The current work examines mean-level patterns of major dimensions of situation characteristics—the Situational Eight DIAMONDS—across the life span. Using population-representative data from the 2013 and 2014 American Time Use Survey (Study 1) and the 2012 German Socioeconomic Panel (Study 2), we tested hypotheses generated from research on situation cues and personality development. Results demonstrated that the DIAMONDS characteristics were age graded: Individuals tended to be in different kinds of situations as a function of their age. Furthermore, there was evidence that some patterns were country specific, whereas others replicated across the United States and Germany. Overall, these studies suggest that—much like personality traits—situation characteristics have predictable mean-level patterns over the life span.
AnusicI.LucasR. E.DonnellanM. B. (in press). The validity of the Day Reconstruction Method in the German Socio-economic Panel Study. Social Indicators Research.
2.
BleidornW.KlimstraT. A.DenissenJ. J. A.RentfrowP. J.PotterJ.GoslingS. D. (2014). Personality maturation around the world: A cross-cultural examination of Social Investment Theory. Psychological Science, 24, 2530–2540.
3.
CohenJ.CohenP.AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1999). The problem of units and the circumstance for POMP. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34, 315–346.
4.
de RaadB. (2004). Situations that matter to personality. In EliaszA.HampsonS. E.de RaadB. (Eds.), Advances in personality psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 179–204). Hove, England: Routledge.
5.
DonnellanM. B.LucasR. E. (2008). Age differences in the Big Five across the lifespan: Evidence from two national samples. Psychology and Aging, 23, 558–566.
6.
EdwardsJ. A.TempletonA. (2005). The structure of perceived qualities of situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 705–723.
7.
GuillaumeE.BaranskiE.BastianB.BroninI.IvanovaC.ChengJ. T.…FunderD. C. (in press). The World at 7: Comparing the experience of situations across 20 countries. Journal of Personality.
8.
HaaseC.HeckhausenJ.WroschC. (2013). Developmental regulation across the life span: Toward a new synthesis. Developmental Psychology, 49, 964–972.
9.
HarmsP. D.RobertsB. W.WinterD. (2006). Becoming the Harvard man: Person-environment fit, personality development, and academic success. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 851–865.
10.
IckesW.SnyderM.GarciaS. (1997). Personality influences on the choice of situations. In HoganR.JohnsonJ.BriggsS. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 165–195). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
11.
JonesA. B.BrownN. A.SerfassD. G.ShermanR. A. (2014). Traumatic experiences yield changes in the situation experience. European Journal of Personality, 28, 339–340. doi:10.1002/per.1970
12.
KahnemanD.KruegerA. B.SchkadeD. A.SchwarzN.StoneA. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The Day Reconstruction Method. Science, 306, 1776–1780.
13.
Lodi-SmithJ.RobertsB. W. (2007). Social investment and personality: A meta-analysis of the relationship of personality traits to investment in work, family, religion, and volunteerism. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 68–86.
14.
R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
15.
RauthmannJ. F. (2013). Effects of supplementary and complementary personality-situation fit on personality processes. Psychology of Everyday Activity, 6, 41–63.
16.
RauthmannJ. F. (2016). Motivational factors in the perception of psychological situation characteristics. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10, 92–108. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12239
17.
RauthmannJ. F.Gallardo-PujolD.GuillaumeE. M.ToddE.NaveC. S.ShermanR. A.…FunderD. C. (2014). The Situational Eight DIAMONDS: A taxonomy of major dimensions of situation characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 677–718.
18.
RauthmannJ. F.JonesA. B.ShermanR. A. (in press). Directionality of person-situation transactions: Are there spill-overs among and between situation experiences and personality states?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
19.
RauthmannJ. F.ShermanR. A. (2016). Situation change: Stability and change of situation variables between and within persons. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1938.
20.
RauthmannJ. F.ShermanR. A. (in press[a]). Measuring the Situational Eight DIAMONDS characteristics of situations: An optimization of the RSQ-8 to the S8*. European Journal of Psychological Assessment.
21.
RauthmannJ. F.ShermanR. A. (in press[b]). Succinctly measuring the psychological characteristics of situations: Ultra-brief measures for the Situational Eight DIAMONDS domains. European Journal of Psychological Assessment.
22.
RauthmannJ. F.ShermanR. A.FunderD. C. (2015a). Principles of situation research: Towards a better understanding of psychological situations. European Journal of Personality, 29, 363–381.
23.
RauthmannJ. F.ShermanR. A.FunderD. C. (2015b). New horizons in research on psychological situations and environments. European Journal of Personality, 29, 382–432.
24.
RauthmannJ. F.ShermanR. A.NaveC. S.FunderD. C. (2015). Personality-driven situation experience, contact, and construal: How people’s personality traits predict characteristics of their situations in daily life. Journal of Research in Personality, 55, 98–111.
25.
ReisH. T. (2008). Reinvigorating the concept of situation in social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 311–329.
26.
RobertsB. W.CaspiMoffitT. (2003). Work experiences and personality development in young adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 582–593.
27.
RobertsB. W.PomerantzE. M. (2004). On traits, situations, and their integration: A developmental perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 402–416.
28.
RobertsB. W.RobinsR. W. (2004). Person-environment fit and its implications for personality development: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality, 72, 89–110.
29.
RobertsB. W.WaltonK. E.ViechtbauerW. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 1–25.
30.
SaucierG.Bel-BaharT.FernandezC. (2007). What modifies the expression of personality tendencies? Defining basic domains of situation variables. Journal of Personality, 75, 479–504.
31.
ScarrS.McCartneyK. (1983). How people make their own environments: A theory of genotype → environment effects. Child Development, 54, 424–435.
32.
SerfassD. S.ShermanR. A. (2015). Situations in 140 characters: Assessing real-world situations on Twitter. PLOS One, 10, 1–19.
33.
ShermanR. A.NaveC. S.FunderD. C. (2010). Situational similarity and personality predict behavioral consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 330–343.
34.
ShermanR. A.RauthmannJ. F.BrownN. A.SerfassD. S.JonesA. B. (2015). The independent effects of personality and situations on real-time expressions of behavior and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 872–888.
35.
ShroutP. E.FleissJ. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428.
36.
SpechtJ.EgloffB.SchmulkeS. C. (2011). Stability and change of personality across the life course: The impact of age and major life events on mean-level and rank-order stability of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 862–882.
37.
SrivastavaS.JohnO. P.GoslingS. D.PotterJ. (2003). Development of personality in early and middle adulthood: Set like plaster or persistent change?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1041–1053.
38.
WrzusC.WagnerG. G.RiedigerM. (2016). Personality-situation transactions from adolescence to old age. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 782–799.
