This paper examines how group identification influences individuals’ judgments of the in-group’s status. Across four studies, using multiple manipulations of identification and measurements of group status, we demonstrate that increased identification with one’s group positively influences judgments of the in-group’s status. Moreover, we find confirmatory support for our prediction that this relationship is mediated by collective self-esteem. Implications of this research for social identity theory and both intragroup and intergroup status perceptions are discussed.
AbersonC. L.HealyM.RomeroV. (2000). Ingroup bias and self-esteem: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 157–173.
2.
AndersonC.AmesD. R.GoslingS. D. (2008). Punishing hubris: The perils of overestimating one’s status in a group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 90–101.
3.
AndersonC.SrivastavaS.BeerJ.SpataroS. E.ChatmanJ. A. (2006). Knowing your place: Self-perceptions of status in social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1094–1110.
4.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
5.
BarkowJ. H. (1989). Darwin, sex, and status. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
6.
BergerJ.ConnerT. L. (1974). Performance expectations and behavior in small groups: A revised formulation. In BergerJ.ConnerM. L.FisekM. H. (Eds.), Expectations states theory: A theoretical research program (pp. 85–109). Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.
7.
BergerJ.RosenholtzS. J.ZelditchM. (1980). Status organizing processes. Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 479–508.
8.
BlauP. M.ScottR. W. (1963). Formal organizations. New York, NY: Wiley.
9.
BourdieuP. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
BranscombeN. R.WannD. L. (1994). Collective self-esteem consequences of outgroup derogation when a valued social identity is on trial. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 641–657.
11.
BranscombeN. R.WannD. L.NoelJ. G.ColemanJ. (1993). In-group or out-group extremity: Importance of the threatened social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 381–388.
12.
BrewerM. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307–324.
13.
BrewerM. B. (2001). Ingroup identification and intergroup conflict: When does ingroup love become out-group hate? In AshmoreR. D.JussimL.WilderD. (Eds.), Social identity, intergroup conflict, and conflict resolution (pp. 17–41). New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
BrewerM. B.ManziJ. M.ShawJ. S. (1993). In-group identification as a function of depersonalization, distinctiveness, and status. Psychological Science, 4, 88–92.
15.
BrownR.WilliamsJ. (1984). Group identification: The same thing to all people?Human Relations, 7, 547–564.
16.
CarpenterS.JohnsonL. E. (2001). Women derive collective self-esteem from their feminist identity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 254–257.
17.
CastanoE.YzerbytV.BourguignonD.SeronE. (2002). Who may enter? The impact of in-group identification on in-group/out-group categorization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 315–322.
18.
ChenY.BrocknerJ.GreenbergJ. (2003). When is it “a pleasure to do business with you?” The effects of relative status, outcome favorability, and procedural fairness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 92, 1–15.
19.
CrispR. J.HeustonS.FarrM. J.TurnerR. N. (2007). Seeing red or feeling blue: differentiated intergroup emotions and ingroup identification in soccer fans. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 9–26.
20.
CrockerJ.BlaineB.LuhtanenR. (1993). Prejudice, intergroup behavior and self-esteem: Enhancement and protection motives. In HoggM. A.AbramsD. (Eds.), Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 52–67). Hemel Hempstead: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
21.
CrockerJ.LuhtanenR. (1990). Collective self-esteem and ingroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 60–67.
22.
DeauxK.ReidA.MizrahiK.CottingD. (1999). Connecting the person to the social self: The function of social identification. In TylerT. R.KramerR. M.JohnO. P. (Eds.), The psychology of the social self (pp. 91–114). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23.
DerksB.Van LaarC.EllemersN. (2009). Working for the self or working for the group: How personal and social self-affirmation promote collective behavior among members of devalued groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 183–202.
24.
EllemersN. (1993). The influence of socio-structural variables on identity enhancement strategies. In StroebeW.HewstoneM. (Eds.), European review of social psychology (vol. 4, pp. 27–54), Chichester: Wiley.
25.
EllemersN.DoosjeB.van KnippenbergA.WilkeH. (1992). Status protection in high status minority groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 123–140.
26.
EllemersN.KortekaasP.DoosjeB. (1999). Self-categorization, commitment to the group and social self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 371–389.
27.
EllemersN.SpearsR.DoosjeB. (1997). Sticking together or falling apart: Ingroup identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 617–626.
28.
EthierK. A.DeauxK. (1994). Negotiating social identity when contexts change: Maintaining identification and responding to threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 243–251.
29.
FrankR. H. (1985). Choosing the right pond: Human behavior and the quest for status. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
30.
HagendoornL.DrogendijkR.TumanovS.HrabaJ. (1998). Inter-ethnic preferences and ethnic hierarchies in the former Soviet Union. International Journal on Intercultural Relations, 22, 483–503.
31.
HoggM. A.AbramsD. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. New York, NY: Routledge.
32.
HornseyM. J.HoggM. A. (2002). The effects of status on subgroup relations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 203–218.
33.
HornseyM. J.van LeeuwenE.Van SantenW. (2003). Dragging down and dragging up: How relative group status affects responses to common fate. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7, 275–288.
34.
HoyleR. H. (1991). Evaluating measurement models in clinical research: covariance structure analysis of latent variable models of self-conception. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 67–76.
35.
HoyleR. H.KennyD. A. (1999). Sample size, reliability, and tests of statistical mediation. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research (pp. 195–222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In HoyleR. H. (Ed), Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues and applications (pp. 76–99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
38.
IacobucciD.SaldanhaN.DengX. (2007). A mediation on mediation: Evidence that structural equation models perform better than regressions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17, 140–154.
39.
JamesL. R.MulaikS. A.BrettJ. M. (2006). A tale of two methods. Organizational Research Methods, 9, 233–244.
40.
JettenJ.BranscombeN. R.SchmittM. T.SpearsR. (2001). Rebels with a cause: group identification as a response to perceived discrimination from the mainstream. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1204–1213.
41.
KahnK.HoA. K.SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (2009). The space between us and them: Perceptions of status differences. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 591–604.
42.
LeonardelliG. J.TormalaZ. L. (2003). The negative impact of perceiving discrimination on collective well-being: The mediating role of perceived ingroup status. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 507–514.
43.
LinN. (1999). Social networks and status attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 467–87.
44.
LuhtanenR.CrockerJ. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one’s social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302–318.
45.
MacCallumR. C.WegenerD. T.UnchinoB. N.FabrigarL. R. (1993). The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 185–199.
46.
MacKinnonD. P.LockwoodC. M.WilliamsJ. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99–128.
47.
MajorB.SciacchitanoA. M.CrockerJ. (1993). In-group versus out-group comparisons and self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 711–721.
48.
MartinotD.RedersdorffS.GuimondS.DiffS. (2002). Ingroup versus outgroup comparisons and self-esteem: the role of group status and ingroup identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 1586–1600.
49.
MummendeyA.KlinkA.MielkeR.WenzelBlanz (1999). Socio-structural characteristics of intergroup relations and identity management strategies: Results from a field study in East Germany. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 259–285.
50.
PackerD. J. (2009). Avoiding groupthink: Whereas weakly identified members remain silent, strongly identified members dissent about collective problems. Psychological Science, 20, 546–548.
51.
PerreaultS.BourhisR. Y. (1999). Ethnocentrism, social identification, and discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 92–103.
52.
PettitN. C.LountR. B.Jr. (2010). Looking down and ramping up: The impact of status differences on effort in intergroup contexts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 9–20.
53.
RidgewayC.WalkerH. (1995). Status structures. In CookK.FineG.HouseJ. (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology (pp. 281–310). New York, NY: Allyn and Bacon.
54.
RikettaM. (2005). Cognitive differentiation between self, ingroup, and outgroup: The roles of identification and perceived intergroup conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 97–106.
55.
RubinM.HewstoneM. (1998). Social identity theory’s self-esteem hypothesis: A review and some suggestions for clarification. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 40–62.
56.
SachdevI.BourhisR. Y. (1987). Status differentials and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 277–293.
57.
ScheepersD. (2009). Turning social identity threat into challenge: Status stability and cardiovascular reactivity during intergroup competition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 228–233.
58.
ScheepersD.EllemersN. (2005). When the pressure is up: The assessment of social identity threat in low and high status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 192–200.
59.
ScheepersD.SpearsR.DoosjeB.MansteadA. S. R. (2003). Two functions of verbal inter-group discrimination: Instrumental and identity motives as a result of group identification and threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 568–577.
60.
ShroutP. E.BolgerN. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445.
61.
SidaniusJ.LevinS.LiuJ.PrattoF. (2000). Social dominance orientation, anti-egalitarianism and the political psychology of gender: An extension and cross-cultural replication. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 41–67.
62.
SpearsR.DoosjeB.EllemersN. (1999). Commitment and intergroup behavior. In EllemersN.SpearsR.DoosjeB. (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
63.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
64.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In WorchelS.AustinW. G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
65.
TanakaJ. S. (1987). “How big is big enough”: Sample size and goodness of fit in structural equation models with latent variables. Child Development, 58, 134–146.
66.
TroppL. R.WrightS. C. (2001). Ingroup identification and the inclusion of ingroup in the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 585–600.
67.
TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
68.
TwengeJ. M.CampbellW. K. (2002). Self-esteem and socioeconomic status: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 59–71.
69.
TylerT. R.BladerS. L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349–361.
70.
van KnippenbergA. (1984). Intergroup differences in group perceptions. In TajfelH. (Ed.), The social dimension: European developments in social psychology (pp. 560–578). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
71.
van KnippenbergA.EllemersN. (1990). Social identity and intergroup differentiation processes. In StroebeW.HewstoneM. (Eds.), European review of social psychology, (Vol. 1, pp. 137–169). Chichester: Wiley.
72.
VerkuytenM.HagendoornL. (2002). In-group favoritism and self-esteem: The role of identity threat and trait valence. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 5, 285–297.
73.
VerkuytenM.HagendoornL.MassonK. (1996). The ethnic hierarchy among minority and majority youth in the Netherlands. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1104–1118.
74.
WeberM. (1968). Economy and society. In RothG.WittichC. (Eds.), New York, NY: Bedminster.
