The induced-hypocrisy paradigm is an effective two-step procedure—the behavioral standards salience step and the transgressions salience step—for encouraging normative behaviors. Recent findings have raised questions about the necessity of the first step in inducing behavioral change. This research aims to test the role of the standards salience step in the hypocrisy paradigm. To this end, we used a meta-analytic approach to test the moderation of standards salience on hypocrisy effect sizes. We compared 16 studies with “strong” standards salience with 19 studies with “weak” standards salience. The results revealed that, compared with control and transgressions-only conditions, the hypocrisy effect sizes were moderate in the “strong” standards group and weak or nonsignificant in the “weak” standards group. These results contribute to the further investigation of the processes underlying the hypocrisy paradigm and represent progress by identifying the optimal conditions for implementing its first step.
AronsonE. (1999). Dissonance, hypocrisy, and the self-concept. In Harmon-JonesE.MillsJ. (Eds.), Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology (pp. 103–126). American Psychological Association.
2.
*AronsonE.FriedC.StoneJ. (1991). Overcoming denial and increasing the intention to use condoms through the induction of hypocrisy. American Journal of Public Health, 81(12), 1636–1638. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.81.12.1636
BardenJ.RuckerD. D.PettyR. E. (2005). “Saying one thing and doing another”: Examining the impact of event order on hypocrisy judgments of others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(11), 1463–1474. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205276430
CarlosW. C.LewisB. W. (2018). Strategic silence: Withholding certification status as a hypocrisy avoidance tactic. Administrative Science Quarterly, 63(1), 130–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839217695089
7.
*CooperJ.FeldmanL. A. (2020). Helping the “couch potato”: A cognitive dissonance approach to increasing exercise in the elderly. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 50(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12639
8.
DevineP. G.PlantE. A.AmodioD. M.Harmon-jonesE.VanceS. L. (2002). The regulation of explicit and implicit race bias: The role of motivations to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(5), 835–848. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.5.835
9.
*DickersonC. A.ThibodeauR.AronsonE.MillerD. (1992). Using cognitive dissonance to encourage water conservation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(11), 841–854. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00928.x
10.
*DroletC. (2018). Cognitive dissonance, hypocrisy, and reducing toleration of human rights violations. Brock University.
11.
*EitelP.FriendR. (1999). Reducing denial and sexual risk behaviors in college students: A comparison of a cognitive and a motivational approach. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 21(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02895028
12.
*FointiatV. (2008). Being together in a situation of induced hypocrisy. Current Research in Social Psychology, 13(12), 145–153.
13.
*FointiatV.GrosbrasJ. M. (2007). «Dire une chose et en faire une autre» : De la déclaration de liberté dans le paradigme de l’hypocrisie induite [“Saying one thing and doing another”: From the declaration of freedom to the induced-hypocrisy paradigm]. Psychologie Francaise, 52(4), 445–458. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.126
14.
*FointiatV.MorisotV.PakuszewskiM. (2008). Effects of past transgressions in an induced hypocrisy paradigm. Psychological Reports, 103(2), 625–633. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.103.2.625-633
15.
*FointiatV.SomatA.GrosbrasJ.-M. (2011). Saying, but not doing: Induced hypocrisy, trivialization, and misattribution. Social Behavior and Personality, 39(4), 465–475. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2011.39.4.465
16.
FriedC. B. (1998). Hypocrisy and identification with transgressions: A case of undetected dissonance. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 20(2), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1207/15324839851036769
17.
FriedC. B.AronsonE. (1995). Hypocrisy, misattribution, and dissonance reduction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(9), 925–933. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295219007
18.
GammaK.MaiR.LoockM. (2018). The double-edged sword of ethical nudges: Does inducing hypocrisy help or hinder the adoption of pro-environmental behaviors?Journal of Business Ethics, 161(2), 351–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3930-2
HammonsM. E. (2010). Examining the hypocrisy paradigm as an intervention for modifying high-risk alcohol use behaviors among college students [Doctoral thesis, University of Central Florida].
21.
HarrerM.CuijpersP.FurukawaT.EbertD. (2019). DMETAR: Companion R package for the guide «Doing Meta-Analysis in R» (R package version 0.0.9000). http://dmetar.protectlab.org
22.
HedgesL. V.PigottT. D. (2004). The power of statistical tests for moderators in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 426–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.426
23.
HigginsC. A.JudgeT. A.FerrisG. R. (2003). Influence tactics and work outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(1), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.181
24.
*KantolaS. J.SymeG. J.CampbellN. A. (1984). Cognitive dissonance and energy conservation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 416–421. https://doi.org/10.1037/00219010.69.3.416
25.
KieslerC. A. (1971). The Psychology of Commitment: Experiments Linking Behavior to Belief. Academic Press.
26.
KimP. H.WiltermuthS. S.NewmanD. T. (2021). A theory of ethical accounting and its implications for hypocrisy in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 172–191. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0161
27.
LiégeoisA.CodouO.RubensL.PrioloD. (2017). «Faites ce que je dis, pas ce que je fais»: Synthèse et perspectives du paradigme de l’hypocrisie induite [“Do as I say, not as I do”: Synthesis and perspectives of the induced-hypocrisy paradigm]. Psychologie Française, 62(2), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psfr.2015.12.001
28.
LiégeoisA.YzerbytV.CorneilleO. (2005, May). I am dirty as anyone else … So what? When attempts at inducing hypocrisy backfire. In Annual meeting of the Belgian Association for Psychological Sciences (BAPS), Ghent University.
29.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Sage.
30.
*LopezA.LassarreD.RateauP. (2011). Dissonance et engagement: Comparaison de deux voies d’intervention visant à réduire les ressources énergétiques au sein d’une collectivité territoriale [Dissonance and commitment: comparing two approaches to reducing energy resources in a local authority]. Pratiques Psychologiques, 17(3), 263–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prps.2010.02.003
31.
MartinieM. A.FointiatV. (2010). Enfreindre sans craindre: tolérance à la dissonance dans le paradigme de l’hypocrisie induite. [Violating without fear: tolerance of dissonance in the induced-hypocrisy paradigm] Psychologie Francaise, 55(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psfr.2010.02.003
32.
*MauduyM.BagneuxV.SénémeaudC. (2022). Fostering victim-defending behaviors among school bullying witnesses: A longitudinal and experimental test of two new strategies for changing behavior. Social Psychology of Education, 26(5), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-022-09745-z
33.
MauduyM.PrioloD.MargasN.SénémeaudC. (2022). When Combining Injunctive and Descriptive Norms Strengthens the Hypocrisy Effect: A test in the Field of Discrimination. Frontiers in Psychology, 13: 989599, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.989599
34.
McKimmieB. M.TerryD. J.HoggM. A.MansteadA. S. R.SpearsR.DoosjeB. (2003). I’m a hypocrite, but so is everyone else: Group support and the reduction of cognitive dissonance. Group Dynamics, 7(3), 214–224. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.7.3.214
*MorrongielloB. A.MarkL. (2008). “Practice what you preach”: Induced hypocrisy as an intervention strategy to reduce children’s intentions to risk take on playgrounds. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 33(10), 1117–1128. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsn011
37.
OdouP.DarkeP.VoisinD. (2019). Promoting pro-environmental behaviours through induced hypocrisy. Recherche et Applications En Marketing (English Edition), 34(1), 74–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/2051570718813848
38.
*PeltA. (2017). Pourquoi? Comment faire? De la nature du comportement prosocial dans l ’ hypocrisie induite: Le cas du gaspillage alimentaire [Why? How to do it? From the nature of prosocial behavior to induced hypocrisy: The case of food waste] (Doctoral dissertation, Université de Lorraine).
39.
PeltA.FointiatV. (2018). Self-consciousness or misattribution effect in the induced hypocrisy paradigm? Mirror, mirror on the wall. . . .Psychological Reports, 121(3), 475–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294117730845
40.
PlantE. A.DevineP. G. (2001). Responses to other-imposed pro-black pressure: Acceptance or backlash?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 486–488. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1478
41.
*PrioloD.LiégeoisA. (2008). Prôner une norme et la transgresser: Le rôle des normes sociales dans le paradigme de l’hypocrisie induite [Advocating a norm and transgressing it: The role of social norms in the induced-hypocrisy paradigm]. Les Cahiers Internationaux De Psychologie Sociale, Numéro, 79(3), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.3917/cips.079.0019
42.
*PrioloD.MilhabetI.CodouO.FointiatV.LebarbenchonE.GabarrotF. (2016). Encouraging ecological behaviour through induced hypocrisy and inconsistency. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 47, 166–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.06.001
43.
PrioloD.PeltA.BauzelR. S.RubensL.VoisinD.FointiatV. (2019). Three decades of research on induced hypocrisy: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(12), 1681–1701. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219841621
44.
*RubensL. (2011). Être engagé, informé ou hypocrite: Quels leviers pour favoriser les comportements pro-environnementaux? [To be committed, informed or hypocritical: what levers can be used to encourage pro-environmental behavior?] (Doctoral dissertation, Paris 10).
45.
*RubensL.GoslingP.BonaiutoM.BrisboisX.MochA. (2015). Being a hypocrite or committed while I am shopping? A comparison of the impact of two interventions on environmentally friendly behavior. Environment and Behavior, 47(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513482838
46.
*SénémeaudC.MangeJ.FointiatV.SomatA. (2014). Being hypocritical disturbs some people more than others: How individual differences in preference for consistency moderate the behavioral effects of the induced-hypocrisy paradigm. Social Influence, 9(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2013.791235
47.
Son HingL. S.LiW.ZannaM. P. (2002). Inducing hypocrisy to reduce prejudicial responses among aversive racists. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(1), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1484
48.
*StoneJ.AronsonE.CrainA. L.WinslowM. P.FriedC. B. (1994). Inducing hypocrisy as a means of encouraging young adults to use condoms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(1), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294201012
49.
StoneJ.CooperJ. (2001). A self-standards model of cognitive dissonance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(3), 228–243. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2000.1446
50.
StoneJ.FernandezN. C. (2008). To practice what we preach: The use of hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance to motivate behavior change. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(2), 1024–1051. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00088.x
51.
StoneJ.FernandezN. C. (2011). When thinking about less failure causes more dissonance: The effect of elaboration and recall on behavior change following hypocrisy. Social Influence, 6(4), 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2011.618368
52.
*StoneJ.WiegandA. W.CooperJ.AronsonE. (1997). When exemplification fails: Hypocrisy and the motive for self-integrity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1037%2F0022-3514.72.1.54
53.
TankardM. E.PaluckE. L. (2016). Norm perception as a vehicle for social change. Social Issues and Policy Review, 10(1), 181–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12022
54.
*ThormanD.WhitmarshL.DemskiC. (2020). Policy acceptance of low-consumption governance approaches: The effect of social norms and hypocrisy. Sustainability, 12(3), 1247. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031247
55.
ViechtbauerW. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03
56.
*WardM. K.MeadeA. W. (2018). Applying social psychology to prevent careless responding during online surveys. Applied Psychology, 67(2), 231–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12118
57.
YousafO.GobetF. (2013). The emotional and attitudinal consequences of religious hypocrisy: Experimental evidence using a cognitive dissonance paradigm. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153(6), 667–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2013.814620
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
