Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

We investigated individual difference predictors of ascribing ingroup characteristics to negative and positive ambiguous targets. Studies 1 and 2 investigated events involving negative targets whose status as racial (Tsarnaev brothers) or national (Woolwich attackers) ingroup members remained ambiguous. Immediately following the attacks, we presented White Americans and British individuals with the suspects’ images. Those higher in social dominance orientation (SDO) and right-wing authoritarianism (RWA)—concerned with enforcing status boundaries and adherence to ingroup norms, respectively—perceived these low status and low conformity suspects as looking less White and less British, thus denying them ingroup characteristics. Perceiving suspects in more exclusionary terms increased support for treating them harshly, and for militaristic counter-terrorism policies prioritizing ingroup safety over outgroup harm. Studies 3 and 4 experimentally manipulated a racially ambiguous target’s status and conformity. Results suggested that target status and conformity critically influence SDO’s (status) and RWA’s (conformity) effects on inclusionary versus exclusionary perceptions.

Keywords

group categorization ingroup overexclusion hypodescent social dominance orientation right-wing authoritarianism terrorism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allport

G. W.

(1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Altemeyer

(1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg, Canada: University of Manitoba Press.

Asbrock

Fritsche

(2013). Authoritarian reactions to terrorist threat: Who is being threatened, the me or the we? International Journal of Psychology, 48, 35-49.

Balcetis

Dunning

(2006). See what you want to see: Motivational influences on visual perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 612-625.

Beinart

(2013, April 24). Are the Tsarnaevs White? Daily Beast. Available from http://www.thedailybeast.com

Blascovich

Wyer

N. A.

Swart

L. A.

Kibler

J. L.

(1997). Racism and racial categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1364-1372.

Brewer

M. B.

(2008). Depersonalized trust and ingroup cooperation. In Kruger

J. I.

(Ed.), Rationality and social responsibility: Essays in honor of Robyn Mason Dawes (pp. 215-232). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

Caruso

E. M.

Mead

N. L.

Balcetis

(2009). Political partisanship influences perception of biracial candidates’ skin tone. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 20168-20173.

Castano

Yzerbyt

Bourguignon

Seron

(2002). Who may enter? The impact of in-group identification on in-group/out-group categorization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 315-322.

10.

Cohrs

J. C.

Moschner

Maes

Kielmann

(2005). The motivational bases of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: Relations to values and attitudes in the aftermath of September 11, 2001. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1425-1434.

11.

Dambrun

(2007). Understanding the relationship between racial prejudice and support for the death penalty: The racist punitive bias hypothesis. Social Justice research, 20, 228-249.

12.

Devos

Banaji

M. R.

(2005). American = white? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 447-466.

13.

Duckitt

(2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 41-113.

14.

Feldman

D. C.

(1984). The development and enforcement of group norms. Academy of Management Review, 9, 47-53.

15.

First Post. (2013, April 25). Boston bombers: The unbearable whiteness of the brothers Tsarnaev. First Post. Available from http://www.firstpost.com

16.

Gramzow

R. H.

Gaertner

(2005). Self-esteem and favoritism toward novel in-groups: The self as an evaluative base. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 801-815.

17.

Hayes

A. F.

(2013). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

18.

Sidanius

Cuddy

Banaji

(2013). Status boundary enforcement and the categorization of black-white biracials. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 940-943.

19.

Sidanius

Levin

D. T.

Banaji

M. R.

(2011). Evidence for hypodescent and racial hierarchy in the categorization and perception of biracial individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 492-506.

20.

Sidanius

Kteily

N. S.

Sheehy-Skeffington

Pratto

Henkel

Stewart

(2014). The nature of social dominance orientation: Introducing the social dominance 7 scale. Manuscript submitted for publication.

21.

Hornstein

(1976). Cruelty and kindness: A new look at aggression and altruism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

22.

Krosch

A. R.

Berntsen

Amodio

D. M.

Jost

J. T.

Van Bavel

J. J.

(2013). On the ideology of hypodescent: Political conservatism predicts categorization of racially ambiguous faces as Black. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1196-1203.

23.

Kteily

A. K.

Sidanius

(2012). Hierarchy in the mind: The predictive power of social dominance orientation across social contexts and domains. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 543-549.

24.

Leyens

J.-P.

Yzerbyt

V. Y.

(1992). The ingroup overexclusion effect: Impact of valence and confirmation on stereotypical information search. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 549-569.

25.

Lickel

Miller

Stenstrom

D. M.

Denson

T. F.

Schmader

(2006). Vicarious retribution: The role of collective blame in intergroup aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 372-390.

26.

Marques

J. M.

Yzerbyt

V. Y.

Leyens

J.-P.

(1988). The Black sheep effect: Judgmental extremity towards ingroup members as a function of group identifications. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 1-16.

27.

Miller

S. L.

Maner

J. K.

Becker

D. V.

(2010). Self-protective biases in group categorization: Threat cues shape the psychological boundary between “us” and “them.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 62-77.

28.

Mullen

Brown

Smith

(1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103-122.

29.

Piliavin

Dovidio

Gaertner

Clark

R. D.

III . (1981). Emergency intervention. New York, NY: Academic Press.

30.

Pratto

Sidanius

Stallworth

L. M.

Malle

B. F.

(1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.

31.

Sherif

(1967). Group conflict and co-operation: Their social psychology. London, England: Routledge Kegan Paul.

32.

Sibley

C. G.

Liu

J. H.

(2010). Social dominance orientation: Testing a global individual difference perspective. Political Psychology, 31, 175-207.

33.

Sidanius

Pratto

(1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

34.

Sirota

(2013, April 16). Let’s hope the Boston Marathon bomber is a white American. Salon. Available from http://www.salon.com

35.

Stelzl

Janes

Seligman

(2007). Champ or chump: Strategic utilization of dual social identities of others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 128-138.

36.

Stürmer

Snyder

Kropp

Siem

(2006). Empathy-motivated helping: The moderating role of group membership. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 943-956.

37.

Tajfel

Turner

J. C.

(1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Worchel

Austin

W. G.

(Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.

38.

Thomsen

Green

Sidanius

(2008). We will hunt them down: How social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism fuel ethnic persecution of immigrants in fundamentally different ways. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1455-1464.

39.

Turner

J. C.

Hogg

M. A.

Oakes

P. J.

Reicher

S. D.

Wetherell

M. S.

(1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 94, 1514-1516.

40.

Walsh

(2013, April 22). Are the Tsarnaev brothers white? Salon. Available from http://www.salon.com

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

2.01 MB

“Not One of Us”

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material