Ostracism’s negative consequences have been widely documented, but research has yet to explore the personality characteristics of its targets that precipitate ostracism. Based on theories of the functions of ostracism, we found that people are more willing to ostracize disagreeable targets than more agreeable targets (Studies 2 and 3). This outcome was mediated by participants’ interpersonal trust toward the target, and was especially strong for people who highly endorse fairness as a foundation for morality (Study 4). Ironically, the experience of ostracism induced a state of disagreeableness: the very characteristic that elicits ostracism from others (Study 5). This relationship was mediated by feelings of anger (Study 6). Findings indicate disagreeableness is a particularly negative outcome of ostracism, because it leads to further ostracism.
BerkowitzL.Harmon-JonesE. (2004). Toward an understanding of the determinants of anger. Emotion, 4, 107-130.
2.
Carter-SowellA. R. (2010). Salting a wound, building a callous, or throwing in the towel? The measurement and effects of chronic ostracism experiences (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
3.
ChowR. M.TiedensL. Z.GovanC. L. (2008). Excluded emotions: The role of anger in antisocial responses to ostracism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 896-903. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.09.004
4.
CummingG. (2012). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
5.
DiekmanA. B.ClarkE. K.JohnstonA. M.BrownE. R.SteinbergM. (2011). Malleability in communal goals and beliefs influences attraction to stem careers: Evidence for a goal congruity perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 902-918.
6.
FeinbergM.WillerR.SchultzM. (2014). Gossip and ostracism promote cooperation in groups. Psychological Science, 25, 656-664. doi:10.1177/0956797613510184
7.
FleesonW. (2001). Toward a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 1011-1027.
8.
GómezÁ.MoralesJ.HartS.VázquezA.SwannW. R. (2011). Rejected and excluded forevermore, but even more devoted: Irrevocable ostracism intensifies loyalty to the group among identity-fused persons. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1574-1586. doi:10.1177/0146167211424580
9.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.NosekB. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029-1046.
10.
GrazianoW. G.EisenbergN. (1997). Agreeableness: A dimension of personality. In HoganR.JohnsonJ.BriggsS. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 795-824). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
11.
GrazianoW. G.HabashiM. M. (2010). Motivated processes underlying both prejudice and helping. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 313-331.
12.
GrazianoW. G.HabashiM. M.SheeseB. E.TobinR. M. (2007). Agreeableness, empathy, and helping: A person × situation perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 583-599. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.583
13.
GrazianoW. G.TobinR. M. (2009). Agreeableness. In LearyM. R.HoyleR. H. (Eds.). Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 46-61). New York: Guilford
14.
GruterM.MastersR. (1986). Ostracism as a social and biological phenomenon: An introduction. Ethology and Sociobiology, 7, 227-236.
15.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
16.
HayesA. F.PreacherK. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67, 451-470. doi:10.1111/bmsp.12028
17.
HoganR. T. (1983). A socioanalytic theory of personality. In PageM. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Personality-current theory and research (pp. 58-89). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
18.
Jensen-CampbellL. A.AdamsR.PerryD. G.WorkmanK. A.FurdellaJ. Q.EganS. K. (2002). Agreeableness, extraversion, and peer relations in early adolescence: Winning friends and deflecting aggression. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 224-251. doi:10.1006/jrpe.2002.2348
19.
Jensen-CampbellL. A.RosselliM.WorkmanK. A.SantisiM.RiosJ. D.BojanD. (2002). Agreeableness, conscientiousness, and effortful control processes. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 476-489.
20.
JohnO. P.DonahueE. M.KentleR. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory–Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
21.
JohnO. P.SrivastavaS. (1999). The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In PervinL. A.JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 102-138). New York: Guilford Press.
22.
Johnson-GeorgeC.SwapW. C. (1982). Measurement of specific interpersonal trust: Construction and validation of a scale to assess trust in a specific other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1306-1317. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.6.1306
23.
KagelJ.McGeeP. (2014). Personality and cooperation in finitely repeated prisoner’s dilemma games. Economics Letters, 124, 274-277.
24.
KochanskaG.MurrayK.CoyK. C. (1997). Inhibitory control as a contributor to conscience in childhood: From toddler to early school age. Child Development, 68, 263-277.
25.
KurzbanR.LearyM. R. (2001). Evolutionary origins of stigmatization: The functions of social exclusion. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 187-208.
26.
LegateN.DeHaanC. R.WeinsteinN.RyanR. M. (2013). Hurting you hurts me too: The psychological costs of complying with ostracism. Psychological Science, 24, 583-588.
27.
LernerJ. S.KeltnerD. (2000). Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 473-493. doi:10.1080/026999300402763
28.
LüdtkeO.RobertsB. W.TrautweinU.NagyG. (2011). A random walk down university avenue: Life paths, life events, and personality trait change at the transition to university life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 620-637.
29.
MurrayK.KochanskaG. (2002). Effortful control: Factor structure and relation to externalizing and internalizing behaviors. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, 503-514.
30.
OzerD. J.Benet-MartínezV. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401-421. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190127
31.
RivaP.WilliamsK. D.TorstrickA. M.MontaliL. (2014). Orders to shoot (a camera): Effects of ostracism on obedience. The Journal of Social Psychology, 154, 208-216. doi:10.1080/00224545.2014.883354
32.
RobertsB. W.MroczekD. (2008). Personality trait change in adulthood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 31-35.
33.
RobertsB. W.WaltonK. E.ViechtbauerW. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 1-25. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1
34.
RosenthalR.JacobsonL. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectations and student intellectual development. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
35.
RothbartM. K.DerryberryD.PosnerM. I. (1994). A psychobiological approach to the development of temperament. In BatesJ. E.WachsT. D. (Eds.), Temperament: Individual differences at the interface of biology and behavior (pp. 83-116). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
36.
Smart RichmanL. S.LearyM. R. (2009). Reactions to discrimination, stigmatization, ostracism, and other forms of interpersonal rejection: A dynamic, multi-motive model. Psychological Review, 116, 365-383.
37.
SnyderM. (1984). When belief creates reality. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 247-305). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
38.
SnyderM.TankeE. D.BerscheidE. (1977). Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 656-666. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.35.9.656
39.
TwengeJ. M.BaumeisterR. F.DeWallC.CiaroccoN. J.BartelsJ. (2007). Social exclusion decreases prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 56-66. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.56
40.
WarburtonW. A.WilliamsK. D.CairnsD. R. (2006). When ostracism leads to aggression: The moderating effects of control deprivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 213-220.
41.
WesselmanE. D.ButlerF. A.WilliamsK. D.PickettC. L. (2010). Adding injury to insult: Unexpected rejection leads to more aggressive responses. Aggressive Behavior, 36, 232-237. doi: 10.1002/ab.20347
42.
WesselmannE. D.WirthJ. H.PryorJ. B.ReederG. D.WilliamsK. D. (2013). When do we ostracize?Social Psychological & Personality Science, 4, 108-115.
43.
WilliamsK. D. (1997). Social ostracism. In KowalskiR. (Ed.), Aversive interpersonal behaviors (pp. 133-170). New York, NY: Plenum.
44.
WilliamsK. D. (2009). Ostracism: Effects of being excluded and ignored. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 41, pp. 275-314). New York, NY: Academic Press.
45.
WilliamsK. D.CheungC.ChoiW. (2000). Cyberostracism: Effects of being ignored over the internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 748-762.
46.
WilliamsK. D.WesselmannE. D. (2011). The link between ostracism and aggression. In ForgasJ. P.KruglanskiA. W.WilliamsK. D. (Eds.), The psychology of social conflict and aggression (pp. 37-51). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
