The search for the prosocial personality has been long and controversial. The current research explores the general patterns underlying prosocial decisions, linking personality, emotion, and overt prosocial behavior. Using a multimethod approach, we explored the links between the Big Five dimensions of personality and prosocial responding. Across three studies, we found that agreeableness was the dimension of personality most closely associated with emotional reactions to victims in need of help, and subsequent decisions to help those individuals. Results suggest that prosocial processes, including emotions, cognitions, and behaviors, may be part of a more general motivational process linked to personality.
AkaikeH. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317-332.
2.
AronsonE.CarlsmithJ. M. (1968). Experimentation in social psychology. In LindzeyG.AronsonE. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., pp. 1-79). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
3.
BatsonC. D. (1987). Prosocial motivation: Is it ever truly altruistic? In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 65-122). San Diego CA: Academic Press.
4.
BatsonC. D. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
BatsonC. D.BolenM. H.CrossJ. A.Neuringer-BenefielH. E. (1986). Where is the altruism in the altruistic personality?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 212-220. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.1.212
6.
BatsonC. D.LishnerD. A.StocksE. L. (2015). The empathy-altruism hypothesis. In SchroederD. A.GrazianoW. G. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior (pp. 259-281). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
7.
BentlerP. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
8.
BrownR. (1965). Social psychology. New York, NY: Free Press.
9.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 445-455). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
10.
ByrneB. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
CampbellD. T. (1963). Social attitudes and other acquired behavioral dispositions. In KochS. (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. 6, pp. 94-172). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
12.
CarloG.McGinleyM.DavisA.StreitC. (2012). Behaving badly or goodly: Is it because of what I feel or think? In MaltiT. (Ed.), New directions for youth development: Adolescent emotions: Development, morality, and adaptation (Vol. 1, pp. 75-93). Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass.
13.
CarloG.OkunM. A.KnightG. P.de GuzmanM. R. T. (2005). The interplay of traits and motives on volunteering: Agreeableness, extraversion and prosocial value motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1293-1305.
14.
CarloG.Pytlik ZilligL. M.RoeschS. C.DienstbierR. A. (2009). The elusive altruist: The psychological study of the altruistic personality. In NarvaezD.LapsleyD. K. (Eds.), Personality, identity and character: Explorations in moral psychology (pp. 271-294). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
15.
CokeJ. S.BatsonC. D.McDavisK. (1978). Empathic mediation of helping: A two-stage model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 752-766.
16.
DalbertC. (2009). Belief in a just world. In LearyM. R.HoyleR. H. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 288-297). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
17.
DarleyJ. M.BatsonC. D. (1973). From Jerusalem to Jericho: A study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 100-108.
18.
DavisM. H. (1996). Empathy: A social psychological approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
19.
DavisM. H. (2015). Empathy and prosocial behavior. In SchroederD. A.GrazianoW. G. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior (pp. 282-306). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
20.
DovidioJ. F.PiliavinJ. A.SchroederD. A.PennerL. A. (2006). The social psychology of prosocial behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
EisenbergN.Eggum-WilkensN. D.SpinradT. L. (2015). The development of prosocial behavior. In SchroederD. A.GrazianoW. G. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior (pp. 114-136). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
22.
EisenbergN.GuthrieI. K.CumberlandA.MurphyB. C.ShepardS. A.ZhouQ.CarloG. (2002). Prosocial development in early adulthood: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 993-1066. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.993
23.
GoldbergL. R. (1992). The development of markers of the Big Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.
24.
GrazianoW. G.EisenbergN. (1997). Agreeableness: A dimension of personality. In HoganR.JohnsonJ.BriggsS. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 795-824). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
25.
GrazianoW. G.HabashiM. M. (2010). Motivational processes underlying both prejudice and helping. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 313-331.
26.
GrazianoW. G.HabashiM. M. (2015). Searching for the prosocial personality. In SchroederD. A.GrazianoW. G. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior (pp. 231-255). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27.
GrazianoW. G.HabashiM. M.SheeseB. E.TobinR. M. (2007). Agreeableness, empathy, and helping: A person X situation perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 583-599.
28.
GrazianoW. G.Jensen-CampbellL. A.FinchJ. F. (1997). The self as a mediator between personality and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 392-404.
29.
GrazianoW. G.Jensen-CampbellL. A.SteeleR. G.HairE. C. (1998). Unknown words in self-reported personality: Lethargic and provincial in Texas. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 893-905.
30.
GrazianoW. G.TobinR. M. (2010). Agreeableness: Motives for maintaining positive relationships with others. In LearyM.HoyleR. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 46-61). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
31.
GrazianoW. G.TobinR. M. (2013). The cognitive and motivational foundations underlying agreeableness. In RobinsonM. D.WatkinsE.Harmon-JonesE. (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 347-366). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
32.
HabashiM. M.GrazianoW. G. (2009, January). Agreeableness and prosocial behavior. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Albuquerque, NM.
33.
HaidtJ.KesebirS. (2010). Morality. In FiskeS.GilbertD.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 797-832). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
34.
HartshorneH.MayM. (1928). Studies in the nature of character: Studies in deceit. New York, NY: MacMillan.
35.
HartshorneH.MayM. A.MallerJ. B. (1929). Preliminary efforts to study altruistic tendencies. In HartshorneH.MayM. A.MallerJ. B. (Eds.), Studies in the nature of character, II Studies in service and self-control (pp. 13-41). New York, NY: MacMillan.
HeymanG. D.LegareC. H. (2013). Social cognitive development: Learning from others. In CarlstonD. C. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of social cognition (pp. 749-766). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
38.
Jensen-CampbellL. A.RosselliM.WorkmanK.SantisiM.RiosJ. D.BojanD. (2002). Agreeableness, conscientiousness, and effortful control processes. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 476-489.
39.
JohnO. P.SrivastavaS. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy. In PervinL. A.JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp 102-138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
40.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulating evidence of the conscious and unconscious bolsters of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881-919.
41.
KammrathL. K.ScholerA. A. (2011). The Pollyanna Myth: How highly agreeable people judge positive and negative relational acts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1172-1184. doi:10.1177/0146167211407641
42.
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
43.
KohlbergL. (1969). Stages and sequences: The cognitive development approach to socialization. In GoslinD. A. (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory of research (pp. 347-480). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
44.
KohlbergL. (1984). The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.
45.
KohnstammG. A.HalversonC. F.Jr.MervieldeI.HavillV. L. (1998). Analyzing parental free description of child personality. In KohnstammG. A.HalversonC. F.MervieldeI.HavillV. L. (Eds.), Parental description of child personality: Developmental antecedents of the Big Five? (pp. 1-19). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46.
LearyM. R.HoyleR. H. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of individual differences in social behavior. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
47.
MacCallemR. C.BrowneM. W.SugawaraH. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130-149.
48.
MehrabianA.EpsteinN. (1972). A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of Personality, 40, 525-543.
49.
MooradianT. A.DavisM.MatzlerK. (2011). Dispositional empathy and the hierarchical structure of personality. American Journal of Psychology, 124, 99-109.
50.
NettleD.LiddleB. (2008). Agreeableness is related to social-cognitive, but not social-perceptual, Theory of Mind. European Journal of Psychology, 22, 323-335. doi:10.1002/per.672
51.
OlinerS. P.OlinerP. M. (1992). The altruistic personality: Rescuers of Jews in Nazi Europe. What lead ordinary men and women to risk their lives on behalf of others?New York, NY: Simon & Schuster. (Original work published 1988)
52.
PennerL. A.DovidioJ. F.PiliavinJ. A.SchroederD. A. (2005). Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 365-392.
53.
PennerL. A.FritzscheB. A. (1993, August). Measuring the prosocial personality: Four construct validity studies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
54.
PennerL. A.FritzscheB. A.CraigerJ. P.FreifeldT. S. (1995). Measuring the prosocial personality. In ButcherJ.SpeilbergerC. D. (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 10, pp. 147-163). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
55.
SchriesheimC. A.SolomonE.KopelmanR. E. (1989). Grouped versus randomized format: An investigation of scale convergent and discriminant validity using LISREL confirmatory factor analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 19-32.
56.
TobinR. M.GrazianoW. G. (2011). The disappointing gift: Dispositional and situational moderators of emotional expression. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110, 227-240. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.02.010
57.
TobinR. M.GrazianoW. G.VanmanE.TassinaryL. (2000). Personality, emotional experience, and efforts to control emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 656-669.
58.
ToiM.BatsonC. D. (1982). More evidence that empathy is a source of altruistic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 281-292.
59.
TuckerL. R.LewisC. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1-10.
60.
TurielE. (2015). Morality and prosocial judgments and behavior. In SchroederD. A.GrazianoW. G. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior (pp. 137-152). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
61.
WegenerD. T.FabrigarL. R. (2000). Analysis and design for nonexperimental data: Addressing causal and noncausal hypotheses. In ReisH. T.JuddC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 412-450). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
62.
WheatonB.MuthenB.AlwinD. F.SummersG. F. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. In HeiseD. R. (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1977 (pp. 84-136). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
