The current research explores whether humans process inputs about combat (e.g., assessments of formidability) that produce outputs of post-fight respect (e.g., shaking an opponent’s hand when the fight ends). Using an online questionnaire (Study 1, n = 132), an in-person questionnaire (Study 2, n = 131), and an in-lab fight simulation (Study 3, n = 58), we investigated whether participants were more likely to receive (Studies 1 and 3) and display (Studies 2 and 3) post-fight respect as a function of the fight outcome (Hypothesis 1), use of fight tactics (Hypothesis 2), fighter asymmetries (Hypothesis 3), fighter ranking (Hypothesis 4), and the presence of witnesses (Hypothesis 5). The results support Hypotheses 1 to 4 concerning expectations of receiving post-fight respect, and support only Hypotheses 2 and 3 concerning displays of post-fight respect. We suggest that post-fight respect signals positive valuations of fighting performance that may function to maintain valuable relationships within the social group.
AureliF.CordsM.Van SchaikC. P. (2002). Conflict resolution following aggression in gregarious animals: A predictive framework. Animal Behaviour, 64, 325-343.
3.
AureliF.SmucnyD. A. (2000). The role of emotion in conflict and conflict resolution. In AureliF.de WaalF. B. M. (Eds.), Natural conflict resolution (pp. 199-224). Berkeley: University of California Press.
4.
AureliF.van SchaikC. P. (1991). Post-conflict behaviour in long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis): II. Coping with the uncertainty. Ethology, 89, 101-114.
5.
BenensonJ. F.WranghamR. W. (2016). Cross-cultural sex differences in post-conflict affiliation following sports matches. Current Biology, 26, 2208-2212.
6.
BirdR.SmithE. (2005). Signaling theory, strategic interaction, and symbolic capital. Current Anthropology, 46, 221-248.
7.
CastlesD. L.WhitenA. (1998a). Post-conflict behaviour of wild olive baboons. I. Reconciliation, redirection and consolation. Ethology, 104, 126-147.
8.
CastlesD. L.WhitenA. (1998b). Post-conflict behaviour of wild olive baboons. II. Stress and self-directed behaviour. Ethology, 104, 148-160.
9.
ChiaoJ. Y.HaradaT.ObyE. R.LiZ.ParrishT.BridgeD. J. (2009). Neural representations of social status hierarchy in human inferior parietal cortex. Neuropsychologia, 47, 354-363.
10.
Clutton-BrockT. H.AlbonS. D.GibsonR. M. (1979). The logical stag: Adaptive aspects of fighting in red deer (Cervus Elaphus L.). Animal Behaviour, 27, 211-225.
11.
CordsM. (1992). Post-conflict reunions and reconciliation in long-tailed macaques. Animal Behaviour, 44, 57-61.
12.
CordsM. (1994). Experimental approaches to the study of primate conflict resolution. In RoederJ. J.ThierryB.AndersonJ. R.HerrenschmidtN. (Eds.), Current primatology, Vol. II: Social development, learning and behaviour (pp. 127-136). Strasbourg, France: Presses de l’ Université Louis Pasteur.
13.
DalyM.WilsonM. (1988). Homicide. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
14.
de WaalF. B. M. (1993). Reconciliation among primates: A review of empirical evidence and unresolved issues. In MasonW. A.MendozaS. P. (Eds.), Primate social conflict (pp. 111-144). Albany: State University of New York Press.
15.
de WaalF. B. M.AureliF. (1997). Conflict resolution and distress alleviation in monkeys and apes. In CarterC. S.KirkpatrickB.LenderhendlerI. (Eds.), The integrative neurobiology of affiliation (pp. 317-328). New York, NY: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
16.
de WaalF. B. M.van RoosmalenA. (1979). Reconciliation and consolation among chimpanzees. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 5, 55-66.
17.
de WaalF. B. M.YoshiharaD. (1983). Reconciliation and redirected affection in rhesus monkeys. Behaviour, 85, 224-241.
18.
EaglyA. H.ChaikenS. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College.
19.
KoskiS. E.KoopsK.SterckE. H. (2007). Reconciliation, relationship quality, and postconflict anxiety: Testing the integrated hypothesis in captive chimpanzees. American Journal of Primatology, 69, 158-172.
20.
KutsukakeN.CastlesD. L. (2001). Reconciliation and variation in post-conflict stress in Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata fuscata): Testing the integrated hypothesis. Animal Cognition, 4, 259-268.
21.
LeeK.AshtonM. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329-358.
22.
LucasK.SherryJ. L. (2004). Sex differences in video game play: A communication-based explanation. Communication Research, 31, 499-523.
23.
MarcusD. K.Zeigler-HillV.MercerS.NorrisA. L. (2014). The psychology of spite and the measurement of spitefulness. Psychological Assessment, 26, 563-574.
24.
McCulloughM. E.PedersenE. J.TabakB. A.CarterE. C. (2014). Conciliatory gestures promote forgiveness and reduce anger in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 11211-11216.
25.
Newton-FisherN. E. (2004). Hierarchy and social status in Budongo chimpanzees. Primates, 45, 81-87.
26.
O’DriscollC. (2012). A “fighting chance” or fighting dirty? Irregular warfare, Michael Gross and the Spartans. European Journal of Political Theory, 11, 112-130.
27.
OngW. J. (2012). Fighting for life: Contest, sexuality, and consciousness. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
28.
PalagiE.PaoliT.TarliS. B. (2004). Reconciliation and consolation in captive bonobos (Pan paniscus). American Journal of Primatology, 62, 15-30.
29.
ParkerG. A. (1974). Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 47, 223-243.
30.
PayneR. J. H. (1998). Gradually escalating fights and displays: The cumulative assessment model. Animal Behaviour, 56, 651-662.
31.
PinkerS. (2011). The better angels of our nature: The decline of violence in history and its causes. London, England: Penguin.
32.
RomeroG. A.PhamM. N.GoetzA. T. (2014). The implicit rules of combat. Human Nature, 25, 496-516.
33.
SellA. N. (2011). The recalibrational theory and violent anger. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 381-389.
34.
SellA. N.CosmidesL.ToobyJ.SznycerD.von RuedenC.GurvenM. (2009). Human adaptations for the visual assessment of strength and fighting ability from the body and face. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B: Biological Sciences, 276, 575-584.
35.
SellA. N.HoneL. S.PoundN. (2012). The importance of physical strength to human males. Human Nature, 23, 30-44.
36.
SilkJ. B.CheneyD. L.SeyfarthR. M. (1996). The form and function of post-conflict interactions between female baboons. Animal Behaviour, 52, 259-268.
37.
StenzelC. L.RupertP. A. (2004). Psychologists’ use of touch in individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 41, 332-345.
38.
van QuaquebekeN.HenrichD. C.EckloffT. (2007). “It’s not tolerance I’m asking for, it’s respect!” A conceptual framework to differentiate between tolerance, acceptance and (two types of) respect. Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung, 38, 185-200.
39.
VigilJ. D. (1996). Street baptism: Chicano gang initiation. Human Organization, 55, 149-153.
40.
WangD. H.LiH. (2007). Nonverbal language in cross-cultural communication. Sino-US English Teaching, 4, 66-70.
41.
WattsD. P. (1995). Post-conflict social events in wild mountain gorillas (Mammalia, Hominoidea). I: Social interactions between opponents. Ethology, 100, 139-157.
42.
WolfR. (2011). Respect and disrespect in international politics: The significance of status recognition. International Theory, 3, 105-142.
43.
YorkA. D.RowellT. E. (1988). Reconciliation following aggression in patas monkeys, Erythrocebus patas. Animal Behaviour, 36, 502-509.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
