Social perceptions of speakers are influenced by their voice information, including vocal characteristics and semantic content. Our study investigated how individuals’ warmth- and competence-related perceptions of speakers were affected by vocal pitch levels (i.e., high/low) and three kinds of semantic cues (i.e., prosocial, antisocial, and neutral) simultaneously. We have three key findings. First, antisocial cues negatively affected social perceptions, regardless of speakers’ gender. However, prosocial cues did not have positive impacts on evaluations of speakers because ratings were similar between prosocial cues and neutral cues. Second, female vocal pitch mattered for warmth-related perceptions but not for competence-related perceptions. The role of semantic cues should be additionally considered when investigating the impact of male vocal pitch on these perceptions. For example, higher-pitched men in prosocial contexts were perceived as warmer, while low-pitched men in antisocial contexts were judged as more competent. Third, the connection between vocal pitch and two kinds of perceptions showed an opposite trend, in which high pitch was related to more warmth but less competence, while the low pitch was associated with less warmth but more competence. These findings extend the understanding of the role of vocal pitch in the formation of stereotypes of strangers in different semantic contexts.
BanseR.SchererK. R. (1996). Acoustic profiles in vocal emotion expression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 614–636. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.614
2.
BatsonC. D.PowellA. A. (2003). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In MillonT.LernerM. J. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Personality and social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 463–484). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei0519
3.
BenjaminiY.HochbergY. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57, 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
4.
BorkowskaB.PawlowskiB. (2011). Female voice frequency in the context of dominance and attractiveness perception. Animal Behaviour, 82, 55–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.03.024
5.
CaprarielloP. A.CuddyA. J. C.FiskeS. T. (2009). Social structure shapes cultural stereotypes and emotions: A causal test of the stereotype content model. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430208101053
6.
CuddyA. J.FiskeS. T.GlickP. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0
EaglyA. H.MladinicA. (1989). Gender stereotypes and attitudes toward women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 543–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167289154008
9.
FeinbergD. R.JonesB. C.LittleA. C.BurtD. M.PerrettD. I. (2005). Manipulations of fundamental and formant frequencies influence the attractiveness of human male voices. Animal Behaviour, 69, 561–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.06.012
10.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J.GlickP. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005
11.
FitchW. T.GieddJ. (1999). Morphology and development of the human vocal tract: A study using magnetic resonance imaging. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 1511–1522. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.427148
12.
HindelangM. J.HirschiT.WeisJ. G. (1981). Measuring delinquency. Sage Publ.
13.
JonesB. C.FeinbergD. R.DeBruineL. M.LittleA. C.VukovicJ. (2008). Integrating cues of social interest and voice pitch in men's preferences for women's voices. Biology Letters, 4, 192–194. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2007.0626
14.
JonesB. C.FeinbergD. R.DeBruineL. M.LittleA. C.VukovicJ. (2010). A domain-specific opposite-sex bias in human preferences for manipulated voice pitch. Animal Behaviour, 79, 57–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.10.003
15.
KeatingP.KuoG. (2012). Comparison of speaking fundamental frequency in English and Mandarin. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132, 1050–1060. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4730893
16.
KlofstadC. A.AndersonR. C.PetersS. (2012). Sounds like a winner: Voice pitch influences perception of leadership capacity in both men and women. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279, 2698–2704. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.0311
17.
KnowlesK. K.LittleA. C. (2016). Vocal fundamental and formant frequencies affect perception of speaker cooperativeness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 1657–1675. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1091484
18.
KoS. J.JuddC. M.BlairI. V. (2006). What the voice reveals: Within-and between-category stereotyping on the basis of voice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 806–819. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206286627
19.
KoS. J.JuddC. M.StapelD. A. (2009). Stereotyping based on voice in the presence of individuating information: Vocal femininity affects perceived competence but not warmth. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208326477
20.
KrahéB.PapakonstantinouL. (2020). Speaking like a man: Women's pitch as a cue for gender stereotyping. Sex Roles, 82, 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01041-z
21.
KrahéB.UhlmannA.HerzbergM. (2021). The voice gives it away: Male and female pitch as a cue for gender stereotyping. Social Psychology, 52, 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000441
22.
LeungY.OatesJ.ChanS. P. (2018). Voice, articulation, and prosody contribute to listener perception of speaker gender: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 61, 266–297. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-17-0067
23.
LinM. H.KwanV. S.CheungA.FiskeS. T. (2005). Stereotype content model explains prejudice for an envied outgroup: Scale of anti-Asian American stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271320
MunsonB. (2007). The acoustic correlates of perceived masculinity, perceived femininity, and perceived sexual orientation. Language and Speech, 50, 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309070500010601
26.
O'ConnorJ. J.BarclayP. (2018). High voice pitch mitigates the aversiveness of antisocial cues in men's speech. British Journal of Psychology, 109, 812–829. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12310
27.
O'ConnorJ. J.FeinbergD. R.FraccaroP. J.BorakD. J.TigueC. C.ReD. E.TiddemanB. (2012). Female preferences for male vocal and facial masculinity in videos. Ethology, 118, 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2011.02013.x
28.
OleszkiewiczA.PisanskiK.Lachowicz-TabaczekK.SorokowskaA. (2017). Voice-based assessments of trustworthiness, competence, and warmth in blind and sighted adults. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 856–862. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1146-y
29.
PutsD. A.HodgesC. R.CárdenasR. A.GaulinS. J. (2007). Men's voices as dominance signals: Vocal fundamental and formant frequencies influence dominance attributions among men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 340–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.05.002
30.
Radke-YarrowM.Zahn-WaxlerC.ChapmanM. (1983). Children's prosocial disposition and behavior. In MussenP.HetheringtonE. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4. Socialization, personality, and social development (4th ed., pp. 469–545). New York: Wiley.
31.
TitzeI. R. (1989). Physiologic and acoustic differences between male and female voices. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85(4), 1699–1707. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.397959
TsantaniM. S.BelinP.PatersonH. M.McAleerP. (2016). Low vocal pitch preference drives first impressions irrespective of context in male voices but not in female voices. Perception, 45, 946–963. https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006616643675
34.
TusingK. J.DillardJ. P. (2000). The sounds of dominance. Vocal precursors of perceived dominance during interpersonal influence. Human Communication Research, 26, 148–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00754.x
35.
VukovicJ.JonesB. C.FeinbergD. R.DeBruineL. M.SmithF. G.WellingL. L.LittleA. C. (2011). Variation in perceptions of physical dominance and trustworthiness predicts individual differences in the effect of relationship context on women's preferences for masculine pitch in men's voices. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712610X498750
36.
WojciszkeB.BazinskaR.JaworskiM. (1998). On the dominance of moral categories in impression formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1251–1263. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672982412001
37.
WuQ.LiuY.LiD.LengH.IqbalZ.JiangZ. (2021). Understanding one's character through the voice: Dimensions of personality perception from Chinese greeting word “Ni Hao”. The Journal of Social Psychology, 161(6), 653–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2020.1856026
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
