Individuals attempting to label their emotions look for a plausible source of their physiological arousal. Co-occurrence of plausible sources can lead to the misattribution of real (or bogus) physiological arousal, resulting in physically attractive individuals being perceived as more attractive than they actually are. In two experiments, female participants heard bogus heart rate feedback while viewing photos of attractive male models. Compared with low-power and control participants, high-power participants rated reinforced photos (increased heart rate) more attractive than non-reinforced photos (stable heart rate) to a greater extent when they heard their own bogus heart rate feedback (Experiments 1 and 2) and to a lesser extent when they heard a recording of another participant’s heart rate (Experiment 2). These findings, which suggest that power increases the tendency to misattribute one’s physiological arousal to physically attractive individuals, are discussed with reference to theories linking power and social perception.
BarghJ. A.RaymondP.PryorJ. B.StrackF. (1995). Attractiveness of the underling: An automatic power→sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 768-781. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.5.768
2.
BerdahlJ. L. (2007). Harassment based on sex: Protecting social status in the context of gender hierarchy. Academy of Management Review, 32, 641-658. doi:10.2307/20159319
3.
BloemkolkD.DefaresP.van EnckevortG.van GelderenM. (1971). Cognitive processing of information on varied physiological arousal. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 31-46. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420010104
4.
BourdieuP.PasseronJ. C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture (2nd ed.). London, England: SAGE.
5.
BursikK.GefterJ. (2011). Still stable after all these years: Perception of sexual harassment in academic contexts. The Journal of Social Psychology, 151, 331-349. doi:10.1080/00224541003628081
6.
CochranC. C.FrazierP. A.OlsonA. M. (1997). Predictors of responses to unwanted sexual attention. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 207-226. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00109.x
7.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
DuboisC. L. Z.KnappD. E.FaleyR. H.KustisG. A. (1998). An empirical examination of same- and other-gender sexual harassment in the workplace. Sex Roles, 39, 731-749. doi:10.1023/A:1018860101629
9.
DuttonD. G.AronA. P. (1974). Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under conditions of high anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 510-517. doi:10.1037/h0037031
10.
FiskeS. T. (2010). Interpersonal stratification: Status, power, and subordination. In FiskeS. T.GilbertD. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 941-982). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
11.
GalinskyA. D.GruenfeldD.MageeJ. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453-466. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.453
12.
GalinskyA. D.MageeJ. C.GruenfeldD. H.WhitsonJ. A.LilljenquistK. A. (2008). Power reduces the press of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1450-1466. doi:10.1037/a0012633
13.
GalinskyA. D.MageeJ. C.InesiM. E.GruenfeldD. H. (2006). Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science, 17, 1068-1074. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01824.x
14.
GruenfeldD. H.InesiM. E.MageeJ. C.GalinskyA. D. (2008). Power and the objectification of social targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 111-127. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.111
15.
GuinoteA. (2007). Power and the suppression of unwanted thoughts: Does control over others decrease control over the self?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 433-440. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.03.003
16.
GuinoteA. (2008). Power and affordances: When the situation has more power over powerful than powerless individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 237-252. doi:10.1037/a0012518
17.
GuinoteA. (2010a). The situated focus theory of power. In GuinoteA.VescioT. K. (Eds.), The social psychology of power (pp. 141-173). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
18.
GuinoteA. (2010b). In touch with your feelings: Power increases reliance on bodily information. Social Cognition, 28, 110-121. doi:10.1521/soco.2010.28.1.110
19.
IvyD. K.HamletS. (1996). College students and sexual dynamics: Two studies of peer sexual harassment. Communication Education, 45, 149-166. doi:10.1080/03634529609379044
20.
KeltnerD.GruenfeldD.GalinskyA. D.KrausM. W. (2010). Paradoxes of power: Dynamics of the acquisition, experience, and social regulation of social power. In GuinoteA.VescioT. K. (Eds.), The social psychology of power (pp. 177-208). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
KerberK. W.ColesM. G. H. (1978). The role of perceived physiological activity in affective judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 419-433. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(78)90039-2
23.
KunstmanJ. W.ManerJ. K. (2010). Sexual overperception: Power, mating motives, and biases in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 282-294. doi:10.1037/a0021135
24.
LammersJ.StokerJ. I.JordanJ.PollmanM.StapelD. A. (2011). Power increases infidelity among men and women. Psychological Science, 22, 1191-1197. doi:10.1177/0956797611416252
25.
LondonH.NisbettR. E. (1974). Thought and feeling: Cognitive alteration of feeling states. Oxford, UK: Aldine.
26.
MageeJ. C.SmithP. K. (2013). The social distance theory of power. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 158-186. doi:10.1177/1088868312472732
27.
MakkarS. R.GrishamJ. R. (2013). Effects of false feedback on affect, cognition, behavior, and postevent processing: The mediating role of self-focused attention. Behavior Therapy, 44, 111-124. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2012.07.005
28.
OverbeckJ. R. (2010). Concepts and historical perspectives on power. In GuinoteA.VescioT. K. (Eds.), The social psychology of power (pp. 19-45). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
29.
OverbeckJ. R.DroutmanV. (2013). One for all: Social power increases self-anchoring of traits, attitudes, and emotions. Psychological Science, 24, 1466-1476. doi:10.1177/0956797612474671
30.
PapageorgiouC.WellsA. (2002). Effects of heart rate information on anxiety, perspective taking, and performance in high and low social-evaluative anxiety. Behavior Therapy, 33, 181-199. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(02)80024-7
31.
PayneB. K.HallD. L.CameronC. D.BisharaA. J. (2010). A process model of affect misattribution. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1397-1408. doi:10.1177/0146167210383440
32.
RichesonJ. A.AmbadyN. (2003). Effects of situational power on automatic racial prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 177-183. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00521-8
33.
ScheepersD.de WitF.EllemersN.SassenbergK. (2012). Social power makes the heart work more efficiently: Evidence from cardiovascular markers of challenge and threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 371-374. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.06.014
34.
SchmidP. C.Schmid MastM. (2013). Power increases performance in a social evaluation situation as a result of decreased stress responses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 201-211. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1937
35.
StreetA. E.GradusJ. L.StaffordJ.KellyK. (2007). Gender differences in experiences of sexual harassment: Data from a male-dominated environment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 464-474. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.75.3.464
36.
TostL. P.GinoF.LarrickR. P. (2012). Power, competitiveness, and advice taking: Why the powerful don’t listen. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117, 53-65. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.10.001
37.
U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1995). Sexual harassment in the federal workplace: Trends, progress, continuing challenges. Washington, DC: U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board, Office of Merit Systems Review and Studies.
38.
ValinsS. (1966). Cognitive effect of false heart rate feedback. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 400-408. doi:10.1037/h0023791
39.
ValinsS. (2005). Persistent effects of information about internal reactions: Ineffectiveness of debriefing. Integrative Physiological & Behavioral Science, 40, 161-165. doi:10.1007/BF03159713
40.
WaldoC. R.BerdahlJ. L.FitzgeraldL. F. (1998). Are men sexually harassed? If so, by whom?Law and Human Behavior, 22, 59-79. doi:10.1023/A:1025776705629
41.
WeickM.GuinoteA. (2008). When subjective experiences matter: Power increases reliance on the ease of retrieval. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 956-970. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.956
42.
WhiteG. L.KightT. D. (1984). Misattribution of arousal and attraction: Effects of salience of explanations for arousal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 55-64. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(84)90012-X
43.
WildJ.ClarkD. M.EhlersA.McManusF. (2008). Perception of arousal in social anxiety: Effects of false feedback during a social interaction. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 39, 102-116. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2006.11.003
44.
WollS. B.McFallM. E. (1979). The effects of false feedback on attributed arousal and rated attractiveness in female subjects. Journal of Personality, 47, 214-229. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1979.tb00200.x
45.
ZillmanD. (1978). Attribution and misattribution of excitatory reactions. In HarveyJ.IckesW.KiddR. F. (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 2, pp. 335-368). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
