic coping. In MolinelliB.GrimaldoV. (Eds.), Handbook of the Psychology of Coping: New research (pp. 111-132), Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publisher.
32.
KarremansJ. C.Van LangeP. A. (2008). The role of forgiveness in shifting from “Me” to “We.”Self and Identity, 7, 75-88. doi:10.1080/15298860601182435
33.
KashdanT. B.FerssizidisP.FarmerA. S.AdamsL. M.McknightP. E. (2013). Failure to capitalize on sharing good news with romantic partners: Exploring positivity deficits of socially anxious people with self-reports, partner-reports, and behavioral observations. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 51, 656-668. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2013.04.006
34.
KelleyH. H.ThibautJ. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York, NY: John Wiley.
35.
KennyD.KashyD.CookW. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
36.
LangstonC. A. (1994). Capitalizing on and coping with daily-life events: Expressive responses to positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1112-1125.
37.
LaurenceauJ. P.BarrettL. F.PietromonacoP. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1238-1251. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.74.5.1238
38.
LaurenceauJ. P.BarrettL. F.RovineM. J. (2005). The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: A daily-diary and multilevel modeling approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 314-323. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.314
39.
LemayE. P.ClarkM. S. (2008). How the head liberates the heart: Projection of communal responsiveness guides relationship promotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 647-671. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.647
40.
LemayE. P.ClarkM. S.FeeneyB. C. (2007). Projection of responsiveness to needs and the construction of satisfying communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 834-853. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.834
41.
LewandowskiG. W.Jr.NardoneN.RainesA. J. (2010). The role of self-concept clarity in relationship quality. Self and Identity, 9, 416-433. doi:10.1080/15298860903332191
42.
ManziC.PariseM.IafrateR.SedikidesC.VignolesV. L. (2015). Insofar as you can be part of me: The influence of intrusive parenting on young adult children’s couple identity. Self and Identity, 14, 570-582. doi:10.1080/15298868.2015.1029965
NortonR. (1983). Measuring marital quality: A critical look at the dependent variable. Journal of Marriage and Family, 45, 141-151. doi:10.2307/351302
45.
PaganiA. F.DonatoS.IafrateR. (2013). Actively dealing with good fortune? A confirmatory factor analysis of the “Perceived Responses to Capitalization Attempts (PRCA)” scale. TPM–Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 20, 101-116.
46.
PaganiA. F.DonatoS.PariseM.IafrateR.BertoniA.SchoebiD. (2015). When good things happen: The effects of implicit and explicit capitalization attempts on intimate partners’ well-being. Family Science, 6, 119-128. doi:10.1080/19424620.2015.1082013
47.
PaganiA. F.DonatoS.PariseM.BertoniA.IafrateR.SchoebiD. (2019). Explicit stress communication facilitates perceived responsiveness in dyadic coping. Frontiers in Psychology, 10:401. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00401
48.
PariseM.DonatoS.PaganiA. F.RibeiroM. T.ManziC. (2015). Couple identity processes in young adulthood: An experimental study on the role of intrusive parenting for romantic partners’ other-serving bias. In ColumbusA. M. (Ed.), Advances in Psychology Research. Volume 111 (pp. 123-138). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Publisher.
49.
PariseM.ManziC.DonatoS.IafrateR. (2017). Free to love? The role of intrusive parenting for young adult children’s romantic relationship quality. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, 45, 187-201. doi:10.1080/10852352.2016.11981
50.
PariseM.PaganiA. F.DonatoS.SedikidesC. (2019). Self-concept clarity and relationship satisfaction at the dyadic level. Personal Relationships, 26, 54-72. doi: 10.1111/pere.12265
51.
PetersB. J.ReisH. T.GableS. L. (2018). Making the good even better: A review and theoretical model of interpersonal capitalization. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 12, e12407. doi:10.1111/spc3.12407
52.
RandallA. K.BodenmannG. (2009). The role of stress on close relationships and marital satisfaction. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 105-115. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2008.10.004
53.
ReisH. T.GableS. L. (2015). Responsiveness. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 67-71. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.01.001
54.
RusbultC. E.MartzJ. M.AgnewC. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357-391. doi:10.1177/0265407504042837
55.
RusbultC. E.Van LangeP. A. M.WildschutT.YovetichN. A.VeretteJ. (2000). Perceived superiority in close relationships: Why it exists and persists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 521-545. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.521
56.
SchoebiD.PaganiA. F.LuginbuehlT.BradburyT. N. (2015). Committed to maintain: A brief measure of Maintenance oriented relationship commitment (MORC). Family Science, 6, 160-169. doi:10.1080/19424620.2015.1082046
57.
ShallcrossS. L.HowlandM.BemisJ.SimpsonJ. A.FrazierP. (2011). Not “capitalizing” on social capitalization interactions: The role of attachment insecurity. Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 77-85. doi:10.1037/a0021876
58.
StolarskiM.WojtkowskaK.KwiecińskaM. (2016). Time for love: Partners’ time perspectives predict relationship satisfaction in romantic heterosexual couples. Time & Society, 25, 552-574. doi:10.1177/0961463X15596703
59.
WeidlerD. J.ClarkE. M. (2011). A distinct association: Inclusion of other in the self and self-disclosure. The New School Psychology Bulletin, 9, 36-46.
60.
WieselquistJ.RusbultC. E.FosterC. A.AgnewC. R. (1999). Interpersonal relationships and group processes: Commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 942-966. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.942
61.
YovetichN. A.RusbultC. E. (1994). Accommodative behavior in close relationships: Exploring transformation of motivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 138-164. doi:10.1006/jesp.1994.1007
62.
ZimbardoP. G.BoydJ. N. (2008). The time paradox. New York, NY: Free Press.
63.
ZimbardoP. G.KeoughK. A.BoydJ. N. (1997). Present time perspective as a predictor of risky driving. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 1007-1023. doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(97)00113-x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
