There is no question that biases exist in self-perceptions of personality. To what extent do people have insight into their positive and negative self-biases? In two samples (total N = 130), people with positive biases (i.e., self-perceptions that are more positive than a reputation-based criterion measure) accurately described themselves as positively biased, and people with negative biases accurately described themselves as negatively biased. Furthermore, people were able to distinguish which traits they were more or less biased about. These findings suggest that people may know more about themselves than they initially admit. Implications for the use of self-reports and the study of self-knowledge are discussed.
AlickeM. D. (1985). Global self-evaluation as determined by the desirability and controllability of trait adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1621-1630. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.6.1621
2.
AlickeM. D.SedikidesC. (2011). Self enhancement and self-protection: Historical overview and conceptual framework. In AlickeM. D.SedikidesC. (Eds.), The handbook of self-enhancement and self-protection (pp. 1-19). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
3.
BackM. D.VazireS. (2012). Knowing our personality. In VazireS.WilsonT. D. (Eds.), Handbook of self-knowledge (pp. 131-156). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
BaumeisterR. F. (1982). Self-esteem, self-presentation, and future interaction: A dilemma of reputation. Journal of Personality, 50, 29-45. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1982.tb00743.x
6.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
7.
BollichK. L.JohannetP. M.VazireS. (2011). In search of our true selves: Feedback as a path to self-knowledge. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 312. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00312
8.
CampbellJ. D.FehrB. (1990). Self-esteem and perceptions of conveyed impressions: Is negative affectivity associated with greater realism?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 122-133. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.1.122
CarlsonE. N. (2013). Honestly arrogant or simply misunderstood? Narcissists’ awareness of their narcissism. Self and Identity, 12(3), 259-277. doi:10.1080/15298868.2012.659427
11.
CarlsonE. N.VazireS.FurrR. (2011). Meta-insight: Do people really know how others see them?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 831-846. doi:10.1037/a0024297
12.
CarlsonE. N.VazireS.OltmannsT. F. (2011). You probably think this paper’s about you: Narcissists’ perceptions of their personality and reputation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 185-201. doi:10.1037/a0023781
13.
ChaikenS.TropeY. (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
14.
CrossP. (1977). Not can but will college teaching be improved. New Directions for Higher Education, 17, 1-15. doi:10.1002/he.36919771703
15.
DunningD.HeathC.SulsJ. M. (2004). Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 69-106. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00018.x
16.
EhrlingerJ.GilovichT.RossL. (2005). Peering into the bias blind spot: People’s assessments of bias in themselves and others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 680-692. doi:10.1177/0146167204271570
17.
EliotG. (1956). Middlemarch. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company. (Original work published 1871)
18.
EpleyN.DunningD. (2000). Feeling “holier than thou”: Are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self- or social prediction?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 861-875. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.861
19.
FurrR. M. (2009). Profile analysis in person-situation integration. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(2), 196-207. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.08.002
20.
GawronskiB.BodenhausenG. V. (2012). Self-insight from a dual-process perspective. In VazireS.WilsonT. D. (Eds.), Handbook of self-knowledge (pp. 22-38). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
21.
GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.SwannW. B.Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504-528. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
22.
HeineS. J.HamamuraT. (2007). In search of East Asian self-enhancement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 4-27. doi:10.1177/1088868306294587
23.
HeineS. J.KitayamaS.HamamuraT. (2007). Inclusion of additional studies yields different conclusions: Comment on Sedikides, Gaertner, & Vevea (2005), Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 10(2), 49-58. doi:10.1111/j.1467-839X.2007.00211.x
24.
JohnO. P.RobinsR. W. (1993). Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits: The Big Five domains, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self. Journal of Personality, 61, 521-551. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993.tb00781.x
25.
JohnO. P.RobinsR. W. (1994). Accuracy and bias in self-perception: Individual differences in self-enhancement and the role of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 206-219. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.206
26.
KolarD. W.FunderD. C.ColvinC. R. (1996). Comparing the accuracy of personality judgments by the self and knowledgeable others. Journal of Personality, 64, 311-337. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00513.x
27.
KrugerJ.DunningD. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1121-1134. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121
28.
KurtA.PaulhusD. L. (2008). Moderators of the adaptiveness of self-enhancement: Operationalization, motivational domain, adjustment facet, and evaluator. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 839-853. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2007.11.005
29.
KwanV. Y.JohnO. P.KennyD. A.BondM. H.RobinsR. W. (2004). Reconceptualizing individual differences in self-enhancement bias: An interpersonal approach. Psychological Review, 111, 94-110. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.111.1.94
30.
McCabeK. O.FleesonW. (2012). What is extraversion for? Integrating trait and motivational perspectives and identifying the purpose of extraversion. Psychological Science, 23, 1498-1505. doi:10.1177/0956797612444904
31.
MessickD. M.BloomS.BoldizarJ. P.SamuelsonC. D. (1985). Why we are fairer than others. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 480-500. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(85)90031-9
32.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.DoldermanD.GriffinD. W. (2000). What the motivated mind sees: Comparing friends’ perspectives to married partners’ views of each other. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 600-620. doi:10.1006/jesp.1999.1417
33.
NisbettR. E.WilsonT. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231
34.
PaulhusD. L.JohnO. P. (1994, August). How many dimensions of evaluation are there?Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, CA.
35.
PaulhusD. L.JohnO. P. (1998). Egoistic and moralistic biases in self-perception: The interplay of self-deceptive styles with basic traits and motives. Journal of Personality, 66, 1025-1060. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00041
36.
PettyR. E.WegenerD. T.WhiteP. H. (1998). Flexible correction processes in social judgment: Implications for persuasion. Social Cognition, 16, 93-113. doi:10.1521/soco.1998.16.1.93
37.
ProninE. (2007). Perception and misperception of bias in human judgment. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 37-43. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.001
38.
ProninE.KrugerJ.SavitskyK.RossL. (2001). You don’t know me, but I know you: The illusion of asymmetric insight. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 639-656. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.4.639
39.
ProninE.LinD. Y.RossL. (2002). The bias blind spot: Perceptions of bias in self versus others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 369-381. doi:10.1177/0146167202286008
40.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
41.
RichardF. D.BondC. F.Jr.Stokes-ZootaJ. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7, 331-363. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331
42.
RobieC.TaggarS.BrownD. J. (2009). The effects of warnings and speeding on scale scores and convergent validity of conscientiousness. Human Performance, 22, 340-354. doi:10.1080/08959280903120287
43.
RoeseN. J.JamiesonD. W. (1993). Twenty years of bogus pipeline research: A critical review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 363-375. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.2.363
44.
SedikidesC. (1993). Assessment, enhancement, and verification determinants of the self-evaluation process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 317-338. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.317
45.
SedikidesC.AlickeM. D. (2012). Self-enhancement and self-protection motives. In RyanR. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of motivation (pp. 303-322). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
46.
SedikidesC.GaertnerL.ToguchiY. (2003). Pancultural self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 60-79. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.60
47.
SedikidesC.StrubeM. J. (1995). The multiply motivated self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1330-1335. doi:10.1177/01461672952112010
48.
SedikidesC.StrubeM. J. (1997). Self evaluation: To thine own self be good, to thine own self be sure, to thine own self be true, and to thine own self be better. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 209-269). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60018-0
SilviaP. J.GendollaG. E. (2001). On introspection and self-perception: Does self-focused attention enable accurate self-knowledge?Review of General Psychology, 5, 241-269. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.5.3.241
51.
SolomonB. C.VazireS. (2014). You are so beautiful . . . to me: Seeing beyond biases and achieving accuracy in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 516-528. doi:10.1037/a0036899
52.
SrivastavaS. (2012). Other people as a source of self-knowledge. In VazireS.WilsonT. D. (Eds.), Handbook of self-knowledge (pp. 90-104). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
53.
StrubeM. J. (2012). From “out there” to “in here”: Implications of self-evaluation motives for self-knowledge. In VazireS.WilsonT. D. (Eds.), Handbook of self-knowledge (pp. 397-412). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
54.
SvensonO. (1981). Are we all less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers?Acta Psychologica, 47, 143-148. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(81)90005-6
55.
TenneyE. R.VazireS.MehlM. R. (2013). This examined life: The upside of self-knowledge for interpersonal relationships. PLoS ONE, 8, e69605. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0069605
56.
Van LangeP. A. M.SedikidesC. (1998). Being more honest but not necessarily more intelligent than others: Generality and explanations for the Muhammad Ali effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 675-680. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199807/08)28:4<675::AID-EJSP883>3.0.CO;2-5
57.
VazireS. (2006). Informant reports: A cheap, fast, and easy method for personality assessment. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 472-481. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.03.003
58.
VazireS. (2010). Who knows what about a person? The self-other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 281-300. doi:10.1037/a0017908
59.
VazireS.MehlM. R. (2008). Knowing me, knowing you: The accuracy and unique predictive validity of self-ratings and other-ratings of daily behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1202-1216. doi:10.1037/a0013314
60.
WegenerD. T.DunnM.TokusatoD. (2001). The flexible correction model: Phenomenology and the use of naive theories in avoiding or removing bias. In MoskowitzG. B. (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology: The Princeton Symposium on the legacy and future of social cognition (pp. 277-290). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
61.
WilsonT. D.DunnE. W. (2004). Self-knowledge: Its limits, value and potential for improvement. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 493-518. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141954
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
