How Do Women and Men Perceive the Sacrifice of Leaving Work for Their Families? A Cost

Abstract

We aimed to analyze perceptions of the costs and benefits of family and work sacrifices. In Study 1, participants (n = 222) rated the associated benefits and costs of a sacrifice (work vs. family). In Study 2, participants (n = 213) rated the associated benefits and costs of a work sacrifice, their willingness to sacrifice, and their sense of authenticity. In Study 3, participants (n = 186) reported on commitment and relationship satisfaction, rated the associated benefits and costs of a work sacrifice, and their life satisfaction. Participants perceived that work sacrifices were costlier for men and more beneficial for women and that women felt more authentic for making them. For women, higher commitment or relationship satisfaction was associated with greater perception of benefits, which was associated with greater life satisfaction. These findings highlight the relevance of gender differences in work sacrifices and hence in women’s professional advancement.

Keywords

romantic relationships work family sacrifices gender differences

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aarntzen

Derks

van Steenbergen

Ryan

van der Lippe

(2019). Work-family guilt as a straightjacket. An interview and diary study on consequences of mothers’ work-family guilt. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 115, 103336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.103336

Adelson

M. J.

(2020). Division of labor and conflict across three stages of heterosexual romantic relationships. The University of Texas at Dallas.

Álvarez

Romo

García

A. B.

(2018). Doing gender in Spanish same-sex couples. The distribution of housework and childcare. Journal of Gender Studies, 27(6), 672–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2017.1287067

Aron

E. N.

Smollan

(1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596

Aron

Fraley

(1999). Relationship closeness as including other in the self: Cognitive underpinnings and measures. Social Cognition, 17(2), 140–160. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1999.17.2.140

Baù

Sieger

Eddleston

K. A.

Chirico

(2017), Fail but try again? The effects of age, gender, and multiple-owner experience on failed Entrepreneurs’ reentry. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 41(6), 909–941. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12233

Bauer

(2016). Gender roles, comparative advantages and the life course: The division of domestic labor in same-sex and different-sex couples. European Journal of Population, 32(1), 99–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-015-9363-z

Bechara

Damasio

A. R.

(2000). Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 10(3), 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/10.3.295

Berscheid

Snyder

Omoto

A. M.

(1989). The relationship closeness inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 792–807. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.792

10.

Cabañero-Martínez

M. J.

Richard-Martinez

Cabrero-Garcia

Orts-Cortés

M. I.

Reig-Ferrer

Tosal-Herrero

(2004). Reliability and validity of the satisfaction with life scale of Diener in pregnant and puerperium women. Psicothema, 16(3), 448–455.

11.

Columbus

Molho

Righetti

Balliet

(2021). Interdependence and cooperation in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(3), 626–650. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000253

12.

Day

L. C.

Impett

E. A.

(2018). Giving when it costs: How interdependent self-construal shapes willingness to sacrifice and satisfaction with sacrifice in romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(5), 722–742. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0265407517694965

13.

Dahm

P. C.

Kim

Glomb

T. M.

(2019). Leaning in and out: Work–life tradeoffs, self-conscious emotions, and life role satisfaction. The Journal of Psychology, 153(5), 478–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2019.1566685

14.

Diener

E. D.

Emmons

R. A.

Larsen

R. J.

Griffin

(1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13

15.

Eagly

A. H.

(1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Psychology Press.

16.

Eagly

A. H.

Wood

(2016). Social role theory of sex differences. In Naples

Hoogland

R. C.

Wickramasinghe

Wong

W. C. A.

(Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of gender and sexuality studies. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118663219.wbegss183

17.

Ellemers

(2018). Gender stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 275–298. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011719

18.

European Institute for Gender Equality. (2014). Gender equality and economic independence: Part-time work and self-employment. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2839/74174

19.

Faul

Erdfelder

Lang

A. G.

Buchner

(2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146

20.

Gerpott

F. H.

Balliet

Columbus

Molho

de Vries

R. E.

(2018). How do people think about interdependence? A multidimensional model of subjective outcome interdependence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(4), 716–742. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000166

21.

Gino

Wilmuth

C. A.

Brooks

A. W.

(2015). Compared to men, women view professional advancement as equally attainable, but less desirable. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(40), 12354–12359. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1502567112

22.

Gómez

Brooks

M.L.

Buhrmester

Vázquez

Jetten

Swann . (2011). On the nature of identity fusion: Insights into the construct and validation of a new measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 918–933. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022642

23.

Hayes

A. F.

(2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.

24.

Herrarte

Moral-Carcedo

Sáez

(2012). The impact of childbirth on Spanish women’s decisions to leave the labor market. Review of Economics of the Household, 10(3), 441–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-012-9151-z

25.

Hochschild

Machung

(2012). The second shift: Working families and the revolution at home. Viking.

26.

Horne

R. M.

Breitkreuz

R. S.

(2018). The motherhood sacrifice: Maternal experiences of childcare in the Canadian context. Journal of Family Studies, 24(2), 126–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2015.1109540

27.

Impett

E. A.

Gere

Kogan

Gordon

A. M.

Keltner

(2014). How sacrifice impacts the giver and the recipient: Insights from approach-avoidance motivational theory. Journal of Personality, 82(5), 390–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12070

28.

Impett

E. A.

Javam

B. M.

Asyabi-Eshghi

Kogan

(2013). The joys of genuine giving: Approach and avoidance sacrifice motivation and authenticity. Personal Relationships, 20, 740–754. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.2013.20.issue-4

29.

Johnston

A. M.

Diekman

A. B.

(2015). Pursuing desires rather than duties? The motivational content of gender stereotypes. Sex Roles, 73(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0494-9

30.

Kim

Y. S.

(2022). A study on the effects of gendered social norms on the tradeoff between paid and unpaid work in Korea. Journal of Family and Economic Issues. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-022-09878-5

31.

Kogan

Impett

E. A.

Oveis

Hui

Gordon

A. M.

Keltner

(2010). When giving feels good: The intrinsic benefits of sacrifice in romantic relationships for the communally motivated. Psychological Science, 21(12), 1918–1924. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610388815

32.

Kulik

Shilo-Levin

Liberman

(2016). Work–family role conflict and well-being among women and men. Journal of Career Assessment, 24(4), 651–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072715616067

33.

Mandal

(2020). Sacrifices of women and men in close relationships: The types and structure of sacrifices. The approach and avoidance motives for making sacrifices. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 8(4), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2020.101952

34.

Moya

M. C.

Moya-Garófano

(2021). Evolution of gender stereotypes in Spain: From 1985 to 2018. Psicothema, 23(1), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2020.328

35.

Nsair

Piszczek

(2021). Gender matters: The effects of gender and segmentation preferences on work-to-family conflict in family sacrifice climates. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 94(3), 509–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12361

36.

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2020). Indicators of gender equality in employment. https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?datasetcode=TIME_USE

37.

Park

Impett

E. A.

MacDonald

Lemay

E. P.

Jr. (2019). Saying “thank you”: Partners’ expressions of gratitude protect relationship satisfaction and commitment from the harmful effects of attachment insecurity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(4), 773–806. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000178

38.

Pew Research Center. (2023). The enduring grip of the gender pay gap. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2023/03/01/the-enduring-grip-of-the-gender-pay-gap/

39.

Powell

van Vugt

(2003). Genuine giving or selfish sacrifice? The role of commitment and cost level upon willingness to sacrifice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(3), 403–412. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.154

40.

Rapoport

Sofer

Solaz

(2011). Household production in a collective model: Some new results. Journal of Population Economics, 24(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-010-0308-x

41.

Reis

H. T.

Collins

W. A.

Berscheid

(2000). The relationship context of human behavior and development. Psychological Bulletin, 126(6), 844–872. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.6.844

42.

Righetti

Impett

(2017). Sacrifice in close relationships: Motives, emotions, and relationship outcomes. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(10), Article e12342. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12342

43.

Righetti

Visserman

M. L.

Impett

E. A.

(2022). Sacrifices: Costly prosocial behaviors in romantic relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 74–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.031

44.

Ruppel

E. K.

Curran

M. A.

(2012). Relational sacrifices in romantic relationships: Satisfaction and the moderating role of attachment. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29(4), 508–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407511431190

45.

Rusbult

C. E.

Martz

J. M.

Agnew

C. R.

(1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5(4), 357–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x

46.

Spanish Ministry of Labour and Social Economy. (2020). Situation of women in the labour market. https://www.mites.gob.es/es/sec_trabajo/analisis-mercado-trabajo/situacion-mujeres/index.htm

47.

Sutherland

C. A.

Young

A. W.

Mootz

C. A.

Oldmeadow

J. A.

(2015). Face gender and stereotypicality influence facial trait evaluation: Counter-stereotypical female faces are negatively evaluated. British Journal of Psychology, 106(2), 186–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12085

48.

van der Drift

L. E.

Agnew

C. R.

Wilson

J. E

. (2014). Spanish version of the investment model scale. Personal Relationships, 21(1), 110–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12016

49.

van Lange

P. A. M.

Rusbult

C. E.

Drigotas

S. M.

Arriaga

X. B.

Witcher

B. S.

Cox

C. L

. (1997). Willingness to sacrifice in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(6), 1373–1395. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.6.1373

50.

Villanueva-Moya

Expósito

(2020). Spanish women making risky decisions in the social domain: The mediating role of femininity and fear of negative evaluation. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 561715. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561715

51.

Villanueva-Moya

Expósito

(2021a). Gender differences in decision-making: The effects of gender stereotype threat moderated by sensitivity to punishment and fear of negative evaluation. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 34(5), 706–717. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2239

52.

Villanueva-Moya

Expósito

(2021b). Women’s evaluation of costs and benefits in public versus private spheres: The role of gender ideology. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 21, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12238

53.

Villanueva-Moya

Expósito

(2022). Are gender roles associated with well-being indicators? The role of femininity, fear of negative evaluation, and regret in decision-making in a Spanish sample. Current in Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03142-7

54.

Visserman

M. L.

Righetti

Muise

Impett

E. A.

Joel

Van Lange

P. A.

(2020). Taking stock of reality: Biased perceptions of the costs of romantic partners’ sacrifices. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(1), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1948550619896671

55.

Wachter

Holz-Rau

(2022). Gender differences in work-related high mobility differentiated by partnership and parenthood status. Transportation, 49, 1737–1764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-021-10226-z

56.

World Economic Forum. (2022). Global gender gap report. https://www.weforum.org/reports/global-gender-gap-report-2022/

57.

Xue

Fleischmann

Head

McMunn

Stafford

(2020). Work-family conflict and work exit in later career stage. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(3), 716–727. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby146

58.

Zhao

(2021). Sample representation in the social sciences. Synthese, 198, 9097–9115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02621-3

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.14 MB

How Do Women and Men Perceive the Sacrifice of Leaving Work for Their Families? A Cost–Benefit Analysis

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material