We examine how relational needs underlie sexism by conducting a meta-analysis (k = 22; N = 4,860) on the links between adults’ romantic attachment and endorsement of ambivalent sexism. Results across two random-effects meta-analytic methods supported that men’s and women’s attachment anxiety predicted stronger endorsement of both benevolent sexism and hostile sexism. Simultaneously, men’s attachment avoidance predicted lower endorsement of benevolent sexism, and for men in relationships (vs. single men), stronger endorsement of hostile sexism. Thus, the way that people fulfil their relational goals lead people to adopt particular attitudes about gender, supporting that relationships are one key source of people’s adoption of sexism. These results bridge attachment theory and ambivalent sexism theory by illustrating how individual differences in the amplification or suppression of needs for relational security fuel adoption of beliefs that function to maintain gender inequality across the world.
BoagE. M.CarnelleyK. B. (2012). Self–reported discrimination and discriminatory behavior: The role of attachment security. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 393-403. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02065.x
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P. T.RothsteinH. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
5.
BowlbyJ. (1969). Attachment and Loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York, NY: Basic Books.
6.
BowlbyJ. (1973). Attachment and Loss: Vol. 2. Separation: Anxiety and anger. New York, NY: Basic Books.
7.
BowlbyJ. (1980). Attachment and Loss: Vol. 3. Loss. New York, NY: Basic Books.
8.
CardN. A. (2012). Applied meta-analysis for social science research. New York, NY: Guilford.
9.
ChenZ.FiskeS. T.LeeT. L. (2009). Ambivalent sexism and power-related gender-role ideology in marriage. Sex Roles, 60, 765-778. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9585-9
10.
CollinsN. L.ReadS. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 644-663. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.4.644
11.
ConnorR. A.GlickP.FiskeS. T. (2016). Ambivalent sexism in the twenty-first century. In SibleyC. G.BarlowF. K. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice (pp. 295-320). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
12.
CrittendenP. M.AinsworthM. (1989). Child maltreatment and attachment theory. In CicchettiD.CarlsonV. (Eds.), Child maltreatment: Theory and research on the causes and consequences of child abuse and neglect (pp. 432-463). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
*CrossE. J.OverallN. C. (2018). Women’s attraction to benevolent sexism: Needing relationship security predicts greater attraction to men who endorse benevolent sexism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 336-347. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2334
14.
*CrossE. J.OverallN. C.HammondM. D.FletcherG. J. O. (2017). When does men’s hostile sexism predict relationship aggression? The moderating role of partner commitment. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 331-340. doi:10.1177/1948550616672000
15.
De LemusS.MoyaM.GlickP. (2010). When contact correlates with prejudice: Adolescents’ romantic relationship experience predicts greater benevolent sexism in boys and hostile sexism in girls. Sex Roles, 63, 214-225. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9786-2
16.
*DeWallC. N.LambertN. M.SlotterE. B.PondR. S.DeckmanT.FinkelE. J.. . . FinchmanF. D. (2011). So far away from one’s partner, yet so close to romantic alternatives: Avoidant attachment, interest in alternatives, and infidelity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1302-1316. doi:10.1037/a0025497
17.
*DonB. P.HammondM. D. (2017). Social support in intimate relationships: The role of relationship autonomy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 1112-1124. doi:10.1177/0146167217705119
18.
DuckittJ. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41-113). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
19.
*EastwickP. W.EaglyA. H.FinkelE. J.JohnsonS. E. (2011). Implicit and explicit preferences for physical attractiveness in a romantic partner: A double dissociation in predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 993-1011. doi:10.1037/a0024061
20.
*EastwickP. W.FinkelE. J.MatthewsJ. (2007). Speed-dating as an invaluable tool for studying romantic attraction: A methodological primer. Personal Relationships, 14, 149-166. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00146.x
21.
FeeneyJ. A.NollerP.CallanV. J. (1994). Attachment style, communication, and satisfaction in the early years of marriage. In BartholomewK.PerlmanD. (Eds.), Attachment processes in adulthood (pp. 269-308). London, England: Kingsley.
22.
FischerA. R. (2006). Women’s benevolent sexism as reaction to hostility. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 410-416. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00316.x
23.
FraleyC. R.ShaverP. R. (2000). Adult romantic attachment: Theoretical developments, emerging controversies, and unanswered questions. Review of General Psychology, 4, 132-154. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.4.2.132
24.
FraleyR. C. (2002). Attachment stability from infancy to adulthood: Meta-analysis and dynamic modeling of developmental mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 123-151. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0602_03
25.
FraleyR. C.WallerN. G.BrennanK. A. (2000). An item-response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 350-365. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.350
26.
*GaraigordobilM. (2013). Sexism and insecure attachment in the couple’s relationship. Revisita Mexicana de Psicología, 30, 53-60.
27.
GirmeY. U.OverallN. C.SimpsonJ. A.FletcherG. J. (2015). “All or nothing”: Attachment avoidance and the curvilinear effects of partner support. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 450-475. doi:10.1037/a0038866
28.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
29.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109-118. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109
30.
GlickP.FiskeS. T.MladinicA.SaizJ. L.AbramsD.MasserB.. . . LópezW. L. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763-775. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.763
31.
*HammondM. D. (2017). [Student survey]. Unpublished data.
32.
*HammondM. D.OverallN. C. (2013a). Men’s hostile sexism and biased perceptions of intimate partners: Fostering dissatisfaction and negative behavior in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1585-1599. doi:10.1177/0146167213499026
33.
*HammondM. D.OverallN. C. (2013b). When relationships do not live up to benevolent ideals: Women’s benevolent sexism and sensitivity to relationship problems. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 212-223. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1939
34.
*HammondM. D.OverallN. C. (2015). Benevolent sexism and support of romantic partner’s goals: Undermining women’s competence while fulfilling men’s intimacy needs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1180-1194. doi:10.1177/0146167215593492
35.
HammondM. D.OverallN. C. (2016). Sexism in intimate contexts: How romantic relationships help explain the origins, functions, and consequences of sexist attitudes. In SibleyC.BarlowF. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice (pp. 321-343). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36.
HammondM. D.OverallN. C. (2017). Dynamics within intimate relationships and the causes, consequences, and functions of sexist attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 120-125. doi:10.1177/0963721416686213
37.
HammondM. D.OverallN. C.CrossE. J. (2016). Internalizing sexism within close relationships: Perceptions of intimate partners’ benevolent sexism promote women’s endorsement of benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 214-238. doi:10.1037/pspi0000043
38.
HardinC. D.HigginsE. T. (1996). Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective. In HigginsE. T.SorrentinoR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: The interpersonal context (Vol. 3, pp. 28-84). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
39.
HartJ.GlickP.DineroR. E. (2013). She loves him, she loves him not: Attachment style as a predictor of women’s ambivalent sexism toward men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 507-518. doi:10.1177/0361684313497471
40.
*HartJ.HungJ. A.GlickP.DineroR. (2012). He loves her, he loves her not: Attachment style as a personality antecedent to men’s ambivalent sexism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1495-1505. doi:10.1177/0146167212454177
41.
HazanC.ShaverP. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511-524.
42.
HofstraJ.van OudenhovenJ. P.BuunkB. P. (2005). Attachment patterns and majority members’ attitudes towards adaptation strategies of immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 601-619. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.05.009
43.
HoxJ. (2002). Multilevel analysis techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44.
HunterJ. E.SchmidtF. L. (2004). Methods of meta–analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
45.
JostJ. T.NosekB. A.GoslingS. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 126-136. doi:10.1111/j.1745–6916.2008.00070.x
46.
LeeT. L.FiskeS. T.GlickP.ChenZ. (2010). Ambivalent sexism in close relationships: (Hostile) power and (benevolent) romance shape relationship ideals. Sex Roles, 62, 583-601. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9770-x
47.
LevyM. B.DavisK. E. (1988). Lovestyles and attachment styles compared: Their relations to each other and to various relationship characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 439-471. doi:10.1177/0265407588054004
48.
LiT.ChanK.-S. (2012). How anxious and avoidant attachment affect romantic relationship quality differently: A meta-analytic review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 406-419. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1842
McDermottR. C.LopezF. G. (2013). College men’s intimate partner violence attitudes: Contributions of adult attachment and gender role stress. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60, 127-136. doi:10.1037/a0030353
51.
*McNultyJ. K.WidmanL. (2013). The implications of sexual narcissism for sexual and marital satisfaction. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 42, 1021-1032. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-0041-5
52.
MikulincerM. (1998). Attachment working models and the sense of trust: An exploration of interaction goals and affect regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1209-1224. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1209
53.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2001). Attachment theory and intergroup bias: Evidence that priming the secure base schema attenuates negative reactions to out–groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 97-115. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.97
54.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2003). The attachment behavioral system in adulthood: Activation, psychodynamics, and interpersonal processes. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 53-152). New York, NY: Academic Press.
55.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
56.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2015). The psychological effects of the contextual activation of security–enhancing mental representations in adulthood. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 18-21. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.01.008
57.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998-2012). MPlus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
58.
NezlekJ. B. (2011). Multilevel modeling for social and personality psychology. In NezlekJ. B. (Ed.), The SAGE library in social and personality psychology methods. London, England: SAGE.
59.
*NourmandR. S. (2013). Emotional intelligence, attachment style, and ambivalent sexism (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations Publishing (3567664)
60.
OverallN. C.GirmeY.LemayE. P.Jr.HammondM. D. (2014). Attachment anxiety and reactions to relationship threat: The benefits and costs of inducing guilt in romantic partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 235-256. doi:10.1037/a0034371
61.
*OverallN. C.HammondM. H. (2016). [Student surveys]. Unpublished data.
62.
*OverallN. C.SibleyC. G.TanR. (2011). The costs and benefits of sexism: Resistance to influence during relationship conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 271-290. doi:10.1037/a0022727
63.
RadkeH. R. M.HornseyM. J.SibleyC. G.BarlowF. K. (2018). Negotiating the hierarchy: Social dominance orientation among women is associated with the endorsement of benevolent sexism. Australian Journal of Psychology, 70, 158-166. doi:10.1111/ajpy.12176
64.
RholesW. S.SimpsonJ. A.OriñaM. M. (1999). Attachment and anger in an anxiety-provoking situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 940-957. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.940
65.
SchmittD. P.AlcalayL.AllensworthM.AllikJ.AultL.AustersI.. . . ZupanèièA. (2004). Patterns and universals of adult romantic attachment across 62 cultural regions: Are models of self and of other pancultural constructs?Journal of Cross–Cultural Psychology, 35, 367-402. doi:10.1177/0022022104266105
66.
SharpsteenD. J.KirkpatrickL. A. (1997). Romantic jealousy and adult romantic attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 627-640. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.627
67.
ShaverP. R.SchachnerD. A.MikulincerM. (2005). Attachment style, excessive reassurance seeking, relationship processes, and depression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 343-359. doi:10.1177/0146167204271709
68.
*ShinneE. D. (2016). The relationship between sexual objectification and self–objectification, adult romantic attachment, and relationship satisfaction (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation Publishing. (10102266)
69.
SibleyC. G.BeckerJ. C. (2012). On the nature of sexist ambivalence: Profiling ambivalent and univalent sexists. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 589-601. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1870
70.
SibleyC. G.WilsonM. S.DuckittJ. (2007a). Antecedents of men’s hostile and benevolent sexism: The dual roles of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 160-172. doi:10.1177/0146167206294745
71.
SibleyC. G.WilsonM. S.DuckittJ. (2007b). Effects of dangerous and competitive worldviews on right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation over a five–month period. Political Psychology, 28, 357-371. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00572.x
72.
SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S. (2012). Adult attachment orientations, stress, and romantic relationships. In DevineP.PlantA. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 45, pp. 279-328). New York, NY: Elsevier.
73.
SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S.NelliganJ. S. (1992). Support-seeking and support-giving within couples in an anxiety-provoking situation: The role of attachment styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 434-446. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.3.434
74.
SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S.PhillipsD. (1996). Conflict in close relationships: An attachment perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 899-914. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.5.899
75.
Van OudenhovenJ. P.HofstraJ. (2006). Personal reactions to “strange” situations: Attachment styles and acculturation attitudes of immigrants and majority members. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30, 783-798. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2006.05.005
76.
VikiG. T.AbramsD.HutchisonP. (2003). The “true” romantic: Benevolent sexism and paternalistic chivalry. Sex Roles, 49, 533-537. doi:10.1023/A:1025888824749
77.
WeberC.FredericoC. M. (2007). Interpersonal attachment and patterns of ideological belief. Political Psychology, 28, 389-416. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00579.x
78.
*YakushkoO. (2005). Ambivalent sexism and relationship patterns among women and men in Ukraine. Sex Roles, 52, 589-596. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-3727-5
79.
ZhangY. B.LinM. C.NonakaA.BoemK. (2005). Harmony, hierarchy and conservatism: A cross-cultural comparison of Confucian values in China, Korea, Japan, and Taiwan. Communication Research Report, 22, 107-115. doi:10.1080/00036810500130539
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
