The impact of diversity on group functioning is multifaceted. Exploring the impact of having a newcomer join a group, the authors conducted a 2 (social similarity of newcomer to oldtimers; in-group or out-group) × 3 (opinion agreement: newcomer has no opinion ally, one opinion ally, or two opinion allies) interacting group experiment with four-person groups. Groups with out-group newcomers (i.e., diverse groups) reported less confidence in their performance and perceived their interactions as less effective, yet they performed better than groups with in-group newcomers (i.e., homogeneous groups). Moreover, performance gains were not due to newcomers bringing new ideas to the group discussion. Instead, the results demonstrate that the mere presence of socially distinct newcomers and the social concerns their presence stimulates among oldtimers motivates behavior that can convert affective pains into cognitive gains.
Abrams, D.M., Wetherell, M., Cochrane, S., Hogg, M.A., & Turner, J.C. (1990). Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 97-119.
2.
Allen, V.L., & Wilder, D.A. (1975). Categorization, beliefs similarity, and intergroup discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 32, 971-977.
3.
Allen, V.L., & Wilder, D.A. (1979). Group categorization and attribution of belief similarity. Small Group Behavior, 10, 73-80.
4.
Alvaro, E.M., & Crano, W.D. (1997). Indirect minority influence: Evidence for leniency in source evaluation and counterargumentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 949-964.
5.
Asch, S.E. (1952). Social psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6.
Biernat, M., Vescio, T.K., & Green, M.L. (1996). Selective self-stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1194-1209.
7.
Bliese, P.D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349-381). San Francisco: Jossy-Bass.
8.
Brown, R., & Abrams D. (1986). The effects of intergroup similarity and goal interdependence on intergroup attitudes and task performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 78-92.
9.
Clark, R.D., III, & Maass, A. (1988). Social categorization in minority influence: The case of homosexuality. European Journal of Social Psychology , 18, 347-364.
10.
Crano, W.D., & Alvaro, E.M. (1998). The context/comparison model of social influence: Mechanisms, structure, and linkages that underlie indirect attitude change . In M. Hewstone & W. Strobe (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 175-188). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
11.
Crano, W.D., & Hannula-Bral, K.A. (1994). Context/categorization model of social influence: Minority and majority influence in the formation of a novel response norm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 30, 247-276.
12.
David, B., & Turner, J.C. (1996). Studies in self-categorization and minority conversion: Is being a member of the out-group an advantage? British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 179-199.
13.
Davis, J.H. (1973). Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. Psychological Review, 80, 97-125.
14.
Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H.B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636.
15.
Doosje, B., Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 410-436.
16.
Feldman, D.C. (1976). A contingency theory of socialization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 433-452.
17.
Feldman, D.C. (1994). Who's socializing whom? The impact of socializing newcomers on insiders, work groups, and organizations. Human Resource Management Review, 4, 213-233.
18.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
19.
Galinsky, A.D., Mussweiler, T., & Medvec, V.H. (2002). Disconnecting outcomes and evaluations: The role of negotiator focus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 83, 1131-1140.
20.
Gorenflo, D.W., & Crano, W.D. (1989). Judgmental subjectivity/objectivity and locus of choice in social comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 605-614.
21.
Gruenfeld, D. (1995). Status, ideology, and integrative complexity on the U.S. Supreme Court: Rethinking the politics of political decision making . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 5-20.
22.
Gruenfeld, D., Mannix, E.A., Williams, K.Y., & Neale, M.A. (1996). Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 1-15.
23.
Harrison, D.A., Mohammed, S., McGrath, J.E., Florey, A.T., & Vanderstoep, S.W. (2003). Time matters in team performance: Effects of member familiarity, entrainment, and task discontinuity on speed and quality. Personnel Psychology, 56, 633-669.
24.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
25.
Jackson, S., Stone, V., & Alvarez, E. (1993). Socialization amidst diversity: Impact of demographics on work team oldtimers and newcomers. In L. Cummings & B. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 15, pp. 45-109). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
26.
Jehn, K. & Mannix, E. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 238-251.
27.
Jehn, K.A., Northcraft, G., & Neale, M.A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in work groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741-763.
28.
Kane, A.K., Argote, L., & Levine, J. (2005). Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96, 56-71.
29.
Kenny, D.A., Kashy, D.A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske , & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 233-265). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
30.
Kenny, D.A., Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., Livi, S., & Kashy, D.A. (2002). The statistical analysis of data from small groups . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 126-137.
31.
Kreft, I., & de Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
Lakoff, R. (1973). The logic of politeness; or minding your P's and Q's. Chicago Linguistic Society, 9, 292-305.
33.
Larson, J.R., Jr., Sargis, E.G., & Bauman, C.W., (2004). Shared knowledge and subgroup influence during decision-making discussions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 17, 245-262.
34.
Laughlin, P., & Ellis, A. (1986). Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 177-189.
35.
Levine, J.M., Choi, H.-S., & Moreland, R.L. (2003). Newcomer innovation in work teams. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 202-224). New York: Oxford University Press.
36.
Levine, J.M., Moreland, R.L., & Choi, H.-S. (2001). Group socialization and newcomer innovation. In M. A. Hogg & R. S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 86-106). Oxford, UK: Blackwell .
37.
Levine, J.M., Moreland, R.L., & Hausmann, L.R.M. (2005). Managing group composition: Inclusive and exclusive role transitions. In D. Abrams, M. A. Hogg, & J. M. Marques (Eds.), The social psychology of inclusion and exclusion (pp. 137-160). New York: Psychology Press.
38.
Liljenquist, K.A., Galinsky, A.D., & Kray, L.J. (2004). Exploring the rabbit hole of possibilities by myself or with my group: The benefits and liabilities of activating counterfactual mind-sets for information sharing and group coordination. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 17, 263-279.
39.
Maass, A., & Clark, R.D., III. (1984). Hidden impact of minorities: Fifteen years of minority influence research. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 428-450.
40.
Maass, A., Clark, R.D., III, & Haberkorn, G. (1982). The effects of differential ascribed category membership and norms of minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 89-104.
41.
Maass, A., West, S.G., & Cialdini, R.B. (1987). Minority influence and conversion. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 55-79). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
42.
McLeod, P., Baron, R., Marti, M., & Yoon, K. (1997). The eyes have it: Minority influence in face-to-face and computer-mediated group discussion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 706-718.
43.
Moreland, R.L. (1985). Social categorization and the assimilation of "new" group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 48, 1173-1190.
44.
Moreland, R.L., & Levine, J. (1989). Newcomers and oldtimers in small groups. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (2nd ed., pp. 143-186). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45.
Morrison, E.W. (1993). Newcomer information seeking: Exploring types, modes, sources, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal , 36, 557-590.
46.
Moscovici, S. (1985a). Innovation and minority influence. In S. Moscovici, G. Mugny , & E. Van Avermaet (Eds.), Perspectives on minority influence (pp. 9-52). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
Moscovici, S. (1985b). Social influence and conformity. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 347-412). New York: Random House.
48.
Mugny, G., & Papastamou, S. (1982). Minority influence and psychosocial identity. European Journal of Social Psychology , 12, 379-394.
49.
Nemeth, C.J. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review, 93, 23-32.
50.
Newcomb, T.M. (1963). Stabilities underlying changes in interpersonal attraction. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology, 66, 376-386.
51.
Newcomb, T.M. (1968). Interpersonal balance. In R. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. McGuire, T. M. Newcomb , M. Rosenberg, & P. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A source-book. Chicago: Rand McNally.
52.
Nuwer, H. (1978). Dead souls of hell week. Human Behavior, 7, 53-56.
53.
Pelled, L., Eisenhardt, K., & Xin, K. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1-28.
54.
Perez, J.A., & Mugny, G. (1987). Paradoxical effects of categorization in minority influence: When being an out-group is an advantage. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 157-169.
55.
Phillips, K.W. (2003). The effects of categorically based expectations on minority influence: The importance of congruence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 3-13.
56.
Phillips, K.W., & Loyd, D.L. (2006). When surface and deep-level diversity collide: The effects on dissenting group members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99, 143-160.
57.
Phillips, K.W., Mannix, E., Neale, M.A., & Gruenfeld, D.H. (2004). Diverse groups and information sharing: The effects of congruent ties. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 497-510.
58.
Phillips, K.W., Northcraft, G.B., & Neale, M.A. (2006). Surface-level diversity and decision-making in groups: When does deep-level similarity help? Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9, 467-482.
59.
Prislin, R., & Christensen, P.N. (2002). Group conversion versus group expansion as modes of change in majority and minority positions: All losses hurt but only some gains gratify. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1095-1102.
60.
Prislin, R., & Christensen, P.N. (2005). Social change in the after-math of successful minority influence. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 75-111.
61.
Prislin, R., Limbert, W.M., & Bauer, E. (2000). From majority to minority and vice versa: The asymmetrical effects of losing and gaining majority position within a group . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 385-397.
62.
Sommers, S.R. (2006). On racial diversity and group decision-making: Identifying multiple effects of racial composition on jury deliberations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 597-612.
63.
Stasser, G., & Stewart, D. (1992). The discovery of hidden profiles by decision making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 426-434.
64.
Stasser, G., Stewart, D., & Wittenbaum, G. (1995). Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 244-265.
65.
Sutton, R.I., & Louis, M.R. (1987). How selecting and socializing newcomers influences insiders. Human Resource Management, 26, 347-361.
66.
Tindale, R.S. (1993). Decision errors made by individuals and groups . In N. Castellan Jr. (Ed.), Individual and group decision making: Current issues (pp. 109-24). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
67.
Turner, M.E., Pratkanis, A.R., Probasco, P., & Leve, C. (1992). Threat, cohesion, and group effectiveness: Testing a social identity maintenance perspective on groupthink. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 781-796.
68.
Volpato, C., Maass, A., Mucchi-Faina, A., & Vitti, E. (1990). Minority influence and social categorization. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 119-132.
69.
Wason, P.C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 129-140.
70.
Williams, K.Y., & O'Reilly, C.A. (1998). The complexity of diversity: A review of forty years of research. In B. Staw & R. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 21, pp. 77-40). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
71.
Ziller, R.C., & Behringer, R.D. (1965). Motivational and perceptual effects in orientation toward a newcomer. Journal of Social Psychology, 66, 79-90.
72.
Zurcher, L.A. (1970). The "friendly" poker game: A study of an ephemeral role. Social Forces, 49, 173-186.
