Researchers have long argued that ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation are separable phenomena that occur in different, meaningful combinations. Statistical methods for testing this thesis, however, have been underutilized. We address this oversight by using latent profile analysis (LPA) to investigate distinct profiles of group bias derived from ingroup and outgroup warmth ratings. Using a national probability sample of Māori (the indigenous people of New Zealand; N = 2,289) and Europeans (N = 13,647), we identify a distinct profile reflecting ingroup favoritism/outgroup derogation (Type III in Brewer’s typology of ingroup bias) in both groups (6.7% of Māori, 10.3% of Europeans). The factors associated with this type, however, differed between groups. Whereas ethnic identity centrality predicted membership for Type III for Māori, social dominance orientation predicted this type for Europeans. Thus, although both groups may express the same kind of bias pattern, the motivation underlying this bias varies by status.
AllportG. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
AltemeyerB. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
AshtonM. C.LeeK. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150-166. doi:10.1177/1088868306294907
4.
AtkinsonJ.SalmondC.CramptonP. (2014). NZDep2013 index of deprivation. Dunedin, New Zealand: University of Otago.
5.
BarlowF. K.SibleyC. G.HornseyM. J. (2012). Rejection as a call to arms: Inter-racial hostility and support for political action as outcomes of race-based rejection in majority and minority groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 167-177. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02040.x
6.
BrewerM. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.307
7.
BrewerM. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate?Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429-444. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00126
8.
BrewerM. B. (2017). Intergroup discrimination: Ingroup love or outgroup hate? In SibleyC.BarlowF. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice (pp. 90-110). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BrewerM. B.SilverM. (1978). Ingroup bias as a function of task characteristics. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 393-400. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420080312
10.
CacioppoJ. T.BerntsonG. G. (1994). Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 401-423. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.3.401
11.
CollinsL. M.LanzaS. T. (2010). Latent class and latent transition analysis: With applications in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
12.
CosmidesL.ToobyJ.KurzbanR. (2003). Perceptions of race. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 173-179. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00057-3
13.
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R. (1992). The NEO Personality Inventory (Rev.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
14.
DuckittJ.SibleyC. G. (2007). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 21, 113-130. doi:10.1002/per.614
15.
FahyK. M.LeeA.MilneB. J. (2017). New Zealand socio-economic index 2013. Wellington: Statistics New Zealand.
16.
FischerR.DerhamC. (2016). Is in-group bias culture-dependent? A meta-analysis across 18 societies. SpringerPlus, 5, 70-78. doi:10.1186/s40064-015-1663-6
17.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition (2002). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
18.
GaertnerL.InskoC. A. (2000). Intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm: Categorization, reciprocation, or fear?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 77-94. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.1.77
19.
Gil-WhiteF. (2001). Are ethnic groups biological “species” to the human brain? Essentialism in our cognition of some social categories. Current Anthropology, 42, 515-553. doi:10.1086/321802
20.
GonsalkoraleK.von HippelW. (2012). Intergroup relations in the 21st century: Ingroup positivity and outgroup negativity among members of an internet hate group. In KramerR.LeonardelliG.LivingstonR. (Eds.), Social cognition, social identity, and intergroup relations: Festschrift in honor of Marilynn Brewer (pp. 163-188). Boston, MA: Taylor & Francis.
21.
GreeneM. L.WayN.PahlK. (2006). Trajectories of perceived adult and peer discrimination among Black, Latino, and Asian American adolescents: Patterns and psychological correlates. Developmental psychology, 42, 218-236.
22.
HoukamauC. A.StrongeS.SibleyC. G. (2017). The prevalence and impact of racism toward indigenous Māori in New Zealand. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, 6, 61-80. doi:10.1037/ipp0000070
23.
LeachC. W.van ZomerenM.ZebelS.VliekM. L. W.PennekampS. F.DoosjeB.. . . SpearsR. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 144-165.
24.
LiuJ.McCreanorT.McIntoshT.TeaiwaT. (Eds.). (2005). New Zealand identities: Departures and destinations. Wellington, New Zealand: Victoria University Press.
25.
MilojevP.SenguptaN. K.SibleyC. G. (2014). Majority group opposition to minority political entitlements: The Social Dominance Paradox. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 39, 82-92. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.10.001
26.
Ministry of Social Development. (2016). The Social Report. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.
27.
MullenB.BrownR.SmithC. (1992). In-group bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103-122. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420220202
28.
MummendeyA.OttenS. (1998). Positive–negative asymmetry in social discrimination. European Review of Social Psychology, 9, 107-143. doi:10.1080/14792779843000063
29.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998-2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
30.
New Zealand Qualifications Authority. (2012). The New Zealand qualifications framework. Wellington: New Zealand Government.
31.
NylundK. L.AsparouhovT.MuthénB. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 535-569.
32.
OsborneD.SibleyC. G. (2017). Identifying “types” of ideologies and intergroup biases: Advancing a person-centred approach to social psychology. European Review of Social Psychology, 28, 288-332. doi:10.1080/10463283.2017.1379265
33.
OsborneD.SibleyC. G.HuoY. J.SmithH. J. (2015). Doubling-down on deprivation: Using latent profile analysis to test an age-old assumption in relative deprivation theory. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 482-495. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2099
34.
OsborneD.WeinerB. (2015). A latent profile analysis of attributions for poverty: Identifying response patterns underlying people’s willingness to help the poor. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 149-154. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.007
35.
PhelpsE. A.O’ConnorK. J.CunninghamW. A.FunayamaE. S.GatenbyJ. C.GoreJ. C.BanajiM. R. (2000). Performance on indirect measures of race evaluation predicts amygdala activation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 729-738. doi:101162/089892900562552
36.
PhinneyJ. S. (1990). Ethnic identity in adolescents and adults: Review of research. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 499-514. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.499
37.
PhinneyJ. S. (1992). The multigroup ethnic identity measure: A new scale for use with diverse groups. Journal of Adolescent Research, 7, 156-176. doi:10.1177/074355489272003
38.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.LevinS. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 271-320. doi:10.1080/10463280601055772
39.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
40.
SibleyC. G.BeckerJ. C. (2012). On the nature of sexist ambivalence: Profiling ambivalent and univalent sexists. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 589-601. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1870
41.
SibleyC. G.DuckittJ. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248-279. doi:10.1177/1088868308319226
42.
SibleyC. G.LiuJ. H.DuckittJ.KhanS. S. (2008). Social representations of history and the legitimation of social inequality: The form and function of historical negation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 542-565. doi:10.1002/ejsp.449
43.
SibleyC. G.OsborneD. (2016). Ideology and post-colonial society. Advances in Political Psychology, 37, 115-161. doi:10.1111/pops.12323
44.
SibleyC. G.OsborneD.DuckittJ. (2012). Personality and political orientation: Meta-analysis and test of a Threat-Constraint Model. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 664-677.
45.
SibleyC. G.PirieD. J. (2013). Personality in New Zealand: Scale norms and demographic differences in the Mini-IPIP6. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 42, 13-30.
46.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
47.
Statistics New Zealand. (2013). Census QuickStats about culture and identity. Wellington: Author.
TajfelH. (1972). Experiments in a vacuum. In IsraelJ.TajfelH. (Eds.), The context of social psychology: A critical assessment (pp. 69-122). Oxford, UK: Academic Press.
50.
TajfelH.BilligM.BundyR.FlamentC. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-178. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420010202
51.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterrey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
52.
WalkerR. (1990). Ka whawhai tonu matou. Struggle without end. Auckland, New Zealand: Penguin Books.
53.
WeberC. R.FedericoC. M. (2013). Moral foundations and heterogeneity in ideological preferences. Political Psychology, 34, 107-126. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00922.x
54.
WilsonM. S.BulbuliaJ.SibleyC. G. (2014). Differences and similarities in religious and paranormal beliefs: A typology of distinct faith signatures. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 4, 104-126. doi:10.1080/2153599X.2013.779934
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
