Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2006-04
Associations Between Appearance-Related Self-Discrepancies and Young Women's and Men's Affect,Body Satisfaction,and Emotional Eating: A Comparison of Fixed-Item and Participant-Generated Self-Discrepancies
This study examines the associations between appearancerelated, actual-ideal self-discrepancies—from both own and romantic partner's standpoints—and negative affect, body satisfaction, and eating behavior. It extends previous research through studying both genders and the romantic partner standpoint, but its main novel contribution is a systematic comparison between idiographic, participant-generated, and nomothetic, fixed-item measures of appearance-related selfdiscrepancies. The findings show that these measures cannot be, and should not be, treated as equivalent. The idiographic measures were superior in predicting outcome variables when considering the own standpoint. Nomothetic measures did demonstrate some gender-specific associations, but only from the romantic partner standpoint, and only for women. These findings can be explained with respect to the assessment of accessible, versus available, self-discrepancies. Implications for selfdiscrepancy and body image theory and research are discussed.
Anderson, S. M., & Chen, S. (2002). The relational self: An interpersonal social-cognitive theory. Psychological Review, 109, 619-645.
2.
Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (1986). Love and the expansion of self: Understanding attraction and satisfaction. New York: Hemisphere.
3.
Aron, A., Paris, M., & Aron, E. N. (1995). Falling in love: Prospective studies of self-concept change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(6), 1102-1112.
4.
Brown, T. A., Cash, T. F., & Milkulka, P. J. (1990). Attitudinal bodyimage assessment: Factor analysis of the Body Self-RelationsQuestionnaire. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 135-144.
5.
Bruch, M. A., Rivet, K. M., & Laurenti, H. J. (2000). Type of selfdiscrepancy and relationships to components of the tripartite model of emotional distress. Personality and Individual Differences, 29(1), 37-44.
6.
Buss, D. M. (1998). The psychology of humanmate selection: Exploring the complexity of the strategic repertoire. In C. Crawford & D. Krebs (Eds.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology: Issues, ideas, and applications(pp. 405-430). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Cafri, G., Thompson, J. K., Riciardelli, L., McCabe, M., Smolak, L., & Yesalis, C. (2005). Pursuit of the muscular ideal: Physical and psychological consequences and putative risk factors. Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 215-239.
8.
Cash, T. F. (1990). The Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire. Unpublished test manual, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA.
9.
Cash, T. F., & Pruzinsky, T. (Eds.). (1990). Body images: Development, deviance, and change. New York: Guilford.
10.
Cash, T. F., & Pruzinsky, T. (Eds.). (2002). Body image: A handbook of theory, research, and clinical practice. New York: Guilford.
11.
Cash, T. F., Thériault, J., & Annis, N. M. (2004). Body image in an interpersonal context: Adult attachment, fear of intimacy, and social anxiety. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(1), 89-103.
12.
Dittmar, H. (2005). A new look at “compulsive buying”: Selfdiscrepancies and materialistic values as predictors of compulsive buying tendency. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24.
13.
Dittmar, H., Beattie, J., & Friese, S. (1996). Objects, decision considerations and self-image inmen's and women's impulse purchases. Acta-Psychologica, 93, 187-206.
14.
Dittmar, H., Halliwell, E., & Kingston, L. (2005, August). Examining the relative predictive power of self-discrepancies for body image outcome variables as assessed though self-state matching and discrepancy-reporting techniques. Paper presented at the BPS Social Psychology Section Annual Conference, Edinburgh, Scotland.
15.
Dittmar, H., & Howard, S. (2003). Thin-ideal internalization and social comparison tendency as moderators of media models' impact on women's body-focused anxiety. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(6), 768-791.
16.
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408-423.
17.
Eating Disorders Association. (EDA). (2000). Eating Disorders Association. Available from http://www.edacuk.com/
18.
Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society(2nd ed.). New York: Norton.
19.
Erikson, E. H. (1982). The life cycle completed. New York: Norton.
20.
Feingold, A., & Mazzella, R. (1998). Gender differences in body image are increasing. Psychological Science, 9(3), 190-195.
21.
Forston, M. T., & Stanton, A. L. (1992). Self-discrepancy theory as a framework for understanding bulimic symptomatology and associated distress. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 11(2), 103-118.
22.
Franzoi, S. L., Kessenich, J. J., & Sugrue, P. A. (1989). Gender differences in the experience of body awareness: An experiential sampling study. Sex Roles, 21, 7-8, 499-515.
23.
Freud, S. (1961). The ego and the id. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud(Vol. 19, pp. 3-66). London: Hogarth.
24.
Grogan, S. (1999). Body image: Understanding body dissatisfaction inmen, women and children. London: Routledge.
25.
Halliwell, E. (2002). Sociocultural influences on body image concerns throughout adulthood. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Sussex, England.
26.
Halliwell, E., & Dittmar, H. (2003). A qualitative investigation of women's and men's body image concerns and their attitudes toward aging. Sex Roles, 49, 675-684.
27.
Halliwell, E., & Dittmar, H. (2004). Does size matter? The impact of model's body size on women's body-focused anxiety and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(1), 104-122.
28.
Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319-340.
29.
Higgins, E. T. (1989). Continuities and discontinuities in selfregulatory and self-evaluative processes: A developmental theory relating self and affect. Journal of Personality, 57(2), 407-444.
30.
Higgins, E. T. (1999). When do self-discrepancies have specific relations to emotions? The second-generation question of Tangney, Niedenthal, Covert, and Barlow (1998). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1313-1317.
31.
Higgins, E. T., Bond, R. N., Klein, R., & Strauman, T. (1986). Selfdiscrepancies and emotional vulnerability: How magnitude, accessibility, and type of discrepancy influence affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(1), 5-15.
32.
Higgins, E. T., Klein, R., & Strauman, T. (1985). Self-concept discrepancy theory: A psychological model for distinguishing among different aspects of depression and anxiety. Social Cognition, 3, 51-76.
33.
Higgins, E. T., Tykocinski, O., & Vookles, J. (1992). Self and health: How “patterns” of self-beliefs predict types of emotional and physical problems. Social Cognition, 10, 125-150.
34.
James, W. (1948). Psychology. New York: World.
35.
Leit, R. A., Pope. H. G., & Gray, J, J. (2001). Cultural expectations of muscularity inmen: The evolution of Playgirl centerfolds. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 29, 90-93.
36.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: Rand McNally.
37.
Moretti, M. M., & Higgins, E. T. (1999). Own versus other standpoints in self-regulation: Developmental antecedents and functional consequences. Review of General Psychology, 3, 188-223.
38.
Muth, J. L., & Cash, T. F. (1997). Body-image attitudes: What difference does gender make?Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1438-1452.
39.
Pope, H. G., Olivardia, R., Borowiecki, J. J., & Cohane, G. H. (2001). The growing commercial value of the male body: A longitudinal-survey of advertising in women's magazines. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 70, 189-192.
40.
Snyder, R. (1997). Self-discrepancy theory, standards for body evaluation, and eating disorder symptomatology among college women. Women and Health, 26(2), 69-84.
41.
Strauman, T. J. (1989). Self-discrepancies in clinical depression and social phobia: Cognitive structures that underlie emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 98(1), 14-22.
42.
Strauman, T. J. (1992). Self-guides, autobiographical memory, and anxiety and dysphoria: Toward a cognitive model of vulnerability to emotional distress. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101(1), 87-95.
43.
Strauman, T. J., & Glenberg, A. M. (1994). Self-concept and body image disturbance: Which self-beliefs predict body size overestimation?Cognitive Therapy and Research, 18, 105-125.
44.
Strauman, T. J., & Higgins, E. T. (1987). Automatic activation of selfdiscrepancies and emotional syndromes: When cognitive structures influence affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1004-1014.
45.
Strauman, T. J., & Higgins, E. T. (1988). Self-discrepancies as predictors of vulnerability to distinct syndromes of chronic emotional distress. Journal of Personality, 56(4), 685-707.
46.
Strauman, T. J., Vookles, J., Berenstein, V., Chaiken, S., & Higgins, E. T. (1991). Self-discrepancies and vulnerability to body dissatisfaction and disordered eating. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(6), 946-956.
47.
Szymanski, M. L., & Cash, T. F. (1995). Body-image disturbances and self-discrepancy theory: Expansion of the Body-Image Ideals Questionnaire. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 14(2), 143-146.
48.
Tangney, J. P., Niedenthal, P. M., Covert, M. V., & Barlow, D. H. (1998). Are shame and guilt related to distinct self-discrepancies? A test of Higgins's (1987) hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 256-268.
49.
Tantleff-Dunn, S., & Gokee, J. L. (2002). Interpersonal influences on body image development. In T. F. Cash & T. Pruzinsky (Eds.), Body image: A handbook of theory, research and clinical practice(pp. 108-116). New York: Guilford.
50.
Tantleff-Dunn, S., & Thompson, J. K. (1995). Romantic partners and body image disturbance: Further evidence for the role of perceived- actual disparities. Sex Roles, 33, 589-605.
51.
Thompson, J. K., Heinberg, L. J., Altabe, M., & Tantleff-Dunn, S. (1999). Exacting beauty: Theory, assessment, and treatment of body image disturbance. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
52.
Van Strien, T. (1996). On the relationship between dieting and “obese” and bulimic eating patterns. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 19(1), 83-92.
53.
Van Strien, T., Frijiter, J. E. R., Bergers, G. P. A., & Defares, P. B. (1986). The Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ) for assessment of restrained, emotional, and external eating behavior. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 5(2), 295-315.
54.
Waller, G., & Osman, S. (1998). Emotional eating and eating psychopathology among non-eating-disordered women. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 23, 419-423.
55.
Weilage, M., & Hope, D. A. (1999). Self-discrepancy in social phobia and dysthymia. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 23(6), 637-650.
56.
Wiederman, M. W. (2002). Body image and sexual functioning. In T. F. Cash & T. Pruzinsky (Eds.), Body image: A handbook of theory, research and clinical practice(pp. 287-294). New York: Guilford.
57.
Zuckerman, M., & Lubin, B. (1965). Manual for the multiple affect adjective check list. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.
