To elucidate temporal sequences among and between person and situation variables, this work examines cross-measurement spillovers between situation experiences S (on the Situational Eight DIAMONDS characteristics [Duty, Intellect, Adversity, Mating, pOsitivity, Negativity, Deception, Sociality]) and personality states P (on the Big Six HEXACO dimensions [Honesty/Humility, Emotionality, eXtraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Openness to Experience]) in experience sampling data. Multi-level modeling of lagged data at tn-1 and non-lagged data at tn grants the opportunity to examine (a) the stability (P → P, S → S), (b) cross-sectional associations (S ↔ P), and (c) cross-lagged associations among and between situation experiences and personality states (S → P, P → S). Findings indicated that there were (a) moderate stability paths, (b) small to moderate cross-sectional paths, and (c) only very small cross-lagged paths (though the different situation characteristics and personality states showed differential tendencies toward no directionality, S → P or P → S unidirectionality, or bidirectionality). Findings are discussed in light of refining studies on dynamic person–situation transactions.
AbelsonR. P. (1985). A variance explanation paradox: When a little is a lot. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 129-133.
2.
AshtonM. C.LeeK. (2001). A theoretical basis for the major dimensions of personality. European Journal of Personality, 15, 327-353.
3.
AshtonM. C.LeeK. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150-166.
4.
BaltesP. B. (1997). On the incomplete architecture of human ontogeny. American Psychologist, 52, 366-380.
5.
BanduraA. (1978). The self system in reciprocal determinism. American Psychologist, 33, 344-358.
BleidornW.PetersA.-L. (2011). A multilevel multitrait-multimethod analysis of self- and peer-reported daily affective experiences. European Journal of Personality, 25, 398-408.
8.
BrownN. A.RauthmannJ. F. (in press). Situation characteristics are age-graded: Mean-level patterns of the Situational Eight DIAMONDS across the lifespan. Social Psychological and Personality Science.
9.
BrownN. A.ShermanR. A. (2016). Factors affecting the experience of situations: The case for time of day, gender, and employment status. Manuscript in preparation.
10.
BussD. M. (1987). Selection, evocation, and manipulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1214-1221.
11.
BussD. M. (1991). Evolutionary personality psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 459-491.
12.
BussD. M. (1996). Social adaptation and five major factors of personality. In WigginsJ. S. (Ed.), The five factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 180-207). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
13.
CaspiA.RobertsB. W. (2001). Personality development across the life span: The argument for change and continuity. Psychological Inquiry, 12, 49-66.
ChingC. M.ChurchA. T.KatigbakM. S.RayesJ. A. S.Tanaka-MatsumiJ.TakaokaS.. . . OrtizF. A. (2014). The manifestation of traits in everyday behavior and affect: A five-culture study. Journal of Research in Personality, 48, 1-16.
16.
ChurchA. T.KatigbakM. S.ChingC. M.ZhangH.ShenJ.AriasR. M.. . . AlvarezJ. M. (2013). Within-individual variability in self-concepts and personality states: Applying density distribution and situation-behavior approaches across cultures. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 922-935.
17.
CohenJ.CohenP. C.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
19.
CramerA. O. J.van der SluisS.NoordhofA.WichersM.GeschwindN.AggenS. H.BorsboomD. (2012). Dimensions of normal personality as networks in search of equilibrium: You can’t like parties if you don’t like people. European Journal of Personality, 26, 414-431.
20.
DenissenJ. J. A.PenkeL. (2008). Individual reaction norms underlying the Five Factor Model of personality: First steps towards a theory-based conceptual framework. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1285-1302.
21.
EndlerN. S. (1981). Situational aspects of interactional psychology. In MagnussonD. (Ed.), Toward a psychology of situations: An interactional perspective (pp. 361-373). London, England: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
FleesonW. (2001). Toward a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 1011-1027.
23.
FleesonW. (2004). Moving personality beyond the person-situation debate: The challenge and the opportunity of within-person variability. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 83-87.
24.
FleesonW. (2007). Situation-based contingencies underlying trait-content manifestation in behavior. Journal of Personality, 75, 825-862.
25.
FleesonW. (2012). Perspectives on the person: Rapid growth and opportunities for integration. In DeauxK.SnyderM. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology (pp. 33-63). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
26.
FleesonW.GallagherP. (2009). The implications of Big Five standing for the distribution of trait manifestation of behavior: Fifteen experience-sampling studies and a meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1097-1114.
27.
FleesonW.JayawickremeE. (2015). Whole trait theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 82-92.
28.
FleesonW.NoftleE. E. (2008). In favor of the synthetic resolution to the person-situation debate. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 150-154.
29.
FournierM. A.MoskowitzD. S.ZuroffD. C. (2008). Integrating dispositions, signatures, and the interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 531-545.
30.
FournierM. A.MoskowitzD. S.ZuroffD. C. (2009). The interpersonal signature. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 155-162.
31.
FunderD. C. (2006). Towards a resolution of the personality triad: Persons, situations, and behaviors. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 21-34.
32.
FunderD. C. (2008). Persons, situations and person-situation interactions. In JohnO. P.RobinsR.PervinL. (Eds.), Handbook of personality (3rd ed., pp. 568-580). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
33.
FunderD. C. (2009). Persons, behaviors and situations: An agenda for personality psychology in the postwar era. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 120-126.
34.
FunderD. C.ColvinC. R. (1991). Explorations in behavioral consistency: Properties of persons, situations, and behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 773-794.
35.
GandrudC. (2015). Package “DataCombine.” R Package.
36.
HemphillJ. F. (2003). Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients. American Psychologist, 58, 78-79.
37.
HoganR. (1996). A socioanalytic perspective on the five-factor model. In WigginsJ. S. (Ed.), The five factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 163-179). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
38.
HolmesJ. G. (2002). Interpersonal expectations as the building blocks of social cognition: An interdependence theory perspective. Personal Relationships, 9, 1-26.
39.
IckesW.SnyderM.GarciaS. (1997). Personality influences on the choice of situations. In HoganR.JohnsonJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 165-195). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
40.
JohnO. P.SrivastavaS. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In PervinL. A.JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102-138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
41.
JohnsonJ. A. (1999). Persons in situations: Distinguishing new wine from old wine in new bottles. In Van MechelenI.De RaadB. (Eds.), Personality and situations [Special Issue]. European Journal of Personality, 13, 443-453.
42.
JudgeT. A.SimonL. S.HurstC.KelleyK. (2014). What I experienced yesterday is who I am today: Relationship of work motivations and behaviors to within-individual variation in the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 199-221.
43.
KennyD. A. (1975). Cross-lagged panel correlation: A test for spuriousness. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 887-903.
44.
LewinK. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
45.
LewinK. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
46.
MacDonaldK. B. (1995). Evolution, the Five-Factor Model, and levels of personality. Journal of Personality, 63, 525-567.
47.
MacDonaldK. B. (1998). Evolution, culture, and the five-factor model. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 119-149.
48.
McAdamsD. P. (1992). The five-factor model in personality: A critical appraisal. Journal of Personality, 60, 329-361.
49.
McAdamsD. P.PalsJ. L. (2006). A new Big Five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. American Psychologist, 61, 204-217.
50.
McCabeK. O.MackL.FleesonW. (2012). A guide for data cleaning in experience sampling studies. In MehlM. R.ConnorT. S. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 321-338). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
51.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the Five-Factor Model. In WigginsJ. S. (Ed.), The five factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 51-87). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
52.
MillerG. F. (2012). The smartphone psychology manifesto. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 221-237.
53.
MischelW.ShodaY. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246-268.
54.
MischelW.ShodaY. (1999). Integrating dispositions and processing dynamics within a unified theory of personality: The Cognitive Affective Personality System (CAPS). In PervinL. A.JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 197-218). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
55.
MischelW.ShodaY. (2008). Towards a unified theory of personality: Integrating dispositions and processing dynamics within the cognitive-affective processing system. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 208-241). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
56.
MurrayH. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
57.
NettleD. (2006). The evolution of personality variation in humans and other animals. American Psychologist, 61, 622-631.
58.
PettigrewT. F. (1997). Personality and social structure: Social psychological contributions. In HoganR.JohnsonJ. A.BriggsS. R. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 417-438). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
59.
PlominR.DeFriesJ. C.LoehlinJ. C. (1977). Genotype-environment interaction and correlation in the analysis of human behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 309-322.
60.
RamN.ConroyD. E.PincusA. L.HydeA. L.MolloyL. E. (2012). Tethering theory to method: Using measures of intraindividual variability to operationalize individuals’ dynamic characteristics. In HancockG.HarringJ. (Eds.), Advances in longitudinal modeling in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 81-110). New York, NY: Routledge.
61.
RauthmannJ. F. (2010). Systems intelligence as a trait: A meta-model for a systemic understanding of personality. In HämäläinenR. P.SaarinenE. (Eds.), Essays on systems intelligence (pp. 61-87). Espoo, Finland: Systems Analysis Lab (Aalto University, School of Science and Technology).
62.
RauthmannJ. F. (2012). You say the party is dull, I say it’s lively: A componential approach to how situations are perceived to disentangle perceiver, situation, and perceiver x situation variance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 519-528.
63.
RauthmannJ. F. (2013). Effects of supplementary and complementary personality-situation fit on personality processes. Psychology of Everyday Activity, 6, 41-63.
64.
RauthmannJ. F. (2015). Structuring situational information: A road map of the many pathways to different situational taxonomies. European Psychologist, 20, 176-189.
65.
RauthmannJ. F. (2016). Motivational factors in the perception of psychological situation characteristics. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 10, 92-108.
66.
RauthmannJ. F.Gallardo-PujolD.GuillaumeE. M.ToddE.NaveC. S.ShermanR. A.FunderD. C. (2014). The Situational Eight DIAMONDS: A taxonomy of major dimensions of situation characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 677-718.
67.
RauthmannJ. F.ShermanR. A. (2016). Situation change: Stability and change of situation variables between and within persons. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1938. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01938
68.
RauthmannJ. F.ShermanR. A. (in press). Ultra-brief measures for the Situational Eight DIAMONDS domains. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. doi:10.1027/1015–5759/a000245
69.
RauthmannJ. F.ShermanR. A.FunderD. C. (2015a). New horizons in research on psychological situations and environments. Rejoinder to target article. European Journal of Personality, 29, 382-432.
70.
RauthmannJ. F.ShermanR. A.FunderD. C. (2015b). Principles of situation research: Towards a better understanding of psychological situations. Target article. European Journal of Personality, 29, 363-381.
71.
RauthmannJ. F.ShermanR. A.NaveC. S.FunderD. C. (2015). Personality-driven situation experience, contact, and construal: How people’s personality traits predict characteristics of their situations in daily life. Journal of Research in Personality, 55, 98-111.
72.
R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
73.
ReadS. J.MonroeB. M.BrownsteinA. L.YangY.ChopraG.MillerL. C. (2010). A neural network model of the structure and dynamics of human personality. Psychological Review, 117, 61-92.
74.
ReisH. T. (2008). Reinvigorating the concept of situation in social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 311-329.
75.
RobertsB. W.RobinsR. W. (2004). A longitudinal study of person-environment fit and personality development. Journal of Personality, 72, 89-110.
76.
RyffC. D. (1987). The place of personality and social structure research in social psychology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1192-1202.
77.
RossL.NisbettR. E. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
78.
SaucierG.Bel-BaharT.FernandezC. (2007). What modifies the expression of personality tendencies? Defining basic domains of situation variables. Journal of Personality, 75, 479-504.
79.
ScarrS.McCartneyK. (1983). How people make their own environments: A theory of genotype-environment effects. Child Development, 54, 424-435.
80.
SchmittM.GollwitzerM.BaumertA.BlumG.GeschwendnerT.HofmannW.RothmundT. (2013). Proposal of a nonlinear interaction of person and situation (NIPS) model. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 499.
81.
SerfassD. G.ShermanR. A. (2013). Personality and the perceptions of situations from the Thematic Apperception Test. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 708-718.
82.
ShermanR. A. (2014). Situation change: Understanding person-environment transactions in real life (Accepted NSF Grant Proposal).
83.
ShermanR. A.NaveC. N.FunderD. C. (2010). Situational similarity and personality predict behavioral consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 330-343.
84.
ShermanR. A.NaveC. S.FunderD. C. (2012). Properties of persons and situations related to overall and distinctive personality-behavior congruence. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 87-101.
85.
ShermanR. A.NaveC. S.FunderD. C. (2013). Situational construal is related to personality and gender. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 1-14.
86.
ShermanR. A.RauthmannJ. F.BrownN. A.SerfassD. G.JonesA. B. (2015). The independent effects of personality and situations on real-time expressions of behavior and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 872-888.
87.
ShiffmanS.StoneA.HuffordM. R. (2008). Ecological momentary assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 1-32.
88.
ShinerR. L. (2009). Persons and situations act together to shape the course of human lives. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 270-271.
89.
SointuL.LonnqvistJ.VerkasaloM. (2012). Persons, situations, and behavior: Consistency and variability of different behaviors in four interpersonal situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 1007-1022.
90.
van LieshoutC. F. M. (2000). Lifespan personality development: Self-organising goal-oriented agents and developmental outcome. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24, 276-288.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
