We assessed self-consistency (expressing similar traits in different situations) by having undergraduates in the United States (n = 230), Australia (n = 220), Canada (n = 240), Ecuador (n = 101), Mexico (n = 209), Venezuela (n = 209), Japan (n = 178), Malaysia (n = 254), and the Philippines (n = 241) report the traits they expressed in four different social situations. Self-consistency was positively associated with age, well-being, living in Latin America, and not living in Japan; however, each of these variables showed a unique pattern of associations with various psychologically distinct sources of raw self-consistency, including cross-situationally consistent social norms and injunctions. For example, low consistency between injunctive norms and trait expressions fully explained the low self-consistency in Japan. In accord with trait theory, after removing normative and injunctive sources of consistency, there remained robust distinctive noninjunctive self-consistency (reflecting individuating personality dispositions) in every country, including Japan. The results highlight how clarifying the determinants and implications of self-consistency requires differentiating its distinctive, injunctive, and noninjunctive components.
BairdB. M.LeK.LucasR. E. (2006). On the nature of intraindividual personality variability: Reliability, validity, and associations with well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 512-527.
2.
BauerD. J.CurranP. J. (2005). Probing interactions in fixed and multilevel regression: Inferential and graphical techniques. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40, 373-400.
3.
BiesanzJ. C. (2010). The social accuracy model of interpersonal perception: Assessing individual differences in perceptive and expressive accuracy. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 853-885.
4.
BleidornW.KoddingC. (2013). The divided self and psychological (mal) adjustment—A meta-analytic review. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 547-552.
5.
BlockJ. (1961). Ego identity, role variability, and adjustment. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 25, 392-397.
6.
BorkenauP.LeisingD. (2016). A more complete picture of personality: What analyses of trait profiles have told us about personality judgment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25, 228-232.
7.
BoucherH. C. (2011). The dialectical self-concept II: Cross-role and within-role consistency, well-being, self-certainty, and authenticity. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 1251-1271.
8.
BryanM. L.JenkinsS. P. (2016). Multilevel modelling of country effects: A cautionary tale. European Sociological Review, 32, 3-22.
9.
ChingC. M.ChurchA. T.KatigbakM. S.LockeK. D.Vargas-FloresJ. D. J.Ibáñez-ReyesJ.. . . OrtizF. A. (2013). Cross-cultural generalizability of the personality and role identity structural model (PRISM): Implications for trait and cultural psychology. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 894-907.
10.
ChurchA. T. (2000). Culture and personality: Toward an integrated cultural trait psychology. Journal of Personality, 68, 651-703.
11.
ChurchA. T. (2010). Measurement issues in cross-cultural research. In WalfordG.ViswanathanM.TuckerE. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of measurement (pp. 151-177). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
12.
ChurchA. T.AlvarezJ. M.KatigbakM. S.MastorK. A.CabreraH. F.Tanaka-MatsumiJ.. . . BuchananA. L. (2012). Self-concept consistency and short-term stability in eight cultures. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 556-570.
13.
ChurchA. T.Anderson-HarumiC. A.del PradoA. M.CurtisG. J.Tanaka-MatsumiJ.Valdez MedinaJ. L.. . . KatigbakM. S. (2008). Culture, cross-role consistency, and adjustment: Testing trait and cultural psychology perspectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 739-755.
14.
ChurchA. T.KatigbakM. S.ChingC. M.ZhangH.ShenJ.AriasR. M.. . . AlvarezJ. M. (2013). Within-Individual variability in self-concepts and personality states: Applying density distribution and situation-behavior approaches across cultures. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 922-935.
15.
ChurchA. T.KatigbakM. S.Ibáñez-ReyesJ.Vargas-FloresJ. D.CurtisG. J.Tanaka-MatsumiJ.. . . SimonJ. R. (2014). Relating self-concept consistency to hedonic and eudaimonic well-being in eight cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45, 695-712.
16.
CialdiniR. B.KallgrenC. A.RenoR. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 201-234.
17.
CliftonA.KuperL. E. (2011). Self-reported personality variability across the social network is associated with interpersonal dysfunction. Journal of Personality, 79, 359-390.
18.
ConstantinoM. J.WilsonK. R.HorowitzL. M.PinelE. C. (2006). The direct and stress-buffering effects of self-organization on psychological adjustment. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25, 333-360.
19.
CronbachL. J. (1955). Processes affecting scores on “understanding others” and “assumed similarity. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 177-193.
20.
CrossS. E.GoreJ. S.MorrisM. L. (2003). The relational-interdependent self-construal, self-concept consistency, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 933-944.
21.
DaukantaitėD.ThompsonE. S. (2014). The relationship between identity consistency across social roles and different aspects of mental health varies by age group. Identity, 14, 81-95.
22.
del PradoA. M.ChurchA. T.KatigbakM. S.MiramontesL. G.WhittyM. T.CurtisG. J.. . . ReyesJ. A. S. (2007). Culture, method, and the content of self-concepts: Testing trait, individual-self-primacy, and cultural psychology perspectives. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1119-1160.
23.
Diaz-LovingR.DragunsJ. G. (1999). Culture, meaning, and personality in Mexico and in the United States. In LeeY.-T.McCauleyC. R.DragunsJ. G. (Eds.), Personality and person perception across cultures (pp. 103-126). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
DiehlM.HastingsC. T.StantonJ. M. (2001). Self-concept differentiation across the adult life span. Psychology and Aging, 16, 643-654.
25.
DiehlM.HayE. L. (2007). Contextualized self-representation in adulthood. Journal of Personality, 75, 1255-1283.
26.
DonahueE. M.RobinsR. W.RobertsB. W.JohnO. P. (1993). The divided self: Concurrent and longitudinal effects of psychological adjustment and social roles on self-concept differentiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 834-846.
27.
DunkelC. S.MinorL.BabineauM. (2010). The continued assessment of self-continuity and identity. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 171, 251-261.
28.
EdwardsA. L. (1953). The relationship between the judged desirability of a trait and the probability that the trait will be endorsed. Journal of Applied Psychology, 37, 90-93.
29.
EnglishT.ChenS. (2007). Culture and self-concept stability: Consistency across and within contexts among Asian Americans and European Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 478-490.
30.
EnglishT.ChenS. (2011). Self-concept consistency and culture: The differential impact of two forms of consistency. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 838-849.
31.
FleesonW.NoftleE. E. (2008). Where does personality have its influence? A supermatrix of consistency concepts. Journal of Personality, 76, 1355-1386.
32.
FukushimaO.HosoeT. (2011). Narcissism, variability in self-concept, and well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 568-575.
33.
FunderD. C. (2009). Persons, behaviors, and situations: An agenda for personality psychology in the postwar era. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 120-126.
34.
FurrR. M. (2008). A framework for profile similarity: Integrating similarity, normativeness, and distinctiveness. Journal of Personality, 76, 1267-1316.
35.
FurrR. M.FunderD. C. (2004). Situational similarity and behavioral consistency: Subjective, objective, variable-centered, and person-centered approaches. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 421-447.
36.
GageE.CokerS.JobsonL. (2015). Cross-cultural differences in desirable and undesirable forms of self-consistency and influence on symptoms of depression and anxiety. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46, 713-722.
37.
HampsonS. E.GoldbergL. R.JohnO. P. (1987). Category-breadth and social-desirability values for 573 personality terms. European Journal of Personality, 1, 241-258.
38.
HeineS. J. (2001). Self as cultural product: An examination of East Asian and North American selves. Journal of Personality, 69, 880-906.
39.
HeineS. J.HamamuraT. (2007). In search of East Asian self-enhancement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 4-27.
40.
HongJ. J.WoodyS. R. (2007). Cultural mediators of self-reported social anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 1779-1789.
41.
KatigbakM. S.ChurchA. T.AlvarezJ. M.WangC.Vargas-FloresJ. D. J.Ibáñez-ReyesJ.. . . OrtizF. A. (2013). Cross-observer agreement and self-concept consistency across cultures: Integrating trait and cultural psychology perspectives. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 78-89.
42.
KishtonJ. M.WidamanK. F. (1994). Unidimensional versus domain representative parceling of questionnaire items: An empirical example. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 757-765.
43.
KrausM. W.ChenS.KeltnerD. (2011). The power to be me: Power elevates self-concept consistency and authenticity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 974-980.
44.
LeikasS.LönnqvistJ.VerkasaloM. (2012). Persons, situations, and behaviors: Consistency and variability of different behaviors in four interpersonal situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 1007-1022.
45.
LeisingD.LockeK. D.KurziusE.ZimmermanJ. (2016). Quantifying the association of self-enhancement bias with self-ratings of personality and life satisfaction. Assessment, 23, 588-602.
46.
LeisingD.ScherbaumS.LockeK. D.ZimmermanJ. (2015). A model of “substance” and “evaluation” in person judgments. Journal of Research in Personality, 57, 61-71.
47.
LockeK. D. (2006). What predicts well-being: A consistent self-concept or a desirable self-concept?Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 25, 228-247.
48.
LockeK. D.ChristensenL. (2007). Re-construing the relational-interdependent self-construal and its relationship with self-consistency. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 389-402.
49.
LockeK. D.CraigT. Y.BaikK.GohilK. (2012). Binds and bounds of communion: Effects of interpersonal values on assumed similarity of self and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 879-897.
50.
LockeK. D.HorowitzL. M. (1997). The multifaceted self effect: Flexibility or merely self-enhancement?Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 406-422.
51.
LockeK. D.ZhengD.SmithJ. (2010). Consistency of personality profiles of the self and others in China and America (Unpublished manuscript). Department of Psychology, University of Idaho, Moscow.
52.
LutzC. J.RossS. R. (2003). Elaboration versus fragmentation: Distinguishing between self-complexity and self-concept differentiation. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 22, 537-559.
53.
MalloyT. E.AlbrightL.Diaz-LovingR.DongQ.LeeY. T. (2004). Agreement in personality judgments within and between nonoverlapping social groups in collectivist cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 106-117.
54.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
55.
MischelW. (2004). Toward an integrative science of the person. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 1-22.
56.
MischelW.ShodaY.Mendoza-DentonR. (2002). Situation-behavior profiles as a locus of consistency in personality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 30-34.
57.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2014). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
58.
NormanW. T. (1967). 2800 personality trait descriptors: Normative operating characteristics for a university population. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
59.
PengK.NisbettR. E. (1999). Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American Psychologist, 54, 741-754.
60.
PreacherK. J.CurranP. J.BauerD. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437-448.
61.
RosenbergM. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
62.
SheldonK. M.RyanR. M.RawsthorneL. J.IlardiB. (1997). Trait self and true self: Cross-role variation in the Big-Five personality traits and its relations with psychological authenticity and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1380-1393.
63.
ShermanR. A.NaveC. N.FunderD. C. (2010). Situational similarity and personality predict behavioral consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 330-343.
64.
Spencer-RodgersJ.WilliamsM. J.PengK. (2010). Cultural differences in expectations of change and tolerance for contradiction: A decade of empirical research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 296-312.
65.
SpybrookJ.KelceyB.DongN. (2016). Power for detecting treatment by moderator effects in two and three-level cluster randomized trials. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 41, 605-627.
66.
SuhE. M. (2002). Culture, identity consistency, and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1378-1391.
67.
SuhE. M. (2007). Downsides of an overly context-sensitive self: Implications from the culture and subjective well-being research. Journal of Personality, 75, 1321-1343.
68.
TaylorS. E.BrownJ. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210.
69.
TriandisH. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
70.
VazireS.CarlsonE. N. (2010). Self-knowledge of personality: Do people know themselves?Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 605-620.
71.
WestS. G.RyuE.KwokO.ChamH. (2011). Multilevel modeling: Current and future applications in personality research. Journal of Personality, 79, 2-50.
72.
WoodD.FurrR. M. (2016). The correlates of similarity estimates are often misleadingly positive: The nature and scope of the problem, and some solutions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20, 79-99.
73.
YumJ. O. (1988). The impact of confucianism on interpersonal relationships and communication patterns in East Asia. Communication Monographs, 55, 374-388.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
