Induced hypocrisy is a sequential, two-step, cognitive dissonance procedure that prompts individuals to adopt a proattitudinal behavior. The present meta-analysis of 29 published and nine unpublished induced-hypocrisy studies enabled us to test three key dissonance-related issues. First, is hypocrisy effective in promoting change in behavioral intention and behavior? Our analyses supported the idea that hypocrisy (vs. control) increased both behavioral intention and behavior. Second, does hypocrisy generate psychological discomfort? Results pertaining to this issue were inconclusive due to the small number of studies measuring psychological discomfort. Third, are both steps necessary to generate change? Effect sizes conform to the idea that the transgressions-only condition can increase both behavior and intention. Our meta-analysis raises a number of theoretical issues concerning the psychological processes underlying induced hypocrisy and highlights implications for practitioners.
AitkenC. K.McMahonT. A.WearingA. J.FinlaysonB. L. (1994). Residential water use: Predicting and reducing consumption. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 136-158. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb00562.x
2.
AjzenI. (1991). Theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
3.
AndersonC. A.LindsayJ. J.BushmanB. J. (1999). Research in the psychological laboratory: Truth or triviality?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(1), 3-9. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00002
4.
AronsonE. (1999). Dissonance, hypocrisy, and the self-concept. In Harmon-JonesE.MillsJ. (Eds.), Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology (pp. 103-126). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
5.
*AronsonE.FriedC.StoneJ. (1991). Overcoming denial and increasing the intention to use condoms through the induction of hypocrisy. American Journal of Public Health, 81, 1636-1638. doi:10.2105/AJPH.81.12.1636
6.
ArthurW.BennettW.HuffcuttA. I. (2001). Conducting meta-analysis using SAS. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
BardenJ.RuckerD. D.PettyR. E. (2005). “Saying one thing and doing another”: Examining the impact of event order on hypocrisy judgments of others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1463-1474. doi:10.1177/0146167205276430
8.
BatorR. J.BryanA. (2007, August). Revised hypocrisy manipulation to induce commitment to exercise. Poster presented at the Annual Conference of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.
9.
BigaA. (2004). Hypocrisy induction to alter selection decisions among aversive racists: Analyzing the role of external motivation to respond without prejudice (Doctoral dissertation). University of South Florida, Tampa.
10.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P. T.RothsteinH. R. (2009). Cumulative meta-analysis. In BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P. T.RothsteinH. R. (Eds.), Introduction to meta-analysis (pp. 371-376). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
11.
CooperH.HedgesL. V.ValentineJ. C. (Eds.). (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (
2nd ed.). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
12.
CooperJ.FazioR. H. (1984). A new look at dissonance theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 229-266. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60121-5
13.
CrowneD.MarloweD. (1964). The approval motive: Studies in evaluative dependence. New York, NY: John Wiley.
14.
DesrichardO.MonteilJ.-M. (1994). When dissonance is also memory based. Psychological Reports, 75, 1331-1336. doi:10.2466/pr0.1994.75.3.1331
15.
*DickersonC.ThibodeauR.AronsonE.MillerD. (1992). Using cognitive dissonance to encourage water conservation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 841-854. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00928.x
16.
DossettA. P. (2009). Inducing hypocrisy as a means of mass persuasion (Doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University, Columbus.
17.
DuvalS.TweedieR. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455-463. doi:10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
18.
EitelP.FriendR. (1999). Reducing denial and sexual risk behaviors in college students: A comparison of a cognitive and a motivational approach. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 21, 12-19. doi:10.1007/BF02895028
19.
ElliotA.DevineP. (1994). On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance: Dissonance as psychological discomfort. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 382-394. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.382
20.
Fernandez-DolsJ. M.AguilarP.CampoS.VallacherR.JanowskyA.RabbiaH.. . . LernerM. J. (2010). Hypocrites or maligned cooperative participants? Experimenter induced normative conflict in zero-sum situations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 525-530. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.02.001
21.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
22.
FestingerL.CarlsmithJ. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 203-210. doi:10.1037/h0041593
23.
FieldA. P.GillettR. (2010). How to do a meta-analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 63, 665-694. doi:10.1348/000711010X502733
24.
*FointiatV. (2004). “I know what I have to do, but …” When hypocrisy leads to behavioral change. Social Behavior and Personality, 32, 741-746. doi:10.2224/sbp.2004.32.8.741
25.
*FointiatV. (2008). Being together in a situation of induced hypocrisy. Current Research in Social Psychology, 13(12), 145-153. doi:10.1.1.135.3787
26.
*FointiatV.GrosbrasJ. M. (2007). “Dire une chose et en faire une autre”: de la déclaration de liberté dans le paradigme de l’hypocrisie induite [“Saying one thing and not doing it”: The impact of freedom in the induced hypocrisy paradigm]. Psychologie Française, 52(4), 1-14. doi:10.1016/j.psfr.2006.12.005
27.
*FointiatV.MorisotV.PakuszewskiM. (2008). Effects of past transgressions in an induced hypocrisy paradigm. Psychological Reports, 103, 625-633. doi:10.2466/pr0.103.2.625-633
28.
*FointiatV.PrioloD.Saint-BauzelR.MilhabetI. (2013). Justifier nos transgressions pour réduire notre hypocrisie? Hypocrisie induite et identification des transgressions [Justifying our counter-normative behaviors. Induced hypocrisy and transgressions identification]. Revue Internationale De Psychologie Sociale/International Review of Social Psychology, 26(4), 49-78.
29.
*FointiatV.SomatA.GrosbrasJ. M. (2011). Saying, but not doing: Induced hypocrisy, trivialization, and misattribution. Social Behavior and Personality, 39, 465-476. doi:10.2224/sbp.2011.39.4.465
30.
FreijyT.KotheE. J. (2013). Dissonance-based interventions for health behaviour change: A systematic review. British Journal of Health Psychology, 18, 310-337. doi:10.1111/bjhp.12035
31.
*FriedC. B. (1998). Hypocrisy and identification with transgressions: A case of undetected dissonance. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 20, 145-154. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2002_6
32.
*FriedC. B.AronsonE. (1995). Hypocrisy, misattribution, and dissonance reduction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 925-933. doi:10.1177/0146167295219007
33.
GaertnerL.SedikidesC.LukeM.O’MaraE. M.IuzziniJ.JacksonL. E.WuQ. (2012). A motivational hierarchy within: Primacy of the individual self, relational self, or collective self?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 997-1013. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.03.009
34.
GoldonowiczJ. M. (2012). Cognitive dissonance in the classroom: The effects of hypocrisy on academic dishonesty (Master’s thesis). University of Central Florida, Orlando.
35.
GrijalvaE.ZhangL. (2016). Narcissism and self-insight: A review and meta-analysis of narcissists’ self-enhancement tendencies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 3-24. doi:10.1177/0146167215611636
36.
*HammonsM. E. (2010). Examining the hypocrisy paradigm as an intervention for modifying high-risk alcohol use behaviors among college students (Doctoral dissertation). University of Central Florida, Orlando.
37.
Harmon-JonesE. (2000). Cognitive dissonance and experienced negative affect: Evidence that dissonance increases experienced negative affect even in the absence of aversive consequences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1490-1501.
38.
Harmon-JonesE.Harmon-JonesC.FearnM.SigelmanJ. D.JohnsonP. (2008). Left frontal cortical activation and spreading of alternatives: Tests of the action-based model of dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(1), 1-15. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.1
39.
Harmon-JonesE.PetersonH.VaughnK. (2003). The dissonance-inducing effects of an inconsistency between empathy and knowledge of past failures to help: Support for the action-based model of dissonance. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 69-78. doi:10.1207/S15324834BASP2501_5
40.
HeitlandK.BohnerG. (2010). Reducing prejudice via cognitive dissonance: Individual differences in preference for consistency moderate the effects of counter-attitudinal advocacy. Social Influence, 5, 164-181. doi:10.1080/15534510903332261
41.
HenrichJ.HeineS.NorenzayanA. (2010). The weirdest people in the world?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 61-83. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
42.
*KantolaS. J.SymeG. J.CampbellN. A. (1984). Cognitive dissonance and energy conservation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 416-421. doi:10.1037/00219010.69.3.416
43.
LammersJ.StappelD. A. (2011). Abstraction increases hypocrisy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 475-480.
44.
*LiégeoisA. (2005). La cognition sociale à l’aide de la promotion de la consommation durable: Les cas de l’automaticité comportementale et de l’hypocrisie induite [Social cognition helping the promotion of sustainable consumption: The case of behavioral automaticity and induced hypocrisy] (Doctoral dissertation). Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
45.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
46.
*LopezA.LassarreD.RateauP. (2011). Dissonance et engagement: Comparaison de deux voies d’intervention visant à réduire les ressources énergétiques au sein d’une collectivité territoriale [Dissonance and commitment: Comparison of two ways of intervention to reduce energy resources within a territorial administration]. Pratiques Psychologiques, 17, 263-284. doi:10.1016/j.prps.2010.02.003
47.
MartinieM.-A.FointiatV. (2010). Enfreindre sans craindre: Tolérance à la dissonance dans le paradigme de l’hypocrisie induite [Breaking the rules, it doesn’t matter: Tolerance to dissonance in induced-hypocrisy paradigm]. Psychologie Française, 55, 41-47. doi:10.1016/j.psfr.2010.02.003
48.
MartinieM.-A.OliveT.MillandL.JouleR. V.CapaR. L. (2013). Evidence that dissonance arousal is initially undifferentiated and only later labeled as negative. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 767-770. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.003
49.
MatzC. D.WoodW. (2005). Cognitive dissonance in group: The consequences of disagreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 22-37. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.22
50.
McConnellA. R.BrownC. M. (2010). Dissonance averted: Self-concept organization moderates the effect of hypocrisy on attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 361-366. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.10.019
51.
McGrathA. L. (2018). Encouraging ecological behaviour through induced hypocrisy and inconsistency: A commentary. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 56, 1-2. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.01.005
52.
*McGrathA. L.WardM. (2014, February13-15). Reducing cognitive dissonance after an act of hypocrisy: A comparison of dissonance reduction modes. Paper presented at the 15th Annual Meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Austin, TX.
53.
*McKimmieB. M.TerryD. J.HoggM. A.MansteadA. S. R.SpearsR.DoosjeB. (2003). I’m a hypocrite, but so is everyone else: Group support and the reduction of cognitive dissonance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7, 214-224. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.7.3.214
54.
*MorrongielloB. A.MarkL. (2008). Practice what you preach: Induced hypocrisy as an intervention strategy to reduce children’s intentions to risk take on playgrounds. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 33, 1117-1128. doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsn011
55.
*PeltA. (2016). Pourquoi? Comment faire? De la nature du comportement prosocial dans l’hypocrisie induite? [Why? How? Prosocial behavior nature in the induced hypocrisy] (Doctoral dissertation). Université de Lorraine, Metz, France.
56.
PetersonA. A.HaynesG. A.OlsonJ. M. (2008). Self-esteem differences in the effects of hypocrisy induction on behavioral intentions in the health domain. Journal of Personality, 76, 305-322. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00487.x
57.
*PrioloD.LiégeoisA. (2008). Prôner une norme et la transgresser: Le rôle des normes sociales dans le paradigme de l’hypocrisie induite [The role of social norms in the induced hypocrisy paradigm]. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 79(3), 37-50. doi:10.3917/cips.079.0019
58.
*PrioloD.MilhabetI.CodouO.FointiatV.Le BarbenchonE.GabarrotF. (2016). Encouraging ecological behaviour through induced hypocrisy and inconsistency. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 47, 166-180. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.06.001
59.
QuirinM.KazénM.KuhlJ. (2009). When nonsense sounds happy or helpless: The Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 500-516. doi:10.1037/a0016063
60.
RhodesR. E.DickauL. (2012). Experimental evidence for the intention-behavior relationship in the physical activity domain: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 31, 724-727. doi:10.1037/a0027290
61.
*RubensL. (2011). Être engagé, informé ou hypocrite: Quels leviers pour favoriser les comportements pro-environnementaux? [Being committed, informed or hypocritical: How to trigger action to promote pro-environmental behavior?]. Saarbrücken, Germany: Éditions Universitaires Européennes.
62.
*RubensL.GoslingP.BonaiutoM.BrisboisX.MochA. (2015). Being a hypocrite or committed while I am shopping? A comparison of the impact of two interventions on environmentally friendly behavior. Environment & Behavior, 47, 3-16. doi:10.1177/0013916513482838
SearsD. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515-530.
65.
SedikidesC.GaertnerL.LukeM. A.O’MaraE. M.GebauerJ. E. (2013). A three-tier hierarchy of self-potency : Individual self, relational self, collective self. In ZannaM. P.OlsonJ. M. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 48, pp. 235-295). London, England: Academic Press.
66.
*SénémeaudC.MangeJ.FointiatV.SomatA. (2014). Being hypocritical disturbs some people more than others: How individual differences in preference for consistency moderate the behavioral effects of the induced-hypocrisy paradigm. Social Influence, 9, 133-148. doi:10.1080/15534510.2013.791235
67.
SimonsohnU.NelsonL. D.SimmonsJ. P. (2014). P-curve: A key to the file drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 534-547. doi:10.1037/a0033242
68.
SimonsohnU.SimmonsJ. P.NelsonL. D. (2015). Better p-curves: Making p-curve analysis more robust to errors, fraud, and ambitious p-hacking, a reply to Ulrich and Miller (2015). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 1146-1152. doi:10.1037/xge0000104
69.
*Son HingL. S.LiW.ZannaM. P. (2002). Inducing hypocrisy to reduce prejudicial responses among aversive racists. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 71-78. doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1484
70.
*StoneJ.AronsonE.CrainA. L.WinslowM. P.FriedC. B. (1994). Inducing hypocrisy as a means of encouraging young adults to use condoms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 116-128. doi:10.1177/0146167294201012
71.
StoneJ.FernandezN. (2008). To practice what we preach: The use of hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance to motivate behavior change. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1024-1051. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00088.x
72.
StoneJ.FernandezN. (2011). When thinking about less failure causes more dissonance: The effect of elaboration and recall on behavior change following hypocrisy. Social Influence, 6, 199-211. doi:10.1080/15534510.2011.618368
73.
StoneJ.FocellaE. (2011). Hypocrisy, dissonance and the self-regulation processes that improve health. Self and Identity, 10, 295-303. doi:10.1080/15298868.2010.538550
74.
*StoneJ.WiegandA. W.CooperJ.AronsonE. (1997). When exemplification fails: Hypocrisy and the motive for self-integrity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 54-65. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.54
75.
SweeneyA. M.MoyerA. (2015). Self-affirmation and responses to health messages: A meta-analysis on intentions and behavior. Health Psychology, 34, 149-159. doi:10.1037/hea0000110
76.
TakakuS. (2001). The effects of apology and perspective taking on interpersonal forgiveness: Introducing a dissonance-attribution model of interpersonal forgiveness. Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 494-508. doi:10.1080/00224540109600567
77.
TakakuS.WeinerB.OhbuchiK. (2001). A cross-cultural examination of the effects of apology and perspective taking on forgiveness. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 20, 144-167. doi:10.1177/0261927X01020001007
78.
ThibodeauR.AronsonE. (1992). Taking a closer look: Reasserting the role of the self-concept in dissonance theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 591-602.
79.
ThompsonS. C.KyleD.SwanJ.ThomasC.VrungosS. (2002). Increasing condom use by undermining perceived invulnerability to HIV. AIDS Education and Prevention, 14, 505-514. doi:10.1521/aeap.14.8.505.24115
80.
TropeY.LibermanN. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440-463. doi:10.1037/a0018963
81.
VeveaJ. L.WoodsC. M. (2005). Publication bias in research synthesis: Sensitivity analysis using a priori weight functions. Psychological Methods, 10, 428-443. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.10.4.428
82.
ViechtbauerW. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1-48.
83.
VinskiE. J.TryonG. S. (2009). Study of a cognitive dissonance intervention to address high school students’ cheating attitudes and behaviors. Ethics & Behavior, 19(3), 218-226.
84.
WebbT. L.SheeranP. (2006). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 249-268. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.249
85.
*YousafO.GobetF. (2013). The emotional and attitudinal consequences of religious hypocrisy: Experimental evidence using a cognitive dissonance paradigm. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153, 667-686. doi:10.1080/00224545.2013.814620
86.
ZannaM. P.CooperJ. (1976). Dissonance and the attribution process. In HarveyJ. H.IckesW. J.KiddR. F. (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1, pp. 199-217). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
