The impact of hierarchical rank on perspective taking is both practically and theoretically important, prompting considerable research attention to this issue. However, prior research has primarily examined how power affects perspective taking, and has neglected to investigate the impact of status (i.e., the respect and esteem that an individual holds in the eyes of others). Yet status represents a distinct and ubiquitous basis of hierarchical differentiation, one that may profoundly affect perspective taking. The current research addresses this gap, theorizing and testing the prediction that high status enhances perspective taking, in contrast to prior research that has generally found that high power diminishes perspective taking. Five studies, examining various forms of perspective taking across diverse paradigms, provide converging evidence that status and power exert differential effects on perspective taking. Moreover, these studies provide insight regarding the distinction between status and power, as well as the distinct psychology associated with status.
AndersonC.BerdahlJ. L. (2002). The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1362-1377.
2.
AndersonC.HildrethA.HowlandL. (2015). Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive?Psychological Bulletin, 141, 574-601.
3.
AndersonC.KilduffG. J. (2009). Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 491-503.
4.
AndersonC.WillerR.KilduffG. J.BrownC. E. (2012). The origins of deference: When do people prefer lower status?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1077-1088.
5.
BergerJ.RosenholtzS. J.ZelditchM. (1980). Status organizing processes. Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 479-508.
6.
BladerS. L.ChenY. R. (2012). Differentiating effects of power and status: A justice perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 994-1014.
7.
BladerS. L.ChenY. R. (2014). What’s in a name? Status, power, and other forms of social hierarchy. In ChengJ.TracyJ.AndersonC. (Eds.), The psychology of social status (pp. 71-95). New York, NY: Springer.
8.
BladerS. L.YapA. (in press). Justice among those at the top: Power, status, and dishonest behavior. In van ProoijenJ. W.van LangeP. (Eds.), Cheating, corruption, and concealment: The roots of dishonest behavior. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9.
ChengJ. T.TracyJ. L.AndersonC. (2014). The psychology of social status. New York, NY: Springer.
10.
ChengJ. T.TracyJ. L.FoulshamT.KingstoneA.HenrichJ. (2013). Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 103-125.
11.
CôtéS.KrausM. W.ChengB. H.OveisC.van der LöweI.LianH.KeltnerD. (2011). Social power facilitates the effect of prosocial orientation on empathic accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 217-232.
12.
DavisM. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113-126.
13.
FastN. J.HalevyN.GalinskyA. D. (2012). The destructive nature of power without status. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 391-394.
14.
FiskeS. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621-628.
15.
FiskeS. T. (2010). Interpersonal stratification: Status, power, and subordination. In FiskeS.GilbertD. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 941-982). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
16.
FiskeS. T.BerdahlJ. (2007). Social power. In KruglanskiA.HigginsE. (Eds.), Social psychology: A handbook of basic principles (pp. 678-692). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
17.
FlynnF.ReagansR.AmanatullahE.AmesD. (2006). Helping one’s way to the top: Self-monitors achieve status by helping others and knowing who helps whom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1123-1137.
18.
FragaleA. R.OverbeckJ. R.NealeM. A. (2011). Resources versus respect: Social judgments based on targets’ power and status positions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 767-775.
19.
GalinskyA. D.GruenfeldD. H.MageeJ. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453-466.
20.
GalinskyA. D.KuG.WangC. S. (2005). Perspective-taking and self-other overlap: Fostering social bonds and facilitating social coordination. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 8, 109-124.
21.
GalinskyA. D.MageeJ. C.InesiM. E.GruenfeldD. H. (2006). Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science, 17, 1068-1074.
22.
GalinskyA. D.MageeJ. C.RusD.RothmanN. B.ToddA. R. (2014). Acceleration with steering: The synergistic benefits of combining power and perspective-taking. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 5, 627-635.
23.
GoldbergS. (1997). Texoil. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Dispute Resolution Research Center.
24.
GoodeW. J. (1978). The celebration of heroes: Prestige as a control system. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
25.
GordonA. M.ChenS. (2013). Does power help or hurt? The moderating role of self–other focus on power and perspective-taking in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1097-1111.
26.
GouldR. V. (2002). The origins of status hierarchies: A formal theory and empirical test. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 1143-1178.
27.
GruenfeldD. H.InesiM. E.MageeJ. C.GalinskyA. D. (2008). Power and the objectification of social targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 111-127.
28.
GuinoteA. (2007). Power and goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1076-1087.
29.
GuinoteA.WillisG. B.MartellottaC. (2010). Social power increases implicit prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 299-307.
30.
HallJ. A.CoatsE. J.LeBeauL. S. (2005). Nonverbal behavior and the vertical dimension of social relations: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 898-924.
31.
HardyC. L.Van VugtM. (2006). Nice guys finish first: The competitive altruism hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1402-1413.
32.
HaysN. A. (2013). Fear and loving in social hierarchy: Sex differences in preferences for power versus status. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(6), 1130-1136.
33.
HaysN. A.BenderskyC. (2015). Not all inequality is created equal: Effects of status versus power hierarchies on competition for upward mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(6), 867.
34.
HenrichJ.Gil-WhiteF. J. (2001). The evaluation of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 165-196.
35.
JoshiP. D.FastN. J. (2013). I am my (high-power) role: Power and role identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 898-910.
36.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881-919.
KeltnerD.Van KleefG. A.ChenS.KrausM. W. (2008). A reciprocal influence model of social power: Emerging principles and lines of inquiry. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 151-192.
39.
KemperT. D.CollinsR. (1990). Dimensions of microinteraction. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 32-68.
40.
KennyD. A.SnookA.BoucherE. M.HancockJ. T. (2010). Interpersonal sensitivity, status, and stereotype accuracy. Psychological Science, 21, 1735-1739.
41.
KeysarB. (1994). The illusory transparency of intention: Linguistic perspective taking in text. Cognitive Psychology, 26, 165-208.
42.
KilduffG. J.GalinskyA. D. (2013). From the ephemeral to the enduring: How approach-oriented mindsets lead to greater status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 816-831.
43.
KitayamaS.MarkusH. R.KurokawaM. (2000). Culture, emotion, and well-being: Good feelings in Japan and the United States. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 93-124.
44.
KrausM. W.CôtéS.KeltnerD. (2010). Social class, contextualism, and empathic accuracy. Psychological Science, 21, 1716-1723.
45.
LammersJ.GalinskyA. D.GordijnE. H.OttenS. (2012). Power increases social distance. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 3, 282-290.
46.
LammersJ.GordijnE. H.OttenS. (2008). Looking through the eyes of the powerful. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1229-1238.
47.
LammersJ.StokerJ. I.StapelD. A. (2009). Differentiating social and personal power: Opposite effects on stereotyping, but parallel effects on behavioral approach tendencies. Psychological Science, 20, 1543-1548.
48.
MageeJ. C.GalinskyA. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. The Academy of Management Annals, 2, 351-398.
49.
MageeJ. C.SmithP. K. (2013). The social distance theory of power. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 158-186.
50.
MarrJ. C.ThauS. (2014). Falling from great (and not-so-great) heights: How initial status position influences performance after status loss. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 223-248.
51.
McClellandD. C. (1985). How motives, skills, and values determine what people do. American Psychologist, 40(7), 812-825.
52.
MoellerS. K.LeeE. A.RobinsonM. D. (2011). You never think about my feelings: Interpersonal dominance as a predictor of emotion decoding accuracy. Emotion, 11, 816-824.
53.
NowickiS.CartonJ. (1993). The measurement of emotional intensity from facial expressions. Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 749-750.
54.
OverbeckJ. R.ParkB. (2001). When power does not corrupt: Superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 549-565.
55.
OverbeckJ. R.ParkB. (2006). Powerful perceivers, powerless objects: Flexibility of powerholders’ social attention. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99, 227-243.
56.
ParkerS. K.AxtellC. M. (2001). Seeing another viewpoint: Antecedents and outcomes of employee perspective taking. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1085-1100.
57.
PettitN. C.LountR. B. (2010). Looking down and ramping up: The impact of status differences on effort in intergroup contexts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 9-20.
58.
PettitN. C.SivanathanN. (2012). The eyes and ears of status: How status colors perceptual judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 570-582.
59.
PettitN. C.YongK.SpataroS. E. (2010). Holding your place: Reactions to the prospect of status gains and losses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 396-401.
60.
PhillipsD. J.ZuckermanE. W. (2001). Middle-status conformity: Theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 379-429.
61.
RidgewayC. L. (1982). Status in groups: The importance of motivation. American Sociological Review, 47, 76-88.
62.
RidgewayC. L.EricksonK. G. (2000). Creating and spreading status beliefs. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 579-615.
63.
RothmanN. B.MageeJ. C. (2015). Affective expressions in groups and inferences about members’ relational well-being: The effects of socially engaging and disengaging emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 30, 150-166.
64.
ScheepersD.EllemersN. (2005). When the pressure is up: The assessment of social identity threat in low and high status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 192-200.
65.
Schmid-MastM.JonasK.HallJ. A. (2009). Give a person power and he or she will show interpersonal sensitivity: The phenomenon and its why and when. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 835-850.
66.
SkowronskiJ. J.CarlstonD. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 131-142.
67.
SmithE. R.MurphyJ.CoatsS. (1999). Attachment to groups: Theory and management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 94-110.
68.
TjosvoldD.SagariaS. D. (1978). Effects of relative power on cognitive perspective-taking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 256-259.
69.
ToddA. R.HankoK.GalinskyA. D.MussweilerT. (2011). When focusing on differences leads to similar perspectives. Psychological Science, 22, 134-141.
70.
TorelliC. J.LeslieL. M.StonerJ. L.PuenteR. (2014). Cultural determinants of status: Implications for workplace evaluations and behaviors. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123, 34-48.
71.
TverskyB.HardB. M. (2009). Embodied and disembodied cognition: Spatial perspective-taking. Cognition, 110, 124-129.
72.
TylerT. R.BladerS. L. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
73.
van KleefG. A.OveisC.van der LöweI.LuoKoganA.GoetzJ.KeltnerD. (2008). Power, distress, and compassion: Turning a blind eye to the suffering of others. Psychological Science, 19, 1315-1322.
74.
WillerR. (2009). Groups reward individual sacrifice: The status solution to the collective action problem. American Sociological Review, 74, 23-43.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
