People assume that those who hold sexist beliefs hold racist beliefs, and vice versa. However, past work only investigated hostile sexism, or blatantly negative evaluations of women. Hostile sexism is positively associated with benevolent sexism, or, more subjectively, positive attitudes that serve to keep women in restricted domestic roles. Across two studies, participants were randomly assigned to see an ostensible partner’s responses espousing hostile sexism, benevolent sexism, or nonsexist beliefs. Participants then responded to dependent measures, primarily perceived racism. As predicted, a hostile sexist was perceived as more racist than both a benevolent sexist and a nonsexist. Unexpectedly, no significant differences emerged between a benevolent sexist and a nonsexist in Study 1, while a benevolent sexist was perceived as more racist than a nonsexist in Study 2. Overall, the findings suggest that society may be unaware that benevolent sexism may indicate racism, furthering individuals’ risk of experiencing prejudice.
AkramiN.EkehammarB.BerghR. (2011). Generalized prejudice: Common and specific components. Psychological Science, 22(1), 57–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610390384
2.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
3.
AosvedA. C.LongP. J.VollerE. K. (2009). Measuring sexism, racism, sexual prejudice, ageism, classism, and religious intolerance: The Intolerant Schema Measure. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(10), 2321–2354. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00528.x
4.
BareketO.FiskeS. T. (2023). A systematic review of the ambivalent sexism literature: Hostile sexism protects men’s power; benevolent sexism guards traditional gender roles. Psychological Bulletin, 149(11–12), 637–698. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000400
5.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
6.
BaronR. S.BurgessM. L.KaoC. F. (1991). Detecting and labeling prejudice: Do female perpetrators go undetected?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(2), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616729101700201
7.
BarretoM.EllemersN. (2005). The burden of benevolent sexism: How it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(5), 633–642. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.270
8.
BastartJ.BranscombeN. R.SardaE.DelmasF. (2021). Sexism and racism perceptions: It depends on who does it and why. European Journal of Social Psychology, 51(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2713
9.
BeckerJ. C.WrightS. C. (2011). Yet another dark side of chivalry: Benevolent sexism undermines and hostile sexism motivates collective action for social change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 62–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022615
10.
ChaneyK. E. (2022). Preconscious attentional bias to rejection facilitates social distancing for White women in STEM contexts. Social Cognition, 40(5), 438–458. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2022.40.5.438
11.
ChaneyK. E.SanchezD. T. (2018). Gender-inclusive bathrooms signal fairness across identity dimensions. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(2), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617737601
12.
ChaneyK. E.SanchezD. T. (2024). White women’s automatic attentional adhesion to sexism in the face of racism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 110, Article 104540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104540
13.
ChaneyK. E.SanchezD. T.HimmelsteinM. S.ManuelS. K. (2021). Lay theory of generalized prejudice moderates cardiovascular stress responses to racism for White women. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(6), 998–1015. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220929078
14.
ChaneyK. E.SanchezD. T.MaimonM. R. (2019). Stigmatized-identity cues in consumer spaces. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(1), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1075
15.
ChaneyK. E.SanchezD. T.RemediosJ. D. (2016). Organizational identity safety cue transfers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(11), 1564–1576. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216665096
16.
ChaneyK. E.SanchezD. T.RemediosJ. D. (2021). Dual cues: Women of color anticipate both gender and racial bias in the face of a single identity cue. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(7), 1095–1113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220942844
17.
CipollinaR.ChaneyK. E.SanchezD. T. (2023). Factors that contribute to accurately perceiving anti-Black racism and sexism overlap. The Journal of Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2023.2246636
18.
ConnellyK.HeesackerM. (2012). Why is benevolent sexism appealing? Associations with system justification and life satisfaction. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36(4), 432–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312456369
19.
CrawfordJ. T.BrandtM. J. (2019). Who is prejudiced, and toward whom? The Big Five traits and generalized prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(10), 1455–1467. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672198323
20.
DaumeyerN.OnyeadorI.BrownX.RichesonJ. A. (2019). Consequences of attributing discrimination to implicit vs. explicit bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 84, Article 103812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.04.010
21.
DuckittJ.SibleyC. G. (2007). Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 21(2), 113–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.614
22.
DyarC.FeinsteinB. A.EatonN. R.LondonB. (2018). The mediating roles of rejection sensitivity and proximal stress in the association between discrimination and internalizing symptoms among sexual minority women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47, 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0869-1
23.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
24.
FeatherN. T.McKeeI. R. (2012). Values, right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and ambivalent attitudes toward women. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(10), 2479–2504. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00950.x
25.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
26.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(1), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00104.x
27.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109
28.
GlickP.FiskeS. T.MladinicA.SaizJ. L.AbramsD.MasserB.AdetounB.OsagieJ. E.AkandeA.AlaoA.AnnetjeB.WillemsenT. M.ChipetaK.DardenneB.DijksterhuisA.WigboldusD.EckesT.Six-MaternaI.ExpósitoF.. . . LópezW. L. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 763–775. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.763
29.
GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.SwannW. B.Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
30.
GulP.KupferT. R. (2019). Benevolent sexism and mate preferences: Why do women prefer benevolent men despite recognizing that they can be undermining?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(1), 146–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218781000
HoA. K.SidaniusJ.KteilyN.Sheehy-SkeffingtonJ.PrattoF.HenkelK. E.FoelsR.StewartA. L. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO₇ scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6), 1003–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000033
33.
Hopkins-DoyleA.SuttonR. M.DouglasK. M.CalogeroR. M. (2019). Flattering to deceive: Why people misunderstand benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(2), 167–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000135.supp
34.
InmanM. L.BaronR. S. (1996). Influence of prototypes on perceptions of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 727–739. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.727
35.
JostJ. T.KayA. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498
36.
KilianskiS. E.RudmanL. A. (1998). Wanting it both ways: Do women approve of benevolent sexism?Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 39(5–6), 333–352. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018814924402
37.
LiaoK. Y. H.Kashubeck-WestS.WengC. Y.DeitzC. (2015). Testing a mediation framework for the link between perceived discrimination and psychological distress among sexual minority individuals. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62(2), 226–241. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000064
38.
McConahayJ. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale. In DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 91–125). Academic Press.
McMahonJ. M.KahnK. B. (2016). Benevolent racism? The impact of target race on ambivalent sexism. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19(2), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215583153
41.
McMahonJ. M.KahnK. B. (2018). When sexism leads to racism: Threat, protecting women, and racial bias. Sex Roles, 78(9–10), 591–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0828-x
42.
MekawiY.CarterS.BrownB.Martinez de AndinoA.FaniN.MichopoulosV.PowersA. (2021). Interpersonal trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder among Black women: Does racial discrimination matter?Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 22(2), 154–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2020.1869098
43.
Mendoza-DentonR.DowneyG.PurdieV. J.DavisA.PietrzakJ. (2002). Sensitivity to status-based rejection: Implications for African American students’ college experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 896–918. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.83.4.896
44.
NicolA. A.RoundingK. (2013). Alienation and empathy as mediators of the relation between social dominance orientation, right-wing authoritarianism and expressions of racism and sexism. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(3), 294–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.03.009
45.
O’BrienL. T.KiniasZ.MajorB. (2008). How status and stereotypes impact attributions to discrimination: The stereotype-asymmetry hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(2), 405–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.12.003
46.
OsborneD.DaviesP. G. (2009). Social dominance orientation, ambivalent sexism, and abortion: Explaining pro-choice and pro-life attitudes. In PalcroftL. B.LopezM. V. (Eds.), Personality assessment: New research (pp. 309–320). Nova Science Publishers.
47.
PhamM. D.BortonJ. L. S. (2024). “Are you a homophobic racist?”: Applying lay theory of generalized prejudice to the discrimination–distress link. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 30(2), 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000576
48.
PhamM. D.ChaneyK. E.SanchezD. T. (2023). ‘‘I am (oppressed), therefore I see’’: Multiple stigmatized identities predict belief in generalized prejudice and coalition. Self and Identity, 22(6), 1000–1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2023.2216941
49.
PrattoF.PitpitanE. V. (2008). Ethnocentrism and sexism: How stereotypes legitimize six types of power. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(6), 2159–2176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00148.x
50.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
51.
SanchezD. T.ChaneyK. E.ManuelS. K.RemediosJ. D. (2018). Theory of prejudice and American identity threat transfer for Latino and Asian Americans. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(7), 972–983. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218759288
52.
SanchezD. T.ChaneyK. E.ManuelS. K.WiltonL. S.RemediosJ. D. (2017). Stigma by prejudice transfer: Racism threatens White women and sexism threatens men of color. Psychological Science, 28(4), 445–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616686218
53.
SchulerM. S.CoffmanD. L.StuartE. A.NguyenT. Q.VegetabileB.McCaffreyD. F. (2025). Practical challenges in mediation analysis: A guide for applied researchers. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 25(1), 57–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-024-00327-4
54.
ShepherdM.ErchullM. J.RosnerA.TaubenbergerL.QueenE. F.McKeeJ. (2010). “I’ll get that for you”: The relationship between benevolent sexism and body self-perceptions. Sex Roles, 64(1–2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9859-2
55.
ShookN. J.FitzgeraldH. N.BoggsS. T.FordC. G.HopkinsP. D.SilvaN. M. (2020). Sexism, racism, and nationalism: Factors associated with the 2016 U.S. presidential election results?PLoS One, 15(3), Article e0229432. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229432
56.
SibleyC. G.BeckerJ. C. (2012). On the nature of sexist ambivalence: Profiling ambivalent and univalent sexists. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(5), 589–601. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1870
57.
SidaniusJ. (1993). The interface between racism and sexism. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 127(3), 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1993.9915565
58.
SommersS. RNortonM. I. (2006). Lay theories about white racists: What constitutes racism (and what doesn’t). Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9, 117–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430206059881.
59.
SpencerB. (2021). Impact of racism and sexism in the 2008–2020 US presidential elections. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 21(1), 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12266
60.
SwimJ. K.AikinK. J.HallW. S.HunterB. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(2), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.199
61.
Van AsscheJ.KoçY.RoetsA. (2019). Religiosity or ideology? On the individual differences predictors of sexism. Personality and Individual Differences, 139, 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.11.016
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
