Loving the Group That Denies You First: Social Identity Effects of Ostracism Before Inclusion

Abstract

Ostracism is an aversive situation that occurs frequently in everyday life; however, few empirical studies have investigated multiple experiences of inclusion or ostracism from the same group. The prior work in this area has also not evaluated the influence of subsequent inclusion and ostracism on identification with the group, perceptions of the group, or group member behaviors. Across three experiments, the current study investigated the impact of subsequent inclusion and ostracism on an individual’s fundamental needs, identification with the group, perceptions of the group, and risk taking to benefit the group. It was hypothesized that participants who were ostracized and then included would show significant increases in group identification, positive group perceptions, and risk taking to benefit the group. Support for these hypotheses was found. Results are discussed regarding the impact of subsequent experiences of ostracism and inclusion on the individual and his or her relationship with the group.

Keywords

ostracism group identification fundamental needs group perception risk taking

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aronson

Mills

(1959). The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 177-181. doi:10.1037/h0047195

Barreto

Ellemers

(2000). You can’t always do what you want: Social identity and self-presentational determinants of the choice to work for a low-status group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 891-906. doi:10.1177/01461672002610001

Baumeister

R. F.

Leary

M. R.

(1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachment as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497

Benjamin

A. M.

Robbins

S. J.

(2007). The role of framing effects in performance on the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 221-230. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.11.026

Bernstein

M. J.

(2016). Research in social psychology: Consequences of short- and long-term social exclusion. In Riva

Eck

(Eds.), Social exclusion (pp. 51-72). New York, New York: Springer.

Branscombe

N. R.

Schmitt

M. T.

Harvey

R. D.

(1999). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 135-149. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.135

Brewer

M. B.

Manzi

J. M.

Shaw

J. S.

(1993). In-group identification as a function of depersonalization, distinctiveness, and status. Psychological Science, 4, 88-92. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00466.x

Campbell

D. T.

(1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3, 14-25. doi:10.1002/bs.3830030103

Carter-Sowell

A. R.

Zimmerman

C. A.

(2015). Hidden in plain sight: Locating, validating, and advocating the stigma experiences of women of color. Sex Roles, 73(9-10), 399-407. doi:10.1007/s11199-015-0529-2

10.

Castano

Yzerbyt

Bourguignon

(2003). We are one and I like it: The impact of ingroup entitativity on ingroup identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 735-754. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsp.175/fulldoi:10.1002/ejsp.175

11.

Chaiken

Maheswaran

(1994). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 460-473. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.3.460

12.

Diehl

(1990). The minimal group paradigm: Theoretical explanations and empirical findings. European Review of Social Psychology, 1, 263-292. doi:10.1080/14792779108401864

13.

Eisenberger

N. I.

Lieberman

M. D.

Williams

K. D.

(2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302, 290-292. doi:10.1126/science.1089134

14.

Festinger

(1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.

15.

Fiske

S. T.

Cuddy

A. J.

Glick

(2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77-83. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005

16.

Fiske

S. T.

Cuddy

A. J.

Glick

(2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878

17.

Gaertner

Schopler

(1998). Perceived ingroup entitativity and intergroup bias: An interconnection of self and others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 963-980. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(1998110)28:6<963:: AID-EJSP905>3.0.CO;2-S

18.

Gerber

Chang

S.-H.

Reimel

(2017). Construct validity of Williams’ ostracism needs threat scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 115, 50-53. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.07.008

19.

Gómez

Á.

Morales

J. F.

Hart

Vázquez

Swann

W. B.

Jr. (2011). Rejected and excluded forevermore, but even more devoted: Irrevocable ostracism intensifies loyalty to the group among identity-fused persons. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1574-1586. doi:10.1177/0146167211424580

20.

Hamilton

D. L.

Sherman

S. J.

(1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 103, 336-335. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.336

21.

Hayes

A. F.

(2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf

22.

Hogg

M. A.

(2007). Uncertainty–identity theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 69-126. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(06)39002-8

23.

Hogg

M. A.

Adelman

(2013). Uncertainty–identity theory: Extreme groups, radical behavior, and authoritarian leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 69, 436-454. doi:10.1111/josi.12023

24.

Hogg

M. A.

Cooper-Shaw

Holzworth

D. W.

(1993). Group prototypicality and depersonalized attraction in small interactive groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 452-465. doi:10.1177/0146167293194010

25.

Hogg

M. A.

Fielding

K. S.

Darley

(2005). Fringe dwellers: Processes of deviance and marginalization in groups. In Abrams

Hogg

M. A.

Marques

J. M.

(Eds.), The social psychology of inclusion and exclusion (pp. 191-210). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

26.

Hogg

M. A.

Siegel

J. T.

Hohman

Z. P.

(2011). Groups can jeopardize your health: Identifying with unhealthy groups to reduce self-uncertainty. Self and Identity, 10, 326-335. doi:10.1080/15298868.2011.558762

27.

Hohman

Z. P.

Gaffney

A. M.

Hogg

M. A.

(2017). Who am I if I am not like my group? Self-uncertainty and feeling peripheral in a group. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 125-132. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.05.002

28.

Hohman

Z. P.

Hogg

M. A.

(2011). Fear and uncertainty in the face of death: The role of life after death in group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 751-760. doi:10.1002/ejsp.818

29.

Jetten

Branscombe

N. R.

Spears

(2002). On being peripheral: Effects of identity insecurity on personal and collective self-esteem. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 105-123. doi:10.1002/ejsp.64

30.

Knowles

M. L.

Gardner

W. L.

(2008). Benefits of membership: The activation and amplification of group identities in response to social rejection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1200-1213. doi:10.1177/0146167208320062

31.

Lejuez

C. W.

Aklin

W. M.

Zvolensky

M. J.

Pedulla

C. M.

(2003). Evaluation of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) as a predictor of adolescent real-world risk-taking behaviours. Journal of Adolescence, 26, 475-479. doi:10.1016/S0140-1971(03)00036-8

32.

Lejuez

C. W.

Read

J. P.

Kahler

C. W.

Richards

J. B.

Ramsey

S. E.

Stuart

G. L.

. . . Brown

R. A.

(2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 75-84. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.8.2.75

33.

Major

Gramzow

R. H.

McCoy

S. K.

Levin

Schmader

Sidanius

(2002). Perceiving personal discrimination: The role of group status and legitimizing ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 269-282. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.269

34.

Mead

N. L.

Baumeister

R. F.

Stillman

T. F.

Rawn

C. D.

Vohs

K. D.

(2011). Social exclusion causes people to spend and consume strategically in the service of affiliation. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 902-919. doi:10.1086/656667

35.

Mullin

B. A.

Hogg

M. A.

(1999). Motivations for group membership: The role of subjective importance and uncertainty reduction. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 91-102. doi:10.1207/15324839951036443

36.

Niedbala

E. M.

Hohman

Z. P.

(in press). Retaliation against the outgroup: The role of self-uncertainty. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. doi:10.1177/1368430218767027

37.

Noel

J. G.

Wann

D. L.

Branscombe

N. R.

(1995). Peripheral ingroup membership status and public negativity toward outgroups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 127-137. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.1.127

38.

Perreault

Bourhis

R. Y.

(1999). Ethnocentrism, social identification, and discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 92-103. doi:10.1177/0146167299025001008

39.

Rosenthal

Rosnow

R. L.

(1984). Applying Hamlet’s question to the ethical conduct of research: A conceptual addendum. American Psychologist, 39, 561-563. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.39.5.561

40.

Spencer-Rodgers

Hamilton

D. L.

Sherman

S. J.

(2007). The central role of entitativity in stereotypes of social categories and task groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 369-388. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.369

41.

Tajfel

(1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223, 96-102. doi:10.1038/scientificaamerican1170-96

42.

Tajfel

(1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-30. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245

43.

Tajfel

Turner

J. C.

(1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Austin

W. F.

Worchel

(Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

44.

Tang

H. H.

Richardson

(2013). Reversing the negative psychological sequelae of exclusion: Inclusion is ameliorative but not protective against the aversive consequences of exclusion. Emotion, 13, 139-150. doi:10.1037/a0029521

45.

Turner

J. C.

Hogg

M. A.

Oakes

P. J.

Reicher

S. D.

Wetherell

M. S.

(1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

46.

Williams

K. D.

(1997). Social ostracism. In Kowalski

R. M.

(Ed.), Aversive interpersonal behaviors (pp. 133-170). New York, NY: Springer.

47.

Williams

K. D.

(2007a). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 425-452. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085641

48.

Williams

K. D.

(2007b). Ostracism: The kiss of social death. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 236-247. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00004.x

49.

Williams

K. D.

(2009). Ostracism: A temporal need-threat model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 275-314. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)00406-1

50.

Williams

K. D.

Cheung

C. K.

Choi

(2000). Cyberostracism: Effects of being ignored over the Internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 748-762. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.748

51.

Williams

K. D.

Govan

C. L.

(2005). Reacting to ostracism: Retaliation or reconciliation. In Abrams

Hogg

M. A.

Marques

J. M.

(Eds.), The social psychology of inclusion and exclusion (pp. 47-62). New York, NY: Psychological Press.

52.

Williams

K. D.

Jarvis

(2006). Cyberball: A program for use in research on interpersonal ostracism and acceptance. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 174-180. doi:10.3758/BF03192765

53.

Wirth

J. H.

Williams

K. D.

(2009). They don’t like our kind: Consequences of being ostracized while possessing a group membership. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 111-127. doi:10.1177/1368430208098780

54.

Zadro

Williams

K. D.

Richardson

(2004). How low can you go? Ostracism by a computer is sufficient to lower self-reported levels of belonging, control, self-esteem, and meaningful existence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 560-567. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2003.11.006

55.

Zimmerman

C. A.

Carter-Sowell

A. R.

(2016). Examining workplace ostracism experiences in academia: Understanding how differences in the faculty ranks influence inclusive climates on campus. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1-9. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00753

56.

Zwolinski

(2014). Does inclusion after ostracism influence the persistence of affective distress? Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 18, 282-301. doi:10.1037/gdn0000012

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.10 MB