In two dyadic studies (a short-term longitudinal study and a daily experience study), we demonstrate that people high in sexual communal strength (i.e., those motivated to meet a romantic partner’s sexual needs) have partners who are more satisfied with and committed to their relationships. In Study 1, people higher in sexual communal strength had partners who felt more satisfied and committed to the relationship both at that time and 3 weeks later. In Study 2, the partners of people high in sexual communal strength perceived their partners as more responsive to their needs during sex, and this was one reason why they reported feeling more satisfied and committed in the relationship. Implications for theories of communal motivation and approaches to sexuality in romantic relationships are discussed.
AbbeyA.AndrewsF. M.HalmanL. J. (1995). Provision and receipt of social support and disregard: What is their impact on the marital life quality of infertile and fertile couples?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 455–469. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.3.455
2.
BabinE. (2012). An examination of predictors of nonverbal and verbal communication of pleasure during sex and sexual satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 270–292.
3.
BirnbaumG. E.ReisH. T. (2012). When does responsiveness pique sexual interest? Attachment and sexual desire in initial acquaintanceships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 946–958. doi:10.1177/0146167212441028
4.
BirnbaumG. E.ReisH. T.MikulincerM.GillathO.OrpazA. (2006). When sex is more than just sex: Attachment orientations, sexual experience, and relationship quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 929–943. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.929
5.
BlanchflowerD. G.OswaldA. J. (2004). Money, sex, and happiness: An empirical study. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106, 393–415.
6.
BlumsteinP.SchwartzP. (1983). American couples. New York: Simon & Schuster.
7.
BolgerN.AmarelD. (2007). Effects of social support visibility on adjustment to stress: Experimental evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 458–475. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.458
8.
BolgerN.ZuckermanA.KesslerR. C. (2000). Invisible support and adjustment to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 953–961. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.953
9.
BrezsnyakM.WhismanM. A. (2004). Sexual desire and relationship functioning: The effects of marital satisfaction and power. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 30, 199–217. doi:10.1080/00926230490262393
10.
BurkeJ.YoungV. J. (2012). Sexual transformations and intimate behaviors in romantic relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 454–463.
11.
ByersE. S. (2005). Relationship satisfaction and sexual satisfaction: A longitudinal study of individuals in long-term relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 42, 113–118. doi:10.1080/00224490509552264
12.
ByersE. S.LewisK. (1988). Dating couples' disagreements over the desired level of sexual intimacy. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 15–29.
13.
ByersE. S.WangA. (2004). Understanding sexuality in close relationships from the social exchange perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
14.
ClarkM. S.MillsJ. (1993). The difference between communal and exchange relationships: What it is and is not. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 684–691. doi:10.1177/0146167293196003
15.
ClarkM. S.MillsJ. R. (2012). In Van LangeP. A. M.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), A theory of communal (and exchange) relationships. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
DebrotA.CookW. L.PerrezM.HornA. B. (2012). Deeds matter: Daily enacted responsiveness and intimacy in couples' daily lives. Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 617–627. doi:10.1037/a0028666
17.
DindiaK. (2000). Relational maintenance. In HendrickC.HendrickS. S. (Eds.), Close relationships: A sourcebook (pp. 287–299). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
FletcherG. J. O.SimpsonJ. A.ThomasG. (2000). The measurement of perceived relationship quality components: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Personality and and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 340–354.
19.
FritzH. L.HelgesonV. S. (1998). Distinctions of unmitigated communion from communion: Self-neglect and over involvement with others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 121–140.
20.
GableS. L.GosnellC. L.MaiselN. C.StrachmanA. (2012). Safely testing the alarm: Close others' responses to personal positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 963–981.
21.
ImpettE. A.MuiseA.PeragineD. (2014). Sexuality in the context of relationships. In TolmanD. L.DiamondL. M.BauermeisterJ. A.GeorgeW. H.PfausJ. G.WardL. M. (Eds.), APA handbook of sexuality and psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 269–315). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
22.
ImpettE. A.PeplauL. A. (2002). Why some women consent to unwanted sex with a dating partner: Insights from attachment theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 360–370. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00075
23.
ImpettE. A.PeplauL. A. (2003). Sexual compliance: Gender, motivational, and relationship perspectives. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 87–100. doi:10.1080/00224490309552169
24.
ImpettE. A.StrachmanA.FinkelE. J.GableS. L. (2008). Maintaining sexual desire in intimate relationships: The importance of approach goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 808–823. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.808
25.
KatzJ.TironeV. (2009). Women’s sexual compliance with male dating partners: Associations with investment in ideal woman-hood and romantic well-being. Sex Roles, 60, 347–356.
26.
KatzJ.TironeV. (2010). Going along with it: Sexually coercive partner behavior predicts dating women’s compliance with unwanted sex. Violence Against Women, 16, 730–742.
27.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
28.
KoganA.ImpettE.OveisC.HuiB.GordonA.KeltnerD. (2010). When giving feels good: The intrinsic benefits of sacrifice in romantic relationships for the communally motivated. Psychological Science, 21, 1918–1924.
29.
LambertN. M.ClarkM. S.DurtschiJ.FinchamF. D.GrahamS. M. (2010). Benefits of expressing gratitude: Expressing gratitude to a partner changes one’s view of the relationship. Psychological Science, 21, 574–580.
30.
LaumannE. O.GagnonJ. H.MichaelR. T.MichaelsS. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
31.
LeB. M.ImpettE. A.KoganA.WebsterG. D.ChengC. (2013). The personal and interpersonal benefits of communal orientation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 694–710.
32.
LemayE. P.ClarkM. S.FeeneyB. C. (2007). Projection of responsiveness to needs and the construction of satisfying communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 834–853. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.834
33.
MaiselN. C.GableS. L.StrachmanA. (2008). Responsive behaviours in good times and in bad. Personal Relationships, 15, 317–338.
34.
MettsS.CupachR. W. (1989). The role of communication in sexuality. In McKinneyK.SprecherS. (Eds.), Human sexuality: The societal and interpersonal context (pp. 139–161). Norwald, NJ: Ablex.
35.
MillsJ.ClarkM. S.FordT. E.JohnsonM. (2004). Measurement of communal strength. Personal Relationships, 11, 213–230. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2004.00079.x
36.
MuiseA.ImpettE. A.KoganA.DesmaraisS. (2013). Keeping the spark alive: Being motivated to meet a partner’s sexual needs sustains sexual desire in long-term romantic relationships. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 267–273.
37.
MuiseA.PreydeM.MaitlandS. B.MilhausenR. R. (2010). Sexual identity and sexual well-being in female heterosexual university students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 915–925. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9492-8
38.
O’SullivanL. F.AllgeierE. R. (1998). Feigning sexual desire: Consenting to unwanted sexual activity in heterosexual dating relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 234–243. doi:10.1080/00224499809551938
39.
O’SullivanL. F.ByersE. S. (1996). Gender differences in responses to discrepancies in desired level of sexual intimacy. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 8, 49–67.
40.
PollmanM. M. H.FinkenauerC. (2009). Investigating the role of two types of understating in relationship well-being: Understanding is more important than knowledge. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1512–1527. doi:10.1177/0146167209342754
41.
ReisH. T.ClarkM. S.HolmesJ. G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In MashekD.AronA. (Eds), The handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 201–225). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42.
RischG. S.RileyL. A.LawlerM. G. (2003). Problematic issues in the early years of marriage: Content for premarital education. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 31, 253–269.
43.
RusbultC. E.MartzJ. M.AgnewC. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–391. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x
44.
SanfordK. (2003). Expectancies and communication behaviour in marriage: Distinguishing proximal-level effects from distal-level effects. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 391–402.
45.
SeligJ. P.PreacherK. J. (2008, June). Monte Carlo method for assessing mediation: An interactive tool for creating confidence intervals for indirect effects [Computer software]. Retrieved fromhttp://quantpsy.org/
46.
ShroutP. E.HermanC. M.BolgerN. (2006). The costs and benefits of practical and emotional support on adjustment: A daily diary study of couples experiencing acute stress. Personal Relationships, 13, 115–134. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00108.x
47.
SpanierG. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15–28.
48.
TolmanD. L. (2002). Dilemmas of desire: Teenage girls and sexuality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49.
TraeenB. (2010). Sexual dissatisfaction among heterosexual Norwegians in couple relationships. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 25, 132–147. doi:10.1080/14681991003622518
50.
VinokurA.SchulY.CaplanR. D. (1987). Determinants of perceived social support: Interpersonal transactions, personal outlook, and transient affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1137–1145. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1137
51.
WillettsM. C.SprecherS.BeckF. D. (2004). Overview of sexual practices and attitudes within relational contexts. In HarveyJ. H.WenzelA.SprecherS. (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 57–85). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
52.
YabikuS. T.GagerC. T. (2009). Sexual frequency and the stability of marital and cohabiting unions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 983–1000. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00648.x
53.
ZhangZ.ZyphurM. J.PreacherK. J. (2009). Testing multilevel mediation using hierarchical linear models: Problems and solutions. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 695–719. doi:10.1177/1094428108327450
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
