Loneliness is a well-known indicator of relationship deficits, with potentially severe consequences on health and well-being (Perlman & Peplau, 1981). Research has used cross-sectional methods to examine behavioral consequences of loneliness (e.g., Cacioppo et al., 2002). However, within-person associations between daily fluctuations in loneliness and subsequent behavioral outcomes have yet to be explored. Using a sample of community-dwelling adults, the authors examined associations between daily loneliness on daily time with others, and subsequent context-specific alcohol consumption (i.e., social and solitary consumption), and individual differences in these patterns of behavior. Daytime loneliness significantly and uniquely predicted patterns of social behavior and context-specific consumption; time with others mediated loneliness–social consumption associations, but not loneliness–solitary consumption relationships. These findings contribute to existing literature by demonstrating the unique properties of solitary versus social consumption as behavioral responses to loneliness, thus addressing inconsistent findings regarding the effects of loneliness on alcohol consumption.
ArmeliS.MohrC.TennenH.ToddM.CarneyM. A.AffleckG.HromiA. (2003). A daily process examination of the stress-response dampening effects of alcohol consumption. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 17, 266-276.
2.
BauerD. J.PreacherK. J.GilK. M. (2006). Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 11, 142-163.
3.
BerkmanL. D.BreslowL. (1983). Health and ways of living. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4.
BolgerN.DavisA.RafaeliE. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579-616.
5.
BoninM. F.McCrearyD. R.SadavaS. W. (2000). Problem drinking behavior in two community-based samples of adults: Influence of gender, coping, loneliness, and depression. Journal of Addictive Behaviors, 14, 151-161.
6.
BrykA. S.RaudenbushS. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
7.
BurischM. (1984). Approaches to personality inventory construction: A comparison of merits. American Psychologist, 39, 214-227.
CacioppoJ. T.PatrickB. (2008). Loneliness: Human nature and the need for social connection. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
10.
ClarkM. S.LemayE. P. (2010). Close relationships. In FiskeS. T.GilbertD. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 898-940). New York, NY: Wiley.
11.
CohenS.MermelsteinR.KamarckT.HobermanH. M. (1985). Measuring the functional components of social support. In SarasonI. G.SarasonB. R. (Eds.), Social support: Theory, research and applications (pp. 73-94). The Hague, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
12.
CohenS.WillsT. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310-357.
13.
CooperM. L. (1994). Motivations for alcohol use among adolescents: Development and validation of a four-factor model. Psychological Assessment, 6, 117-128.
14.
CooperM. L.FroneM. R.RussellM.MudarP. (1995). Drinking to regulate positive and negative emotions: A motivational model of alcohol use. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 990-1005.
15.
CornwellE. Y.WaiteL. J. (2009). Social disconnectedness, perceived isolation, and health among older adults. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 50, 31-48.
16.
CoxeS.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2009). The analysis of count data: A gentle introduction to Poisson regression and its alternatives. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 121-136.
17.
CreswellK. G.ChungT.ClarkD. B.MartinC. S. (2013). Solitary alcohol use in teens is associated with drinking in response to negative affect and predicts alcohol problems in young adulthood. Clinical Psychological Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/2167702613512795
18.
DavisS. F.HansonH.EdsonR.ZieglerC. (1992). The relationship between optimism–pessimism, loneliness, and level of self-esteem in college students. College Student Journal, 26, 244-247.
19.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and “what” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
20.
DykstraP. A.FokkemaT. (2007). Social and emotional loneliness among divorced and married men and women: Comparing the deficit and cognitive perspectives. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 1-12.
21.
ErnstJ. M.CacioppoJ. T. (1998). Lonely hearts: Psychological perspectives on loneliness. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 8, 1-22.
22.
FeldmanS.DowneyG.Shaffer-NeitzR. (1999). Pain, negative mood, and perceived support in chronic pain patients: A daily diary study of people with reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndrome. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(5), 776-785.
23.
GardnerW. L.PickettC. L.JefferisV.KnowlesM. (2005). On the outside looking in: Loneliness and social monitoring. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(11), 1549-1560.
24.
GrossE. F.JuvenonJ.GableS. L. (2002). Internet use and well-being in adolescence. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 75-90.
25.
HeinrichL. M.GulloneE. (2006). The clinical significance of loneliness: A literature review. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 695-718.
26.
HofmannD.GavinM. (1998). Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management, 24, 623-641.
27.
HussongA. M.HicksR. E.LevyS. A.CurranP. J. (2001). Specifying the relations between affect and heavy alcohol use among young adults. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 449-461.
KeyesK. M.HasinD. S. (2008). Socio-economic status and problem alcohol use: The positive relationship between income and the DSM-IV alcohol abuse diagnosis. Addiction, 103, 1120-1130.
LarsenR. J.FredricksonB. L. (1999). Measurement issues in emotion research. In KahnemanD.DienerE.SchwarzN. (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 40-60). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
32.
LiuS.WangM.ZhanY.ShiJ. (2009). Daily work stress and alcohol use: Testing the cross-level moderation effects of neuroticism and job involvement. Personnel Psychology, 62, 575-597.
33.
MaasC. J.HoxJ. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1, 86-92.
34.
MohrC. D.ArmeliS.OhannessianC. M.TennenH.CarneyA.AffleckG. (2003). Daily interpersonal experiences and distress: Are women more vulnerable?Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 22, 393-423.
35.
MohrC. D.ArmeliS.TennenH.CarneyM. A.AffleckG.HromiA. (2001). Daily interpersonal experiences, context, and alcohol consumption; Crying in your beer and toasting to good times. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 489-500.
36.
MohrC. D.ArmeliS.TennenH.TempleM.ToddM.ClarkJ.CarneyM. A. (2005). Moving beyond the keg party: A daily process study of college student drinking motivations. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 19, 392-403.
37.
MohrC. D.BrannanD.WendtS.JacobsL.WrightR.WangM. (2013). Daily mood–drinking slopes as predictors: A new take on drinking motives and related outcomes. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27, 944-955.
38.
MyersD. G.DienerE. (1995). Who is happy?Psychological Science, 6, 10-19.
39.
PeplauL. A.PerlmanD. (1979). Blueprint for a social psychological theory of loneliness. In CookM.WilsonG. (Eds.), Love and attraction: Proceedings of an international conference (pp. 101-110). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
40.
PerlmanD.PeplauL. A. (1981). Toward a social psychology of loneliness. Personal Relationships, 3, 31-56.
41.
PerrineM. W.MundtJ. C.SearlesJ. S.LesterL. S. (1995). Validation of daily self-report alcohol consumption using interactive voice response (IVR) technology. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 56, 487-490.
42.
PressmanS. D.CohenS.MillerG. E.BarkinA.RabinB. S.TreanorJ. J. (2005). Loneliness, social network size, and immune response to influenza vaccination in college freshmen. Health Psychology, 24, 297-306.
43.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
44.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S.CheongY. F.CongdonR. T. (2000). HLM 5: Hierarchical, Linear and Nonlinear Modeling. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
45.
ReisH. T.GableS. L. (2000). Event-sampling and other methods for studying everyday experience. In ReisH. T.JuddC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 190-222). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
46.
RobinsL. N.CottlerL.BucholzK.ComptonW. (1995). The Diagnostic Interview Schedule for DSM-IV. St. Louis, MO: Washington University School of Medicine.
47.
RokachA.NetoF. (2000). Coping with loneliness in adolescence: A cross-cultural study. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 28(4), 329-341.
48.
RubensteinC. M.ShaverP. (1982). The experience of loneliness. In PeplauL. A.PerlmanD. (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research, and therapy (pp. 206-223). New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience.
49.
RussellD. W. (1996). UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 20-40.
50.
ShankurA.McMunnA.BanksJ.SteptoeA. (2011). Loneliness, social isolation, and behavioral and biological health indicators in older adults. Health Psychology, 30, 377-385.
51.
SnijdersT.BoskerR. (1999). Multilevel models: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52.
SteeleC. M.JosephR. A. (1990). Alcohol myopia: Its prized and dangerous effects. American Psychologist, 45, 921-933.
53.
SwendsenJ. D.TennenH.CarneyM. A.AffleckG.WillardA.HromiA. (2000). Mood and alcohol consumption: An experience sampling test of the self-medication hypothesis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 198-204.
54.
WangM.LiuS.ZhanY.ShiJ. (2010). Daily work–family conflict and alcohol use: Testing the cross-level moderation effects of peer drinking norms and social support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 377-386.
55.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
56.
WilsonC.MoultonB. (2010, September). Loneliness among older adults: A national survey of adults 45+ (Report prepared by Knowledge Networks and Insight Policy Research). Washington, DC: AARP.
57.
WoodW.EaglyA. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699-727.
58.
YoungJ. E. (1982). Loneliness, depression, and cognitive therapy: Theory and application. In PeplauL. A.PerlmanD. (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research, and therapy (pp. 379-406). New York, NY: Wiley Inter-Science.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
