Previous research has consistently found widespread attitudinal impacts of terrorist attacks. Using data from the European Social Survey, which was conducting interviews in 11 countries when the Charlie Hebdo attacks happened in January 2015, I compare respondents from before and after the shootings to test whether the event shifted public opinion on several topics. There is no evidence of average impacts across a range of issues, from xenophobia to ideological self-placement and immigration policy preferences. Data collected when the Paris November 2015 shootings happened also present no evidence of public opinion change on immigration and refugee policy matters in France, but there appears to be an effect in other countries—which varies according to contextual vulnerability. Results suggest that views on immigration and immigrants have, to a certain extent, stabilized in Europe and are less susceptible to shifts from dramatic events.
Ben-EzraM.LeshemE.GoodwinR. (2015). In the wake of national trauma: Psychological reactions following the Charlie Hebdo terror attack. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 172, 795-796.
2.
BenjaminiY.HochbergY. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), 57, 289-300.
3.
BenjaminiY.YekutieliD. (2001). The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. The Annals of Statistics, 29, 1165-1188.
4.
BerrebiC.KlorE. F. (2008). Are voters sensitive to terrorism? Direct evidence from the Israeli electorate. American Political Science Review, 102, 279-301.
5.
BogardusE. S. (1933). A social distance scale. Sociology & Social Research, 17, 265-271.
6.
BonannoG. A.JostJ. T. (2006). Conservative shift among high-exposure survivors of the September 11th terrorist attacks. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28, 311-323.
7.
BozzoliC.MüllerC. (2011). Perceptions and attitudes following a terrorist shock: Evidence from the UK. European Journal of Political Economy, 27, S89-S106.
8.
BroockmanD. E. (2014). Do female politicians empower women to vote or run for office? A regression discontinuity approach. Electoral Studies, 34, 190-204.
9.
CaricatiL.ManciniT.MarlettaG. (2017). The role of ingroup threat and conservative ideologies on prejudice against immigrants in two samples of Italian adults. The Journal of Social Psychology, 157, 86-97.
10.
Castanho SilvaB.BosancianuC. M.LittvayL. (in press). Multilevel structural equation modeling: A basic introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
11.
CastanoE.LeidnerB.BonacossaA.NikkahJ. P.errulliR.SpencerB.HumphreyN. (2011). Ideology, fear of death, and death anxiety. Political Psychology, 32, 601-621.
12.
DavisD. W.SilverB. D. (2004). Civil liberties vs. security: Public opinion in the context of the terrorist attacks on America. American Journal of Political Science, 48, 28-46.
Echebarria-EchabeA.Fernández-GuedeE. (2006). Effects of terrorism on attitudes and ideological orientation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 259-265.
15.
EdlingC.RydgrenJ.SandellR. (2016). Terrorism, belief formation, and residential integration: Population dynamics in the aftermath of the 2004 Madrid terror bombings. American Behavioral Scientist, 60, 1215-1231.
16.
EggersA. C.HainmuellerJ. (2009). Mps for sale? Returns to office in postwar British politics. American Political Science Review, 103, 513-533.
17.
European Commission. (2016). Eurobarometer 83.4, November 2015 (ZA6643, dataset version 2.0.0). TNS opinion & social, Brussels [Producer]. Cologne, Germany: GESIS.
18.
European Social Survey. (2015). ESS Round 7 (2014/2015) (Data file edition 2.0, Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC). Bergen: Norwegian Centre for Research Data.
19.
FernbachP. M.RogersT.FoxC. R.SlomanS. A. (2013). Political extremism is supported by an illusion of understanding. Psychological Science, 24, 939-946.
20.
FinseraasH.JakobssonN.KotsadamA. (2011). Did the murder of Theo van Gogh change Europeans’ immigration policy preferences?KYKLOS, 64, 396-409.
21.
FinseraasH.ListhaugO. (2013). It can happen here: The impact of the Mumbai terror attacks on public opinion in Western Europe. Public Choice, 156, 213-228.
22.
GadarianS. K. (2010). The politics of threat: How terrorism news shapes foreign policy attitudes. The Journal of Politics, 72, 469-483.
23.
GreenE. G. T.SarrasinO.BaurR.FaselN. (2016). From stigmatized immigrants to radical right voting: A multilevel study on the role of threat and contact. Political Psychology, 37, 465-480.
24.
GreenbergJ.PyszczynskiT.SolomonS. (1986). The causes and consequences of a need for self-esteem: A terror management theory. In BaumeisterR. F. (Ed.), Public self and private self (pp. 189-212). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
25.
GreenbergJ.SimonL.PyszczynskiT.SolomonS.ChatelD. (1992). Terror management and tolerance: Does mortality salience always intensify negative reactions to others who threaten one’s worldview?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 212-220.
26.
HoggM. A.MeehanC.FarquharsonJ. (2010). The solace of radicalism: Self-uncertainty and group identification in the face of threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1061-1066.
27.
HopkinsD. J. (2010). Politicized places: Explaining where and when immigrants provoke local opposition. American Political Science Review, 104, 40-60.
28.
HuddyL.FeldmanS.CapelosT.ProvostC. (2002). The consequences of terrorism: Disentangling the effects of personal and national threat. Political Psychology, 23, 485-509.
29.
ImbensG.KalyanaramanK. (2012). Optimal bandwidth choice for the regression discontinuity estimator. Review of Economic Studies, 79, 933-959.
30.
ImbensG. W.LemieuxT. (2008). Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142, 615-635.
31.
InglehartR.WelzelC. (2005). Modernization, cultural, change, and democracy: The human development. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
32.
JakobssonN.BlomS. (2014). Did the 2011 terror attacks in Norway change citizens’ attitudes toward immigrants?International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 26, 475-486.
33.
JostJ. T.FitzsimonsG.KayA. C. (2004). The ideological animal: A system justification view. In GreenbergJ.KooleS. L.PyszczynskiT. (Eds.), Handbook of experimental existential psychology (pp. 263-282). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
34.
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W.SullowayF. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375.
35.
KamC. D.KinderD. R. (2007). Terror and ethnocentrism: Foundations of American support for the War on Terrorism. Journal of Politics, 69, 320-338.
36.
LambertA. J.SchererL. D.ScottJ. P.OlsonK. R.AndrewsR. K.O’BrienT. C. (2010). Rally effects, threat, and attitude change: An integrative approach to understanding the role of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 886-903.
37.
LeeD. S. (2008). Randomized experiments from non-random selection in U.S. House elections. Journal of Econometrics, 142, 675-697.
38.
LeeD. S.LemieuxT. (2010). Regression discontinuity designs in economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 48, 281-355.
39.
LegewieJ. (2013). Terrorist events and attitudes toward immigrants: A natural experiment. American Journal of Sociology, 118, 1199-1245.
40.
MalkaA.SotoC. J.InzlichtM.LelkesY. (2014). Do needs for security and certainty predict cultural and economic conservatism? A cross-national analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 1031-–1051.
41.
MuellerJ. E. (1970). Presidential popularity from Truman to Johnson. American Political Science Review, 64, 18-34.
42.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998-2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
43.
NailP. R.McGregorI. (2009). Conservative shift among liberals and conservatives following 9/11/01. Social Justice Research, 22, 231-240.
44.
OnraetE.Van HielA.CornelisI. (2013). Threat and right-wing attitudes: A cross-national approach. Political Psychology, 34, 791-803.
45.
PettigrewT. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65-85.
46.
SatorraA.BentlerP. M. (2000). Scaled and adjusted restricted tests in multi-sample analysis of moment structures. In HeijmansR. D. H.PollockD. S. G.SatorraA. (Eds.), Innovations in multivariate statistical analysis: A Festschrift for Heinz Neudecker (pp. 233-247). London, England: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
47.
SatorraA.BentlerP. M. (2010). Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika, 75, 243-248.
48.
SchüllerS. (2015). The 9/11 conservative shift. Economics Letters, 135, 80-84.
49.
StegmuellerD. (2013). How many countries for multilevel modeling? A comparison of frequentist and Bayesian approaches. American Journal of Political Science, 57, 748-761.
50.
StephanW. G.YbarraO.BachmanG. (1999). Prejudice towards immigrants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 2221-2237.
Van de VyverJ.HoustonD. M.AbramsD.VasiljevicM. (2016). Boosting belligerence: How the July 7, 2005, London bombings affected liberals’ moral foundations and prejudice. Psychological Science, 27, 169-177.
53.
van ProoijenJ.-W.KrouwelA. P. M.BoitenM.EendebakL. (2015). Fear among the extremes: How political ideology predicts negative emotions and out-group derogation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 485-497.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
