Fate means that an event was meant to be, that is, predetermined by prior unseen forces. Most people believe in fate, which seems at odds with similarly pervasive beliefs that alternative past actions would have brought about different circumstances (i.e., counterfactual beliefs). Two experiments revealed that construal level accounts for the relative plausibility of fate versus counterfactual explanations. Construal was manipulated in Experiment 1, such that goal pursuits framed in abstract (“why?”) as opposed to concrete (“how?”) terms heightened fate but not counterfactual attributions. Extending this finding, Experiment 2 showed that fate judgments were higher for temporally distant than recent past events, an effect mediated by construal perceptions. Neither counterfactual nor luck judgments varied with temporal distance. These findings help to explain how individuals explain complicated yet meaningful life events while extending the reach of Trope and Liberman's (2003) construal-level theory.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
2.
Davis, C. G., & Lehman, D. R. (1995). Counterfactual thinking and coping with traumatic life events. In N. J. Roese & J. M. Olson (Eds.), What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 353-374). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
Davis, C. G., Lehman, D. R., Wortman, C. B., Silver, R. C., & Thompson, S. C. (1995). The undoing of traumatic life events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 109-124.
4.
Fischhoff, B. (1975). Hindsight ≠ foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgments under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 288-289.
5.
Galinsky, A., Liljenquist, K., Kray, L. J., & Roese, N. J. (2005). Finding meaning in mutability: Making sense and deriving significance through counterfactual thinking. In D. R. Mandel, D. J. Hilton, & P. Catellani (Eds.), The psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 110-125). London: Routledge.
6.
Gilbert, D. T., Brown, R. P., Pinel, E. C., & Wilson, T. D. (2000). The illusion of external agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 690-700.
7.
Gilovich, T., & Medvec, V. H. (1995). The experience of regret: What, when, and why. Psychological Review, 102, 379-395.
8.
Girotto, V., Legrenzi, P., & Rizzo, A. (1991). Event controllability in counterfactual thinking. Acta Psychologica, 78, 111–133.
9.
Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., & Pyszczynski, T. (1997). Terror management theory of self-esteem and cultural worldviews: Empirical assessments and conceptual refinements. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 61-139). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
10.
Higgins, E. T. (1998). From expectancies to worldviews: Regulatory focus in socialization and cognition. In J. M. Darley & J. Cooper (Eds.), Attribution and social interaction: The legacy of Edward E. Jones (pp. 243-309). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
11.
Jokisaari, M. (2003). Regret appraisals, age, and subjective well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 487-503.
12.
Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136-153.
13.
Kelley, H. H. (1967) Attribution theory in social psychology. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 15, 192-238.
14.
Kundera, M. (1984). The unbearable lightness of being. New York: Harper & Row.
15.
Landman, J., & Manis, J. D. (1992). What might have been: Counterfactual thought concerning personal decisions. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 473-477.
16.
Liberman, N., Sagristano, M., & Trope, Y. (2002). The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 523-535.
17.
Mandel, D. R., Hilton, D. J., & Catellani, P. (Eds.). (2005). The psychology of counterfactual thinking. London: Routledge.
18.
Mandel, D. R., & Lehman, D. R. (1996). Counterfactual thinking and ascriptions of cause and preventability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 450–463.
19.
Markman, K. D., Gavanski, I., Sherman, S. J., & McMullen, M. N. (1995). The impact of perceived control on the imagination of better and worse possible worlds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 588–595.
20.
McMullen, M. N., Markman, K. D., & Gavanski, I. (1995). Living in neither the best nor the worst of all possible worlds: Antecedents and consequences of upward and downward counterfactual thinking. In N. J. Roese & J. M. Olson (Eds.), What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 133-167). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
Nasco, S. A., & Marsh, K. L. (1999). Gaining control through counter-factual thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 556-568.
22.
Page, C. M., & Colby, P. M. (2003). If only I hadn't smoked: The impact of counterfactual thinking on a smoking-related behavior. Psychology and Marketing, 20, 955-976.
23.
Pennington, G. L., & Roese, N. J. (2003). Regulatory focus and temporal perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 563-576.
24.
Preacher, K. J., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2001, March). Calculation for the Sobel test: An interactive calculation tool for mediation tests [Computer software]. Available from http://www.unc.edu/~preacher/sobel/sobel.htm.
25.
Pyszczynski, T. A., Solomon, S., & Greenberg, J. (2002). In the wake of 9/11: The psychology of terror. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
26.
Roese, N. J. (1997). Counterfactual thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 133-148.
27.
Roese, N. J. (2004). Twisted pair: Counterfactual thinking and the hindsight bias. In D. Koehler & N. Harvey (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 258-273). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
28.
Roese, N. J., & Maniar, S. D. (1997). Perceptions of purple: Counterfactual and hindsight judgments at Northwestern Wildcats football games. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1245-1253.
29.
Roese, N. J., & Olson, J. M. (1996). Counterfactuals, causal attributions, and the hindsight bias: A conceptual integration. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 197-227.
30.
Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning theory and clinical psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
31.
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expentancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1-28.
32.
Sanna, L., Schwarz, N., & Small, E. (2002). Accessibility experiences and the hindsight bias: I-knew-it-all-along versus It-could-never-have-happened. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1288–1296.
33.
Sanna, L. J., Schwarz, N., & Stocker, S. L. (2002). When debiasing backfires: Accessible content and accessibility experiences in debiasing hindsight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 497–502.
34.
Seelau, E. P., Seelau, S. M., Wells, G. L., & Windschitl, P. D. (1995). Counterfactual constraints. In N. J. Roese & J. M. Olson (Eds.), What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking(pp. 57-79). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
Semin, G. R., Higgins, E. T., de Montes, L. G., Estourget, Y, & Valencia, J. F. (2005). Linguistic signatures of regulatory focus: How abstraction fits promotion more than prevention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 36-45.
36.
Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1982 (pp. 290-312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
37.
Stroessner, S. J., & Green, C. W. (1990). Effects of belief in free will or determinism on attitudes toward punishment and locus of control. Journal of Social Psychology, 130, 789-799.
38.
Teigen, K. H. (1995). How good is good luck? The role of counter-factual thinking in the perception of lucky and unlucky events. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 281-302.
39.
Teigen, K. H. (1996). Luck: The art of a near miss. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 37, 156-171.
40.
Teigen, K. H. (1997). Luck, envy, and gratitude: It could have been different. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 38, 313-323.
41.
Teigen, K. H., Evensen, P. C., & Samoilow D. K. (1999). Good luck and bad luck: How to tell the difference. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 981-1010.
42.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2000). Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 876-889.
Turnbull, W. (1981). Naive conceptions of free will and the deter-ministic paradox. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 13, 1-13.
45.
Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1987). What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 3-15.
46.
Webster's Dictionary and Thesaurus. (1999). New York: Nichols.
47.
Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional model of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.
48.
Young, M. J., & Morris, M. W. (2004). Existential meanings and cultural models: The interplay of personal and supernatural agency in American and Hindu ways of responding to uncertainty. In J. Greenberg, S. L. Koole, & T. Pyszczynski (Eds.), Handbook of experimental existential psychology(pp. 215-230). New York: Guilford.
