Romantic partners often have to sacrifice their interests to benefit their partner or to maintain the relationship. In the present work, we investigated whether relative power within the relationship plays an important role in determining the extent to which partners are likely to sacrifice. Drawing from both classic theories and recent research on power, we tested two competing predictions on the relationship between power and sacrifice in romantic relationships. We tested whether (a) power is negatively related to sacrifice and (b) power is positively related to sacrifice. Furthermore, we also explored whether the association between power and sacrifice is moderated by commitment and inclusion of the other in the self. To test our hypotheses, we used different methodologies, including questionnaires, diary studies, and videotaped interactions. Results across the five studies (N = 1,088) consistently supported the hypothesis that power is negatively related to tendencies to sacrifice in close relationships.
AquinoK.TrippT. M.BiesR. J. (2006). Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 653-668. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.653
2.
AronA.AronE. N.SmollanD. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596-612. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
3.
AronA.AronE. N.TudorM.NelsonG. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 241-253. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.241
4.
ArriagaX. B.KumashiroM.FinkelE. J.VanderDriftL. E.LuchiesL. B. (2014). Filling the void: Bolstering attachment security in committed relationships. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 5, 398-406. doi:10.1177/1948550613509287
5.
BarghJ. A.RaymondP.PryorJ. B.StrackF. (1995). Attractiveness of the underling: An automatic power-sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 768-781. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.5.768
6.
CarsonP. P.CarsonK. D.RoeW. (1993). Social power bases: A meta-analytic examination of interrelationships and outcomes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1150-1169. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01026.x
7.
ChenS.Lee-ChaiA. Y.BarghJ. A. (2001). Relationship orientation as moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 183-187. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.173
8.
CôtéS.KrausM. W.ChengB. H.OveisC.van der LoweI.LianH.KeltnerD. (2011). Social power facilitates the effect of prosocial orientation on empathic accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 217-232. doi:10.1037/a0023171
9.
DeMarreeK. G.BrinolP.PettyR. E. (2014). The effects of power on prosocial outcomes: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 41, 20-30. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2012.07.005
10.
DePauloB. M.FriedmanH. S. (1998). Nonverbal communication. In GilbertD.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 3-40). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
11.
DeWallC. N.LambertN. M.SlotterE. B.DeckmanT.PondR. S.FinkelE. J.. . . FinchamF. D. (2011). So far away from one’s partner, yet so close to romantic alternatives: Avoidant attachment, interest in alternatives, and infidelity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1302-1316.
12.
EastwickP. W.NeffL. A.FinkelE. J.LuchiesL. B.HuntL. L. (2014). Is a meta-analysis a foundation or just another brick? Comment on Meltzer, McNulty, Jackson, and Karney (2014). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 429-443. doi:10.1037/a0034767
13.
EbenbachD. H.KeltnerD. (1998). Power, emotion and judgmental accuracy in social conflict: Motivating the cognitive miser. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 20, 7-21. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2001_2
14.
EtcheverryP. E.LeB. (2005). Thinking about commitment: Accessibility of commitment and prediction of relationship persistence, accommodation, and willingness to sacrifice. Personal Relationships, 12, 103-123. doi:10.1111/j.1350-4126.2005.00104.x
15.
FelmleeD. H. (1994). Who’s on top? Power in romantic relationships. Sex Roles, 31, 275-295. doi:10.1007/BF01544589
16.
FinkelE. J.CampbellK. W.BuffardiL. E.KumashiroM.RusbultC. E. (2009). The metamorphosis of Narcissus: Communal activation promotes relationship commitment among narcissists. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1271-1284. doi:10.1177/0146167209340904
17.
FinkelE. J.SlotterE. B.LuchiesL. B.WaltonG. M.GrossJ. J. (2013). A brief intervention to promote conflict reappraisal preserves marital quality over time. Psychological Science, 24, 1595-1601. doi:10.1177/0956797612474938
18.
FiskeS. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621-628. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.48.6.621
19.
GalinskyA. D.GruenfeldD. H.MageeJ. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453-466. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.453
20.
GalinskyA. D.MageeJ. C.InesiM. E.GruenfeldD. H. (2006). Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science, 17, 1068-1074. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01824.x
21.
GoodwinS. A.GubinA.FiskeS. T.YzerbytV. Y. (2000). Power can bias impression processes: Stereotyping subordinates by default and by design. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 3, 227-256. doi:10.1177/1368430200003003001
22.
GordonA. M.ChenS. (2013). Does power help or hurt? The moderating role of self–other focus on power and perspective-taking in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1097-1110. doi:10.1177/0146167213490031
23.
GruenfeldD. H.InesiM. E.MageeJ. C.GalinskyA. D. (2008). Power and the objectification of social targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 111-127. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.111
24.
GuinoteA. (2007). Power and goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1076-1087. doi:10.1177/0146167207301011
HoogervorstN.De CremerD.van DijkeM. H.MayerD. M. (2012). When do leaders sacrifice? The effects of sense of power and belongingness on leader self-sacrifice. Leadership Quarterly, 23, 883-896. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.05.006
27.
ImpettE. A.GordonA. M. (2008). For the good of others: Toward a positive psychology of sacrifice. In LopezS. J. (Ed.), Positive psychology: Exploring the best in people (pp. 79-100). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
28.
KarremansJ. C.SmithP. K. (2010). Having the power to forgive: When the experience of power increases interpersonal forgiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1010-1023. doi:10.1177/0146167210376761
29.
KauraS. A.AllenC. M. (2004). Dissatisfaction with relationship power and dating violence perpetration by men and women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 576-588. doi:10.1177/0886260504262966
30.
KelleyH. H.ThibautJ. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York, NY: John Wiley.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
33.
KrausM. W.CôtéS.KeltnerD. (2010). Social class, contextualism, and empathic accuracy. Psychological Science, 21, 1716-1723. doi:10.1177/0956797610387613
34.
KumashiroM.RusbultC. E.FinkelE. J. (2008). Navigating personal and relational concerns: The quest for equilibrium. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 94-110. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.94
35.
KumashiroM.RusbultC. E.FinkenauerC.StockerS. (2007). To think or to do: Assessment orientation, locomotion orientation, and the Michelangelo phenomenon. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24, 591-611. doi:10.1177/0265407507079261
36.
KwaadstenietE. W.van DijkE. (2010). Social status as a cue for tacit coordination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 515-524. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.01.005
37.
LammersJ.GalinskyA. D.GordijnE. H.OttenS. (2012). Power increases social distance. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 3, 282-290. doi:10.1177/1948550611418679
38.
LammersJ.StokerJ. I.JordanJ.PollmannM.StapelD. A. (2011). Power increases infidelity among men and women. Psychological Science, 22, 1191-1197. doi:10.1177/0956797611416252
39.
MageeJ. C.SmithP. K. (2013). The social distance theory of power. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 158-186. doi:10.1177/1088868312472732
40.
MalamuthN. M. (1986). Predictors of naturalistic sexual aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 953-962. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.953
41.
PiffP. K.KrausM. W.CôtéS.ChengB. H.KeltnerD. (2010). Having less, giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 771-784. doi:10.1037/a0020092
42.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
43.
RighettiF.FinkenauerC.FinkelE. J. (2013). Low self-control promotes the willingness to sacrifice in close relationships. Psychological Science, 24, 1533-1540. doi:10.1177/0956797613475457
44.
RighettiF.KumashiroM.CampbellS. B. (2014). Goal difficulty and openness to interpersonal goal support. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 1107-1118. doi:10.1177/0146167214535954
45.
RighettiF.RusbultC. E.FinkenauerC. (2010). Regulatory focus and the Michelangelo phenomenon: How close partners promote one another’s ideal selves. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 972-985. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.06.001
46.
RonfeldtH. M.KimerlingR.AriasI. (1998). Satisfaction with relationship power and the perpetration of dating violence. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60, 70-78. doi:10.2307/353442
47.
RusbultC. E.KumashiroM.KubackaK. E.FinkelE. J. (2009). “The part of me that you bring out”: Ideal similarity and the Michelangelo phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 61-82. doi:10.1037/a0014016
48.
RusbultC. E.MartzJ. M.AgnewC. R. (1998). The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357-391. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x
49.
SchneiderI. K.KonijnE. A.RighettiF.RusbultC. E. (2011). A healthy dose of trust: The relationship between interpersonal trust and health. Personal Relationships, 18, 668-676. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01338.x
50.
SimpsonJ. A.FarrellA. K.OrinaM. M.RothmanA. J. (2015). Power and social influence in relationships. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. (Eds.), Interpersonal Relations: Vol. 3, APA handbook of personality and social psychology (pp. 393-420). American Psychological Association.
51.
SlotterE. B.EmeryL. F.LuchiesL. B. (2014). Me after you: Partner influence and individual effort predict rejection of self-aspects and self-concept clarity after relationship dissolution. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 831-844. doi:10.1177/0146167214528992
52.
SlotterE. B.LuchiesL. B. (2014). Relationship quality promotes the desire for closeness among distressed avoidantly attached individuals. Personal Relationships, 21, 22-34. doi:10.1111/pere.12015
53.
SprecherS.FelmleeD. (1997). The balance of power in romantic heterosexual couples over time from “his” and “her” perspectives. Sex Roles, 37, 361-379. doi:10.1023/A:1025601423031
54.
Van KleefG. A.OveisC.van der LöweI.LuoKoganA.GoetzJ.KeltnerD. (2008). Power, distress, and compassion: Turning a blind eye to the suffering of others. Psychological Science, 19, 1315-1322. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02241.x
55.
Van LangeP. A. M.RusbultC. E.DrigotasS. M.ArriagaX. B.WitcherB. S.CoxC. L. (1997). Willingness to sacrifice in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1373-1395. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.6.1373
56.
WieselquistJ.RusbultC. E.FosterC. A.AgnewC. R. (1999). Commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 942-966. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.942
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
