Benevolent sexism prescribes that men are dependent on women in relationships and should cherish their partners. The current research examined whether perceiving male partners to endorse benevolent sexism attenuates highly anxious women’s negative reactions to relationship conflict. Greater attachment anxiety was associated with greater distress and insecurity during couples’ conflict discussions (Study 1), during daily conflict with intimate partners (Study 2), and when recalling experiences of relationship conflict (Study 3). However, this heightened distress and insecurity was attenuated when women (but not men) perceived their partner to strongly endorse benevolent sexism (Studies 1-3) and thus believed their partner could be relied upon to remain invested (Study 3B). These novel results illustrate that perceiving partners to endorse benevolent sexism alleviates anxious women’s insecure reactions to relationship threat by conveying partner’s continued reliability. Implications of these security-enhancing effects are considered in light of the role benevolent sexism plays in sustaining gender inequality.
ArriagaX. B.ReedJ. T.GoodfriendW.AgnewC. R. (2006). Relationship perceptions and persistence: Do fluctuations in perceived partner commitment undermine dating relationships?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1045-1065.
2.
BarretoM.EllemersN. (2005). The burden of benevolent sexism: How it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 633-642.
3.
BarretoM.EllemersN.PiebingaL.MoyaM. (2010). How nice of us and how dumb of me: The effect of exposure to benevolent sexism on women’s task and relational self-descriptions. Sex Roles, 62, 532-544.
4.
BohnerG.AhlbornK.SteinerR. (2010). How sexy are sexist men? Women’s perception of male response profiles in the ambivalent sexism inventory. Sex Roles, 62, 568-582.
5.
CampbellL.SimpsonJ. A.BoldryJ.KashyD. A. (2005). Perceptions of conflict and support in romantic relationships: The role of attachment anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 510-531.
6.
CollinsN. L. (1996). Working models of attachment: Implications for explanation, emotions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 810-832.
7.
DardenneB.DumontM.BollierT. (2007). Insidious dangers of benevolent sexism: Consequences for women’s performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 764-779.
8.
DumontM.SarletM.DardenneB. (2010). Be too kind to a woman, she’ll feel incompetent: Benevolent sexism shifts self-construal and autobiographical memories toward incompetence. Sex Roles, 62, 545-553.
9.
FeatherN. T. (2004). Value correlates of ambivalent attitudes toward gender relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 3-12.
10.
FernándezM.CastroY.OteroM.FoltzM.LorenzoM. (2006). Sexism, vocational goals, and motivation as predictors of men’s and women’s career choice. Sex Roles, 55, 267-272.
11.
GlickP.DieboldJ.Bailey-WernerB.ZhuL. (1997). The two faces of Adam: Ambivalent sexism and polarized attitudes toward women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1323-1334.
12.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
13.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1999). The ambivalence toward men inventory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 519-536.
14.
GlickP.FiskeS. T.MladinicA.SaizJ.AbramsD.MasserB.. . . LópezW. L. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763-775.
15.
GlickP.LameirasM.FiskeS. T.EckesT.MasserB.VolpatoC.. . . WellsR. (2004). Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 713-728.
16.
HammondM. D.OverallN. C. (2013). When relationships do not live up to benevolent ideals: Women’s benevolent sexism and sensitivity to relationship problems. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 212-223.
17.
HammondM. D.OverallN. C. (2014). Endorsing benevolent sexism magnifies willingness to dissolve relationships when facing partner-ideal discrepancies. Personal Relationships, 21, 272-287.
18.
HammondM. D.OverallN. C. (2015). Benevolent sexism and support of romantic partner’s goals undermining women’s competence while fulfilling men’s intimacy needs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1180-1194.
19.
HammondM. D.OverallN. C.CrossE. J. (2016). Internalizing sexism within close relationships: The perceived sexism of intimate partners maintains women’s endorsement of benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 214-238.
20.
HammondM. D.SibleyC. G.OverallN. C. (2014). The allure of sexism: Psychological entitlement fosters women’s endorsement of benevolent sexism over time. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 421-428.
21.
HartJ.GlickP.DineroR. E. (2013). She loves him, she loves him not: Attachment style as a predictor of women’s ambivalent sexism toward men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 507-518.
22.
ImpettE. A.GordonA. M. (2010). Why do people sacrifice to approach rewards versus to avoid costs? Insights from attachment theory. Personal Relationships, 17, 299-315.
23.
JackmanM. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
24.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press
25.
KilianskiS. E.RudmanL. A. (1998). Wanting it both ways: Do women approve of benevolent sexism?Sex Roles, 39, 333-352.
26.
LeB.AgnewC. R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta–analysis of the Investment Model. Personal Relationships, 10, 37-57.
27.
LeeT. L.FiskeS. T.GlickP.ChenZ. (2010). Ambivalent sexism in close relationships: (Hostile) power and (benevolent) romance shape relationship ideals. Sex Roles, 62, 583-602.
28.
LemayE. P.Jr.DudleyK. L. (2011). Caution: Fragile! Regulating the interpersonal security of chronically insecure partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 681-702.
29.
LittleK. C.McNultyJ. K.RussellM. (2010). Sex buffers intimates against the negative implications of attachment insecurity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 484-498.
30.
MacKinnonD. P.FritzM. S.WilliamsJ.LockwoodC. M. (2007). Distribution of the product confidence limits for the indirect effect: Program PRODCLIN. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 384-389.
31.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2003). The attachment behavioral system in adulthood: Activation, psychodynamics, and interpersonal processes. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 53-152). New York: Academic Press.
32.
MoyaM.GlickP.ExpósitoF.de LemusS.HartJ. (2007). It’s for your own good: Benevolent sexism and women’s reactions to protectively justified restrictions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1421-1434.
33.
OverallN. C.GirmeY. U.LemayE. PJr.HammondM. D. (2014). Attachment anxiety and reactions to relationship threat: The benefits and costs of inducing guilt in romantic partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 235-256.
34.
OverallN. C.SibleyC. G.TanR. (2011). The costs and benefits of sexism: Resistance to influence during relationship conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 271-290.
35.
OverallN. C.SimpsonJ. A. (2015). Attachment and dyadic regulation processes. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 61-66.
36.
RosenthalR.RosnowR. L. (2007). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
37.
RusbultC. E.MartzJ. M.AgnewC. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357-391.
38.
SibleyC. G.OverallN. C.DuckittJ.PerryR.MilfontT. L.KhanS. S.. . . RobertsonA. (2009). Your sexism predicts my sexism: Perceptions of men’s (but not women’s) sexism affects one’s own sexism over time. Sex Roles, 60, 682-693.
39.
SibleyC. G.PerryR. (2010). An opposing process model of benevolent sexism. Sex Roles, 62, 438-452.
40.
SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S. (2012). Adult attachment orientations, stress, and romantic relationships. In DevineP.PlantA. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 279-328). New York, NY: Elsevier North-Holland.
41.
SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S.PhillipsD. (1996). Conflict in close relationships: An attachment perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 899-914.
42.
TranS.SimpsonJ. A. (2009). Pro-relationship maintenance behavior: The joint roles of attachment and commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 685-698.
43.
TranS.SimpsonJ. A. (2011). Attachment, commitment and relationship maintenance: When partners really matter. In CampbellL.La GuardiaJ.OlsonJ.ZannaM. (Eds.), The Ontario Symposium: Vol. 10. The science of the couple (pp. 95-117). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
44.
VikiG. T.AbramsA. (2002). But she was unfaithful: Benevolent sexism and reactions to rape victims who violate traditional gender role expectations. Sex Roles, 47, 289-293.
45.
VikiG. T.AbramsD.HutchisonP. (2003). The “true” romantic: Benevolent sexism and paternalistic chivalry. Sex Roles, 49, 533-537.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
