We examined whether seven relational constructs (satisfaction, commitment, closeness, conflict, ambivalence, maintenance, and love) showed significant within-person residual variance over time (variability), whether couple members were similar in their variability (covariation), and whether variability and covariation differed by relationship length. We used dyadic daily diary data from 157 couples together from 2 months to 44 years. Each relational construct significantly varied within person from day to day, and couple members significantly covaried. Longer term couples generally experienced less variability than newer couples. We also found that for satisfaction, closeness, ambivalence, and love, couple covariation decreased in longer relationships. We discuss how these findings can be used to help individuals work to maintain greater stability in their feelings about the relationship.
AcitelliL. K.KennyD. A.WeinerD. (2001). The importance of similarity and understanding of partners’ marital ideals to relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 8, 167–185. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2001.tb00034.x
2.
AlmeidaD. M.WethingtonE.KesslerR. C. (2002). The Daily Inventory of Stressful Events: An interview-based approach for measuring daily stressors. Assessment, 9, 41–55. doi:10.1177/1073191102091006
3.
AndersonC.KeltnerD.JohnO. (2003). Emotional convergence between people over time. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 84, 1054–1068. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1054
4.
ArriagaX. B. (2001). The ups and downs of dating: Fluctuations in satisfaction in newly formed romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 754–765. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.80.5.754
5.
ArriagaX. B.ReedJ. T.GoodfriendW.AgnewC. R. (2006). Relationship perceptions and persistence: Do fluctuations in perceived partner commitment undermine dating relationships?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1045–1065. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1045
6.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
7.
BerscheidE.LopesJ. (1997). A temporal model of relationship satisfaction and stability. In SternbergR. J.HojjatM. (Eds.), Satisfaction in close relationships (pp. 129–159). New York, NY: Guilford.
8.
BokerS. M.LaurenceauJ. P. (2006). Dynamical systems modeling: An application to the regulation of intimacy and disclosure in marriage. In WallsT. A.SchaferJ. L. (Eds.), Models for intensive longitudinal data (pp. 195–218). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
9.
BolgerN.DavisA.RafaeliE. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579–616. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145030
10.
BolgerN.DeLongisA.KesslerR. C.WethingtonE. (1989). The contagion of stress across multiple roles. Journal of Marriage and Family, 51, 175–183. doi:10.2307/352378
11.
BraikerH. B.KelleyH. H. (1979). Conflict in the development of close relationships. In BurgessR.HustonT. (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships (pp. 135–167). New York, NY: Academic.
12.
ButlerE. A. (2011). Temporal interpersonal emotion systems: The “TIES” that form relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 367–393. doi:10.1177/1088868311411164
13.
ButlerE. A.YoungV. J.RandallA. K. (2010). Suppressing to please, eating to cope: The effect of overweight women’s emotion suppression on romantic relationships and eating. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29, 599–623. doi:10.1521/jscp.2010.29.6.599
14.
ButnerJ.DiamondL. M.HicksA. M. (2007). Attachment style and two forms of affect coregulation between romantic partners. Personal Relationships, 14, 431–455. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00164.x
15.
CampbellL.SimpsonJ. A.BoldryJ. G.RubinH. (2010). Trust, variability in relationship evaluations, and relationship processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 14–31. doi:10.1037/a0019714
16.
DucharmeJ.DoyleA. B.MarkiewiczD. (2002). Attachment security with mother and father: Associations with adolescents’ reports of interpersonal behavior with parents and peers. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 203–231. doi:10.1177/0265407502192003
17.
FinchamF. D.BradburyT. N. (1987). The assessment of marital quality: A reevaluation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 797–809. doi:10.2307/351973
18.
GrossJ. J.CarstensenL. L.PasupathiM.TsaiJ.Götestam SkorpenC.HsuA. Y. (1997). Emotion and aging: Experience, expression, and control. Psychology and Aging, 12, 590–599. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.12.4.590
19.
HoffmanL. (2007). Multilevel models for examining individual differences in within-person variation and covariation over time. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 609–629. doi:10.1080/00273170701710072
20.
KelleyH. (1979). Personal relationships: Their structure and processes. New York, NY: Wiley.
21.
KelleyH.ThibautJ. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York, NY: Wiley.
22.
KingD. B.DeLongisA. (2013). Dyadic coping with stepfamily conflict: Demand and withdraw responses between husbands and wives. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 198–206. doi:10.1177/0265407512454524
23.
LaurenceauJ. P.BolgerN. (2005). Using diary methods to study marital and family processes. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 86–97. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.19.1.86
24.
LedermannT.MachoS. (2014). Analyzing change at the dyadic level: The common fate growth model. Journal of Family Psychology, 28, 204–213. doi:10.1037/a0036051
25.
NeffL. A.KarneyB. R. (2007). Stress crossover in newlywed marriage: A longitudinal and dyadic perspective. Journal of Marriage & Family, 69, 594–607. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00394.x
26.
OgolskyB.NiehuisS.RidleyC. (2009). Using online methods and designs to conduct research on personal relationships. Marriage & Family Review, 45, 610–628. doi:10.1080/01494920903224202
27.
OgolskyB. G. (2009). Deconstructing the association between relationship maintenance and commitment: Testing two competing models. Personal Relationships, 16, 99–115. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2009.01212.x
28.
RidleyC. A.CateR. M.CollinsD. M.ReesingA. L.LuceroA. A.GilsonM. S.AlmeidaD. M. (2006). The ebb and flow of marital lust: A relational approach. The Journal of Sex Research, 43, 144–153. doi:10.1080/00224490609552309
29.
RileyM. A.TurveyM. T. (2002). Variability and determinism in motor behavior. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34, 99–125. doi:10.1080/00222890209601934
30.
RockeC.BroseA. (2013). Intraindividual variability and stability of affect and well-being: Short-term and long-term change and stabilization processes. GeroPsych: The Journal of Gerontopsychology and Geriatric Psychiatry, 26, 185–199. doi:10.1024/1662-9647/a000094
31.
RusbultC. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172–186.
32.
RusbultC. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 101–117.
33.
SabatelliR. M.ShehanC. L. (1993). Exchange and resource theories. In BossP.DohertyW. J.LaRossaR.SchummW. R.SteinmetzS. K. (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods (pp. 385–417). New York, NY: Plenum.
34.
SaxbeD.RepettiR. L. (2010). For better or worse? Coregulation of couples’ cortisol levels and mood states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 92–103. doi:10.1037/a0016959
35.
SchumannK. (2012). Does love mean never having to say you’re sorry? Associations between relationship satisfaction, perceived apology sincerity, and forgiveness. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29, 997–1010. doi:10.1177/0265407512448277
36.
SoonsJ. P. M.LiefbroerA. C.KalmijnM. (2009). The long-term consequences of relationship formation for subjective well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 1254–1270. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00667.x
37.
StoneA. A.KesslerR. C.HaythornthwaiteJ. A. (1991). Measuring daily events and experiences: Methodological considerations. Journal of Personality, 59, 575–607.
38.
ThibautJ.KelleyH. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York, NY: Wiley.
39.
TotenhagenC. J.ButlerE. A.RidleyC. A. (2012). Daily stress, closeness, and satisfaction in gay and lesbian couples. Personal Relationships, 19, 219–233. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01349.x
40.
TotenhagenC. J.CurranM. A.SeridoJ.ButlerE. A. (2013). Good days, bad days: Do sacrifices improve relationship quality?Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 881–900. doi:10.1177/0265407512472475
41.
TotenhagenC. J.SeridoJ.CurranM. A.ButlerE. A. (2012). Daily hassles and uplifts: A diary study on understanding relationship quality. Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 719–728. doi:10.1037/a0029628
42.
WhittonS.WhismanM. (2010). Relationship satisfaction instability and depression. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 791–794. doi:10.1037/a0021734
43.
WhittonS. W.RhoadesG. K.WhismanM. A. (2014). Fluctuation in relationship quality over time and individual well-being: Main, mediated, and moderated effects. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 858–871. doi:10.1177/0146167214528988
44.
YoungV.CurranM.TotenhagenC. (2013). A daily diary study: Working to change the relationship and relational uncertainty in understanding positive relationship quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 132–148. doi:10.1177/0265407512453826
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
